Slashdot Mirror


Drug Companies Plan Male Contraceptive Pill

TamMan2000 writes "I can hear the trolls now, with their jokes about how nobody who reads slashdot will ever score... But, incase any of us ever do score the male pill could soon be a reality."

8 of 100 comments (clear)

  1. "I'm on the pill...really." by greenhide · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that the technology/knowledge to create birth control pills for men has been around for a while. I imagine they will be much safer, too, since sperm is manufactured on a frequent regular basis, the pill would just have to affect that process. It could probably be taken as little as 24-36 hours before sex to have its effect, and it would most likely not affect hormone levels.

    It's just that pills for men have this one little problem:

    Zero Accountability.

    Oh, sure, if you're using them because you're in a committed relationship and don't want your honey to get pregnant, they'd be useful as heck.

    However, one of the reasons that birth control pills for women work so well is because the women taking them have a *huge* incentive to take them -- they don't want to get pregnant. So, they're much less likely to forget a dose.

    On the other hand, consider a player. He may even have pills, but forget to take them. It'll be important to him, but not as present in his mind as it would in a woman's, because the effects for him are not so dire. For the player, it might rank just above flossing as a priority.

    Also, imagine men saying, "Honey, it's cool, I'm on the pill." A woman has no real reason to lie and say that she's on the pill if she isn't, and if she does lie then she has to suffer the consequences.

    --
    Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    1. Re:"I'm on the pill...really." by ctr2sprt · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Here's something /. readers will just get: Suspenders and a Belt. It's a good policy for computer security, and it's a good policy for safe sex. For hook-ups and other short-term relationships resulting in sex, condoms are still the way to go because of STDs; but if you've been with your partner for a long time and trust him or her, physical barrier-free sex can be a very good thing. But some girls have negative reactions to birth control pills; and some are security-minded, like the /. crowd. A male birth control pill helps out those situations.

      Plus, this is important because it gives guys a little more say in whether a girl gets pregnant. (If she gets pregnant by me, anyway.) A lot of people seem to think girls are the only ones who care about getting pregnant by accident, but... I'd have to live with myself, and that, for the rest of my life. Yes, it's not as terrible, but it's still pretty damn bad, and it's not something I'd like to see happen.

    2. Re:"I'm on the pill...really." by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally, I would love to have a safe and effective pill, similar to the one for women. As it is, I'm in one of those long term relationships, and we have sex frequently. My g/f is on the pill, which is nice, helps suppress acne, timing on her periods is regular, etc. Problem is, its only 98% or so effective, which means that there is a 2% chance of her getting pregent if we do it at the wrong time of the month. Cosidering that we are likely to have sex 1 to 2 times during that period, I don't really like the way the math of it starts to work out. So, we bag it. And let me tell you I hate condoms, or as we call them, the wall of anti-orgasm. They are really great if you want to go forever, you can't feel much through them. I would love to have another simple solution.
      I've often thought that a male pill would be perfect for me. She's on hers, I'm on mine, if each pill is indiviually 98% effective that's a much better risk factor, .04% I believe. I could ditch those damn condoms and just enjoy better sex. Of course, everything I have heard about the male pills, which are being tested, is that they are basically huge doses of Testosterone. Which can lead to being even harrier, more violent, and whole host of other problems. Given the choice between that and condoms, I'd choose condoms. As it is, we have just worked out a system, where by we start without it, then, as I get close, we stop and put it on. Its not perfect, and does occasionally lead to "slips" but that is what the pill is for, as a saftey net for the few times that, for whatever reason, I don't have my hat on.

      --
      Necessity is the mother of invention.
      Laziness is the father.
  2. The consequence of lying for a woman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Never heard of Old Dirty Bastard's 10 kids by 9 different women?

    Never heard of the Jerry Springer "I want your baby and your money" Show?

    There are many women who lie about using the pill for the express purpose of getting pregnant. Whether they do it for money (ODB) or for love (Jerry Springer style), they do it.

    A guy who sleeps around isn't looking to have a family and would more likely to be diligent in taking the medication correctly. It's a pill in the morning, not some series of injections. It's easy for a playboy to prevent exactly those things that would hamper his playing. Except for STDs of course.

  3. Re:It's about time! by MrResistor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There has been no technical or biological barriers to producing a non-painful or non-surgical male contraceptive drug like this.

    Excuse me? Stopping sperm production is non-trivial. There is no natural mechanism for stopping sperm production, like there is for egg production. Doing it with drugs has generally required something like large doses of Testosterone, which has serious side effects and isn't consistent enough for practical purposes.

    Stopping egg production, on the other hand, is relatively simple, and there are various natural mechanisms in place for doing so, such as pregnancy and excessively low body fat. Low body fat is obviously a difficult thing to maintain, especially at the level where it effects fertility, and again it isn't consistent enough to be considered effective. Pregnancy, however, is very consistent, even across the animal kingdom. I don't know of a single creature that is fertile during pregnancy.

    This consistency, and the fact that it is a natural mechanism, is why there are birth control pills for women; because it's easy, not because of some aleged (imagined, IMO) prejudice that birth control is a woman's responsibility. It is a fairly simple thing to mess with a woman's biochemistry and make her body think it's pregnant, which is exactly what every birth control pill, shot, or implant does (and if you think women get side-effects from those, just wait until you have to deal with an actual pregnant woman on a daily basis!)

    does it fuck with your emotions and hormonal balance in the ways the pill, Norplant and Depo do to women?

    Of course it does, they only question is how much. There's no way it could work without messing with your hormonal balance, and there's no way your hormones are going to get messed with without having emotional and physical side-effects. The trick will be the same as it has been for female birth control; balancing effectiveness against side effects (dosage), and trading off more annoying side-effects for less annoying ones (formula).

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  4. Male pill is actually harder. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think that the technology/knowledge to create birth control pills for men has been around for a while. I imagine they will be much safer, too, since sperm is manufactured on a frequent regular basis, the pill would just have to affect that process.

    Wrong on pretty much all counts, actually.

    Stopping ovulation in women is straightforward - you're trying to stop a once-a-month event, and the female body already has a shut-down mechanism built in (ovulation stops during pregnancy). The pill just triggers this mechanism (tricks the body into thinking it's pregnant).

    Men are designed to produce sperm all the time. There is no built-in shut-down mechanism to trigger. You also have to stop production of *all* of the hundreds of millions of sperm cells produced between sexual encounters, as opposed to stopping just one egg from being released. A male contraceptive that eliminates 99.9% of sperm production is still useless.

    And because you're trying to inhibit a function that's never normally shut down, you have to start from scratch when figuring out how to do it, and live with the fact that a male contraceptive that's 100% effective runs a real risk of causing permanent damage if not very carefully designed.

    It could probably be taken as little as 24-36 hours before sex to have its effect, and it would most likely not affect hormone levels.

    Hormone manipulation is just about the only way to affect sperm production. What do you think drives it? Hormones are the body's signalling system for stopping/starting body processes.

    It's only now, after decades of research, that relatively safe, reasonably effective approaches to male contraception are being developed, and we have a long way to go before they're mature.

  5. Men need a valve... by km790816 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    boys should not be able to get their drivers licences until they have the valve installed. It will be closed by default. It can only be openned once the man is out of college and has a job.

    We should invest money is this! Big brother at it's best. Imagine how few losers would be around!

    (No, I'm not serious. But i think it's funny.)

  6. Good News by danratherfan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The fewer humans the better.

    I've said it before, and i'll say it again...
    Abortion doctors are america's greatest heroes.