Slashdot Mirror


Evidence of strange quark matter striking Earth?

sifi writes "A group of researchers have identified two seismic events that they think provide the first evidence of a previously undetected form of matter passing through the Earth. The BBC has the full story [bbc.co.uk]. The so-called strange quark matter is so dense that a piece the size of a human cell would weigh a tonne. I kind of like the idea that the whole Earth can be used as a sort of 'particle detector' - I just hope that I'm not in the way when another one passes through!"

36 comments

  1. three-peat by grammar+nazi · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Wow. It's not like I didn't read this story the first *two* times that slashdot posted it. I think I'll go for THREE.

    --

    Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    1. Re:three-peat by jantheman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's try posting "Strange Matter of Quarkocity gives striking evidence on Earth" (I bet it'll get in again).

      --
      -- Mod me down. I am not a karma tart. ffs,gag
    2. Re:three-peat by shemnon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow. It's not like I read this comment the first *two* times someone posted it. I think I'll go for THREE.

      --
      --Shemnon
    3. Re:three-peat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give the man a break. Apparently the editors are so clueless as to repeat stories this often even with truckloads of freedback. I don't know what we need to do to wake them up, but I think smiling and pretending the story is interesting when in fact we've seen it twice before is not going to help discourage them from this kind of editorial laziness.

    4. Re:three-peat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK YOU EDITORS

      Keep this up and slashdot will be a shadow that it once was. What's so hard about fucking not doing reposts. Your only job is to sift through submitted stories and decide which ones go up. You can't even do that right.

      I would love to have your job. If I was an editor, I would do it right.

  2. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this 'Repost a story' day or something?

    1. Re:wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the opportunity to re-post the modded-up comments to get higher karma. (without being modded redundant)

  3. And then by Konster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow. It's not like I didn't read this story the first *two* times that slashdot posted it. I think I'll go for THREE. This was posted a week ago? Ugh. Please be a little more careful with the news postings.

    1. Re:And then by Konster · · Score: 2

      Damn. I left out the block quotes. Sorry.

    2. Re:And then by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Evidence of strange quark matter...

      Once again, you saw it here, on Slashdot.

  4. Familiar by Sandman1971 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmm, oh yeah, I know why it seems familiar!

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/11/22/195207 &mode=thread&tid=99 (posted Friday November 22, @04:58PM)

    Maybe Slashdot 'editors' should be required to use the Slashdot search before submitting articles?

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
  5. If last time was a dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is this one? "Tripe"?

  6. I wonder... by Koos+Baster · · Score: 2, Funny

    > The so-called strange quark matter is so dense that a piece the size of a human cell would weigh a tonne.

    What kind of human cell would that be, exactly? A large one or a small one? (Well I guess even large human cells are pretty small, right?)

    ---
    Why tell a story once if you can tell it twice and still get lame response?

    1. Re:I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are nerve cells in your body that are a foot long, so no......

  7. Double and Triple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    After posting a dup of the Spam King article, Hermos decided to try a triple! It's time to let the readers moderate stories, clearly it's become to much work for the editors.

  8. Doubtful by yusing · · Score: 1

    Occam's Razor requires that all simpler possible explanations be eliminated first.

    There are only two events. Is it a coincidence that they were both (based on the article) grazing incidences?

    Unfortunately, scientists may not be able to find any more events that suggest the passage of strange quark matter through the Earth. In 1993 the US Geological Survey stopped collecting data from "unassociated events."

    Is that a coincidence, or was a new weapon being tested?

    --

    "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

  9. third time's the charm by gabe · · Score: 0

    Wow. It's not like I didn't read this story the first *two* times that slashdot posted it. I think I'll go for THREE. ... and now this comment is posted three times.

    --
    Gabriel Ricard
  10. Way to go Hemos! by Froze · · Score: 3, Funny

    Two dupes within a half hour of each other. Your last excuse was you hadn't had your coffee. I suggest you move to something a bit stronger ;-)

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
    1. Re:Way to go Hemos! by beerman2k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or possible move off of something stronger. :)

  11. Wow, I've just lived a Deja-Vu... by PinkX · · Score: 1

    Which, as we all already know, is a failure in The Matrix.

    Or is it that it's just ANOTHER dupe story?

    lol

  12. Lets do the time warp again! by dasunt · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's astounding;
    Time is fleeting;
    Madness takes its toll.
    But listen closely...
    Not for very much longer.
    I've got to keep control.

    I remember doing the time-warp
    Drinking those moments when
    The Blackness would hit me
    And the void would be calling...

    Let's do the time-warp again.

  13. Re:Doubtful [OT] by Mathness · · Score: 2, Informative

    Occam's Razor requires that all simpler possible explanations be eliminated first.

    Nope, quite the reverse. The principle states that one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed.

    Take a look here or here or do a search on Google.

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  14. One report for the way in, and one for the way out by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 2

    what els canyou say.

  15. Wow by Catskul · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow. It's not like I didn't read this post the first time someone posted it. Maybe someonw will go for THREE.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  16. Hmm by Catskul · · Score: 2

    I think the word you were looking for was trite . : )

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
    1. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you aware of what "tripe" is? I feel it is an appropriate moniker for a triple-post.

  17. No coffee STILL , Hemos? by MrWa · · Score: 1
    It's been only 22 minutes since the last duplicate story!

    Some get Hemos some coffee, please!

  18. In real news... by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Funny

    A group of researchers have identified three postings that they think provide the first evidence of a previously undetected form of morning fog passing through slashdot. Slashdot has the full story. The so-called strange quark fog can only be detected indirectly, when it causes duplicate duplicate postings on popular web sites. I kind of like the idea that slashdot can be used as a sort of 'particle detector' - I just hope that I'm not in the way when another one passes through!

    -- MarkusQ

  19. you modded the first post as redundant?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This whole thread is redundant! Come on!

  20. A sharp razor will cut more than hair! by e144539 · · Score: 0
    You must have been thinking more along the lines of the law of parsimony -- "Adoption of the simplest assumption in the formulation of a theory or in the interpretation of data, especially in accordance with the rule of Ockham's razor."

    Ernst Mach advocated a version of Occam's razor which he called the Principle of Economy, stating that "Scientists must use the simplest means of arriving at their results and exclude everything not perceived by the senses." Taken to its logical conclusion this philosophy becomes positivism; the belief that there is no difference between something that exists but is not observable and something that doesn't exist at all. Mach influenced Einstein when he argued that space and time are not absolute but he also applied positivism to molecules. Mach and his followers claimed that molecules were metaphysical because they were too small to detect directly. This was despite the success the molecular theory had in explaining chemical reactions and thermodynamics. It is ironic that while applying the principle of economy to throw out the concept of the ether and an absolute rest frame, Einstein published almost simultaneously a paper on Brownian motion which confirmed the reality of molecules and thus dealt a blow against the use of positivism.

    The moral of this story is that Occam's razor should not be wielded blindly. As Einstein put it in his Autobiographical notes

    "This is an interesting example of the fact that even scholars of audacious spirit and fine instinct can be obstructed in the interpretation of facts by philosophical prejudices."

  21. Re:Doubtful [OT] by Catskul · · Score: 4, Informative
    Actually he correctly used it. His wording was just weird.

    More clearly what he said was:
    If you want to accept a theory, you must first eliminate the possiblilty that all simpler possible explanations are correct. If you dont eliminate all simpler explanations then by Occams Razor, one of those simpler explanations is the correct explanation

    He's offering that his explanation is simpler and has not been eliminated as possible, so therefor by Occams must be correct.
    Earn your title Mathness.
    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  22. Triple-plus danger by Sanga · · Score: 2, Funny

    Usual cliches:

    Information wants to be in triplicate.

    There is strength in crowds.

    Third time lucky?

    Slashdot: Putting the repeat in "lather, rinse, repeat".

    If you do not know what I am taling about:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/11/2 2/195207 &mode=nested&tid=99

  23. Sometimes I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sometimes I wonder if the slashdot editors even read slashdot.

    This is a threepeat!

  24. Deja Vu All Over Again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the Spam King take over Slashdot? A repeat and a threepeat in one day! Maybe it's time that the Slashdot editors started reading Slashdot.

    Did the Spam King take over Slashdot? A repeat and a threepeat in one day! Maybe it's time that the Slashdot editors started reading Slashdot.

    Did the Spam King take over Slashdot? A repeat and a threepeat in one day! Maybe it's time that the Slashdot editors started reading Slashdot.

  25. So is there anything CONSTRUCTIVE we can do? by jerde · · Score: 1

    Anyone who actually reads /. immediately recognizes these duplicate postings.

    Wouldn't the editors of /. be expected to READ it as well?

    Why weren't there so many duplicates three years ago? What's changed?

    Okay, griping done -- now, what is a constructive way of dealing with this?

    How about a policy: Post more than three duplicates (previous story 1 year old) and you lose your story-posting priveleges? And CowboyNeal will beat you silly with a nerfbat.

    It's getting downright silly.

    How about the ability for moderators to mark a story redundant? Give the story itself a Karma of, say, 1000, so it would take a lot of such moderations. Keep the Karma hidden, to help prevent abuse. :(

    - Peter

    --
    INsigNIFICANT