Slashdot Mirror


Laser Clock Generates One Trillion BPS

FunkyELF writes "Professor of optics, electrical and computer engineering and physics Peter Delfyett, Jr., of the School of Optics CREOL, has developed a laser-driven clock that is smaller than the head of a pin, with applications in computers as well as general timekeeping. One of many fascinating things going on at The University of Central Florida"

33 comments

  1. Nice, by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 5, Funny


    but I bet it still manages to fuck up daylight savings time.

  2. And I thought 200 bpm was fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine trying to dance to 1 trillion bps! I guess you could just take a lot of speed and vibrate all night.

  3. Smaller than the head of a pin? by 3-State+Bit · · Score: 3, Funny

    Then you can't bloody well read it, can you?
    I have a clock that by definition is more accurate.
    It consists of a cesium atom.

    1. Re:Smaller than the head of a pin? by keller · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't it difficult to keep track of your ceasium atom? Doesn't it get lost when you put it in your pocket, and how do you adjust this one for daylight savings time?

      --

      Enig? Det alt for hot det smor!

    2. Re:Smaller than the head of a pin? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Computers can read it though, which is the whole point. Atomic clocks are large and bulky things... Think before you post.

    3. Re:Smaller than the head of a pin? by John+Sullivan · · Score: 1
      how do you adjust this one for daylight savings time?

      Easy - you just increase your count by 33,093,474,372,000.

      --
      This is my World Wide Web of Whatever
    4. Re:Smaller than the head of a pin? by keller · · Score: 1

      you'll have to remember to compensate for the time spent updating the count!!!

      --

      Enig? Det alt for hot det smor!

    5. Re:Smaller than the head of a pin? by Ethidium · · Score: 2
      Yeah, but you can't take yours out in the rain!

      Cesium in air and water

      --
      \
  4. UCF's contributions... by BoxJockey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is way more impressive than the last contribution made by (former) UCF Students... The Blair Witch Project

    --
    "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things."
    1. Re:UCF's contributions... by BoxJockey · · Score: 1

      That is students or, in this case, faculty

      --
      "UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things."
  5. Yanks are morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    That would be one BILLION bps.

    One TRILLION would be 1,000,000,000,000,000.

    1. Re:Yanks are morons by Drawkcab · · Score: 1

      Well, the clock was developed in the US, so it will be described accordingly. Until your part of the world stops spending all of your collective time eating cheese and arguing over agricultural subsidies and starts inventing things again, you'll just have to put up with our system of nomenclature.

  6. Just so long as they don't get good at football. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    There are enough good teams from Florida!

    UCF is an excellent school. I'm really impressed everytime I hear something about the students/teachers it's good. That being said OU has the highest percentage of Merit Scholor's (sp? since I'm not one!) of a Public University in the country! Although with $15k/year scholorship cash and costs at only 3k/semester for classes & books, I wish I were, then my student loans would be nonexistant!

  7. NY Times Story by infernow · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's a link of for this story on the NY times at the bottom of the page.
    I figure i'd post it here for reference:
    And here it is.

    --

    that that is is that that is not is not

  8. I'm going to burn in hell for this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, I know this is cruel and all, but I saw the professor's picture, and the first thing I thought of was that sticker on the side of the laser...

    DO NOT LOOK INTO LASER WITH REMAINING GOOD EYE.

    I'm sorry! I even went to UCF for a while!

  9. How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? We all know that Floridan's can't count worth shit...

    1. Re:How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? by Verne · · Score: 1

      I bet they don't even know what a trillion is...

      trillion

      In Britain, France, and Germany, 10^18 or a million cubed.

      In the USA and Canada, 10^12.

      Hell, the word comes from 'tri' for third power, and million. Quite how the americans decided to make a trillion as a million to the power of two is beyond the rest of the world....

      that's my rant for the day :)

      Out.

      --


      There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
    2. Re:How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? by martyn+s · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, a million is 1,000,000 x 1000^0
      a billion is is 1,000,000 x 1000^1
      and a trillion is 1,000,000 x 1000^2

      So a trillion is the third in the series of 1,000,000 x 1000^n.

      Listen, I love the metric system, and as an American, I wish we'd adopt it officially. But I don't see how your nomenclature for numbers is any better. What do *you* call 10^12? A million million? Sorry, I like our system better. Or even if you call it a thousand billion, it still doesn't fit.

      Our number system puts a comma after every three digits, starting from the right side. So if you see a number that starts off like this: 100,000,000.... You'll know it's a hundred something, whether it's a hundred million, billion, trillion or quadrillion. If you're going to call 1,000,000,000,000 (10^12) "A thousand billion", instead of "one [n-illion]" then you confuse the whole system.

    3. Re:How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Million 10^(6*1)
      Billion 10^(6*2)
      Trillion 10^(6*3)

      Outside of canada/usa anyway.

    4. Re:How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? by Verne · · Score: 1

      10^12 is called a billion for most of the world.

      We could both equally call it a million million.

      You could call it a thousand billion or a trillion.

      I guess the only thing that would start to confuse everyone is if I started talking about numbers like:

      987,654,321,234,567,890

      nine hundred and eighty seven thousand six hundred and fifty four billion, three hundred and twenty one thousand, two hundred and thirty four million, five hundred and sixty seven thousand eight hundred and ninety.

      Which I guess you'd call:

      nine hundred and eighty seven quadrillion six hundred and fifty four trillion, three hundred and twenty one billion, two hundred and thirty four million, five hundred and sixty seven thousand, eight hundred and ninety.

      The systems screwy. I blame the americans.

      --


      There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
    5. Re:How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? by martyn+s · · Score: 1

      >The systems screwy. I blame the americans.

      I'm not sure if you were just being ironic, but from your description, the European way sounds a lot more screwy.

    6. Re:How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? by Verne · · Score: 1

      Check this out:

      987,654,321,234,567,890 ,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
      nine hundred and eighty seven thousand six hundred and fifty four billion, three hundred and twenty one thousand, two hundred and thirty four million, five hundred and sixty seven thousand eight hundred and ninety trillion

      now, your turn plz... ;)

      --


      There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
    7. Re:How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? by Verne · · Score: 1

      agh, that's a quadrillion!!@#

      Screw english. Let's all just say 10*10^42 and get along happily.

      --


      There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
    8. Re:How do they know it's a TRILLION BPS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They watch interference patterns. There are mathematical ways to measure infinitesimaly small pulses as long as they repeat in a predictable pattern. Essentialy, they have written a mathematical proof that the device which they built resonates at 1 THz.

  10. As a proud UCF grad.. by BalkanBoy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... I can also add that UCF has consistently won among the top three places on many of the ACM programming contests and is one of the best schools to attend in spite of my imperfect CS record (which was only due to lack of diligence on my part :).

    Here I'd (selfishly take this moment to) like to take a chance to thank some people for having the heart to understand someone like me (and I was not stupid or bad - just lazy/undisciplined) - Dr. Bass, Dr. Hagan, and Dr. Richardson of the physics department, Dr. Shah and Dr. Orooji of the CS department for also understanding and being forgiving, Dr. Parsons of the CS department for having the strictness and skill to teach us all why we should love Scheme and not C++ :), Dr. Frederick and Dr. Dutton for helping me channel my energies toward the right places....

    College has undoubtedbly been one of the most learning experiences for me, both academically, and culturally (ethically and otherwise). Jim Ennis, Mark Olkiewiz - I 'love' you both in spite of anything you may think of me.

    And last, but not least - Doug Mowry - may God be with you and your family, and thank you for being like a second father and making UCF seem like a warm place to a foreign student... To this day I will not forget you, ever the diplomat with a warm heart... (if that's possible for diplomats :). You will always be in my mind in spite of the fact of your physical absence....

    There are many other people I'd like to thank - but too many to list. UCF rulez!

    --
    'A lie if repeated often enough, becomes the truth.' - Goebbels
  11. Mercury Ion clock + Broadband, here I come. by Nyphur · · Score: 4, Informative

    When reading up on the atomic clock on this site, I read mention aobut the mercury ion clock which would be, when finished, 1000 times more accurate than the standard caesium atomic clock: http://whyfiles.org/078time/2.html

    More competition for the new laser-clock, but at 1008 Billion signals per second, I see a major advantage in his laser-research.

    Peter Delfyett's area of focus is "increasing the speed of fiber-optic systems" because, according to his research, in the current fibre-optic system:

    "beams from several separate lasers, each costing about $1,000, send light wavelengths at the same speed at the same time down the line and the total speed is calculated by multiplying the number of wavelengths by their pulse rates."

    Delfyette's current area of research led him to use a "mode-lock laser". This is used to "control the timing and the number of wavelengths that are simultaneously generated"

    If you can't see where I'm going with this, think about fibre-optic communications, particularly Fibre-Optic Broadband. This new system can generate 1008 Billion signals per second, each signal having the ability to carry one digital bit, and all this from just one laser, instead of many expensive, bulky convergance lasers. The implications of Peter's new laser-research include the fact that if you had a single fibre-optic fibre for broadband internet access, it would give you a maximum download speed of 120162.9638671875 Megabytes per second, unless I'm mistaken which I could be because my mathematics isn't the best. At any rate, it's much faster than today's fibre-optic broadband connections. Also, since the fibre-optic lines themselves need not be changed, only new laser-systems installed, this technology could be implemented into all current major fibre-optic networks.

    I can see Peter's research coming in very handy in the future of land-based communications.

    --
  12. A few inaccuracies... by BMagneton · · Score: 3, Informative

    I work for a group that uses and researches mode-locked lasers for a different purpose, and there seem to be a few inaccuracies and misconceptions floating around.

    Mode locked lasers have been around since at least 1970, and are widely used for laser and communications research and telecom applications. It's a technology that's getting better as people like Delfyett iron out the substantial kinks, but it's hardly a new technique.

    Talking about the size of these things, let's trace a source or two. UCF News release: "smaller than the head of a pin." NY Times: "that potentially could nestle on the head of a pin." Really, the individual optical components (Mach-Zehnder modulator, fiber, electronic oscillator, waveplates, filters, polarization control, isolators, etc.) reqired for a mode locked laser are each at least a few cubic centimeters. With good packaging, you might get a mode locked laser into a lunchbox, but no way as small as a pinhead. That's not to say thirty years down the road they won't have figured out how to put all of these components onto a chip and make it tiny, but it's not happening any time in the next ten years without a serious revolution in optics miniturization.

    Mode locked lasers utility as a clock is limited to very fast things, as they're not good clocks for long periods of time. The numerical measure that is quoted for clock accuracy (-140 dBc/Hz, for those of you that follow the stuff) isn't good for time periods longer than 0.1 microseconds. Go below 1-10 MHz (more than 1 - 0.1 microseconds worth of time) or so, and the inaccuracy goes up exponentially for any mode locked laser. Now, that's a thousand clock ticks for a GHz processor, so it's fine for chip clocks. Just don't try timing anything that takes a millisecond.

    Compare this to atomic clocks, which get worse over these short time scales, but much, much better over any human time scale. There are physics-based reasons for this, mostly involving the temperature, vibration, and other nusiance noises applied to a few very simple atoms suspended in a shielded vacum trap vs the stability of a bunch of optical components in a box that constantly have optical and electrical power flowing through them.

    This is why NIST is looking at linking the two types of clock, not replacing one with the other.

    BMagneton

  13. A trillion beats a second, eh? by cornjchob · · Score: 1

    "After seeing this, the scientists are still looking frantically through the motherboard manual that controls the light to find out what exactly the POST code is for one trillion beats in a second"

    And if nothing better comes out of this, at least we know we can hook the driver circuit up to a speaker to scare the hell out of any insect in a 4 mile radius.

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  14. One trillion BPS!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat your heart out, Moby!