Slashdot Mirror


User: stevenbee

stevenbee's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
99
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 99

  1. Quick Question.... on Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of Penguin Computers · · Score: -1, Troll

    What the FUCK is a "Beowulf Cluster" ???

  2. Which is better? on Ask Warren Ellis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Red Hat or Debian?

  3. This reminds me... on newdocms: Beyond the Hierarchical File System · · Score: 1

    Of Ray Kurzweil's "narrative filesystem". He did a presentation on it at an expo last year, it seemed pretty interesting. Although, at least for now, I'm with the guy who posted above expressing satisfaction with hierarchical filesystems, it's nice to see that there is open development of this kind of thing. I shall download and test frothwith!

  4. Re:Micheal is a fucking moron on Total Commercialization Awareness · · Score: 1

    Sod off! :-)

  5. Re:Micheal is a fucking moron on Total Commercialization Awareness · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "Spelled" is not spelled "spelt". It is spelled "spelled".
    Unless, of course, you were referring to the ancient grain...

  6. Re:Seems to me... on GNU-Darwin Dropping Cocoa, PPC Support · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    D'oh !

    : )

  7. Seems to me... on GNU-Darwin Dropping Cocoa, PPC Support · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    That Apple at this point is more dependent on BSD technology!

    ;-)

  8. Too much karma.. on Lik-Sang To Take On The Big 3? · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Pls mod down, thx.

  9. Re:Some Advice on Lik-Sang To Take On The Big 3? · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Your to late, jackass.

    i already made that joke!

  10. Interesting Article on BMG Stops Producing CDs · · Score: 5, Funny
    One minor gripe, though:

    The correct term is "differently abled CD's"

    : )

  11. Finally some good news on XMPP Gets An IETF Working Group · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm glad that it is finally dawning on the Big Technology powers-that-be that proprietary messaging schemes are bad for everyone's business. This is definitely needed if wireless is really to be the way of the future, and since there is so much money being spent on the gadgets, it's inevitable that they are going to have to play nice and compete on some other basis besides lock-out.

  12. Well known exploit on Computerized Betting System Proves Vulnerable · · Score: -1, Troll
    The perpetrator expoited a well know vulnerability in Microsoft's Intarnet Server program.

    Click THIS LINK for proof-of-concept

    ;-)

  13. Re:Mildly Interesting on The Legends Of Dune - Volume 1: The Butlerian Jihad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have to agree -- what made the original Dune series such a joy for me to read was not the incredibly detailed universe per se, but the beautiful story which was overlaid upon it. I think writers these days sometimes tend to stage-manage at the expense of the play.

  14. Re:Nice, but.... on Protecting Your DRM Rights · · Score: 0, Troll
    And, if you don't trust your customers to be fair, then you have the right to not sell the products of your talent to those who do not give it proper respect.

    That's it !!! I will distribute a EULA with my records! --> ; )

  15. Re:Nice, but.... on Protecting Your DRM Rights · · Score: 1, Troll

    I understand the *concept* of fair use, but worry about the way it pans out in practice...

    I would hate to sell like one cd and have 2 more unpaid for copies floating around. That's like giving away 2 apples for every one you sell! Kind of a sad business model...

    Making music is a risky enough way to try to make a living without this hassle.

    And just for the record, I'm not trolling, this issue is close to my heart is all.

  16. Re:Nice, but.... on Protecting Your DRM Rights · · Score: 2

    I'm not signed to a label, so I don't have anyone to front me money, I'm totally dependent on actual sales. But on the bright side, I don't *owe* a label zillions of $$$ : )

  17. Nice, but.... on Protecting Your DRM Rights · · Score: 1, Troll

    Who is going to protect my right(I'm a recording artist) to make a living off of my work? I depend on sales of my cd's, not on the number of copies of my work in existence!

  18. Re:I sincerely hope... on Public-Domain Bookmobile Hits the Road · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it may be true that the Court won't be swayed, I find the project to be rather heartening on a humanitarian level; it's all to rare to see a pure celebration of knowledge and the free flow of information in this day and age....

  19. Re:A member no more on Ed Felten in the Economist · · Score: 2
    Try the Randian argument

    Who's Randi?

  20. A member no more on Ed Felten in the Economist · · Score: 1
    I was a member of the EFF at one time, but I find that my own political philosophy has diverged from theirs to the point where I can no longer support them.

    I am, however, supportive of the "freedom to tinker", and am always on the hunt for examples of fair-use advocacy that doesn't require on to buy into blanket leftist ideology.

    Any suggestions?

  21. Re:Hope it works... on Upheavals In UnitedLinux · · Score: 2
    As a quick asside, howmuch of the bloat on MS install CD's is due to the device capabilities DB.

    Hey, if it increases functionality and ease of use, it ain't bloat.

  22. As the saying goes.... on Online Auctions Patented, eBay Sued · · Score: 2
    People who can, do.

    People who can't, sue.

  23. Re:Linux Driver programmer will be missed my many on RIP: Leonard Zubkoff · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    WOW, that is amazing -- re-post a link which is in the original story, get modded as informative.

    Well done, Mr. Swimfast!

  24. Re:Private e-mail ? on Hotmail: Not Safe For Work? · · Score: 2
    Then let's hope you're not at work and reading slashdot then....

    LOL, no.....

  25. Private e-mail ? on Hotmail: Not Safe For Work? · · Score: 2
    The computer i use at work is the property of my employer, provided for work-related purposes only...
    Likewise, the bandwidth I use is restricted to those activities necessary for me to carry out my duties.
    I have specifically agreed to limit my use of thecomputer and network in this manner as a term of my
    continued employment. Why would I expect any kind of privacy in this case?

    Interested to know what people think about this.