Slashdot Mirror


Is Mac OS X Slow?

Junks Jerzey asks: "Every time there's a mention of Mac OS X on Slashdot, there's a flurry of responses about how unbearably slow Mac OS X is. To anyone who has done software development under both Mac OS X and Windows or Linux, is there any truth to this or is it simply a knee-jerk reaction from non-Mac users who see low numbers like 800MHz. I'm talking about average priced Macs here, like the LCD iMac line, not the dual 1.25GHz machines that sell for $4500+." Having the fortune of using a Titanium Powerbook for over a month, I don't find Mac OS X that slow at all, however, there are some things that do take a little longer than I am used to, but I think these things are application-specific. For those Mac OS X users out there, have you noticed operations that seemed slower using Mac OS X compared to similar operations on other operating systems?

4 of 1,139 comments (clear)

  1. The original release was slower by Roached · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The original release of OS X was slower, the newest version is noticably faster.

  2. I've never found it slow by PaxTech · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Of course, I have a dual 1Ghz G4 with a gig of RAM so YMMV.. ;)

    --
    All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
  3. Answer to title. by McFly69 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yes

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  4. Re:Check Complete by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Your sentence:
    "but this damn thing is too slow"
    suggested grammar and spelling:
    "but this thing is too damned slow"

    and/or:

    "but, as suggested by the MicroComputer Hardware Manufacturer's Advertising Consortium, I should upgrade to a machine with more memory and megahertz, because `You Never Can Have Too Much Power[tm]'"

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net