Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Australian Argues for Freedom of Mooning

Posted by michael on from the i-come-from-the-land-down-underwear dept.

Carl Brewer submits this blurb about an unusual freedom of speech argument.

7 of 55 comments (clear)

  1. What happened to "say no to crack"? by longbottle · · Score: 5, Funny

    So... now it's OK to say yes to crack!? When did THIS happen?!

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity. I enjoy every minute of it!
  2. Jeez by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 2, Funny
    Next thing you know, they'll be asking for FREEDOM OF CRAPFLOODING!

    code awards journals subscribe older stuff rob's page preferences submit story advertising supporters past polls topics about bugs jobs hof Sections apache Nov 25 apple Nov 29 (3 recent) askslashdot Nov 29 (17 recent) books Nov 29 (2 recent) bsd Nov 29 (2 recent) developers Nov 28 (7 recent) features Nov 29 (1 recent) interviews Nov 18 radio Jun 29 science Nov 28 (11 recent) yro Nov 29 (7 recent) Australian Argues for Freedom of Mooning Posted by michael on Friday November 29, @04:57PM from the i-come-from-the-land-down-underwear dept. Carl Brewer submits this blurb about an unusual freedom of speech argument. Slashdot Login Nickname: Password: [ Create a new account ] Related Links Carl Brewer unusual freedom of speech argument More on Censorship Also by michael Your Rights Online MS Asking Makers of 'Windows' Software To Rename ZDNet Australia Interviews Richard Alston Record the Surveillance Cams Ireland To Check EVerything A Birds-Eye View of Online Censorship American Companies Help China Censor the Net Security and Privacy in the US Death Of The Global Information Infrastructure Canadian Privacy Commissioner Addresses 'Lawful Access' Speaking Out For Free Software In India Australian Argues for Freedom of Mooning | Log in/Create an Account | Top | Search Discussion Threshold: -1: 0 comments 0: 0 comments 1: 0 comments 2: 0 comments 3: 0 comments 4: 0 comments 5: 0 comments Flat Nested No Comments Threaded Oldest First Newest First Highest Scores First Oldest First (Ignore Threads) Newest First (Ignore Threads) The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way. A programming language is low level when its programs require attention to the irrelevant. All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2002 OSDN. [ home | awards | contribute story | older articles | OSDN | advertise | self serve ad system | about | terms of service | privacy | faq ]
    --

    --sdem
  3. Witty retort by satanami69 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Magistrate Sheryl Cornack adjourned the case until December 13 to allow time for the federal and state attorneys-general to consider a response."

    I think the delay might be to let Sheryl do some squats before showing her response.

    --
    I really hate Dan Patrick.
  4. In other news... by rm+-vrf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Australian authorities have released the goatse guy, who was in their custody after an incident involving a passing police car, a jelly doughnut, and a koala bear.

  5. Well, us here in the States by hitzroth · · Score: 4, Funny

    have the right to bear arms...

    --
    In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
    --VonNeumann
  6. Can you imagine... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 3, Funny

    What a Beowulf cluster of these guys would look like?

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  7. A considered response by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Magistrate Sheryl Cornack adjourned the case until December 13 to allow time for the federal and state attorneys-general to consider a response."

    Does this mean the attorneys-general are preparing to present their rebuttal?