Slashdot Mirror


ALICE vs. ALICE

new-black-hand writes "The A.L.I.C.E Bot-off has produced some interesting results. It basically involved taking two instances of the A.L.I.C.E conversation bot and pointing them at each other. The results show that the bot is not really that intelligent, and relies more on human input."

18 of 325 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by Jack+William+Bell · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Man I *really* hope no one mods you up 'Funny'. You are entitled to sexist views, but I hope no-one else shares them.

    --
    - -
    Are you an SF Fan? Are you a Tru-Fan?
  2. lol by geek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee lost our sense of humor huh?

    Tell me why it's ok for women to call us pigs but we can't make the occasional crack?

    Go away

    1. Re:lol by Arandir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tell me why it's ok for women to call us pigs but we can't make the occasional crack?

      It's called "political correctness".

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    2. Re:lol by geek · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "It's called "political correctness"

      Ah, so that's why I don't care. Got it. ;)

  3. Wow. How disgusting. by SlashChick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know whether I'm more offended by that completely sexist remark, or the fact that it was modded up as "Funny".

    By the way, even if you were joking, it's not funny. Personally, I find this incredibly insulting.

    Oh, and for those of you who think it's okay to make these sorts of jokes, I highly suggest you read the "HOWTO Encourage Women in Linux" paper. It's a well-written summary of why so many women are scared to even go to computer events -- we're constantly stared at ("Oh my gosh! A female!"), heckled, and treated as sex objects even though those of us who dare to go usually have quite valid opinions.

    I find this sort of behavior, even said as a joke, completely unacceptable. I would find it equally unacceptable if a similar joke were directed toward men, Jews, black people, or any other group. I seriously hope you give some thought to this next time you make a degarding commment about a group of people, even as a joke.

    (Yes, I AM female. Damnit.)

    1. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by tekunokurato · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Get a grip. This is exactly the same sort of joke you'd hear watching sitcom characters or the like. It's nothing new, and it's simply a bit funny. Make a man joke and we'd laugh too. Come off as a nasty, man-hating woman, however, and we just think less of your sense of humour.

    2. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 5, Insightful

      SlashChick: we're constantly stared at, heckled, and treated as sex objects even though those of us who dare to go usually have quite valid opinions.

      You have a valid point, but you chose an odd screen name with which to express it.

    3. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by LostCluster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There needs to be a new mod category... (-1) Offensive

    4. Re:Wow. How disgusting. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How the heck is that supposed to make any intelligent, self-respecting woman laugh?

      In EXACTLY the same way that self-respecting nerds calling each other "dork" or "geek" or "no-life" or "socially enept" or "dweller of your mom's basement" or other perfectly funny stereotypes that usually aren't true. We laugh because we're bigger than the stereotype. That's what intelligent, self-respecting people do. We know we have weaknesses and we know there's some truth to stereotypes, and we embrace that and laugh and then get on with life.

      If someone tells me that because I'm a white male , I'm responsible for all the world's wars... I laugh. I acknowledge that there is some small amount of truth the stereotype they're buying into, but generally, it's funny. It's not true. And it's funny. Imagine that! And by laughing and going along with their tasteless joke instead of butting heads about their lies, heck, I might even make a friend that day. Technically, they're lying. Technically, they're disrespecting me. But you know what? I'd rather laugh with them than make war with them.

      Laugh. You'll get sick less.

  4. [OT] Oh my gosh! A female! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can I have a picture of you? And your phone number?
    </ironi>

    Here's a question, and I'm quite serious about it.

    Is it okay to have jokes, where someone is a the receiving end of it? As in, can I make a joke about the occupants of the Titanic ending up as Iceberg dressing? Okay, that wasn't a joke, but still.

    How about one, where you comment on the fact that most neo-nazies believe that they are a superior race, but are usually butt-ugly and shave their heads because they don't know how to otherwise avoid lice?

    How about one, where you indicate that the difference between bowling balls and babies is that you can't unload a truck full of bowling balls using a pitch fork?

    How about one where you mention that men are disgusting pigs who only talk about football, sex and are incredibly homophobic?

    Where is the line drawn? Is it drawn at where YOU get offended? Should the rest of the humour-inclined world be at a loss, just because you're a bit squimish?

    So you're offended by a joke? Good for you. Tough fucking luck, but good for you. If you don't want freedom of speech - say so. If you don't want to be offended by "unacceptable" speech - don't go outside, don't turn on your radio, don't turn on your TV, don't turn on your computer, and for Gods sake don't turn on your lover either, 'cause he or she just might say something nasty like "fuck me" or something.

    In the immortal words of George Carlin:

    BLOW ME!

    By any chance did you hear that?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  5. what this is leading to.. by RyLaN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    linux-a.l.i.c.e bot. user: "my sound isnt working as a non-root user" bot: "try adduser yourusername audio" then we can shut down all those sites that prescribe RTFM, and use their bandwidth to host bots..

    --
    At least the war on the environment is going well
  6. Re:uh-huh by RealityProphet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No, someone is NOT expecting too much out of a computer program. The whole point of the ALICE project is to pass the Turing test, i.e. to create a computer program that is intelligent. With this in mind, ALICE fails miserably. And as I understand it, ALICE will never become intelligent, because it does not have the capability adapt and learn.

  7. Artificial "Intelligence" by deblau · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Wisdom is using experience to provide you with many choices.
    Intelligence is being able to pick the most appropriate choice.

    You can have Artificial Wisdom, that's easy. Just give ALICE (or whomever) a large enough data set. But Artificial Intelligence requires context (state), fluidity, adaptability, and insight. AIML processors are certainly not intelligent; in fact, the search-and-replace methodology employed is rather overtly non-intelligent. An Excel spreadsheet could do the same thing.

    Please let's not get excited about this as AI.

    --
    This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
  8. Re:uh-huh by rueba · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Passing the Turing Test is NOT the same as being intelligent. What exactly constitutes "intelligence" is a subject of intensive debate.

    It might be possible for a program to pass the Turing Test and still not be considered intelligent according to some other criteria.

    --
    The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
  9. Well, duh! by joto · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If you ever thought Alice to be intelligent, try this:
    • you: Do you know what kind of Ice cream I prefer?
    • [Alice will undoubtedly answer something witty]
    • you: My favourite ice cream is chocolate
    • [Alice will undoubtedly answer something witty]
    • you: What is my favourite kind of ice cream?
    • [Alice will still fail to provide the correct answer, although it may still be witty]

    The reasons Alice seems intelligent is because we want to be fooled. But something with that kind of learning ability is not something I consider intelligent. Of course, with people, this kind of thing comes up all the time, because people aren't paying attention. Not so with Alice, you can try it as many times you want, and Alice will never learn.

  10. Grounding by Yoda2 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Although not as linguistically powerful as systems such as A.L.I.C.E., I have developed a system that can learn nouns and verbs based on visual perception. It starts to address the issue of teaching a computer to associate meaning with words.

    If you happen to be interested, have a look here for more information. All of the source code is freely available.

  11. Re:uh-huh by szquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    so do we have any proof that if a human baby is given no "input", they will grow up to be intelligent?

    We do have proof that a human baby can develop language skills with only very fragmentary language input. This probably happens because the human brain is genetically hardwired to learn language the same way it is hardwired to instantly recognize facial features. By contrast, ALICE is a very large, very sophisticated catalog that correlates stimulus with response. Unfortunately stimulus-response is a staggeringly inefficient way to learn language. ALICE has already had thousands of times more language training than any infant receives. So by that standard, no, the bot isn't very intelligent.

    --
    Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
  12. Re:Which is exactly why it has a girls name by shepd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >Man I *really* hope no one mods you up 'Funny'. You are entitled to sexist views, but I hope no-one else shares them.

    You are *so* right. Shows like Clueless, Ally McBeal and Blossom should be banned for their sexist views and attitudes against men.

    It's about time that men march up and tell women they want to be treated as equals! It's time for some jockstrap burning!

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC