Slashdot Mirror


Making A Videowall

Ur@eus writes "Zeeshan Ali Khattak has made a videowall using Red Hat Linux, GStreamer and commodity hardware. The solution was made based on the need to create a flexible and cheap solution for use in Pakistani Schools and Universities using commodity hardware. To find out how this was done and some more details, and of course some cool pictures, check out the Video Whale project homepage."

163 comments

  1. Cropping needs improving by fruey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Great idea, looks good... but in most video walls you have to allow for the space between each monitor when you crop, or reduce the physical space between each. Here, there's way too much space between each screen (both vertically and horizontally) and the images look strange because the cropping doesn't allow for it.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Cropping needs improving by tagevm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly my first thought when I saw the pictures. Why don't they just get rid of the monitor cases, so they can put the tubes closer together and make one huge box for the lot?

    2. Re:Cropping needs improving by helmutjd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think in this case they would've been better off with a different brand/type of monitor altogether... those ones have far too much plastic trim around them. Cropping that much out of the movie would really kill the image, and the only other alternative would be to remove all the monitors from their mouldings to get 'em closer together (not fun). Sweet project, though.

    3. Re:Cropping needs improving by FyRE666 · · Score: 2

      I suppose a quick fix would be to either physically adjust the monitor controls to make them overscan by a couple of inches in each axis, or set up the X servers to do this. Probably wouldn't help the lifespan of the monitors though I guess...

    4. Re:Cropping needs improving by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Weird, my first thought when I saw this was a computer and 20 video cards is cheaper than a computer and a projector?

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    5. Re:Cropping needs improving by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, 20 video cards/monitors.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    6. Re:Cropping needs improving by moonbender · · Score: 2

      It is, if you've already got 20 video cards and monitors ... and that will be true for most schools.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    7. Re:Cropping needs improving by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 20 video cards / monitors, a tech person to install the 20 video cards monitors linux box with the software, a rack to hold the 20 monitors, the willingness to break some expensive monitors if you slip up setting up the monitors, and the costs incurred by not being able to use those 20 monitors that they were hooked up too, until they all get set back up. Still, doesn't seem worth it.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    8. Re:Cropping needs improving by Octal · · Score: 1

      I know Xinerama has support for overlapping parts of screens already, they probably have support for leaving gaps, too.

    9. Re:Cropping needs improving by Scipher · · Score: 1

      The article mentions the fact that just getting the PCI video cards took 3 months, and they have no spares - Pakistan doesn't have a whole lot of old parts from the sounds of things.

      Perhaps it is impossible/prohibitively expensive for this school to get an LCD projector? In which case this could be a good solution.

  2. Kinda cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but not really, I'd rather just get a projector.

    1. Re:Kinda cool... by handybundler · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's perfectly justified. When you look at the cost of monitors vs configuration, why not just invest in a projector initially. Considering the nature of an educational use (larger format terrorist training videos? taboo ha-ha) they might be abot to seek sponsorship in this.

      --


      a/s/l here. Sorry, adding domain tags to your s
  3. well, by sirius_bbr · · Score: 2, Funny

    at least they're showing a good movie on it :))

    --
    this sig has intentionally been left blank
    1. Re:well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they are?

      I thought they were showing The Matrix, but I guess I must be mistaken.

      Seriously though, I really can not understand why this is such a highy loved movie. The plot is stupid and the dialog is written like crap. If this was a game, like a shooter of sorts, it would be acceptable because games are interactive. However, The Matrix is sadly a movie. Had Mr. Fishburne and the fellow that plays in the Sopranos not been there, the movie would really have been terrible. Carrie Ann-Moss is not even very nice looking. She's got a sharp prtruding jaw bone that makes her look a little male-like.

      About the video wall, it looks like its off to a nice start. Had they removed the cases and built some custom maybe plexiglass casses with a rack to hold it all, it owuld look better. Its just the spacing is too much between each screen. I do understand its a work in progress and meant to be done on a small budget. Maybe this with my said modifications, could be a good large screen for an HTPC.

    2. Re:well, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Matrix sucked.
      Cool visuals set to "Overdrawn at the Memory bank" story. Is anyone else here tired of the one trick pony that is "The Matrix"?

    3. Re:well, by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      Nobody else is looking at her jaw-bone, idiot.

      Try looking at the other end, from behind...
      .

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  4. Why? by Omkar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A video wall seems extremely cool but uniquely useless, especially for a school in Pakistan. Can anyone tell me why this wall was built? The only use I can think of is to play Super Smash Bros: Melee. Oh, and the cropping needs work.

    1. Re:Why? by hovik · · Score: 2, Funny

      Simulating nuclear explosions. Great way to visualize it, and it's probably a big fad in Pakistan these days.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A video wall seems extremely cool but uniquely useless, especially for a school in Pakistan. Can anyone tell me why this wall was built?


      This wall was built in a small terrorist training cell, hence the need to save some money. It will be used for showing Islamnic propaganda films and to show how to properly perform urban street terrorism like sniping and hit and run bombings. Very fucked up people in Pakistan there. I wasn't even aware most people had electricity, much less computers.

    3. Re:Why? by davey_darling · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My first thought was that something like this could be a fairly low buck way to set up a cool video display at a nightclub or party..

      You could gather any old mismatched monitors and throw them up on a wall somewhere, hell, even just stack 'em on top of each other and strap 'em together for that cool 'arty' look...

      I'm sure there have been many art exhibits that have done similar things before. (you know the ones, they usually highlight the terrible things that television has done to our society and whatnot) Now you can do it too!

      Hell, it's a few days late, but I'm sure you could whip up a pretty spooky halloween display with this thing.. Show a creepy movie on displays scattered about the place, instant kinda high-tech terror..

    4. Re:Why? by Omkar · · Score: 1

      Well, it's Pakistan. Nightclubs? You've got to be kidding.

    5. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The obvious reason why this was built was so they could sit around and play the enormously popular game, Pakiman.

  5. funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Troll

    starving children aplenty, uneducated masses, and violence over religious differences, and they're messing with redhat to watch The Matrix. Way to utilize those funds!

    1. Re:funny by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      you forgot to mention nuke's.

      armament budgets tend to be so big for developing countries that if they could just dump 'em they would be able to feed 'most' of the people.

      kewl project though, and totally peaceful.. props for them of that.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      what a crap comment! I guess you're only allowed to do hacks if you happen to live in a perfectly functioning society? the other day everyone is says how cool it is that a guy puts a mobo in a pumpkin-- but people shouldn't be messing with a little hack for a video wall in the third world?? WTF?

    3. Re:funny by Ouroboro · · Score: 2

      starving children aplenty, uneducated masses, and violence over religious differences, and they're messing with redhat to watch The Matrix. Way to utilize those funds!

      Well if it bothers you so much why don't you sell your computer, and donate the funds to end world hunger. I see two really good outcomes from this.

      1. You get to feel good about doing something to fix the problem, rather than just point at others and asking them why they aren't fixing it.
      2. We don't have to read you retarded comments any more.
      --
      When I want your opinion I will beat it out of you.
    4. Re:funny by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1

      Shit man we're talking about Pakistan here, not the U.S....

    5. Re:funny by dytin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is way offtopic, but just to let you know there already is enough money to feed everyone in the world. There is plenty of food to feed everyone. The problem is not a lack of money, it is the systems that are set up in third world countries. When food donations come poring in, the dictators take such a large proportion before it is distributed that the people pretty much don't get any of the original donation. Even if all of the armament budgets in the world were stopped, and all of the money donated to starving poeple, there would still be world hunger, because of the damn dictators.

    6. Re:funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hit that one right on.

    7. Re:funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you describing usa? checking

      -starving childrens... yes
      -uneducated masses... yes, ppl in us can't even place europe on a map
      -violence over religious differences... yes

      messing with redhat and matrix... yes, but that is a good thing!!!

  6. holy cow!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and they have access to nukes!!
    God help us

    1. Re:holy cow!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, all the holy cows are in India... you got mixed up. They both have nukes, though.

  7. Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by baschie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems that four computers with four pci videocards would cost about the same as one computer with 4 Matrox G200 MMS Quadhead videocards ($699). You would not need all kinds of software distributing the videosource over four computers and it would make administrating and moving the whole system much easier.

    1. Re:Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Matrox MMS cards would definitely be more suitable, seeing as they're designed for this sort of things. As an added bonus both models (G200MMS and G450MMS) have TV-out support if you have trouble finding enough monitors.

    2. Re:Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by Quixote · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But what about the bandwidth issues? Will the PCI bus handle 16 video streams flowing through it (e.g. a movie, as the wall in the article shows) ?

    3. Re:Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      THey have enough problems searching for S3(!) video cards. The Matrox? Maybe the local nuclear facility might have one a them kick ass cards...

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    4. Re:Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      I don't know what resolution they are using for the video display, but they are using the XVideo extention.. which means they are probably using hardware pixel scaling.. if you send a 160x120 (1/4 of a 640x480 stream) at 32bit color depth, you get 4.4 megabytesy per second. with 60 frames per second.

      if you want to send a full 640x480 image to each display, you would need 70.3 megabytes/sec.

      32bit/33mhz PCI is 133MB/sec.. so they are probably taking advantange of the XVideo hardware scaling.

      you also have to take into consideration the network bandwith used to push the video into each box.

      my only question is.. what bit depth are they using.. and how does that affect the PCI bandwidth used.

    5. Re:Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by KaosConMan · · Score: 1

      4 Quad heads would be easier (bandwidth, admin, moving, & computing), but as he mentioned in the article: getting ANY video cards was difficult let alone Quad head cards.

    6. Re:Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by KaosConMan · · Score: 1

      He's not pushing 16 video streams through. He's really only pushing 4, minus the 1 that is on the system that is streaming. He has 4 systems running the 1/4 of the wall each. 1 of the systems is the server so it doesn't need to stream it's own 1/4. The other 3 are using Xinerama to give it the appearence of being the height of 4 monitors so it isn't streaming 4 monitors worth of data per system.

    7. Re:Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by ottffssent · · Score: 2

      Well, why don't you think about it a little bit first? You've got about 100MB/sec (800Mb/sec) available for the cards. Divide by 2 bits per pixel gives 400Mpixels. Divide by 16 monitors and you've got 5Mpixels per monitor. Even at a resolution of 2048x1536, that's only 3 Mpixels per monitor. Repeating our calculation at 32 bits per pixel, we get 200Mpixels, or 2.5M per monitor, about 1800x1440 resolution.

      So yes, there is plenty of bandwidth.

    8. Re:Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one computer with 4 Matrox G200 MMS Quadhead videocards ($699).


      Ummm. Do you have 4 AGP slots in your computer, 'cause I sure as hell don't.
    9. Re:Wouldn't four quadheads be more usefull by baschie · · Score: 1

      You are right and I am sorry. And it sure is great how they managed to do this with their limited resources. I just skimmed through the article to see how they did it, skipping over the part saying why they did it this way :o .

      My comment was more intended for people also wanting to do it that way, being inspired by the article. I hope to have given a viable alternative for those who do have access to these resources. Although, like others stated before, a beamer would even be a better solution imho.

  8. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It would be cheaper to use a projector.
    And too much space between the screens.

  9. 16 monitors vs projector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hmmm. 16 x 17" monitors @ $200.00 each is $3200.00... Hell, even if they were only $100.00 each you can get a very nice projector for less which will blow away the functionality of this system.

    The whole idea behind a video wall is that you can display the same, different, or transitional information across the monitors. They (the monitors) can be ganged together for a single display, split into sub-displays, or data can be moving across them. The system that they describe has very limited use and will not be able to do what a videowall is meant to do.

    Videowalls are quickly being killed these days by projectors except in the instance where you have limited installation depth and do not have room for the minimum throw of the projector. Or I guess where the ambient light is too high but even then you would want non-glare screens on your video wall for the same reason and the lamps in projectors are getting quite bright these days.

    Even if you take into account the annual cost of lamps for the projectors you would have to balance this out against the maintentance cost in parts and man hours of the system he has built. bet it works out pretty close.. Just getting all 16 monitors to calibrate equally is going to be a nightmare.

    1. Re:16 monitors vs projector by FyRE666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ok, what if they used a cluster of 16 projectors? ;-)

    2. Re:16 monitors vs projector by Ur@eus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually part of the plan as I understood it is actually just to use the normal computers of the school computer lab and just quickly assemble the videowall from those when needed.

    3. Re:16 monitors vs projector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies retiring their older systems may have a lot of identical CRTs to sell for cheap. Most people I know favor LCDs over CRTs anyway. Anyway, I think there is a large buyer's market for used CRTs. Still, it's got to be a pain to set all those up.

    4. Re:16 monitors vs projector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know where you're shopping, but in my neighborhood (Northeastern Ohio), a decent projector is going to start at $15,000 and go upwards of $40,000. The school I used to work at payed $35,000 (two years ago) for a projector that could only do 800x600 native and looked crappy at any other resolution. The colors were always tinged with blue because of the light source, so you never got true color at all. Not even close. The school's logo was supposed to be a royal blue, but came off more purple. So... you're pricing is flawed. You might be able to get an LCD display for $3200, that that sits atop a transparency projector, but you're never going to get a decent projector for that kind of money. Admittedly, they've come down in price, but with a decent feature set you can still expect to spend $16,000 . Wake up you fucking idiot. Jeezus, the level of stupidity here never seases to amaze mw. This project was cool, worthwhile and inspirational. We should all be doing stuff like this.

    5. Re:16 monitors vs projector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you posting this from a time warp from 1995. I just bought a surplus LCD transparency panel for $125 from Inventory Solutions. Get a clue, check E-bay :-D

    6. Re:16 monitors vs projector by pridkett · · Score: 2

      Oh you mean something like this. As they'll tell you, it's not as easy as you think. Most commercial projects don't color balance with each other all that well because well, they don't need to. Plus there is need to do some funky stuff with fading around the edges. ANL also has a MicroMural and MicroMural2. The MicroMural2 is pretty impressive to see a full screen hi-res video running on. They've done a good job of making the projecters blend together.

      The other issue is the noise and heat that LCD projectors make. Which is pretty significant.

      --
      My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
    7. Re:16 monitors vs projector by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      $15,000 USD is probably for a home theater projector or a very bright, very high resolution presentation projector.

      Also, local supplies can't compare to the variety available on the internet.

      I bought a 1300 lumen XGA projector, built by NEC, for $2300, and the colors are pretty nice. Granted, it was refurbished, but competing units new aren't too much more, Panasonic has one available for $2500 at some sellers, it lists for $4000. These aren't one of those cheesy overhead panels either.

      The CDW unit you linked to is 7700 lumens, which is _very_ bright, for a lot of uses, 2000 is plenty. I thnk that Sanyo can be had quite a bit cheaper elsewhere, CDW tends to be pretty expensive.

      While projects enhancing the flexibility of open source should be encouraged, I wouldn't expect that anyone would really want to use this to watch movies.

    8. Re:16 monitors vs projector by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      I forgot to point out that I do understand that Pakistan is quite a bit of a different country, pricing and availability is vastly different. The previous post was pointing out that you can too get a _good_ presentation projector for much less than what was linked to.

      I wish I knew how to get older computer hardware to less wealthy and even impovershed countries that could use them, I think I might even have a spare video card of what they are using.

  10. Imagine the possibilties... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    ...for porn!

    16 Debbies doing Dallas, or maybe 4, or heck even one giant Debbie filling my living room!

  11. Its like watching a tv through bars.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Absolutely pointless.

    Someone needs to trim the edges around those monitors with a chainsaw.

    I bet its a pirated version of the Matrix too.

  12. WOW! A VIDEOWALL!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Can I watch my Duran Duran videos on it while I puff up my hair?
    What's next? A vacuum tube computer!? Running Linux?

  13. arg! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How dare you defile my video wall! Montag! MONTAG!
    Burn these /. fools down.

  14. They need an S3 card eh? by Provocateur · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll trade you one S3 card for 4 of those monitors :-) Yessirree these cards are expensive here heh heh

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  15. Er, no offense... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...but that thing looks *terrible*. There's just way too much space between the screens.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  16. simulated by SubtleNuance · · Score: 5, Funny

    For god sakes man

    take those monitors out

    of their cases. Put

    Them closer together and

    kill the funky spacing.

  17. movie.* = comedy by bumby · · Score: 2, Funny

    Any movie watched on that wall will make it a funny
    comedy. I mean, just watch the head on this dude!
    http://www.gstreamer.net/apps/vw/vw_files/p ic07.jp g

    "...When the aliens invaded!!"

    --
    Hey! That's my sig you're smoking there!
    1. Re:movie.* = comedy by SCHecklerX · · Score: 5, Funny
      Any movie watched on that wall will make it a funny comedy. I mean, just watch the head on this dude!

      So, basically it turns all actors into canadians.

      "What's wrong with their heads?? It's ok, their canadian." (or something like that :)

    2. Re:movie.* = comedy by enneff · · Score: 2

      Err, speaking from an outsider's perspective, Americans and Canadians look almost exactly the same.

    3. Re:movie.* = comedy by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      Err, speaking from an outsider's perspective, Americans and Canadians look almost exactly the same.

      You've never watched South Park, have you?

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  18. One thing I notice... by Helter · · Score: 1

    is that they don't give much instruction for how to recreate their project.

    Practicality issues aside, this would be a fun project fo duplicate.

  19. Why not use old LCDs? by Wonderkid · · Score: 1

    LCDs may cost more than CRTs, but they are far lighter, use less power and the gap between the edges would be much less. You could salvage LCDs from old laptops.

    --

    O'WONDERWe're working on it.

    1. Re:Why not use old LCDs? by kubla2000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You could salvage LCDs from old laptops.

      Not so easily done: http://www.eio.com/lcdconnect.htm as far as I can tell, you'd have to get into some pretty heavy-duty electronics and buy convertor cards to handle the different input expected by a laptop display from that which is delivered by a vga card.

    2. Re:Why not use old LCDs? by Bobartig · · Score: 2

      ..And it would costs abouts $200 a pop to get converter boards to use those LCD monitors on a desktop display. A lot of people assume that it's economically advantageous to use laptop LCD's instead of desktop ones. Typically, it doesn't cost less to use a laptop screen with a desktop, and the only places it makes sense is when you very specifically need like a 12.1" or 8.4" screen in a dash board or control panel. This thread talks about the technical problems associated with laptop screens on the desktop, and these guys carry everything you need to do it. Check it out, it's really expensive, even if you have 16 laptops with identical LCD's.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    3. Re:Why not use old LCDs? by Student_Tech · · Score: 1

      What if they could somehow get 16 laptops and have the laptops be the computers, solve the problem of interfacing the screen, but now you have the problem of finding the 16 laptops, and the fact that inexpensive laptops have small screens.

    4. Re:Why not use old LCDs? by computechnica · · Score: 1

      One way do do this with one LCD screen is to take a 15" LCD and a old Overhead projector and build a projector. You may have to have a dark room but it looks awesome. I have built one for my basement Home Theatre and it rocks. A good set of instructions can be found at VG150 LCD Projector.

  20. projectorwall by bumby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Now, how about a projectorwall instead? That is something I would like to see. 16 projectors would make a hell of a screen ;)

    --
    Hey! That's my sig you're smoking there!
    1. Re:projectorwall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See here...

      http://brighton.ncsa.uiuc.edu/~prajlich/wall/

    2. Re:projectorwall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or here...

  21. Hmm.. Video Wall by Alec+Varezz · · Score: 0

    Porn might look interesting on it.

  22. Wait a Minute... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Don't forget: this stuff is for the wealthiest 5%. The rest of the population occupies itself with eking out a living.

  23. Listen to you! by Matey-O · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jeebus Cripes! These guys whip up a Cool Hack(tm) with scrounged materials, make it work and add to the collective abilities of Gstreamer and all you have to say is 'it looks crappy'.

    What a bunch of hypocrites. The fact that the monitors can be swapped out after a proof of concept, and that you've got the power of four CPU's available (Beo-mumble) is completely lost on you guys.

    And I've figured there'd be at least ONE MPAA crack from somebody.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Listen to you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Dude, welcome to Slashdot. The trolls outnumber the GNU hippies twenty to one. But all that does is prove how superior we hippies are. Jesus, even Taco himself is hell bent on hawking overpiced hardware and modding down anybody who questions the wisdom of $500 gimmicks that will be useless trash a few months down the road.
      Fuck them though. I, like you, appreciate the Pakis efforts. It's the thought that counts.

    2. Re:Listen to you! by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would have been much more impressed if it were scrounged hardware. The monitors are new...not the plastic on the display cable of most of them still. All in all, if looks like crap, and the cost of parts exceeds a better alternative. I call that a bad idea.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    3. Re:Listen to you! by Pfhor · · Score: 2

      Actually, not everyone removes the plastic wrappers that come with new stuff. I have a friend from india who has had a vcr for over 2 years now, and the remote is still in the protective plastic wrapper.

    4. Re:Listen to you! by rplacd · · Score: 1

      A good reason to keep remotes in wrappers is dust. However, it's probably not your friend's reason...

    5. Re:Listen to you! by Pfhor · · Score: 2

      Well, i actually talked to him about it, and he mentioned that its really common in india. To the point where if it isn't really getting in the way, why bother taking it off (such as leaving the plastic on the monitor cables).

  24. truth hurts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Sorry but is it better to lie and say it looks great or tell the man straight that it looks shit and it needs more work ?

  25. Eliminate space between screens by benny_lama · · Score: 1

    by using LCD projectors instead of monitors. You can either throw the screen onto a wall or have a rear-projection setup. With the LCD projectors and a little patience you can make the images sit next to each other perfectly and give the illusion of a monstrous desktop.

    --
    "No Comm, No Bomb"
  26. Fiftieth Post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eat me!

  27. Re:First CLINTON 2004 Post!!! by thisisatest · · Score: 1, Funny

    Makes you wonder what Hillary will do to her interns...

    Anyway, I'd like to congratulate Slashdotters on actually reading the article for a change, and not flooding this story with remarks about MPAA chasing after violaters, Pakistan being slightly out of their jurisdiction, as well as that of many US laws brought in thanks to the MPAA.

    Contrast with the recent Ask Slashdot about openning a movie cafe in Bolivia, where the comments were utterly comical, especially the 'Gee, thanks a lot, people, but I'm in BOLIVIA' from the original poster.

    One cannot help but wonder if that was the work of one monomaniac with two dozen accounts doing it as a joke.

    --
    You'd almost think a 'net company would know
  28. Cost-effective ? by tmark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the need to create a flexible and cheap solution for use in Pakistani Schools and Universities using commodity hardware

    I just can't believe this is cost-effective for more than a 4-screen display. With quality video projectors costing less than $2-3000 USD, this solution doesn't save much money, and is far less convenient in terms of portability - how would you even move around an 8x8 grid of monitors -, which would seem to be key for application in schools and universities. Also, the whole array is visually distracting due to the breaks between the monitors.

    Sometimes people get distracted by technology and forget about the constraints of the problem to be solved.

    1. Re:Cost-effective ? by jhubbard · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that it's probably easier for them to purchase 16 - 17" monitors than 1 - $3200 projector. The monitors could be used by all students whereas the projector can only be used by one group at a time. After using the video wall, it can be torn down and the monitors given back to the appropriate classroom(s).

      Also, projectors may cost considerably more than here in the US. This project presents a nice easy way to use existing technology the schools may have to do something else. A lot of us don't really have any idea how bad things might be. I've worked for small companies and getting them to purchase big ticket items was like pulling the tooth of an awake tiger.

      --James

  29. Zeeshan Ali Khattak?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God-bless-you!

  30. @#$@ the warl by Nobley · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wire this thing poorly and you might just get yourself a Firewall.

  31. eliminating the spaces... by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have seen several notes deriding the spaces between the displays. The "fixes" suggested for this include using LCDs (which I suspect are outside of the budget), or disassembling the monitors and bringing the CRTs closer together. (anyone want to discuss the safty issues of pulling one of the center displays out to replace it?)

    I suspect it would be far cheaper, to use fresnel lenses in front of the CRT's with modifications to the rack they built to center the CRT on the fresnel, and mask off the power light for the monitor.

    Will it be perfect? No, but I think it will be more flexiable.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
    1. Re:eliminating the spaces... by Bobartig · · Score: 2, Informative

      wouldn't using all those fresnel's kill your viewing angle? I don't think you could view it in a classroom setup, unless given a really long room.

      There are those projector hacks where people attach a hood to their tv/monitor, then pass it through a fresnel and onto a surface. If you built 16 mini fresnel rear projectors, I think you'd end up with something like the setup they use in bestbuy, which is like a bunch of rear projection TV's.

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    2. Re:eliminating the spaces... by Octal · · Score: 1

      But wit fresnels you get that nice Brazil effect

  32. Couple of things... by Junta · · Score: 2

    1) Why did they need a videowall in the first place? What is the point?

    2) Why use a video wall, when a Projector would be much more clean and efficient? Even if the ambient light was high or the didn't want people blocking the path, they could rig things so the projector is behind the screen in a dark room. Lack of throw area can be compensated for through use of mirrors to reflect the path....

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    1. Re:Couple of things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) why use a video wall at all. i mean a tv with hooked up vhs recorder accomplishes the same. for everything else you think you "need" at an university go visit the theatre. seriously. a projector is cheaper, easier to handle, and this thing just blows. i mean this reminds me more of MTV kind of jackass technology show. using technology for nothing but bullshit in a worst case social/political situation.
      in u.s. it would be even more frightening to see such a waste of ,,.

  33. Fresnel Lense by Roger_Wilco · · Score: 1

    Applying the Fresnel lense hack discussed some time ago could make the screens merge more successfully.

    1. Re:Fresnel Lense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought of that too, but I think it'd be hard to get the optics right. Looking through a fresnel lens only looks right if you're positioned correctly.

      I don't know optics.. there is probablity some arrangement that could work.

  34. YOU BROKE THE RULES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'll pull out all your pubic hairs!

  35. Well I'm Mpressed by jodo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Maybe all the a**holes posting are totally feeling f**ked by the corrupt m$ ruling of yesterday and need to take it out on the someone. Naaaagh... they're just a**holes.
    I for one find this hack exciting because it demos the power of OS. In a place where they have to bust their asses to find pci cards and their monitors are too valuable to remove from their cases. It's just a demo folks. And they did it in Pakistan. Not Redmond.

    --

    "Don't Follow Leaders." Bob Dylan
  36. Islam doesn't make you a murderous freak... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    But if you do happen to be an asshole, Islam gives you just the right excuse to act on it.

    You can twist Christianity to provide you with an excuse, too, but Christianity takes a lot more twisting. Don't forget that Muhammad always ordered prisoners of war massacred -- usually the entire male population of any place he conquered, and he spent his entire life conquering places, too. Christians have done similar things, but Jesus gave them specific instructions in the Bible. Muhammad did provide such instructions. Islam has a model for their ideal Earthly society, and that model is a medeival version of Stalin's purges. And it's all right there in the Qu'ran. Jesus said to turn the other cheek; Muhammad said "kill 'em all, let God sort 'em out." There's a lot of good stuff in the Qu'ran, too, but one of the major axioms of the Islamo-fascist faith is that the only perfect society the world has ever seen was the Islamic world during Muhammad's life and a couple of decades afterward. Their explicit goal is to recreate that society in every detail. Think about that. Think about it long and hard.

    And don't be so stupid as to blame Bush for a recession that simply arrived on schedule; the tech boom years were bound to crash. Any idiot could see that. It was made worse by all the hyper-Libertarian anti-regulation ideology (presided over by a Democrat), but who voted for it? Who voted for the Congress that made the laws? Who kept on voting for them after the laws were passed? The voters, stupid. If you hire a moron to fix your car, it's your own damn fault when he breaks it.

  37. Oops: "Jesus NEVER gave them instructions"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh heh heh, sorry 'bout that...

    1. Re:Oops: "Jesus NEVER gave them instructions"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read Matthew 10.

      Xian moron.

  38. Re:Bloody Towel Heads.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, white folks just run the country and fuck the economy with his cronies.

    Actually, this group represents only a small minority of the population. The remaining are partitioned by 'asset' or 'liability'. As they say, "Cattle and leeches."

  39. Can you imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an openmosix cluster of these?

    I bet you thought I was going to say something else. Ha!

    Zing! Got you. *licks his finger and touches you* ssssss....

  40. More complex utilization? by Fastolfe · · Score: 2

    It's kind of nifty that any Joe can do this, but one of the things I see these types of video walls being able to do is to change the arrangement and utilization of the 16 monitors, so that one second you might have a 4x4 video stream, and the next you might have a 2x2 stream in the center with some other type of content elsewhere, or a 3x4 stream with 4 1x1 screens of other information, that sort of thing. If there was an easy way to define these types of "programs", independently of the video stream(s), that might make these things a little more fun to play with.

  41. You've got to be kidding! by flikx · · Score: 2

    This is for Pakistani schools?? What a crock. Meanwhile, American schools are using old 15" televisions from the 1970's in stuffy classrooms filled with 45 children. If the school even has a television or two to share with all classrooms in the entire school.

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:You've got to be kidding! by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 1

      Y'see, American school jumped on the Micro$oft bandwagon before they did a little elementary arithmetic, and so now there are brand-spanking new WinXP licenses on 15-year old computers in a 75-year old building with no heat or A/C. Oddly enough, there aren't any students either. Oh well...

      Remember, nobody was ever fired for buying Micro$oft! ;-)

  42. Availability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    As the man stated on his webpage, they are focusing their search on PCI videocards; specifically accepting videocards based on the S3Virge/DX chipset. Sure, they could purchase one overhead display, or two, but perhaps they want the functionality of a CRT. There may also be other projects involved such as clustering+Xinerama and/or chromium, I wouldn't doubt their intellect. There are obviously fewer projectors in Pakistan than there are PCI videocards and CRT's. I only hope people stop cursing and dis-respecting their intellect based on the actions of their opposite angry half of the population of Pakistan. We can say the same about our country in funding education. I'm happy they are doing well with what they got out of this sad world.

  43. Fuck The Matrix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough of that movie already. Get over it.

  44. A creative solution to the problem of... by Spurious+Growth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No Funding! I think the point that people are missing here is that the project does not have a budget. There is no money to spend on a video projector. The entire system relies on hardware which is, on a regular basis, serving an entirely different purpose. This solution allows them to create a large display when it is necessary, out of components at hand. Almost any computer lab can generate a 4' x 5' display on demand.

    Also, what is the effective resolution of such a screen? It sounds remarkably similar to the IBM ultra high resolution LCD we heard about a while back.

    Spurious

  45. Once again, did anyone read by JWhitlock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...or just look at the pictures. As the author states:
    I rather quick realized that the only extra component we needed in Gstreamer was one that that did the cropping for us. At the same time I also saw that my knowledge about multimedia and GStreamer was not good enough to allow me to write this element. So I tried asking my friend Wim Taymans if he would be willing to take on the task of writing such a plugin. He was kind enough to do that not only because of my need, but also because he saw it as another nice feature of Gstreamer that would be needed by many others.
    So, they know that cropping is a problem. But that's just software (and maybe a bit of hardware, with those huge borders). But that isn't their biggest hardware problem.
    It turned out however that our biggest problem was finding PCI video cards in Pakistan whose XFree86 drivers could do XVideo, this in a situation when its hard to even find PCI video cards at all in the market. Solving this problem of lacking parts took us 3 months and at one point we even considered abondoning the project. We still need more cards because we do not have more than these 16 s3virge/DX cards. If any of the cards stop functioning, we are out of business.
    This isn't the U.S. - it's Pakistan. They can't go to eBay and find a 4-head card, or even pick and chose cards (or even monitors) based on requirements. They have to use what they can find, and I for one am impressed. How many of you would give up if it took three months to just find the hardware?

    This is a great engineering story, of folks working with what they have, and a great Free Software story - they could have tried some pirated copy of commerical software, but instead they decided to use open source components, stretching what is possible. Could it have been done with a projector? Sure, if one was availible. But now the state of multi-monitor free software has been advanced a little, which may benefit you or me some day.

    I hope that there were some other people who saw how cool this was, who are contacting the authors with useful suggestions about removing the shells and mounting the tubes closer together, that are looking at the GStreamer source and thinking about how to add cropping, and how to make cropping easy, and hopefully a few people that are thinking about donating equipment, and realizing how lucky they are to live in a world where you can order a projector from Amazon and have it delivered in days.

    1. Re:Once again, did anyone read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and realizing how lucky they are to live in a world where you can order a projector from Amazon and have it delivered in days.

      Maybe we aren't lucky for it, maybe it makes us lazy?

    2. Re:Once again, did anyone read by sireenmalik · · Score: 1

      It is far easier and cheaper to get any software and hardware in Pakistan! As you already know there are no strict laws on piracy so everything is dirt cheap. Also the second monitors should not be more than 30-40 USD per piece. But the point remains the guys did a nice job and put together a nice system.

      --


      Voltaire: God is dead.
      God: Voltaire is dead!
    3. Re:Once again, did anyone read by JWhitlock · · Score: 3, Insightful
      and realizing how lucky they are to live in a world where you can order a projector from Amazon and have it delivered in days.

      Maybe we aren't lucky for it, maybe it makes us lazy?

      Nietzsche is alive and posting on Slashdot?

      It may make us lazier in some ways, but allows us to do more in others. I would never create a project like this - I'd just buy a projector. That may make me lazy, but it means I can invest my time and energy in the presentations I put on the display. Sure, technology and privilege makes it easier to be lazy, but it doesn't require us to be lazy. It allows us to use the same amount of energy but get much more done.

      This reminds me of my earliest programming days, when I was inspired to learn programming by Mandelbrot and Julia sets, and movies like TRON (not the fantasy of living programs, but the cool 3D graphics that looked possible to duplicate). It was a difficult journey - it took a long time to find a language that was fast enough (BASIC was a little slow), and that had reasonable graphics libraries (MODULA-2 didn't). I taught myself C and C++, coded a basic driver for my graphics card, and learned matrix transforms to draw 3D graphics out of line and pixel primitives. I didn't get far - the best I did was implementing a 3D scene generator out of a book.

      Today, I'd download the ActiveX libraries, or OpenGL libraries, and use gcc or Java or something else to draw my objects. I'd never have to learn how to interact with the video driver. I could be creating Quake maps without knowing how to do a matrix operation or a binary tree representation of a scene (which I never learned).

      Does that mean I'd be lazier if I was born 10 years later? Nope. I'd just be able to quickly jump the hurdle of low-level details and concentrate on the higher level stuff. Maybe I'd study art more, to learn what makes a good 3D scene. Maybe I'd study basic AI, to make my creations more life-like. Or maybe I'd still learn all the way down to register instructions, because I like to see how far down I can go, but I'd have better guides down known paths (like Michael Abrash's Graphics Programming Black Book.

      Remember, without this crazy, materialistic, wasteful country, no one would have developed cheap graphics cards that make their way to Pakistan in the first place. Keep ignoring the modern miracles of reliable computer networks, always-on electrical grids, indoor air conditioning, and market economies. Continue to prosper without guilt. But do try to leave something useful for those that come after you.

    4. Re:Once again, did anyone read by enneff · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're an idiot. The cropping he was referring to in his article is entirely different to the type of cropping suggested by a multitude of posters in this thread.

      The article describes cropping as cutting monitor-sized squares out of a video stream, splitting it into an array of several streams.

      The posters in this thread are talking about additional cropping to reduce the warping caused by the spacing between the monitors.

    5. Re:Once again, did anyone read by enneff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Haha, I love the way I'm modded as a Troll because I correct a mistake.

  46. There is another good use... by gozar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, for this particular application I feel that a projector would be better utilized, but there is another cool way this could be used. By using just two screens you could watch a letterbox movie! That is something you could try at home, with just two video cards. Get a couple of 19" monitors, remove the cases, put them close together, and viola, your own wide screen high resolution monitor...

    --
    What, me worry?
  47. Wouldn't a LDP proyector be a better choice here? by eyefish · · Score: 2

    I don't want to take credit away from this proyect (I already have it archived into my "cool video hacks" category), but I think in this particular case it would be cheaper, simpler, faster to setup, smaller, and more convenient to simply use a DLP-based video proyector with a high lumens value (plus you could get a much larger image with better image quality as freebies).

    If you notice, the Vide Whale is only about 6 feet high, and it suffers from a software problem which is basically not cropping the areas between the monitors (makes it look pretty bad). So, why not the DLP solution? I'm pretty sure they can get something decent for about 3,000 dollars, which I bet is way cheaper than the price of all the machines, video cards, monitors, and cables combined (not to mention the time saved when setting it up and the costs saved in transportation).

  48. VLC + wall filter by Sam+H · · Score: 1

    I implemented a quite similar feature in VLC one year ago. See this or this.

    --
    God, root, what is difference ?
  49. what a shitty way to watch the Matrix... by scharkalvin · · Score: 2, Troll

    If you want to make a huge screen out of many smaller ones take the tubes out of the cabinets and get them closer together or find monitors with smaller bezels. I think they make monitors designed for those video walls in mind. Hate to say it but the picture sucks!

    OTHO for the right application, it is a clever hack.

  50. Ahh the Matrix on a matrix of monitors... by wiresquire · · Score: 2, Funny

    As you can see, we've had our eye on you for some time now, Mr. Khattak. It seems that you've been living two lives. In one life, you're Zeeshan Ali Khattak, program writer for a respectable software company, you have a social security number, you pay your taxes, and you help your landlady carry out her garbage. The other life is lived in computers, where you go by the hacker alias Zak147 and are guilty of virtually every computer crime we have a law for.

    One of these lives has a future, and one of them does not. I'm going to be as forthcoming as I can be, Mr. Anderson. You're here because we need your help.

    We know that you've been contacted by a certain individual, a man who calls himself umer_pk. Now whatever you think you know about this man is irrelevant. He is considered by many authorities to be the most dangerous man alive. My colleagues believe that I am wasting my time with you but I believe that you wish to do the right thing. We're willing to wipe the slate clean, give you a fresh start and all that we're asking in return is THAT YOU CLEAN THIS FRIGGIN MESS UP AND BUY A BIG SCREEN TV!

    --

    So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

  51. Ideal videowall by Gerry+Gleason · · Score: 2
    I've had this idea of a while that you could "tile" a large flat screen monitor from standard low res flat panels. With existing tech, you could do way better than this project by finding the cheapest low res LCD monitors, and either find a model with narrow edge trim, or remount the screens to get minimal spacing. Of course, this is lame if the screens aren't cheap enough, and who really wants a big screen with visible lines between tiles. What I wonder is, whether it is possible to design a module and mounting method that eliminates the lines completely. Maybe have modules that butt right up to each other (maybe even connect together, but I digress), and then have a single piece glass in front, possibly with a difusion surface to help merge the pixels. For big screens, even with high res, the actual pixels could be pretty big, so you could have 1'x1' module with say a 20 dot per inch pitch for 240x240 pixels.

    Ok, maybe twice that resolution for an HDTV resolution in smaller sizes, but this would be good for say on 8x12 screen. They would have to be $10-50 per tile to be really worthwhile, but even a bit more than this would be competetive with current large flat panels, but you need to get down to the lower end of this to make it really popular. The big if would be whether it looks just as good as a one-piece design.

  52. Damn cable bags by skinfitz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Looks like they cant get those silly plastic bags off monitor cables in pakistan either.

  53. Anywhere you want to show off tech ability? by fantomas · · Score: 2

    I dunno, how about anywhere you might want to do a bit of high tech / glam PR ...industry conventions, sales shows, University open days, art galleries - hey, the kind of places people hire this kit for in Europe or USA.... What a thought.


    I agree it seems a bit of overkill for a school, but why not the above reasons?

    .

    As for why do it, do you really think justification is required for a tech project on /. ? Seems a damn sight better use of tech than stuffing a computer into a rotting vegetable (halloween jack-o-computer). This guy might get a bit of a business out of it as well.


  54. Cheaper may not be their motivation by kent_eh · · Score: 1

    The vid wall solution is much brighter than a projector could be on any screen. A better option if lighting isn't entirely controllable in the viewing area.(think trade show booth, lecture theater where there is a demonstration involved, outdoors)

    On the other hand, it's a pretty cool thing to do 'just because you can'.

    --

    ---
    "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    1. Re:Cheaper may not be their motivation by itwerx · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the kids can't make shadow-animals this way. :)
      A rear-projection unit would work as well of course but the screen and projection unit would be quite a bit more expensive.

  55. you're all missing the projector point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't repace this thing with a video projector...hook it up to 16 of 'em. C'mon a video wall of 100'x100' with a resolution of 4096x3072...now that's a video wall 8-]

  56. Just imagine ... by LoudMusic · · Score: 2

    a ... BEOWULF cluster of THESE!!! ... yeah.

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  57. Over complicating the problem by Catskul · · Score: 2


    You can leave the laptop lcd's still attached to the laptops and allow the laptops to control the screen. You can get decent enough laptops on ebay for less than the cost of a new video card and monitor.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  58. More importantly, what will they call it? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    What are they going to call a wall from the video whale project -- the Whaling Wall?

    1. Re:More importantly, what will they call it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up! Too funny

  59. Not as cheap, but a MUCH better picture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should get a viswall.
    http://www.visbox.com

  60. Re:Why? Obvious: So the kids can watch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would tend to agree. I hear a lot about how Islam is a "religion of peace", but nothing from the Muslims that would support this. I am therefore forced to assume that Islam sucks, unless proven otherwise.

  61. READ THIS! by itwerx · · Score: 1

    I found an old S3-Virge-DX card (and some older cards I wasn't sure about) in my spares box and emailed them asking if they'd like it, here's the response (I removed extraneous bits that don't apply, like his mailing address!):

    Hello,
    Thank you for sending a positive comment, we have
    been waiting for one :) Yes please, we really need
    them bad, but afaik old Trio64 are not Xv supported by
    the XFree86 drivers. Did you test them? Well if you
    can send us any PCI vga card on earth that could do Xv
    using the XFree86 drivers, just send us plz. uptill
    now you are the only one who offered us & the 2nd one
    with a positive comment :)


    WTF?!?
    Am I the only person who actually read the article and thought about helping out?
    C'mon y'all...

    1. Re:READ THIS! by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't be so surprised. Most ppl that post on Slashdot these days deserve my .sig.

      The guy that modded his old Commie64 "portable" into a modern Pentium GHz+ (complete with custom wiring, chips and boards) got the same treatment - again, ONLY from slashdot trolls and kiddiez.

      I thought his mod was cool and wrote him an encouraging note.

      People like thee and me are getting few and far between. NOTE TO SLASHDOT READERS: Please do not flame people unnecessarily or in haste. These folks in Pakistan are writing code that can help other people too.
      .

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  62. Props from the USA by MsGeek · · Score: 2

    Very impressive. All you schmucks who are drooling on and on with your anti-Islam, anti-Pakistani statements are really pissing me off. These guys basically took monitors and video cards that would normally be consigned to dumpsters here and turning them into a pretty amazing video wall. So, they have yet to put the guts of the monitors into cases that would allow closer placement of the CRTs. Big whoop. That's just a matter of time and materials. Any idiot can physically mod a case, be it a PC case or a CRT case.

    Props for a very cool experiment, guys. Don't let the trolls grind you down.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  63. Zeeshan Ali replies: by Zeenix · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hello, Let me answer all the queries in one reply cause i see a lot queries asking the same questions again and again.

    (1) About the Need for schools/universities: Well, its quite obvius that the price of our video-wall is not less than the commercially available projectors. but for that possibility every school/college shall HAVE to buy a projector of course. But many of the schools/universities have a lab of atleast 16 computers networked together. So we can arrange them such a configuration that will allow them to make a video-wall within some minutes when ever they need to.

    (2) About the cropping: Oh we only needed to change 4 config files for that and we fix this one a day after we took the pictures.

    (3) About taking the gap out: we've thought much on that matter, like taking out the monitors out of their cases. we tried all that but that didnt matter at all. And if you look at the screen from the distance its intended to be kept from the audience, the effect of those gaps reduces significantly. Trust me on this :)

    (4) About terrorism: well, i can only say that being a member of an open-source community, i know the value of Freedom...

  64. CLAP CLAP CLAP by ToKsUri · · Score: 1

    Totally true what you are saying.

  65. Are things cheaper in Pakistan? by JWhitlock · · Score: 2
    It is far easier and cheaper to get any software and hardware in Pakistan! As you already know there are no strict laws on piracy so everything is dirt cheap. Also the second monitors should not be more than 30-40 USD per piece. But the point remains the guys did a nice job and put together a nice system.

    Is this correct? Are you from Pakistan?

    I tried to see if I could get a package to Pakistan. With a bit of research, I found a page for the North West Frontier Province Primary Education Project (NWFP-PEP), based in Peshawar, Pakistan. However, that website does not have a postal code as required by UPS. Is this a sign that they don't make regular deliveries there? FedEx did not require a postal code, and they claimed they could get a 4ftx4ftx4ft, 50lb box to Peshawar for only $316.43.

    So, hardware from the U.S. may be a little expensive. But you think that the Pakistan hardware market would be cheaper?

    Now, I imagine software piracy is pretty widespread - Microsoft Windows and Office are probably availible for the cost of a CD, and a Matrix DVD made it's way to Pakistan. But multi-monitor video is a pretty narrow application, usually provided by the vendor of a multi-head graphics card. It would probably be eaiser to get Linux tools to do the job than to try to get a pirated copy. Plus, I'm not sure what their internet connectivity is - they seem to have the basics (a yahoo email account), but I'd expect at least one of the people to have a University email account. The website is hosted on the gstreamer website, not in Pakistan.

    Please enlighten me how they would get the needed software and extra montors for $30-40 USD each.

    1. Re:Are things cheaper in Pakistan? by sireenmalik · · Score: 1


      you can get "any" software for the price of a CD. Presently the govtt. is tightening up the grip on piracy but it is still a long way.

      Monitors-this is second-hand/refurbished stuff that costs really that much. It is mostly sourced from Taiwan and China.

      --


      Voltaire: God is dead.
      God: Voltaire is dead!
  66. Remember the AL-QUEDA training video? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The man in black was shooting bill clinton's projection on a cave wall? Now these terrorists are going to destroy the monitors when they fire at pictures of peace loving americans!! Are these fuckers getting dumber or what?

  67. His implementation is flawed. by newestbob · · Score: 0
    You need to account for the space between the monitors, and crop out the image so that it's correct. This means that some of the image isn't displayed because it's "obscured" by the inter-monitor gap.

    The effect of the flaw on the images in the article is obvious. The images look stretched out or "exploded" instead of contiguous, because this naive implementation doesn't discard the portions of the image that would logically fall between the monitors.

    While it may seem wrong to cut out parts of the image, our brains are great at filling in gaps, and it would have looked perfectly natural.

  68. Just hang on one darn minute there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There've been times in history when the Islamic world was pretty darn civilized. So, okay, yeah, this is maybe not one of those times. Certainly the worst wingnuts get all the publicity, too. But there are sane people in the Islamic world -- some of them seriously respectable Islamic scholars -- who are saying as loud and often as they can that terrorism is bullshit, that killing civilians is just plain wrong (and the Qu'ran does happen to back them up on that point, BTW; the militants are doing all kinds of theological backflips to get around the prohibition on killing civilians. It's interesting to note that Western leftists find it very easy to "justify" deliberate and systematic war crimes in terms of their values (as long as the war criminals have "third world credibility"), while for Muslims it takes real ingenuity (but they're still doing it, all the same)). Those voices are being ignored or drowned out, but they're there (equivalent voices of reason are totally absent among Western leftists, of course). They're not having any influence on most Muslim governments, but they are indeed out there. Furthermore, most Muslims in the world are not out killing people. Some approve of terrorism (more than I wish), some don't.

    So let's be fair. Even if the religion were just plain pure evil (and I doubt that), not all of the people are even close to pure evil.

  69. good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I'm not sure of this things usefullness, I'm glad someone is trying new things in the 'old country' just for the sake of doing them. I'm also glad there was cooperation between a dude who just had an idea and another who decided to put some money behind it. Comments about "other problems such as dirty streets and violence and oh-my-god-this-could-be-used-for-nuclear-weapons." By that idiotic logic, all the American (private or public) money going into research about nano-technology, space exploration, faster computer chips should be stopped untill Joe Hobo I saw on a street in New York is given a home a shiny new Ford. These professional complainers don't realize that more often than not, it is people with ....ah fuck it, this comment will get modded down anyway.

  70. Sorry, not the case by baschie · · Score: 1

    Matrox G450MMS, G200MMS, G100MMS (which I own) and the older Appian cards have a dedicated GPU and dedicated memory per chip. Matrox has never sold multiple GPU cards on AGP.
    It is easier to build a multiple GPU card with PCI because PCI is a bus. Each GPU can be seen as a separate device on that bus. Second advantage is that you can indeed use more than one card in the system.
    AGP is a port, and I only know of one manufacturer that has made multiple GPU cards for this bus. They use the "Appian/B1 agp bridge" in it's Jeronimo 2000 card to pull that of.

    Other multihead cards can use AGP without such a bridge because they have only a single GPU connected to multiple ramdacs (e.g. the Matrox's G450, G550, Parhelia; Nvidia's twinhead geforces; Ati's dual monitor radion's).

    A quick note about the new Appian cards. Dualhead Appian cards are made with a single ATI Radeon VE chip and are available in AGP and PCI. Quadhead cards feature two of these Radeons and are only available on PCI.

  71. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    One promising concept that I came up with right away was that you could
    manufacture personal air bags, then get a law passed requiring that they be
    installed on congressmen to keep them from taking trips. Let's say your
    congressman was trying to travel to Paris to do a fact-finding study on how
    the French government handles diseases transmitted by sherbet. Just when he
    got to the plane, his mandatory air bag, strapped around his waist, would
    inflate -- FWWAAAAAAPPPP -- thus rendering him too large to fit through the
    plane door. It could also be rigged to inflate whenever the congressman
    proposed a law. ("Mr. Speaker, people ask me, why should October be
    designated as Cuticle Inspection Month? And I answer that FWWAAAAAAPPPP.")
    This would save millions of dollars, so I have no doubt that the public
    would violently support a law requiring airbags on congressmen. The problem
    is that your potential market is very small: there are only around 500
    members of Congress, and some of them, such as House Speaker "Tip" O'Neil,
    are already too large to fit on normal aircraft.
    -- Dave Barry, "'Mister Mediocre' Restaurants"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...