Slashdot Mirror


Darwin 6.0.2 for x86 Released

Jos Louis writes "Apple has released the x86 version 6.0.2 of Darwin, the FreeBSD-based core of Mac OS X. You can download the bootable ISO on Apple's site."

22 of 524 comments (clear)

  1. frost puist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    frost pist

    1. Re:frost puist by boy_afraid · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Just don't lick it or you'll get your tongue stuck to it.

  2. (815) 272-0670 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    (815) 272-0670

    1. Re:(815) 272-0670 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      well i've seen people post URLs in comments because they want them to get slashdotted, but phone numbers???

      nothing happens when I click on it. maybe my phone is broken.

    2. Re:(815) 272-0670 by twoslice · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Oh yeah, well (836) 334-8567 to you too pal!

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    3. Re:(815) 272-0670 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      867-5309

  3. The goatse uses darwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    And just see what an asshole he is.

  4. I was thinking more along the lines of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    (714) 559-1760. This moron spammed me today via the messenger service.

  5. Another OSX on i86 thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Ok boys... Time to wipe out the whips and beat that horse some more, remember it ain't dead unless you can see the bone.

  6. Hey Jon! Junis Says Hi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I have coded a new 'sploit for my UNIX boxen which I have put on sourceforge. It runs on Kernel 2.1.19.1221a-RC99 and takes the form of a virii which the gubmint will not like. YMMV, but IANAL and IIRC it may not work outside of Linux, so don't hold me responsible if your OSen go DOA. My VAXen are online and I have a PHP blog with a QNX FAQ, which may come in handy. HTH.

    By ReluctantBadger - "Absolutely topping, old chap."

    Slashbots can polish my arse with Charmin.

  7. Re:Not a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Eddie Murphy!!

    Holla, I spotted that .. :)

  8. Ass Clowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    All of Slashdot can shampoo my crotch. Hippie fucks. Use a real OS like Windows XP.

    1. Re:Ass Clowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Mr Ballmer I presume.

    2. Re:Ass Clowns by The+Bungi · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Your ideas intrigue me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    3. Re:Ass Clowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Is that you, Marcus? Roberto here ...

  9. Off-Topic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How the fuck is the parent post off-topic? Shit, the original was OBVIOUSLY a troll. It's even been moderated as such MULTIPLE TIMES for Christ's sake! So a post with a simple plea to avoid a bunch of FUCKWITS taking the BAIT and it's OFF-FUCKING-TOPIC?! Holy shit, you guys.

    God, slashdot sucks! Not long now 'til it's on FC.

    Now THIS post...THIS is OFFTOPIC. Can you see the fucking difference?

  10. Re:Myth: Viral nature of the GPL by atrowe · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Youre entire argument is based upon a technicality and does not hold true for real-world users. While code compiled using GCC does not include any derivative code from the GCC compiler itself, it will almost certainly include code from one of the many libraries which are distributed with GCC.

    Any software project larger than "Hello World!" is going to be dependant upon libraries which are liscensed under the GPL. While the LGPL was created to address some of these issues, not every library is liscensed under the LGPL, so the problem still exists. This includes the very prevalant C++ library which includes the cin and cout operators which I'm sure every programmer has used at some point in his or her career.

    Please see here, here, or here for documentation supporting my claims. The last link goes to an article written by Stallman himself addressing this problem, so please don't try and tell my that my information is based on Microsoft FUD.

    --

    -atrowe: Card-carrying Mensa member. I have no toleranse for stupidity.

  11. Re:Anyone actually use Darwin? by Timmeh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why was Jesus an asshole? I'm a nontheist (atheist, agnostic, whatever you wanna call it) and that seems to be christianity's only saving grace. While I may not like what chrisitanity has become and what has been carried out in god's name over the centuries, I always thought Jesus was sort of a cool guy (if he was really a guy or just a myth, I dunno, I'm not exactly read up on this.) It seems (to me, perhaps incorrectly) that Jesus was a left-wing radical hippy guy. Is there a reason I should think Jesus was an asshole?

  12. Re:Not a troll by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Begs an off-topic philosophical question:
    How would Karl Marx have felt about the fetishing of costless commodities?
    Coders of the world, patch!

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  13. Re:Anyone actually use Darwin? by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There's reason to believe that he was a jerk like you and I. You've got to figure that if you and your cronies think you're the son of god, that's going to go to your head. Maybe history has intentionally forgotten about all the cool Evil things Jesus did. Who knows?

    The one thing I do know is that Jesus was a human being. Human beings are messed up complicated things. Nobody's perfect. Since I don't believe that Jesus was the son of god, it follows that he was a "sinner".

    Oh, and don't trust left-wing radical hippy guys. Sure, they might be the son of god, but they're probably just a loony. Charles Manson was a hippie. David Koresh, too.

    --

    --
    pants ahoy
  14. Re:atheist!=agnostic by Snocone · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Actually, you've got it wrong too, agnostics DO believe something: They believe in unknowability.

    Agnostic = "I believe is impossible to know whether there is a God."

    Some modern commentators call this 'strong' agnosticism as opposed to what you think it is being 'weak' agnosticism, but that's silly.

  15. Re:Anyone actually use Darwin? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    You were modded as flamebait because you expressed a fairly strong opinion without backing it up.


    Hey, watch this:

    Windows sucks!

    And watch the karma roll in ...

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?