Slashdot Mirror
Thermoelectric Generator With No Moving Parts
Savage-Rabbit writes "These guys have produced a working prototype of a thermoelectric generator. The thing uses extremely cold and hot liquids to achieve a heat transfer through a semiconducting material. This produces a voltage in the semiconductor who can produce up to 50-100 Watts which is actually enough for this thing to have practical uses. This generator could for example be useful in the chemical industry where many production processes generate a lot of excess heat that normally is simply lost. With a thermoelectric generator some of that lost energy could be recovered."
When do I get my full-body suit of this stuff, so that I may run my Pentium (tm) class laptop without plugging it into a wall every hour?
Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
Wow, they have finally broken the Second Law of Thermodynamics! The Second Law prohibits the transfer of useful work from a high entropy source (heat) into a low entropy source (an electric current). The Second Law implies that once energy becomes heat then it remains as heat which will dissipate to the surroundings causing an overall increase of entropy in the system. With this generator, we can finally decrease entropy in the world by turning heat into electricity! We can refigerate not only without expending energy, but we get some work for it! We can make black holes smaller by sucking the entropy from it. Finally we can make a perpetual motion machine!
It's an Icelandic company, so they're developing in an environment where there's plentiful hot water (geothermal). I'm wondering if you could get enough hot water from rooftop water-heating panels. Not the thoroughly expensive photo-voltaic, the much simpler black pipes full of water sort. They're surprisingly efficient even in colder climes: my in-laws in the North of England get most of their hot water from a set. The combination might make this very useful for isolated buildings, even outside of volcanic hot zones.
This is just a Peltier device in reverse. Instead of using a forced flow of electrons to drive heat from a cold surface to a warmer one, it is using the flow of heat from a warm surface, through the Peltier element, to a colder surface to drive electrons, generating current.
Seriously, at my university, thermocouples are covered in a sophomore year mechanical engineering class and lab.
This generator could for example be useful in the chemical industry where many production processes generate a lot of excess heat that normally is simply lost.
Not to mention all the heat lost in even more common things such automobile engines.
I figure, if they used cool water from the Hudson for the cold side, and warm, um, liquid from the urinals for the hot side, they could get the lighting for night games for free!
Though they might want to lower the prices on soda and beer, just to keep things flowing.
Hopefully it could also be used in satalites. I always hear about the extreme temperature differences between the side that faces the sun and the other side.
Welcome to the land of the free...pay toll ahead...no photography...please open your bag...
Does this mean I can water cool my Athlon and keep the computer powered off the waste heat?
Bleh!
What is the efficiency of the process? A Peltier is around 5% efficient (very wasteful). These guys are working on a similar device and are proclaiming efficiencies in the 70 to 80% range. Consider that a car engine is 15% efficient (approx) or a gas turbine is 30% efficient (approx).
Read that closer. They claim 70-80% of the theoretical Carnot maximum efficiency. The max efficiency of a carnot cycle is found from (Th-Tc)/Th, where Th is the temp. of the heat sink, and Tc is the temp of the cold sink (all temperatures in absolute temperature, like Kelvin). That max carnot efficiency is a thermodynamic law, nothing can beat it.
If they can get 70-80% of carnot, that would be great, but it isn't clear how these devices will scale - meaning they might get a great efficiency but low total power. It also isn't clear how hot they will operate (assuming the cold sink is ambient). If the temperature gradient is only a few K, goodbye efficiency (see equation above).
I made a passing glance at their website, and I didn't see an operating temperature, but I didn't look too hard.
-Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat
Don't forget overcloced processors! Maybe it could power its own fan, and draw enough heat off so the fan could be slow and quiet...
They claim:
a generator that gets 3 litres per minute (0.8GPM) of 75C (167F) hot water, gives about 50 Watts when also supplied with the same flow of cold water used for cooling.
They also claim to produce about a 20C drop in temperature. Theoretically that's 4,200 Watts (it takes a lot of energy to raise a liter of water 1 degree). So their efficiency is only 1%.
I hope I've done the math right; high school chemistry was half a lifetime ago.
The RTG's (radioisotope thermal generators) on the Voyager probes are spec'ed for 400 watts electrical from 1800 watts thermal. That's decent efficiency compared to these. And that was thermocouple based.
This generator could for example be useful in the chemical industry where many production processes generate a lot of excess heat that normally is simply lost.
I have a request. I need something that works with body temp and here's what I'd do:
Flip the power breakers off the night of my honey's favorite movie and tell her that the backup generator works off body heat. Oh course it'd be my luck that she'd tell me to start doing jumping jacks....
"Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
Amazing how many people instnatly think they can get free energy here. The breakthrough here is just profitability and efficiency, not new science.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
These guys have nothing new. If they really wanted something to crow about, they'd produce something like a small vapor turbine running on butane and try to get 12% efficiency out of the thing. If they could spin one of those on fluid bearings a la the people making microturbine generators, it should be just as reliable and quiet.
Scientists restrict study to entire physical universe; creationist
Solar PV panels run up to about 14% efficiency, whereas Peltier junction devices run maybe 5%? If you're able to build 3 times as much area of collector for the same price, and you're willing to put up with the efficiency going up and down along with the rate of heat input (output voltage is proportional to the temperature difference, so you will have very low voltage and thus low power when the sun is low in the sky)... I suppose it might be worth it. I suspect (educated guesswork) that if you run the numbers you'll find that other approaches are more worthwhile.
Scientists restrict study to entire physical universe; creationist
is the term you are looking for. Fuel is apparently still too cheap to make them worthwhile for things like cars; people would rather pay for the extra gas. AFAIK, even heavy trucks are still not using turbocompounding to squeeze the extra few percent out of their diesels. This is odd, because I read about Caterpillar designing a near-adiabatic diesel with turbocompounding around a decade ago, yett there's nothing on the market (but at least they're talking about it).
Scientists restrict study to entire physical universe; creationist
Does anyone remember the Slashdot article on the CoolChip? It was basicly a really efficent peliter 70% or so. Well they have engineered it's brother, the powerchip. Give it heat xfer it gives you electricity. At a est 70% efficency.
Powerchips
Global Thermoelectric has had a wide range of these systems available for quite some time.
how did this get moded offtopic, it's funny...
"I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...