Slashdot Mirror


Has the Quality of Consumer Electronics Declined?

NewtonsLaw asks: "With Christmas coming up I dare say that lots of people are going to spend big bucks on consumer electronics in the next few weeks. This column asks an interesting question -- are consumer electronics manufacturers sacrificing quality and reliability for an endless list of features? If you're like me, you've probably got a TV, VCR or other appliance you bought over 5 years ago which is still going strong -- but much of the stuff you've bought in the past 2-3 years is already giving trouble. What's more, it seems to be the big-name manufacturers such as Sony who are most affected by this decline in standards. I'd love to hear the experiences of other Slashdot readers in an effort to get as many data-points as possible. Are you better off buying a $49 DVD player on the expectation that it will only last a year or so -- or do lay out two or three times that amount something made by a big-name manufacturer in the (possibly vain) hope it will provide superior performance and last longer?"

17 of 773 comments (clear)

  1. Economy Issues by BlkPanther · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In America at least, I think the struggling economy is mostly to blame. Manufacturers are just trying to cut costs to bring their profit margins up, and one of the easiest ways of cutting costs is cutting quality.

    This seems to be a disturbing and all to common trend, but hopefully they (manufacturers) will get bit in the ass by customer support and replacement costs, causing them to rethink their strategy!

    --


    I find that most often I end up learning from necessity, rather than for enjoyment.
    1. Re:Economy Issues by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "In America at least, I think the struggling economy is mostly to blame. Manufacturers are just trying to cut costs to bring their profit margins up, and one of the easiest ways of cutting costs is cutting quality."

      I disagree. I think that the problem is caused by the popularisation of the consumer electronics market. The average joe can't discern quality in electronics. He will look to see if a DVD has the basic features he wants and then check the price. If there's another with the same features but a lower price, he will get the cheaper one. The more expensive, quality unit will not sell and the company making it may go out of business.

      It is in this way that 'natural selection' in the marketplace drives away quality products. It's the same thing for hard drives -- one of the main reasons that prices and quality get lower and lower is because aside from speed and capacity, the average person has no reason to buy the more expensive product.

      Quality products are being eliminated from the marketplace because average people can't recognise quality.

    2. Re:Economy Issues by CommieOverlord · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Quality products are being eliminated from the marketplace because average people can't recognise quality.

      I think people can full well recognise quality. However, I think the average consumer is too stingy to pay for quality.

    3. Re:Economy Issues by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think people can full well recognise quality.

      Want to bet? Most people do not know how to interpret even the most basic specifications. When I started out in stereo equipment in the 1970's, you could go to any dealer and get handouts with product specifications on just about any product sold. You could compare transient intermodulation distortion, total harmonic distortion, FM sensitivity, wow & flutter, etc. Now you go into some place like Best Buy or Circuit City and there is nothing but a tag on the shelf. You're lucky if it shows even the most basic specs (e.g., watts per channel, number of discs the changer holds, etc.) and God help you if you ask the salesman for anything more. He'll look at you like you have three heads.

      Consumers are stupid. They don't understand the concept of quality and, instead, concentrate on easily understood features. They don't understand that MOSFETs produce psycho-acoustically benign even-order harmonics when they distort and that conventional transistors product annoying odd-order harmonics. They think that a heavier amplifier is worse becaue it's harder to move around for cleaning. They are oblivious to the fact that speakers that are 3db more efficient take half the power to drive them to a given SPL. Talk to them about output impedence or signal to noise ratio and their eyes glaze over.

      The original poster was 100% correct. The popularisation of consumer electronics has lead to lower quality in order to appease consumers who purchase receivers based on watts-per-dollar. Want high quality goods? Stop letting ignorant people make purchase decisions.

  2. Sort of... by craenor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The quality has declined across the board, but high quality parts are still available. As demand from retailers like M$, Wal-Mart, Best Buy and others increases for discounted electronics, the supply likewise increases.

    However, as more and more people become "Tech Savvy" there are more manufacturers willing to produce the high quality, awesome electronics that modern geeks will shell out the cash to buy.

    So has overall quality declined, maybe...but the good stuff is still there to be had. Just don't go cheap on everything you buy.

  3. Something to remember... by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Higher price does not always equal higher quality. Sometimes all you're paying for is a name. Case in point. At our shop we've sold a ton of CDRW's made by BenQ (formerly Acer). Most customers have never heard of this brand, and sometimes they act suspicious because the price is so good. We sold 10 computers to a certain client, who insisted that all the components be name brand. For CDRW's, they demanded Sony, even though they were quite a bit more expensive, and Sony isn't exactly well known for it's CDRW-making acumen. Half those drives failed over the next 6 months. This is not a bash against Sony, sometimes you just get a bad batch. My point is that paying more for a brand you've heard of isn't always such a good idea.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
  4. The quality of everything now is worse by mgs1000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We, as consumers, by buying the cheapest, lowest-quality stuff out there, are responsible for this. The old adage is true: You get what you pay for. As more and more companies keep cutting costs to satisfy out demands for cheap products by using low-cost parts and low-cost labor(China), this is just going to get worse and worse.

    1. Re:The quality of everything now is worse by scotch · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Don't put too much stock in that old addage. After all, you can get some things for free (certain software comes to mind) that clearly has more value than the $0 paid (slashdot trolls and MS astroturfers notwithstanding). On the flip side, you can buy shirts and shoes and other crap 10-20 more expensive than mainstream stuff that is clearly not providing 20 times the shirt or shoe or whatever.

      "You get what you pay for" is one of those meaningless phrases that people generally agree with just because they've heard it so many times. If you say "the best things in life in free", many of those same people will agree wholeheartedly.

      Another examples is these two conflicting adages:
      "absense make the heart grow fonder"
      "out of sight, out of mind"
      They clearly mean opposite things, but people will agree with whichever one they happen to here. Behold, the power of the adage.

      Or take the example of 2 people that pay different amounts for the same model new car. How can you resolve common scenario with your adage?

      --
      XML causes global warming.
  5. Floppy Disks by 0x00 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I swear the quality of these has declined over the past 10 years. There used to be a time when I could reliably transfer a file between machines on these. Now I open a new packet and 4/10 won't work.

    --

    0x00

  6. Umbrella repair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Long, long ago, there used to be umbrella repair shops. Eventually umbrellas became so cheap that you just throw them away when they break (which happens pretty fast) and just buy new ones.

    It's much the same with consumer electronics. For example, VCR/TV repair places in my town are either struggling or have already gone out of business. Things are so cheap these days that you might as well buy a new one when the old one breaks.

    So, basically quality has indeed gone down, but prices have dropped accordingly.

    We live in a disposable society. Disposable cell phones seem like a huge waste to me, but they're cheap.

    1. Re:Umbrella repair by runderwo · · Score: 4, Insightful
      For example, VCR/TV repair places in my town are either struggling or have already gone out of business. Things are so cheap these days that you might as well buy a new one when the old one breaks.
      So true. Check out this opinion from an old tech:
      http://personalpages.tds.net/~rcarlsen/ce/future.t xt

      And this one:
      http://personalpages.tds.net/~rcarlsen/ce/gripes.t xt
      under "Most of all, I hate waste"

      I think the quote, "Equipment is built with the dumpster in mind, not the repair shop." is particularly telling, especially coming from a tech.

  7. "Cheap" vs. Inexpensive by pvera · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The "good" stuff is still good. We just got more "cheap" stuff that does the basic stuff only the "good" stuff used to do.

    The best example is the stand-alone $49 DVD player. To somebody that is not a total video freak, the $49 does the same job as a $200 unit. My first DVD player cost me $300, a Toshiba that worked for over 2 yrs without any problem. My second DVD player was for my PC and cost me $80. My third one was a stand alone that came as part of a Teac receiver combo and cost $150 with 5.1 speakers plus FM radio (no, they don't sound like Bose, but dammit, that's $150 for a 5.1 home theater). I bought another combo like that one for $130. My wife buys $49 DVD players for my little kid so if they break out of warranty we are out of just $50 (a cheap VCR costs more).

    Each and every DVD player I have bought looks exactly the same on my piece of crap TV. Every one. The original Toshiba was the only one with a decent remote, that is the only thing I have to say on its defense. Each of the $49 DVD players we have bought can read VCD and MP3 CDRs and CDRWs. The last one she got is smaller than our digital cable box, and weights maybe 1/3rd of what my xbox does.

    Notice I said this only applies if you are not a video freak. To us normal Joes, a DVD plays the same regardless, and the only thing you can do to make it better is to get a better TV.

    There are many more examples like this, but to me the most obvious is the cheapo DVD players.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  8. Re:Sony vs. The World by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have never had a Samsung product fail on me. I have two HDDs (they are one of the few companies with a 3 year warranty), two CRT monitors, an LCD, a 32" HDTV, and a DVD player. None have ever given me trouble.

    To be fair, neither has my Sony reciever, Discman, or CD changer.

    YMMV, but I have found Samsung products to be of excellent quality and durability.

    Please do provide some evidence before bad-mouthing a manufacturer. At least say what products you have and what has happened to them - one vague reference to a DVD player is not exactly evidence (BTW: Samsung didn't even program your DVD player; )

  9. 2 words: by nurb432 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Planned Obsolesce.. that pretty much sums up the general decline in ALL products, not just consumer electronics.

    They have realized that if people are happy with what they have, they are less inclined to buy the same product every year *just* beacuse its new and shiny..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  10. As the saying goes by Espen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The plural of 'anecdote is not:
    'data'

  11. P.O.M. Those 3 words make a difference.... by SacredNaCl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know what those three words are?

    Made In China
    Made In Indonesia
    Made In Malaysia

    Look...I have a Samsung wireless phone. The first three units I got all semi-worked but had some defect. Made In Indonesia is stamped on the back. What should be there? Made In Indonesia By Children As Young As 5 Years Old Living 30 To A Room Smaller Than My Bedroom Making A Combined Daily Salary Less Than The Cost Of A Combo Meal. .. You expected quality? Cost to manufacture? $.93 Cost to consumer in US? $100 Yeah, I know why there are there too. Cost more to ship the damn thing than it cost to make.

    Your (insert item here) is a piece of crap? Look at the POM. If it's junk, odds are it comes from one of the three above. But in the age of global parts ...That can be misleading. If the components inside are made in Indonesia, or China... Odds are they will fail quickly.

    This is what you get when you mix poor wages, illiteracy, bad working conditions, and sweat shops.

    Welcome to the global marketplace. Corporations will chase cheap labor to make cheap products while exporting the jobs of those who used to make them somewhere else. It's a nice race to the bottom. Forget quality. Forget quality of life. Japan is just doing the same thing we did. Chase cheaper labor and export jobs to where they can get it. Their economy is in the crapper now? Gee, I wonder why!

    You see it very dramatically in the guitar market. As soon as a country acquires the skill to finally make a decent product, they move the operation to where people will work for a dollar less. They haven't even hit the bottom of the pool yet. There are still places with cheaper labor, less environmental laws, and lower education ...

    Enter corporate solution

    Make you buy it twice.

    How we going to pay for that new plant? Got to drive demand somehow. Making it fail is a good way to do that.

    This isn't to say that corporations don't love to sell you the same stuff twice. General Electric (one of the most crooked US companies in history) does it all the time with light bulbs. Goddess help those who fly on planes with their engines. They can't even make a good cordless phone or a toaster that wont burn your house down. Of course, even avionics parts are being made in China now. Fasteners that fail and kill several hundred people. Yep. Made in China. Thanks for dying on United. ...And thank you General Electric. I'm sure I'll hear from their lawyers soon.

    Just start that mantra...

    Business knows best.
    Free markets.
    Deregulation.
    Business knows best.
    Free markets.
    Deregulation.

    Of course, even General Electric isn't as bad as Hewlett Packard. When HP switched from being technology focused to being "consumer focused" that's when we got things like print heads and ink carts that are programmed to fail at a certain date. Still half full of ink? No matter.
    Still plenty of geeks here who work with embedded applications. Go look into it. Call it what you will..I call it corporate crime.

    It wouldn't suprise me at all to see automobile manufactures start to incorporate this into their cars computers. Encyrpted of course --.

    Business Knows Best.
    Free Markets.
    Deregulation.

    --
    Freedom is merely privilege extended unless enjoyed by one and all.
  12. Re:That's easy by uncoveror · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Planned obsolescence nearly destroyed the big 3 automakers in the 70s. Now the computer and home electronics industries are manufacturing garbage, so we will have to replace it frequently. I am a computer repair technician, and people ask me what brand of PC is good. I have to tell them that they all suck, unless you are willing to spend what Alienware charges. The most disturbing thing is that all this garbage is non-biodegradable, contains toxic chemicals and is bound for landfills.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.