Slashdot Mirror


Evidence of strange quark matter striking Earth?

sifi writes "A group of researchers have identified two seismic events that they think provide the first evidence of a previously undetected form of matter passing through the Earth. The BBC has the full story [bbc.co.uk]. The so-called strange quark matter is so dense that a piece the size of a human cell would weigh a tonne. I kind of like the idea that the whole Earth can be used as a sort of 'particle detector' - I just hope that I'm not in the way when another one passes through!"

18 of 36 comments (clear)

  1. Re:three-peat by jantheman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's try posting "Strange Matter of Quarkocity gives striking evidence on Earth" (I bet it'll get in again).

    --
    -- Mod me down. I am not a karma tart. ffs,gag
  2. And then by Konster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow. It's not like I didn't read this story the first *two* times that slashdot posted it. I think I'll go for THREE. This was posted a week ago? Ugh. Please be a little more careful with the news postings.

    1. Re:And then by Konster · · Score: 2

      Damn. I left out the block quotes. Sorry.

    2. Re:And then by quintessent · · Score: 2

      Evidence of strange quark matter...

      Once again, you saw it here, on Slashdot.

  3. Familiar by Sandman1971 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hmm, oh yeah, I know why it seems familiar!

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/11/22/195207 &mode=thread&tid=99 (posted Friday November 22, @04:58PM)

    Maybe Slashdot 'editors' should be required to use the Slashdot search before submitting articles?

    --
    It's better to burn out than to fade away
  4. If last time was a dupe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is this one? "Tripe"?

  5. I wonder... by Koos+Baster · · Score: 2, Funny

    > The so-called strange quark matter is so dense that a piece the size of a human cell would weigh a tonne.

    What kind of human cell would that be, exactly? A large one or a small one? (Well I guess even large human cells are pretty small, right?)

    ---
    Why tell a story once if you can tell it twice and still get lame response?

  6. Way to go Hemos! by Froze · · Score: 3, Funny

    Two dupes within a half hour of each other. Your last excuse was you hadn't had your coffee. I suggest you move to something a bit stronger ;-)

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
    1. Re:Way to go Hemos! by beerman2k · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or possible move off of something stronger. :)

  7. Lets do the time warp again! by dasunt · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's astounding;
    Time is fleeting;
    Madness takes its toll.
    But listen closely...
    Not for very much longer.
    I've got to keep control.

    I remember doing the time-warp
    Drinking those moments when
    The Blackness would hit me
    And the void would be calling...

    Let's do the time-warp again.

  8. Re:Doubtful [OT] by Mathness · · Score: 2, Informative

    Occam's Razor requires that all simpler possible explanations be eliminated first.

    Nope, quite the reverse. The principle states that one should not make more assumptions than the minimum needed.

    Take a look here or here or do a search on Google.

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  9. One report for the way in, and one for the way out by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 2

    what els canyou say.

  10. Wow by Catskul · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow. It's not like I didn't read this post the first time someone posted it. Maybe someonw will go for THREE.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  11. Hmm by Catskul · · Score: 2

    I think the word you were looking for was trite . : )

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  12. In real news... by MarkusQ · · Score: 5, Funny

    A group of researchers have identified three postings that they think provide the first evidence of a previously undetected form of morning fog passing through slashdot. Slashdot has the full story. The so-called strange quark fog can only be detected indirectly, when it causes duplicate duplicate postings on popular web sites. I kind of like the idea that slashdot can be used as a sort of 'particle detector' - I just hope that I'm not in the way when another one passes through!

    -- MarkusQ

  13. Re:three-peat by shemnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow. It's not like I read this comment the first *two* times someone posted it. I think I'll go for THREE.

    --
    --Shemnon
  14. Re:Doubtful [OT] by Catskul · · Score: 4, Informative
    Actually he correctly used it. His wording was just weird.

    More clearly what he said was:
    If you want to accept a theory, you must first eliminate the possiblilty that all simpler possible explanations are correct. If you dont eliminate all simpler explanations then by Occams Razor, one of those simpler explanations is the correct explanation

    He's offering that his explanation is simpler and has not been eliminated as possible, so therefor by Occams must be correct.
    Earn your title Mathness.
    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  15. Triple-plus danger by Sanga · · Score: 2, Funny

    Usual cliches:

    Information wants to be in triplicate.

    There is strength in crowds.

    Third time lucky?

    Slashdot: Putting the repeat in "lather, rinse, repeat".

    If you do not know what I am taling about:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/11/2 2/195207 &mode=nested&tid=99