Slashdot Mirror


Cascading Molecules Drive IBM's Smallest Computer

Benoit Fries writes "EE Times reports that IBM researchers have created a simple computation engine that's more than 250,000 times smaller than the most advanced silicon circuitry. Called the world's smallest computer, the system relies on a 'molecular cascade' that pushes a handful of carbon monoxide molecules across a copper surface to perform digital logic functions. 'Even if CMOS density follows Moore's Law for 40 more years, molecular cascades are still going to be smaller,' they said."

11 of 218 comments (clear)

  1. CO in this application will be safe by abhinavnath · · Score: 5, Informative

    All those people worrying about asphyxiating on carbon monoxide...

    CO binds very tightly to metallic ligands such as copper. The Carbon atom has an unbound lone pair of electrons, that are donated to the metal's d-electron shell. Additionally the CO molecule creates a pi-back-bonding system with the metal center, making the complex even more stable.

    Upshot: the CO is not going to spontaneously leak off the chip into your atmosphere. In any case, I doubt that such logic circuits would contain sufficient carbon monoxide to pose a health threat.

    (Interesting side note: CO asphyxiates you by binding very tightly to the iron in hemoglobin in your blood, much more tightly than oxygen can. IIRC, however, CO will preferentially bind to copper over Fe.)

    --
    My other sig is also a .Porsche
    1. Re:CO in this application will be safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually Mn often replaces Mg in metal-binding sites, they have a pretty similar radius and bonding affinity.

      For example, the Mg in the Cytochrome C Oxidase of Paracoccus Denhas been shown to sometimes be substituted by Mn.
      (see Iwata et al, Nature, 24 august 1995)

  2. 'Exceedingly Slow' Beowulf Cluster? by Chromal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Aw, I was almost getting excited as I read the article. This technology appears to be a long way from being a post-silicon circuit alternative for CPUs.

    It's "exceedingly slow," according to the article. Still, maybe some kind of niche exists for it to be useful. Then again, maybe they'll implement the NOT gate and get this puppy running near the frequency of 500nm light or something.

    I'd be excited by that. :)

  3. link to their published paper by lysie · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can read the express paper at Science.

  4. Toppling and resetting the structure! by krazyninja · · Score: 5, Informative

    My first thought was, the structure once toppled, IS toppled, and with a stationary background, it would not be possible to reset it. I found it is indeed true. In the IBM page, it states
    ...It takes several hours to set up the most complicated cascades. Since there is no reset mechanism, these molecule cascades can only perform a calculation once....

    My idea is, have a non-stationary background of copper plane, which through some mechanism (which causes repulsion of the CO molecules) places the molecules in the reset position, ready to be "toppled" again!

    --
    "Do something man. Right now."
  5. parallelism is a bit overrated by shren · · Score: 5, Informative

    You have to learn entirely different programming methods to program algorithms to run in parallel. Managing memory and cache access between multiple processors is a pain in the ass on the hardware side. That's what makes mobos for multiple processors more expensive. Plus, some tasks are just not well-suited to scaling across multiple processors at all.

    In short, I'd rather have a one processor machine over a two or more processor machine if the one processor machine gives sufficient speed for a reasonable price.

    --
    Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    1. Re:parallelism is a bit overrated by dviljoen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Stop thinking in terms of single applications. All machines (SMP and Uni) run LOTS of processes. More CPU's means more things can run simultaneously.

      BTW, even for single applications, multi-threading is tricky, but not THAT hard. Any second year CompSci student can do that.

  6. Cascading domino NOT gate is easy by WeeGadget · · Score: 5, Informative

    If a cascading molecule NOT gate is hard then thier cascading domino metaphor must not be accurate... It's easy to build a domino NOT gate. Here's how:

    TtttttttttttttR
    i
    i
    I

    It's 2 runs in an L shape. Simultaneously gate a True signal at T and the input signal at I, read the result at R. Note: True = Falls, False = Stands.

    Here's how it works :
    If I = True then the shorter I run knocks down the last t. When the longer T run reaches R, the last t will already have fallen so R will not fall. so we have:
    I = True --> R = False

    If I = False then the T run will knock down R. So we have:
    I = False --> R = True

    That's a NOT gate!

    Combine that with a V shaped OR gate and you have a NOR gate. It's well known that any logic function can be constructed from NOR gates.

    Jonathan Weesner

  7. Re:Just what we need! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Hard drive manufacture is already carcinogenic, as it involves multiple washes with solvents with known carcinogenic activity (e.g. xylene). WiReD had a story about this several issues ago (late last year? if you search their website i'm sure you'd find it in the archives; specifically mentioned was IBM's HD plants which had cancer incidences several sigma higher than normal in their workforce).

  8. Re:Size is great and all... by SWPadnos · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well...

    Applying a little physics (but not too much, since I don't have the references or the desire/ability to go through the really rough calculations :) :

    The "average" air molecule travels at about 300 meters/sec at room temperature. This speed is a multiple of the temperature T, divided by the mass m of the molecule - E=3/2kT=1/2 mv^2 (so CO is a little faster than average, since Carbon is lighter than Oxygen or Nitrogen)

    So, if they can build room temperature versions of this (the sample was at 4-10 K), and the size remains about the same (17nm across), and the molecules travel say half their speed in atmosphere, and the computational nodes get "recharged" as fast as they calculate, then the thing would be able to go at about 4.4 GHz.

    Not too bad, actually.

    Probably within an order of magnitude, at least (ie, wrong :)

    --
    - The Sigless Wonder
  9. Re:Think Smarter - new IBM motto by fruey · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read this:-

    Unbounding the Future: the Nanotechnology Revolution

    Eric Drexler and Chris Peterson, with Gayle Pergamit William Morrow and Company, Inc.

    I don't know where I downloaded it from, but it's a free ebook (.DOC format) download.

    I can send you it in PDF if you're interested enough and contact me.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant