Slashdot Mirror


Demise Of The Premier .NET community site

Seems like something has horribly gone wrong at ASPFriends.com. The site is being closed as a result of a break down in negotiations with Microsoft over support for funding this developer community forum which has over 73000 members who post over 12 million messages a month regarding MS development. The primary reason for this break down seems to be do with the contract that had to be signed to receive funding. I'm no lawyer and I've not seen the entire contract but it seems like it contains clauses which basically state "at our discretion, with 30 days notice we can terminate this contract and take ownership of your site".

11 of 77 comments (clear)

  1. Trustworthy! by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep thinking MS is a community friendly company, see what happens.

    1. Re:Trustworthy! by GBWorld · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow, let's all just show off our anti-Microsoft bias. Let's read a highly edited snippet of a contract and assume we know enough to jump up and slam Microsoft over being the evil empire. Grow up guys!

      The ASP Friends community was a rather interesting set of email lists. I personally found them annoying, as I prefer to use forums and UseNet. Some people found them highly useful, and, for them, it is bad to see the demise.

      Microsoft was entering into a business dealing to agree to fund a site (pay 100% percent of the bills). If Charles did not like the contract, he had every right to do what any business does, which is negotiate. I see no evidence that he tried.

      Overall, Charles has acted like a spoiled toddler when he has not gotten his way in the past. Shutting down the site without any form of negotiation, and then posting his tantrum on the web, is just another incident. He has, fortunately, found an ally in this site, which is primarily filled with people who would love to jump on Microsoft without any evidence of any wrongdoing. I, for one, refuse to drink either kool aid.

      It seems there are so many legitimate topics to bitch about Microsoft over without jumping into this PR nightmare, but maybe anything you can bitch about Microsoft about is considered a valid topic.

      Now, as for the title of this article, I do not see that ASP Friends was ever the premiere .NET community. Certainly, it was a set of lists that was very useful to both ASP and ASP.NET users, but THE premiere site? This sounds like a press release printed verbatum.

  2. If you try and get cosy with a snake... by Viol8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...you'll get bitten eventually. Its a shame for these guys and somewhat shortsighted from MS's point of view as theres a chance they could alienate a large number of developers, surely the last thing you'd think they'd want to do. But as has been proved in the past MS only thinks about the bottom line, ie $$$$, and external developers don't shift Windows and Office in bulk.

  3. Boohoo. by torpor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You play with a tiger, expect to get scratched.

    It's almost as if they are completely ignorant of the fact that DEVELOPERS are the only ones keeping Microsoft in their position, so -- of *COURSE* Microsoft is going to be aggressive about controlling them.

    The only way to stop MS is to just *NEVER* write code for them. Ever.

    They know this ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  4. Again... by Iamthefallen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This kinda shit happens simply because MS is run by lawyers and marketers, each and every time MS will choose short term gain over a long term beneficial relationship. Partners, developers, customers, MS will screw you over if it means they can make a quick buck.

    And I use MS products for 90% of my development, perhaps it is time to pick up some books on competitors instead...

    --
    Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
  5. Painful Lessons by KalenDarrie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Good products are only a part of the overall make up of a good company. It is just too bad that this guy had to learn the hard way that, despite their public party line, Microsoft is only happy when they're in full control, running the show.

    If you step out of line or play even one note off key, they kick you out of the orchestra and confiscate your instrument. Never mind that you paid for it yourself. They own it now.

    I'm glad he didn't sign that contract, but I'm sad that he has to loose not only his years of work, but the motivation to support his community.

    Even if it is a Microsoft community. Maybe some day he'll get into a better community with a company that will nurture his zeal.

    --
    Kalen D'arrie
  6. Too bad this man isnt in the free community by imr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, he is ethical. Which is at the root of the free software movement.
    I guess he could not see the kind of redmond actions his site is suffering right now because he must have blinded himself due to his total devotion and defense to MS products. Being the one to be hurt always make things easier to understand.
    Yet, as he points out, he could go and get bought, or he could go on and continue to support his site that way, but prefers to shut it down due to ethical reason. Good man.
    Second. He has built a serious community site through a lot of efforts which is also the core of the free software efforts. Apparently, redmond can cope with this kind of behavior (too independant for them, probably) despite recent speeches about community spirit.
    Third, such a fine man, could be very usefull in helping some projects in getting what they lack, the kind of features that made this man stick to redmond so long. There must be something real in his praises of their products and too often, unix cultured people dont get that kind of "things".
    But he still links to asp.net forums despite all they just did to him.
    Well, he probably dreams in a "deus ex machina" Gates, coming down from his tower and putting things together, because he is "Doing the right thing and letting Ms know when its own employees hurt it's reputation is vital.". Yes, it must be "some employee", it can't be the compagny as a whole.
    That is his flaw probably. He still dont get that what is happening to him is the spirit of redmond activity and has been the key to their success since the beginning.
    Repeat after me:"extend and embrace; or strangle to death."
    So we might see a redmond move to correct this situation, but it will be a one time pr move. The kind of "redmond make a deal with peru government" move.

    1. Re:Too bad this man isnt in the free community by cooldeals · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have no idea what you are talking about. Charles makes his money off of training classes. He only LOSES money with the listservs. He spends a tremendous amount of time doing the modration, and other community activities. No money comes from the lists though. You are absolutely wrong about that. They didnt even pay for him to travel to Washington for the summit meetings they setup for his aspelites group. They take take take and dont give... 3k? WTF is that to them, and it DOESNT MAKE CHARLES ANY MONEY!!!! It ALL goes to pay for the licensing and bandwidth the lists need... If you are going to accuse him of things at least get your stories straight. The site is NOT wholey funded by MS... What about the people that moderate the lists? they are not given anything from MS either... they provide free tech support for MS technologies and dont get a damn thing. it ahs to take a TON of hours to do this. Are they getting paid for their time? NOT Listen, if MS was funding this thing the way they should be none of this would be happening. Instead they chose to take advantange of a person who LOVES the "community" aspect of things and puts in the time because he loves it... you call 3k fully funding? it only covers licensing and bandwidth, it doesnt cover anything else which is what makes the lists what they are. 3k for 24-hr tech support from MANY smart people about MANY MS offerings... Good hell, MS is a really dumb bunch of folks to even attempt to change this deal with a crappy contract... They are nuts.

  7. Sweet dreams by codexus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So basically these guys made a website for ASP developers and expected Microsoft to be so thankful that they'll pay for it out of the greedyness of their hearts.

    Sure, that could have worked:)

    --
    True warriors use the Klingon Google
  8. Re:At the risk of sounding naive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Whatever. The only reason that Microsoft has had the need to enforce a contract with Charles is that he has been completely manic depressive for the past year. This is the 4th time this year that he's threatened to shut down his site as a negotiating tactic with Microsoft to try and strongarm them into supporting him in ways not related to the funding of the site. This time they decided to call his bluff.

  9. It's About Who Owns Culture by serutan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The big mistake this guy made was a completely natural one: he confused culture with market share. In our society we place almost no value on non-owner participation. No matter what something may mean to you personally, no matter how much energy you may put into promoting it, no matter how much the owners materially profit from your efforts, it's still 100% theirs and 0% yours, and they can take it away from you at a whim.

    Companies love you to be a cheerleader for Version 1 until Version 2 comes out, then you are supposed to abandon Version 1 and embrace Version 2. Britney is out, Samantha is in. Your website must shut down. Not because you did anything wrong. They just don't need you any more. You were an asset, now your loyalty to their previous products is competition. You're in the way.

    Save your loyalty and devotion for your family and friends, your ideals and your personal standards -- the parts of your culture that can't be owned by others or taken away.