Slashdot Mirror


Linux Used To Make "Star Trek, Nemesis"

Mike McCune writes "The "Linux Journal" has a nice article about the switch from Irix to Linux at Digital Domain and the use of Linux in 'Star Trek, Nemesis.' I guess this means that Linux is finally ready for 'The Enterprise.'"

23 of 249 comments (clear)

  1. No by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 5, Funny

    ``I guess this means that Linux is finally ready for 'The Enterprise.'''
    No. It means the Enterprise is finally ready for Linux.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  2. Data... by coryboehne · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if Data runs on an advanced version of the Linux kernel... It would explain his lack of humor....

    1. Re:Data... by kalidasa · · Score: 5, Funny

      My idiot friend recently installed RH 8 and jumped on IRC with a client rinning from root. It gave him the verbatim "Running IRC from root is stupid" message, and he wouldn't shut up about it for the next few weeks: "Linux called me stupid"

      Gee, artificial intelligence in Linux. If only there were natural intelligence in users.

  3. Grooooaaannn! by RavenDarkholme · · Score: 5, Funny



    I guess this means that Linux is finally ready for 'The Enterprise.'

    Urge ... to ... KILL ... rising.

    For that, you should surely be PUNished.

  4. The deeper meaning of switching from Irix to Linux by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When companies switch from Irix to Linux, it means one of two things:

    * they bought new SGI workstations, which run Linux, OR
    * they couldn't afford SGI workstations, so they bought other Intel workstations with Linux.

    It's not an amazing breakthrough jump. It's just that SGI barely sells Irix machines anymore.

  5. Ho hum, whatever.... by Profane+Motherfucker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's the deal: a switch from IRIX to Linux doesn't mean a fucking thing. They've switched from one variant of Unix to another. What was gained in the end? A net gain overall for Unix of not a fucking thing. Zero.

    If they switched from Windows- or Mac-based machines, then this would be legit. Other than that it's meaningless in the sense of Linux is Taking Over.

    That's all fine and great that it makes for a good story, but if the point is to claim that somehow people are realizing the benefits of Unix-derived operating systems, then it means squat.

    1. Re:Ho hum, whatever.... by spitzak · · Score: 5, Informative

      Linux has replaced a significant number of NT machines at Digital Domain, both on the desktop and in the renderfarm. The machines are not being bought to replace Irix machines, they are being bought instead of Windows machines. And they are being bought for Linux itself, not because Linux is cheaper (each machine has a W2K license because they are dual-boot in case we need a huge LightWave render, and we pay for RedHat, so they are more expensive!).

      Although we still have lots of Irix machines around we use them only because their cost is zero (since we already own them). Believe me Irix is not even considered in any consideration for purchases. We also have a lot of the SGI 320 NT workstations, which were a huge mistake, neither W2K or Linux work right on them. It was a direct competition between Linux and Windows and Linux won.

      We could not consider Mac until OS/X came out. I understand it is quite popular at other places, and if our software is ported (which should not be hard) I think it will be popular at Digital Domain. Unless Linux GUI is improved considerably in the next 2 years it may find itself pushed back into the renderfarm and servers and off the desktop by OS/X.

  6. The big question by Fembot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can it automaitcaly re-modulate the phase buffer to route power to the primary shields without someone having to crawl through dark monster infeseted tunnels?

    1. Re:The big question by cioxx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes. With a kernel patch codenamed "Omega 9".

    2. Re:The big question by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 5, Funny

      ``Can it automaitcaly re-modulate the phase buffer to route power to the primary shields''
      Nope. The manufacturer refused to release specs for the hardware, so no driver has been written yet. Reverse engineering is in progress, though.

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  7. Ready for the Enterprise by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought,Linux was ready for the enterpise since Kernel 1.7.0.1-D.

    --
    ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
  8. pfff by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Rendering pretty pictures is oh-so-boring. I'd like to sit in front of a mic at a console, utter the command "Make it sew!" then watch a beowulf cluster of Singers make the whole crew wardrobe in 4 minutes, including the time needed for Troi's custom boob expansion panels.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  9. This isn't where SGI/IRIX shines by mikael · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Moving a renderfarm to a Linux cluster isn't surprising. Since rendering is an "Embarrassingly parallel" computation and AMD/Intel has more FLOPS/$ compared to the MIPS processors, this is expected. When you need to pass a lot of data between processors, you'll need one of those Origin 3000 servers with 1000 processors. Linux can't do this yet.

    What is interesting though, is that they moved the workstation applications from SGI to Linux. I didn't know that the SGI hardware was lagging behind that much.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  10. Hmmm by fizban · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess this just give more validity to the "Microsoft as Borg" line of thinking...

    and giving plenty more tag-lines to Linux PR - "Who's handling your Enterprise software these days? Linux, where no company has gone before."

    Urghh.... Must... Stop... Stupid... Puns... Kill... Timothy... for... starting... it...

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

  11. Re:I've said it before... by tortap-0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "so please cut the bullshit and post real news stories"

    You are new to slashdot, right?

  12. Worst pun EVER! by DarkVein · · Score: 5, Funny

    Allow me to present this as timothy should have.

    Mike McCune writes "The "Linux Journal" has a nice article about the switch from Irix to Linux at Digital Domain and the use of Linux in 'Star Trek, Nemesis.' I guess this means that Linux is finally ready for ------[Pun censored, humanity saved]."
    --

    I'm as mimsy as the next borogove but your mome raths are completely outgrabe.

  13. Re:The deeper meaning of switching from Irix to Li by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The reason SGI is probably selling less Irix machines is that Linux is available, cheaper, and does what buyers want.

    No. Five years ago, SGI was selling fewer IRIX machines because Windows NT was available, cheaper, and did what buyers wanted. Two years ago, it was because Windows 2000 was available, cheaper, and did what buyers wanted. Last year it was Linux. This year it's Mac OS X. Who knows what it will be next year?

    The fact that Linux is displacing IRIX in a lot of cases says much more about SGI than it does about Linux.

    --

    I write in my journal
  14. Re:The deeper meaning of switching from Irix to Li by dcavens · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm not sure if that's true. Looking over SGI's website, they don't seem to sell ANY linux based workstations any more. Only the Fuel and the Octane2 (both IRIX/MIPS machines.)

    They do have a yet-to-be-released NUMA Linux system based on Itanium, but it probably shouldn't be thought of as a workstation.

    I'm guessing you're probably right though that "SGI barely sells Irix machines". Not sure how many they're selling, but they're still cettainly losing money.

  15. That makes sense by SensitiveMale · · Score: 5, Funny

    It does seem as if the plot and story were created on a 286.

  16. Re:The deeper meaning of switching from Irix to Li by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Who knows what it will be next year?"

    I've got money on OS/2.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  17. Klingons use BSD by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Which OS would the Klingons use? Klingons have long hair and beards and live in dark dirty rooms, so we know that they're UNIX users. But are they Linux users? They certainly have bad tempers, which means they'd feel right at home on the Linux kernel developers list. But take a look at Klingon ships. They're pretty simple and a little rough around the edges, but at the same time really tough and secure. With these design priorities, it's pretty safe to say that they're running OpenBSD.

    Not convinced? Consider this additional evidence. On TNG, the Klingons are worried that their traditional values are dying. On Slashdot, the crapflooding trolls declare daily that BSD is dying. 'Nuff said. :-)

  18. Not in 2.4.20 by KPU · · Score: 5, Funny

    Quoting the 2.4.20 changelog, "replace end user confusing 'on fire' joke with real info"

  19. That explains why..... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    the Bird of Prey is now a Giant Penguin