Slashdot Mirror


LANL Warning About Radioactive Trees

coryboehne writes "KOB-TV in Albuquerque is reporting that Los Alamos National Labs is warning personnel who are cutting trees in a canyon east of Los Alamos that some trees in the area might be radioactive. The canyon, known as Bayo Canyon, was formerly known as Technical Area 10, and was used for weapons testing from the 1940s until 1961. A full summary of Environmental Direct Penetrating Radation in the Los Alamos area is available from the LANL Meteorology & Air Quality Group"

26 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Get yours now by Siriaan · · Score: 5, Funny

    /me puts on tinfoil pants

  2. Radioactive Squirrels? by Narcocide · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do said trees have radioactive squirrels?

    1. Re:Radioactive Squirrels? by IHateEverybody · · Score: 5, Funny


      Do said trees have radioactive squirrels?

      In another time, a teenager bitten by a radioactive squirrel would have been a great idea for a superhero.

      --
      Does this .sig make my butt look big?
  3. Weapons? by Flamesplash · · Score: 5, Funny

    So are these considered to be weapons? I mean chop the thing down then drop them out of a plane, or strap an engine on it and you have a wooden missle.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  4. I can see it now... by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Charmin Ultrasoft Disinfectant Radioactive Toilet Paper for the ultimate in clean"

  5. The first indication... by tgrotvedt · · Score: 5, Funny

    The first signs that alerted KOB-TV to this phenomenon was when reporters were strolling through then canyon, the trees were giving them strange looks...

    --
    What makes a man want to be a mouse? (Python's Flying Circus)
  6. I can see it now... by dirkdidit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Child: But Dad, I'm afraid of the dark.
    Father: Oh, you don't have anything to worry about.
    Child: How come, Daddy?
    Father: Well you see son, our house was built with radioactive trees, so the entire house is like a big night light.
    Child: Is that why my hamster got cancer?
    Father: No more questions, time for sleep.

  7. Re:What are they talking about... by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course, you seem to be ignoring the fact that we now have nuclear power (whether this is a good thing or not is debatable) and also the fact that millions of lives were saved from a conflict in Asia (whether this benefit outweighs the result is also debatable).

    Bottom line: it can have terrible consequences, but it can also be construed as being something that has done much more.

  8. xmas by sweede · · Score: 5, Funny

    No, think of it as a self-illuminating christmass tree !!

    think of the money on electricity you'd save !

    --
    I follow the SDK and GDN principles.. Spelling Dont Kount, Grammer Dont Neither
  9. Wooden missles? by Jack_Frost · · Score: 5, Funny

    Aren't those more commonly known as "arrows?"

  10. Obligatory Simpson's reference by Zen+Programmer · · Score: 5, Funny
    Radioactive trees? Sounds like the work of Montgomery Burns!

    If you didn't get it, read this script.

  11. Forest Fire? by hrieke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Before someone marks this as funny, would a forest fire be an extream hazord because of the radioactivity?

    Let's not forget that recently the Los Alamos area was on fire from forest fires.

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Forest Fire? by Meowing · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most of the radioactive material used had a very short half life, but there are traces of the nasty stuff. A more complete version of the story is here.

  12. Heh by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

    The last couple weeks I have been knee deep in research about nuclear testing working on my web site (Buy a nuclear testing shirt! My kid's gotta eat!)

    The only test I can think of offhand that was in New Mexico was the original Trinity bomb that was set off pre-Hiroshima.

    There were, however, several criticality accidents at Los Alamos, and several "downwind incidents" in Nevada around the same time.

    See the "history" page on my site for a description of the Army SL-1 that went critical in Idaho in the 60s. That's one I didn't learn about until recently, and apparently it was a pretty hot one too. The more I research into this, the more amazed I am about the amount of contamination there is scattered around the US, and on the islands we ran tests on.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  13. No different at ORNL by T5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I worked at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the late '80s, we had a stand of trees (poplars, I believe) between the main road through the heart of the facility and a research reactor building. I used to walk right by these trees every day to get to the cafeteria. One day, the sidewalk on that side of the road was blocked off, and several men, wearing bunny suits and wielding chainsaws, were hard at work felling the trees. By the next day, even the stumps were gone.

    We've had our share of radioactive frogs too, some with some, shall we say, unique anatomy. Once, on that same main road, one of these unfortunate amphibians wandered underneath the tread of one of the facility's vehicles. Again, we see the bunny suits, this time with sprayers full of this black, sticky foam. Down the road every so often, you'd see a bunnyman either spraying or scraping an already-encapsulated piece of frog from the road where the contaminated tire had deposited it.

    1. Re:No different at ORNL by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

      several men, wearing bunny suits and wielding chainsaws were hard at work felling the trees

      That describes most of my dreams since I was ten. Weird.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  14. Not really... the dose levels are still really low by Jack_Frost · · Score: 5, Informative

    You're still talking about a few hundred millirem per year... only about twice what you'd receive from the sun at the same elevation. You need about 50 REM in the space of a few hours to alter blood cells. Inhaling the smoke would lead to slightly higher dose rates, but in that case the smoke will kill you long before the exposure does anything to the living tissue.

  15. Mant by selectspec · · Score: 5, Funny
    Man and ant. Together living in natures harmony, each barely aware of the other.


    But...


    When combined with the power of ATOMIC energy, man and ant become...

    ...MANT!

    --

    Someone you trust is one of us.

  16. Aha! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why treehuggers are typically bald!

  17. Chernobyl, polyploidy by tcyun · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recall hearing many years ago about changes in the trees (maples and birches, I believe) near Chernobyl after the accident there. If memory serves, the trees underwent some abberant type of polyploidy resulting in their leaves increasing in size up to 300%. The result were trees with enormous leaves.

    A quick google search of chernobyl polyploidy tree brings up a handful of good bibliographic links. I am not a biologist (nor do I have access to all of the references). I do suspect that there is a great deal of additional related information on the effects of the continued radiation on the environment.

  18. Cut Um Down ... NOW!!!! by SuperDuG · · Score: 5, Funny
    Look at what happens when you don't nip nuclear freaks of nature in the ass first chance you get...

    Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
    Gozilla
    Mothra
    Attack of the Killer Tomatoes
    Jerry Farwell

    Learn from the past ... these trees can only hurt us!!

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  19. If you want to describe by myowntrueself · · Score: 5, Funny

    a honking great radioactive sharpened *tree* hurtling toward you as an *arrow* you go right ahead.

    I will duck.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  20. LANL is actually really good about this stuff... by signe · · Score: 5, Informative


    I used to work at LANL for a short period of time, back in TA 35 (at the time, working on the SSC detectors). They're somewhat strict about their rules on radiation, and who can go in what areas. The building I was working in was T-shaped, and one of the top pieces of the T (the opposite one from my office) fell within the specified distance from an old tritium dump site. It was well posted that NOONE was to be in that wing without the proper training and badging. When my work required that I go down into that wing for a bit, I had to go to a different radiation safety class and get new radiation badges so that they could measure exposure. And that part of the building was only barely hot.

    Having family that lived in Los Alamos for many years, and an uncle who worked at the labs as well, LANL was always very good about keeping people apprised of any possible issues. Los Alamos started off as a company town, and it still very much operates that way. If you don't work at the labs, you work for a business that supports the people who work for the labs. Everyone knows plenty of people who work there, and the town and the labs are very much dependant on each other.

    -Todd

    --
    "The details of my life are quite inconsequential..."
  21. 'Going Critical' is not bad by NChaimov · · Score: 5, Informative
    See the "history" page on my site for a description of the Army SL-1 that went critical in Idaho in the 60s. That's one I didn't learn about until recently, and apparently it was a pretty hot one too.

    There is a common belief that 'going critical' is synonymous with a meltdown, or out-of-control chain reaction or manifold other bad things. This is, however, false.

    A nuclear reactor is a device which creates chain reactions to amplify the effects of neutrons. The neutron multiplication factor describes whether the number of neutrons present in the core is increasing, decreasing, or remaining the same. Based upon this, the following are defined:

    Subcritical: there are fewer neutrons in the current neutron generation than in the previous neutron generation, e.g. the neutron multiplication factor is less than one.
    Critical: there are exactly the same number of neutrons in the current neutron generation than in the previous neutron generation, e.g. the neutron multiplication factor is equal to one.
    Supercritical: there are more neutrons in the current neutron generation than in the previous neutron generation as a result of delayed neutrons only, e.g. the neutron multiplication factor is greater than one.
    Prompt Critical: there are more neutrons in the current neutron generation than in the previous neutron generation as a result of prompt neutrons alone, e.g. the neutron multiplication factor is equal to one plus the reciprocal of 1-beta, where beta is the fraction of neutrons which are delayed.

    Therefore: 1) A reactor must be critical to maintain its power. 2) A reactor must be supercritical to increase in power. Criticality and supercriticality are normal states for a reactor. It's prompt criticality which is bad.

  22. boyscout field trip. by gukin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was a teenager, my father (a nuclear physicst) took a group of boyscouts on a merrit badge "expedition", we were "prospecting for uranium".

    Back in the bad old days, there were tests done using mock-up weapons equipped with DEPLETED uranium (U-238). The experiments consisted of a fairly authentic weapon with a real primary (the high explosive part which "squishes" the fissionable materals together.)

    The weapons did NOT have real uranium, rather U-238 (the stuff they use on armor piercing shells.) When they detonated the mock-up, the weapons usually blew all apart throwing chunks of U-238 all around the country-side.

    My dear old dad, being a wise-ass, took us out with several geiger-counters looking for the U-238.

    As I recall, we found a rock which seemed "hot", we began digging under the rock, getting closer and closer to the source of what seemed to be setting off the counters when my dad told us to stop. Not because of the radiation, rather the damn rock was likely to roll over and crush the lot of us.

    He ended our field trip by letting us push the rock over into the hole we had excavated; great fun.

  23. Re:Trees probably aren't risky, but other areas ar by goombah99 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    No they are not inhabited.

    also people who work in those areas wear Dosimeters. SO they KNOW for sure that people are not being exposed. Even the town dump is ringed with dosimeters. What about your town. Got any dosimeters? Lots of industries produce rad waste. to name a few: phosphate fertilizer plants, (old) ceramics, coleman laterns, glow in the dark exit signs, hospital isotope waste and manufacture.... For example, the dosimeters in our town have gone off lots of times. One time was a vet disposing of radioactive kitty litter (radioactive iodide is used as a medical treatment). Another time my neighbor set of the alarm because he was wearing pile (patagonia) jackets which if you did not know collect Radon gas that accumualtes in poorly vented closets in many parts of the country. Another time a load of radioactive steel manufactured in mexico drove through town on its way elsewhere. (the mexicans plant hat recycled and melted down a hospital cesium canister. Many steelworkers and truckers in the US and Mexico received high doses, something like a dozen people at the steel plant eventually died of exposre related illnesesses.

    So the good news about living in los alamos is that we know we're no being irradiated cause we monitor it. You dont know and there are lots of ways you could be exposed. for example do you know where the steel rebar in you concrete walls came from? Are you breathing radon?

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.