Salon, Nearly No Money and Ultramercials
Adam9 writes "As Salon fights for survival, they have introduced a new advertising program that allows you to receive a free 12 hour pass by clicking through about 10 seconds of advertisements. Currently, the advertisements are from Mercedes-Benz. According to the article, they've lost about $79.7 million from their start in 1995. They also have about 45,000 subscribers right now." Jamie also pointed out this article from the WSJ, as well as the words from Salon themselves about it.
Tasteful banner ads for online porn! Afterall, it's still the online money making king.
Overheard from irc.slashnet.org:
;)
slyguy^: How many paying subscribers are there to Slashdot?
Hemos: 12. After we split it all up, I got a #4 combo at Taco Bell.
Salon.com... I mean, come on, now. Who really thought that giving haircuts and facials over the internet was a good idea?
Man, that sounds scary. Like something from Brazil or Blade Runner. Might make your head explode if you watch for thirty seconds or more. I guess that's why Salon limited it to 10 seconds. Too much liability.
FWIW, That's exactly how First Virtual worked. Geez, do I feel old.
"When I was your age we had to carry our packets with our bare hands to the router...It was 5 miles, in the snow, uphill!*cough*"
-Brendan
Damn, post a story about how Salon is losing money and then link them in the story? That's like telling your doctor that you have a headache and then they kick you in the nuts.
On a big, cushy, VC-funded bed, I'm sure. ;-)
Method of processing duck feet
I know these things because I write the ad delivery server for a company that has about 10% online penetration (one in ten americans online have 'hit' my ad server at some point.)
In those 1 in 10 Americans that have 'hit' your ad server, I'm sure that 9 of 10 would like to 'hit' something else.
"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." - Jack Nicholson
I subscribed to Yahoo internet life last year -- dead after 3 issues
I subscribed to Salon last month (admittedly I knew they've been in hot water more or less the last few years) and now this
I oughtta start charging these companies for my not subscribing to them...
I must admit it was quite effective, and if i had the money to buy a mercedes then the ad might have effected me.
There's a reason you don't have the money to buy a Mercedes vehicle. Improper usage of the English language, it prevents you from landing a high paying job. The proper word to use in that sentence is "affected". Better luck next time.
That (hot grits) sounds (goatse) familiar (beowulf). Where (karma whore) have (first post!) I (Natalie Portman) seen (/. effect) that (anonymous coward) before? (troll)
When will it occur to Mercedes that anyone trying to save $12 a year in subscription costs probably isn't going out to buy a Mercedes?
Uh huh. And the code looks like this.
/* 1% chance of payment */
//if (Math.random() < 0.01) {
// return true;
//}
//return false;
// Fixed a bug (Bob - Marketing Department)
/** Decide if payment is required.
* @author Jim - IT Development
*/
public boolean isPayment {
return true;
}
Does anyone have anything intellegent to say about my little observation/theory? Other then to mod it a troll?
Ya know, Socrates was a troll. But sometimes, a troll *is* just a troll.