Prey

cybrpnk2 writes with the review below of Michael Crichton's latest book, Prey, which he says is "classic Crichton." Only your thoughts on Crichton can determine whether that's an endorsement or a warning. Read on for the review. Update: 12/07 15:29 GMT by T : The link I originally placed to the movie Them "is some 1996 made-for-TV junk, not the 1950s classic." The link has been updated. Prey author Michael Crichton pages 367 publisher Harper Collins rating Excellent - Among his best reviewer cybrpnk2 ISBN 0066214122 summary The latest sci-fi on nanotechnology from the author of Andromeda Strain and Jurassic Park Michael Crichton has gone full circle and done it again, effectively updating his original sci-fi novel The Andromeda Strain for the 21st century. In his latest book Prey, he has gone from using gigantic T. Rex dinosaurs as the big bad back down to microscopic agents once more. All the classic Crichton trademarks are here -- the race against time, the super-hi tech, the twists in plot and theme. It's his best and in some ways most original novel since Jurassic Park and just as likely to be made into a smash motion picture now that morphing animation is well established. In fact, several scenes in the book almost seem gratuitously tacked on to ultimately make use of some special video effect rather than advance the plot, but that's a minor criticism. Overall this is a great, fun read that's destined to be a SF classic.

In some ways willing suspension of disbelief has to be applied less to the technology depicted and more to the relationships between our protagonists Jake and Julia. They're the typical Silicon Valley couple, all right, but oh how conveniently their relationship advances the plot. He's the between-jobs programming team manager who's specialized in code that models distributed processing and genetic algorithms. She's the cute PR talking head who is lining up funding for the revolutionary Xymos nanobots. He's the cool, loving house-dad that takes care of the cute kids. She's the always-working cold bitch who's having an affair -- isn't she? With the tanned surfing god Xymos exec we hiss at as soon as we meet him? Or is this whole plot line perhaps a little too obvious after being set up by page 18? Maybe Crichton has something a little more twisted in mind for the 350 pages that follow ...

Yep, he sure does, and as fast as helicopters can fly we're at the secretive Xymos desert lab in Nevada where nothing is as it seems. Those swirling little dust devils out there on the parking lot security cameras are considerably more menacing than Taz in a Loony Tunes cartoon, but damned if anybody will give Jack a straight answer about just how ... or especially why. Seems the escaped particles that make up the clouds have been programmed with distributed computing algorithms Jack came up with in his last job -- Xymos wants HIM to tell THEM what's going on. Uh, oh -- Jack used the concept of predator / prey stalking dynamics to keep distributed agents focused on a concrete goal.

Jack's subsequent experiences, experiments, thought processes, and realizations lead the reader into a fascinating exploration of the concept of hive mind. In one sense this is a book about prejudice -- people are the most evolved social mammals on Earth, and as such are always misinterpreting the capabilities, actions and behaviors of a swarm that has neither leaders or followers, only members. As such, Prey is a rare SF book that truly does explore a uniquely alien life form with some very interesting twists. It's also a thought-provoking possible example of Vernor Vinge's technological singularity concept.

It's a good book and it's going to make a great movie. If you just can't wait for the movie, though, no problem. Crichton's three-act structure for Prey follows the well-trod path of a trio of 50s-style sci-fi movie classics: Tremors , Them! , and Invasion of the Body Snatchers . Check 'em out and watch 'em in order after you read Prey for a fun follow-up. To include the tension of Jack and Julia's romantic triangle, watch Casablanca first ... and remember, a kiss is just a kiss, as time goes by.

You can purchase Prey from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

Comments

I used to love his stuff

[AssFace]

My uncle got me one of his books when I was in middle school. I then proceeded to read everything he ever had published that I could get my hands on.

Now I don't enjoy his books at all and I find him to be sort of behind the curve (but in terms of what the general public knows, he is still ahead of the curve).

I'd much rather read Neal Stephenson in terms of books that have a technical backing to the story. And NS wrote about nano way before MC. MC is just jumping on the bandwagon - and will likely cause a "stir" with it simply because more people read his stuff.
Generally speaking, if a lot of people read and like an author, I'm finding that I don't tend to like it.
Maybe I'm just a dick, or an elitist snob. But if a book makes the NYT bestseller list, or Oprah's list, then I steer clear of it.
(that said, I did enjoy Cold Mountain)

Re:I used to love his stuff

[john82]

And NS wrote about nano way before MC. MC is just jumping on the bandwagon...

Wait a minute, I thought you said you've read all of Crichton? You've forgotten about The Andromeda Strain. That was nano before the term was part of the vernacular. Not sure about Neal's age, but I'm willing to bet that Andromeda Strain was written before Stephenson got started.

Hardly makes Crichton jumping on the bandwagon. One might even go so far as to say that Crichton helped build that wagon in terms of putting real science into SF.

Timeline to be released in 2003

[totallygeek]

His book, Timeline, should be released in 2003. Here you can see some information. I am really looking forward to this film, as I enjoyed the book.

I would like to see Andromeda Strain redone as another movie -- it was an excellent read and view, but I could see some major differences in how it would be adapted for today's audience. It would be great.

Crichton isn't really an SF author

[Johnzo]

The New Yorker had this criticism of Crichton:

[Crichton is] forever describing things that could change the world--but don't. The Andromeda strain of space germs mutates into harmlessness and goes away; the lost city of the Congo is wiped from the map by lava; in Sphere, the discoverers of the extraterrestrial artifact of untold power use that power to wish it into retroactive nonexistence. The fact that Crichton has no interest in showing what might have happened is what makes him a writer of suspense fiction, rather than of science fiction. A science-fiction writer would naturally want to see what would happen if the technologies stayed out of control (as most do), and might even want to ask whether the consequences would be all bad (as they often aren't). Might not free-range dinosaurs make Costa Rica an even more interesting place than it is today? What if nanoswarms offered promise as well as peril? Prey, with its kill-them-all-and-get-out approach, is neither as frightening nor as fascinating as Greg Bear's novelette of twenty years ago, "Blood Music," in which the characters, transformed by the nanotechnology within them, become both far more and much less than human.

I think they're pretty much dead-on. I've always been unsatisfied with Crichton's stuff. His books read like kinda like Star Trek episodes: when they end, the genies are always jammed back into their bottles. (taken from Patrick Nielsen Hayden's blog)

Does it have an ending?

[JasonUCF]

That's my only problem with Crichton. It seems every book of his -- from Andromeda to Sphere to Jurassic Park -- suffers from the same abrupt ending.

I respect that the stories do end and that it's over -- but you have to look at it from a story arc. You can run the arc a number of ways, but essentially in a mystery/suspense you've got this curve that's going up and up and up, and then has a climax or two, then comes down.

I always got the feeling from his books of the curve going up, up, up, and then... flatline. No climax, just like "Oh, 300 pages, time's up." Sort of thing.

I thought it might just have been my problem with one or two of his stories, but after reading a few of them I started to feel it something more like the "Crichton Climax"(tm), (or anti-climax, if you will).

Re:You didn't read Jurassic Park?

[Graff]

I've read all his books, and to me, JP stands out by far. Those others you listed (Congo, Terminal Man, Sphere) had interesting ideas, but were not his best work.

I totally agree on Congo and Terminal man - interesting ideas, but they just didn't cut it and were lacking something. However, I thought Sphere was amazing and engaging. I guess it just depends on your tastes.

My favorite book of his is probably Travels, a autobiography of sorts in which Michael Crichton relates all of the wierd things he has seen in the late sixties, the seventies, and the early eighties. The cool thing is that he doesn't write it as an autobiography, but more like an explorer. It is a very cool read, pick it up if you haven't. He also has a similar book called Five Patients, in which he studies our health care system and uses five example patients to show what is good, bad, and ugly about health care.

Point of Singularity

[Cap'n Canuck]

The best thing about the review was the link to this article by Vernard Vinge entitled Technological Singularity (1993). Michael Chriton may have read this article for inspiration on his book, or perhaps Vinge's book, Marooned In Realtime (1986).

The article talks about a "Singularity" in humankind's development, an event where man develops a machine that will outhink him. This leads to an acceleration, a new evolution, an exponential runaway beyond any hope of control.

The author explains why this will occur, how, and when; between 2005 and 2030. He also gets into ramifications of a post-Singularity world, and the paths that may lead us there, along with some pros and cons of each choice.

There are references to some works of science fiction (though none from Chriton), and a passing reference to the possibility of engendering a set of laws in the machines. Surprisingly, Asimov's Laws Of Robotics was not metioned.

His final quote is taken from Freeman Dyson:

"God is what mind becomes when it has passed beyond the scale of our comprehension."

This asks the question - when Man changes, will our God change as well?

Re:Chrichton's books

[LostSinner]

the one book i haven't seen mentioned is A Case of Need. apparently he wrote it as a med student under the pseudonym of Jeffrey Hudson (::goes out and checks::). yea, that's what he wrote it under.

at any rate, it's a hell of a book, and a stark departure from his usual works. the closest comparison is probably to The Terminal Man (incidentally one of my favorites), but only because they both deal with medical stories.

pick it up if you get a chance. amazon link

Re:Hire this guy...

[cybrpnk2]

Thanks! Check out more of my stuff at SciFiToday.