Competiton: Mozilla's 200,000th Bug
An anonymous reader writes "MozillaZine is reporting that Mozilla's 200,000th bug will soon be reported. Not terribly exciting in itself, but they're running a competition to guess the exact date and time that the bug will be reported to Bugzilla, Mozilla's bug reporting tool. The prize is a Mozilla 1.0 CD that might actually be worth something one day. Anyone can enter, so let's see if we can have a Slashdot winner (we can all share in the glory)! To help you, they're up to 178,325 and 51 bugs have been filled today. (NOTE: Although almost 200,000 bugs have been reported, there are not - and have not been - that many bugs in Mozilla.)"
<old timer mode>I remember Netscape .9, and wondering if it would ever reach 1.0. We'd say, what more could 1.0 do -- it's such a revolution!</otm>
Yep, I'm selling these IE1.0 CDs on ebay and making a fortune! (Off the tech support charges that is)
It's more than 2^16, which proves that the mozilla project's bug tracking code is able to deal with numbers that large. Unlike Micro$oft, which never have more than 65535 open bugs, because else the counter overflows...
Well, the entire Windows2000 operating system only had 65,000 bugs when it shipped. So I guess Microsoft programmers really ARE better than Mozilla programmers. 200,000 bugs? Yikes! Obviously with IE being an integrated part of Windows it has much less than 65,000 bugs therefore IE is better than Mozilla right? :-)
Am I the only person who thinks that counting bugs, all bugs, any bugs, is a bit meaningless? I mean, 1,000 bugs like 'left margin on submit buttons is 1 px too narrow on some displays' worry me less than 1 bug like 'all your credit card details will be posted on 500 weblogs around the world'. What we need here is the bug equivalent of the Beaufort Wind Scale, where a 'light breeze' bug could almost be called an endearing quirk, and a 'hurricane' bug is likely to trash your hard disc...
Virtually serving coffee
Everybody knows that Mozilla hasn't any bu
Yeah I'd like it to load in less than a week and use less that 128Mb to view 'HelloWorld.html'.
;-).
<OLDJOKE>It actually shipped with far more than that, but Microsoft's bug tracking system itself had a bug whereby it couldn't handle more than 65,535 bugs.<\OLDJOKE>
UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
I tends not to have small bugs (ie renders pages a tiny bit incorrectly) it tends to have HUGE bugs (ie you credit card numbers were posted on a public forum)
History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Sir Winston Churchill
Competiton: Slashdot's 10,000,000th Typo
Posted by CmdrTaco on 08:00 AM November 5th, 2002
from the VA's-lowered-budget-can't-afford-spellcheckers dept.
CmdrTaco writes "Slashdot is about to see its 10,000,000th typo. Tis is the 9,999,999th one. Not terribly exciting in itself, but we're running a competition to guess the exact date and time that the slashdot hoard will notice the milestone-breaking spelling mistake. The prize is a poster-size copy of Mrs. Malda's revealing low-cut shot." The typo will show up anytime now - good lukc everyone!
A bug has been discovered in Bugzilla, which caused it to count every reported bug 5 times. This brings the total number of reported bugs in BugZilla to 83240.
Why not? Afraid that Asa might backtrace you by the data in the crashdump, and call your wife?
Just report the damn URL, give the developers something to enjoy. Or is your "someone" underage, maybe?
Got brain?
I doubt it'll last long if Slashdot's users care enough to compete - just don't Slashdot the bug reporting page.
Reminds me of some awful news stations around here:
Although only 300 people died in the earthquake, it could have been worst.
...buggy software?
;)
Include me out!
(C'mon, I get it, really I do
Ahh - My eye!
The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
...and at about 12.30pm GMT, my inbox was suddenly deluged with entries. Even without looking, I knew why that would be... :-)
Gerv
Given that we get 300+ bug reports a day, you would have to file a _lot_ of fake bug reports to influence the result. And, after about 5 fake bug reports, I would find you and LART your ass. :-)
Gerv
Umm... 1993! Oh no wait, that's Microsoft, you wanted Mozilla.
Height: 38U, Weight: 0 Newtons, Eyes: #0000FF, OS: Gray Matter 1.0 (Alpha)
Is that when it catches up to the Internet Explorer bug count?
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
I guess this proves that they are using excel as a bug tracking database -- it can only suppot 2^16 rows.
Considering that Mozilla 1.1 is out and Mozilla 1.2 beta is out, you might as well complain about bugs in IE 1.0 while you're at it.
a lot of these 'bugs' were in pre-1.0 versions - which never see the light of day in commercial software
Wha? In commercial software, pre-1.0 beta releases are called "1.0" up to "2000".
<OLDJOKE>...<\OLDJOKE>
Parse error: Expecting </OLDJOKE> but found <\OLDJOKE> instead.
Suggested action: Upgrade to MS-XML 2.2.
greeeeeeaaaat. so that one cd can hang around with my 200,000 AOL cds i have floating around.....
Your running the Windows version of Mozilla, aren't you?
Those aren't Mozilla bugs =)