Slashdot Mirror


Russians Reveal Early Death of Laika

jonerik writes "Contrary to long-believed Soviet reports that Laika the space dog - the first living animal to be launched into orbit from Earth - lived for a week or so after she was launched into orbit aboard Sputnik 2 in November 1957, CNN is now reporting that Dimitri Malashenkov of the Institute for Biomedical Problems in Moscow has presented a scientific paper at the World Space Congress in Houston, Texas in which he revealed that Laika actually died a few hours after launch due to thermal insulation problems overheating the cabin interior. Sputnik 2 remained in orbit a total of 162 days, before burning up in the atmosphere on April 14, 1958."

36 of 72 comments (clear)

  1. That explains why China is working on a space prog by Ashran · · Score: 4, Funny

    > died a few hours after launch due to thermal insulation problems overheating the cabin interior
    China is just looking for new ways to cook dogs alive without animal rights organisations close by :)

    --

    Before you email me, remember: "There is no god!"
  2. lame by Baikala · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember a french comic named "proteo" where a green-java-like alien observing the earth space race substracted laika from the vesel and adopted her as a mascot. Even as a little kid i knew it was just fantasy but I always want it to be true. RIP laika

    --
    16,777,216 comments ought to be enough for any forum!
    1. Re:lame by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2

      Same thing happened in Julian May's Surveillance

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  3. Damn I hungry... by xagon7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hot-dogs anyone?

    I couldnt resist...

    1. Re:Damn I hungry... by falzer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Uh... hm. What part of the dog did you get in your hot-dog?

  4. of course she died. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The original story didn't make much sense.Seeing that the room for payload in sputnik-2 was probably on the order of 20lbs, how could she have lived for a few weeks without food and water?

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    1. Re:of course she died. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uhh, the dog had food and water for 10 days. that has been public for a long time....

  5. science books by eamonman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Funny how the old science books from way back in middle school neglect to mention that she never came back alive after being the first animal in space. I guess you don't want kids unecessarily grieving over an acheivement that only merits a few sentences. Oh well, I suppose it wouldn't be in a science book's editor's interest to turn a young budding scientist into a young budding animal rights activist.

    --
    0- Eamonman Proud member of DNRC
    1. Re:science books by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Oh well, I suppose it wouldn't be in a science book's editor's interest to turn a young budding scientist into a young budding animal rights activist.


      You speak as if the two are mutually exclusive.

      Science has continually worked against anthrocentrism - the belief than humans are somehow "special" in the universe. The philosophy of animal rights is simply the application of this anti-anthrocentrism to ethical questions.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:science books by The+Red+Rooster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The philosophy of animal rights is simply the application of this anti-anthrocentrism to ethical questions.

      Ummm...NO.

      Animal Rights is a form of anthropomorphising, attributing (wrongly) human traits to animals.

      To quote:

      <whine>
      "Animals have feelings too..."
      </whine>

      Eradicating the rather silly belief that humans are somehow 'special' would have the result of allowing Gov't funded research, here in the US, of embryonic stemcells.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    3. Re:science books by f97tosc · · Score: 2

      Funny how the old science books from way back in middle school neglect to mention that she never came back alive after being the first animal in space. I guess you don't want kids unecessarily grieving over an acheivement that only merits a few sentences. Oh well, I suppose it wouldn't be in a science book's editor's interest to turn a young budding scientist into a young budding animal rights activist.

      I think they failure to mention the fate of the dog had a completely different reason: namely that it was considered utterly irrelevant. Fifty years ago there were no animal rights activists. People simply did not make an issue out of a dead dog back then.

      Tor

  6. Re:Ethics of this by !splut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, it was a biological experiment, not just a technogical one. It was important that they observe the dog's unadulterated biological reaction to the weightless environment. What if weightlessness had some acute biological consequence?

    In the end, they did gather important data about life support in space capsules ("don't insulate so well"). So, yea, I agree it wasn't humane treatment, but at least it wasn't gratuitous.

    --
    The angel in the oatmeal.
  7. Re:Makes me sick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would you prefer they sent a person up as an initial test?.. yourself perhaps?

  8. Hee hee... by C0LDFusion · · Score: 3, Funny

    I never met a Space Dog I didn't Laika!

    Oh, well...

    Anyway, I think its interesting to remember that Dogs made it into space before humans.



    ...that is unless you belong to a UFO cult like the Raelians and think we're originally from outer space.

    --
    Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
  9. Re:That explains why China is working on a space p by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

    That's nothing, you should see what they do to monkeys! No cooking required!

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  10. they are not "animal" rights organizations.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they are pet rights organizations.. they dont give a shit about beef and poultry, but if its cute and cuddly and can be bought at a pet store, it all the sudden deserves rights..

    if we kept pet cows or chickens or pigs in USA, and ate dogs, and china ate cows/chickens/pigs, the "animal" rights whackos would protest that instead...

    1. Re:they are not "animal" rights organizations.. by t0qer · · Score: 2

      Yes when I think of America I think of the great west, dudes driving the cattle train across the open prairie, cookie w00pin up some beans over the fire, and somewhere a coyote is howling under the full moon.

      Awwwoooooooooooooooooooo

    2. Re:they are not "animal" rights organizations.. by bytesmythe · · Score: 2

      What color is the sky on your planet? Animal rights organizations (such as PETA) are very strongly opposed to the way livestock animals are treated.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
  11. Make all the jokes you want... by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But having a dog burn to death is a terrible, terrible thing.

    Our house burnt down when I was 6, and I watched as our family's golden retriever -- coincidentally named "Lucky" -- was trapped under a burning dresser it slept by in the living room. It let out howls of torment that haunt me to this day as it died slowly being helplessly charred as my mom covered my tearful eyes and my father was unable to save it.

    So please show some respect for Laika.

    1. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by olman · · Score: 2

      Oh come on. The mutt bought it due to heat stroke/dehydration/what have you. Talking about the space doggie, of course.

    2. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by olman · · Score: 2

      Yeah, they probably had some drinking water included. So, okay, the doggie probably could replace liquid at the same rate it was sweating it. Probably means it got a heat stroke..

    3. Re:Make all the jokes you want... by mekkab · · Score: 2

      Good sir, you are a genius.

      Your post contains the best troll/flamebait I have ever witnessed in my few short years on slashdot.

      I don't even care if your post is true or not. You have stirred something in my soul with such force that I am flabbergasted.

      I pledge my undying support, king of all trolls.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  12. Re:Center for What Now? by SB5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it involves the Soviet Union, then it has to be listed as such, the CIA and FBI just can't release the pertinent files that explain the "biomedical problem", (insert recent space alien conspircy with the Top Level US government officials here)

    --
    If what you are reading sounds funny, or sarcastic, lame, or stupid
    it is because it is supposed to be. just laugh
  13. Re:Ethics of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm really surprised they didn't include a humane method of euthanizing the animal in the spacecraft.

    Reportedly Sputnik 2's food delivery system included a "last meal" - a poison pill which would have euthanized Laika painlessly rather than allowing her to suffocate or starve to death. However, since she didn't survive long enough to eat the entire food supply, it was never used.

  14. Re:Ethics of this by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    "but at least it wasn't gratuitous"

    Yeah, just think of all the good to humanity that was done by shooting a dog into space. Ok, I'm off to bleed some dogs to death to uh, figure out uh, how long they live, uh, or something.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  15. Re:Makes me sick! by corbettw · · Score: 2

    "...and they are able to speak, informing the scientists what is happening to them."

    Yeah, but someone yelling "OHMYGODITBUUUURNS!!!!" isn't much better than what they had.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  16. Re:science books (anthropomorphising) by jungd · · Score: 4, Informative
    Animal Rights is a form of anthropomorphising, attributing (wrongly) human traits to animals.

    <whine> "Animals have feelings too..." </whine>

    As a scientist who studies cognition in all animals, including humans, I can tell you that in the case of any mammal, while their feelings are not the same as ours, they're pretty damn close.

    Luckily, they don't have the same broad autobiographical understanding of 'self', and hence don't feer death in the same way (they typically have a very shallow understanding of death, but still obviously fear pain)

    Having said that; I aggee with your first statement, but probably not with specifically which traits.

    --
    /..sig file not found - permission denied.
  17. Re:Makes me sick! by f97tosc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never heard of this history. To think that they launched that poor defenseless puppy knowing full well that it would eventually die of starvation/lack of oxygen is horrible. Such inhumane treatment. The people that did this should be ashamed!

    We humans kill animals for a large number of reasons: food, clothing, entertainment and science.

    Out of these, the animals killed for science are relatively limited in numbers, but large in their payoff to man. In this case the payoff was priceless information about how to set up a cabin.

    If you are so concerned about animals I suggest you focus your struggle on the entertainment portion (hunting, animal fights), then food and clothing, science last.

    Tor

  18. Re:science books (anthropomorphising) by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
    just HOW does one go about determining whether animals have feelings or not?

    I'm curious what the most "scientific" available test for this is myself - the problem isn't really any different than determining whether OTHER HUMAN BEINGS have feelings or not...

    Seriously. I mean, if people can think that John Travolta shows 'feelings' when he's acting, surely others could be faking it...how do I know that I'm not the only human being in the world gifted with "feelings" while everyone else is a mindless robot who's just pretending?

    Outside of a "hard science" context, that's a pretty nonsensical question - we "just know" other people (in general) have feelings. "I just know" is nowhere near sufficient for real science, though.

    Anyone with significant interaction with other (nonhuman) mammals "just knows" those animals have feelings, too, but it's rather difficult to prove in a "hard science" sort of way. I suspect the best that can be done is comparisons of brain scans and such between humans and non-humans to the extent that one can say in a more-or-less "hard science" way - "it is probable that other mammals have subjective feelings similar in quality to those of human beings, or at least, that is the most likely explanation for the similarities of response."

  19. What a shame by buzzdecafe · · Score: 2, Funny

    He was my favorite character on "Taxi."

    "Tank you very much."

  20. One of my favorite songs... by FurryFeet · · Score: 2

    is Laika, by the Spanish group Mecano. Rough translation:

    She was Russian and her name was Laika
    she was a very normal dog
    she went from being a common animal
    to be a world star.
    They put her into a spaceship
    to observe the reaction
    She was the first astronaut
    in outer space.
    ---
    Ready is the rocket for take off
    ground control tells Laika goodbye.
    ---
    In base everything was silent
    waiting for any signal.
    All with the helmets to their ears
    heard the dog bark.
    While on Earth a great party,
    shouting, laughter, crying and champagne,
    Laika looked out through the window.
    "What is that colored ball?
    And why am I going around it?".
    ---
    One night, on the telescope
    a new light appeared
    nobody could give an explanation
    to the appearance of the new sun.
    And if we listen to the legend
    then we'll have to think
    that on Earth there is one less dog
    and on the sky one more star.

  21. Re:Makes me sick! by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

    Or even better yet, a criminal animal rights activist.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  22. When I was in Washington D.C. 3 weeks ago... by Squeezer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I went to the Smithsonian's Air and Space Museum and took the 1 hour tour with the guide. When we reached the mockup of sputnik 1, the tour guide said that then the Soviets donated it (didn't ask when it was donated tho) they admitted that the dog died because the A/C system on it failed.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  23. Re:Ethics of this by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2

    I'm really surprised they didn't include a humane method of euthanizing the animal in the spacecraft. I think it's very sad.

    Given Soviet history ethics would have had little to do with it. Politics might have motivated such a system, or at least motivated a false claim to have had such a system. Even in the post-Stalin kinder gentler Soviet Union look how they treated people, their own highly trained Cosmonauts, genuine heros: take away pressure suits and you can fit three in a two man capsule. One valve failure during re-entry and all were lost, bubbles forming in their blood as cabin pressure is lost (think of shaking a soda can and popping the top).

  24. Re:science books (anthropomorphising) by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 2
    Seriously. I mean, if people can think that John Travolta shows 'feelings' when he's acting, surely others could be faking it...how do I know that I'm not the only human being in the world gifted with "feelings" while everyone else is a mindless robot who's just pretending?

    Well, if you're going to go all scientifically philosophical on us, how can you be sure that we exist at all? Maybe we're just figments of your imagination? ;-)

    Just what assumptions you have to make to "prove" that others have feelings would be interesting to discuss though.

    --
    Stefan Axelsson
  25. Re:Ethics of this by packeteer · · Score: 2

    Obviosuly you dont understand Schrodinger's cat if you say it died. The cat is not killed. Schrodinger has simply created several alternate universes in which some of the time the cat dies and sometimes it doesn't.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep