Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Lik-Sang To Take On The Big 3?

Posted by timothy on from the has-anyone-seen-my-free-market dept.

kableh writes "According to a press release on Lik-Sang's website, the gaming accessory company has new management, and is prepared to mount a strong defense in their upcoming lawsuit against Microsoft, Nintendo, and Sony. "Just a few days after having received High Court Orders not allowing us to sell Mod Chip products for the Playstation 2 and Flash Linker products for the Nintendo Gameboy Advance, Lik Sang realized that the powers of those three multi-billion dollar corporations are simply infinite compared to the budgets and resources businesses like Lik Sang have available. Their legal actions have been hurting our customers and our business a lot in the last couple of weeks, so that we have finally decided to let somebody else take over Lik-Sang.com and solely concentrate on the lawsuit", says Alex Kampl, Director of Lik Sang International Limited."

12 of 243 comments (clear)

  1. Moist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Past.

  2. Pork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic


    Fist !

  3. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    FIRST POST! Two in one day...huzzah!

  4. Re:Some Advice by stevenbee · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Your to late, jackass.

    i already made that joke!

    --
    Don't read this!
  5. Too much karma.. by stevenbee · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Pls mod down, thx.

    --
    Don't read this!
  6. Remember in Mortal Combat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    When Lik-Sang was all bad ass, and then Christopher "Not The Highlander" Lambert showed up and kicked his ass? Yeah, that RULED!!!

  7. Oh-oh. by shnarez · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    They added the ability to post "comments" under the article. I can see a great exodus from Slashdot to discuss the story there.

  8. Hey, it's Scott McCollum! by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Look everyone, Scott McCollum of World Tech Tribune! What are you doing among the Linux cultists, ya big troll?

    --
    N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  9. Re:Power corrupts by silentbozo · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Well, you don't want to destroy item [5] of a pointer array, when you really meant to destroy item [-5] of a pointer array (ie, item fifth from the end.) I assume that's the kind of corruption that they refer to...

  10. Re:Power corrupts by offpath3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think you really mean fabs(pwr(x, y)).

  11. Re:Power corrupts by offpath3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Actually, sadly, I think _I_ really meant fabs(exp(x, y))

  12. Re:Power corrupts by CableModemSniper · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    no you mean fabs(pow(x, y));

    --
    Why not fork?