Slashdot Mirror


Speakeasy Welcomes WiFi network sharing

sedawkgrep writes "Speakeasy.net has recently published a policy concerning their subscribers. They're openly welcoming the sharing of subscribers bandwidth via WiFi as long as you don't violate the existing terms of service. Speakeasy has always had a very liberal and open policy with their users. Even though I wouldn't open my network via WiFi, it's refreshing to see a company who is taking a more open approach rather than restrictive when dealing with its customers." I've been a Speakeasy customer for a while now ('tho my move from Boston to Ann Arbor meant going from 768 to 144 *sigh*) and have always been impressed with them. Great step supporting WiFi as well.

26 of 121 comments (clear)

  1. Good ISP by Ydna · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'll second the thumbs up for Speakeasy. I've been using a 768 kbps SDSL through them (and Covad) for a couple years now. There's been only one major snafu during this last Thanksgiving when I tried to upgrade to 1.1 Mbps (the line quality wasn't really good enough despite Covad's claim to the contrary). They cost a bit more, but it's worth it.

    I was previously hooked up via US West. It was exciting.

    --

    "The great thing about multitasking is that several things can go wrong at once." -me

  2. Speakeasy is the best. by packeteer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Right now i am using my D-Link wireless router to access slashdot. I share my bandwidth from my Speakeasy DSL connection to all who come by. I am glad i can share my luck of living in range for dsl in area area where not many can get it.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  3. How's their download speed? by phr2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have PacBell DSL (now SBC) and though the stories of their ever-increasing suckage are all true, they have one redeeming feature. Although my service is supposedly 128kbps up/384 down, in fact I consistently get 1.5 mbps download speed at any time of the day or night, even for multi-gigabyte downloads. Speakeasy seems to charge quite a bit extra for > 384k download speed; if you only pay for 384, what do you usually actually get? I wouldn't mind if it's 384k some of the time and faster at night, but I really like that high speed for large transfers.

    1. Re:How's their download speed? by Cyph · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a 1500/384 RADSL account from Speakeasy, and my download speed is the max of 160k/s. I think it's pretty good, considering TCP overhead.

      Also, if you were to pay for 384, the download speeds you'd get would be 40k/s. I know this because I used to have a 384k SDSL account from Speakeasy, before switching to RADSL. :)

    2. Re:How's their download speed? by ender- · · Score: 3, Informative

      if you only pay for 384, what do you usually actually get?

      Well this can vary I think. I've had Speakeasy DSL at two locations. The first location I paid for 608/128 and got exactly that.

      The second location I paid for 768/384, but they sent me a new modem. With the new modem I was getting 5mbit downloads!!! and 500k uploads.
      Unfortunately, that new modem was REALLY flaky, so I put my original modem in, and with that got exactly 768/384k...
      Of course, the reason I got the new modem was because they said my old one wouldn't work, so I was a little upset at this.

      I got them to send me a replacement of the new modem, but it didn't work well either. So they took back both new modems and refunded the money I had paid for them, and let me keep using the old modem.

      So despite the issue, my overall experience has been very positive with Speakeasy.
      I've just moved again, and as soon as Covad has my street in it's database, I will be transferring my DSL here. [Although only 144k :( :( :( ]

      Ender

  4. switching and 600kbit+ upstream broadband by Erpo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm moving from Cox Cable because they recently instituted monthly transfer caps, and was all set to transfer to pac bell dsl when I read about how they're sending out spyware in the mail. I'm not about to commit for a year (or pay an extra $10/month) when they could very easily make that kind of software mandatory to use their service. Speakeasy.net was my next choice.

    Anyone have any experience to share about speakeasy.net, specifically their customer service as well as how badly the bells abuse their monopoly when you sign up with an alternative dsl carrier? Also, I'm probably just not looking hard enough, but I didn't see any mention on their web site of the speeds provided with each tier of service. I'm looking at either the plain vanilla or sysadmin packages. Preferred rpmfind access would be great, but unless there's a significant speed increase (preferably in the upstream direction) over normal service it's not worth the extra $10/month. Any experience/information would be great.

    Speaking of increased upstream bandwidth, I saw something interesting a while ago and I though I'd ask the slashdot community about it. At the end of the interview with the WinMX developers on slyck.com, someone (it's not clear whether it's the interviewer or interviewee) adds the comment:

    Also I'd like to take this opportunity to point out that as more and more people move away from the crappy 128kbit upstream broadband connections onto the next generation 600kbit+ upstream broadband connections over the next year or two, the amount of available files and other resources will flourish on ALL P2P networks beyond all our wildest dreams.

    600kbit+ upstream connections that people can actually afford? Huh? Has anyone heard anything about this anywhere else?

    1. Re:switching and 600kbit+ upstream broadband by jeffstar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I have 1.1 mbit downstream and 2.2 mbit up from Sympatico for 60$ a month (CDN). It has been down once for an afternoon in over four years. We had an ice storm which knocked out power to my neighbourhood in ottawa for 5 days but my DSL still worked with my laptop and the modem powered by rigged up batteries.

      I see 130 kbyte/sec reliably up and down, and from time to time i'll get 180kbyte/s downstream. No bandwidth caps and I have had the same IP for 4 years.

      Unfortunately my service is grandfathered and the dsl they install now is the 128kbps upstream and maybe 1mbit down.

      I think they stopped offering my service because it required house calls - a technician had to come and install a POTS splitter on the line.

      My service kicked the pants off cable for a long time, and with the better upstream I have i thikn it still does.

  5. Re:speakeasy sucks by CrazyDuke · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd gather that since running an httpd on dialup is essentially pointless to most people; and many users out there are windows users that have default installations of IIS, which are vulnerable to virus attacks, that they just blocked it to prevent port 80 attacks on their customers.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
  6. Muahaha by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 4, Funny

    /me gets his box of sidewalk chalk out

    (God I hope people rememebr warchalking :( )

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  7. bandwidth sharing... by Toasty16 · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've always found it ridiculous that ISPs want customers to shell out an extra 5 bucks a month for the privilege of a second IP address just to have 2 computers connect to the internet, because even when using a router you're not pulling down extra bandwidth, you're still just sharing the fixed bandwidth that the ISP is providing.

    I talked to a service tech for my local cable company, Mediacom, and he said that service was terrible on campus because college students sharing bandwidth was putting a big load on Mediacom's servers. How can this be? If you've got 1000 customers at 1.5mb each, it doesn't matter if each of them share bandwidth with 10 other computers, it's still a total of 1.5gb for the ISP. Bad service just means that the ISP wasn't equipped to serve out that much bandwidth in the 1st place.

    Fight the power, sign up with Speakeasy ;-)

    1. Re:bandwidth sharing... by rnd() · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speakeasy doesn't do this. They'll sell you an extra static IP for around $3 per month, but you can have a router and as many internal IPs as you want.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  8. They're better than average but... by EzDi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I like many of their policies, gaming servers, rpmfind server, and fileshack.

    Too bad they have the all too common problem of only 128k upstream in my area (unless you want to spend too much on internet). Even Qwest in my old neighborhood had 256k on the base accouns, AT&T had 400k,and Time Warner was even faster.

    But my big problem is a couple months ago they started a 1GB/month download quota for their newsgroups. You can buy more downloads, but it's more expensive than getting a newsgroups account from many newgroup providers, not to mention most places will provide full newsgroup access with your acocunt.

    1. Re:They're better than average but... by Some+Dumbass... · · Score: 3, Informative

      You should be happy to pay a little extra per month for usenet over 1GB since you're obviously downloading warez, mp3s, and movies.

      Actually, there are a few legit reasons for needing that much bandwidth. A few people have complained on the dslreports forum that they need the bandwidth to run local mirrors of some newsgroups. Some people seem to be running their own news servers. Others are archiving their favorite newsgroup for posterity. Either way, downloading all the posts in even one moderately busy group will put you over the 1Gb/month limit easily.

      Also, looking at the alt.binary groups briefly, it seems like some of them may have legit (non-copyrighted) material. For example, it kind of looks like the alt.binaries.3d groups are where people post their own creations for others to critique. Likewise with the demoscene groups. The band Phish has a binary group. Perhaps people post bootlegged songs there (Phish actually encourages taping their shows, so this is still legit), or stuff like photos or videos they took of the band. All this stuff is perfectly legal, but can use up over 1Gb/month.

  9. My 2 Cents by dirkness · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've handled DSL installes for about a dozen of friends / family / businesses... from Pac Bell, the now Defunct flash com , verizon, cox (cable), at & t, and Speakeasy. The one provider I feel comfortable in always recomending is speakeasy.

    I have found that the most troublesome area of DSL is getting the line delivered. But speakeasy was the easiest provider to get in touch with a human to help solve any issue that cames up. I've worked tech support for a rival company named after this planet were on. At our call center we cringed when wait times for our customers would shoot up to 40 minutes, which happened regularly. I have rarely had this experience with speakeasy.

    When I have had to call and get someone on the phone they are competant and solve my issues fairly quickly.

    This to me is worth the extra money that they may charge for the service. My only complaint for a while was the lack of online management tools for domain or email hosting like pac bell has. The ability to add, remove and purge email boxes without getting on the phone is a great feature.

    I hope they can continue to improve their service like they have been and keep in mind that some people are willing to pay more for quality service and support.

  10. Re:They Should Be Liberal Considering by swb · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bandwidth costs are getting so cheap these days, its a miracle anyone's in business. "Good" IP T1s are under $400/mo without local loop, and even that's getting inexpensive. I've been quoted well under a grand per month for 3Mbps with local loop.

    In fact, some of the vendors I've talked to say that they've been converting a lot of "business DSL" customers to full T1s, simply because of reliability and cost competitiveness.

    Hundreds per month for 1.5/1.5 is pretty much about right for that bandwidth, and it may still technically be a bargain if it includes local loop. T1s may be a better bargain if all prices are pretty much equal, due to higher reliability.

  11. Share WiFi as crack vector by TrippyZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lets see. If I allow passerbys to use my WiFi dsl connection, and then they use it to crack into remote boxes, who are the Feds going to come after?

  12. Great service by constantnormal · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a little difficult to evaluate the problem-solving capabilities of Speakeasy, because the actual frequency of problems is pretty low.

    I moved to Speakeasy and a 144K iDSL line (I know, but it's all I could get at the time) from another ISP with a 128K ISDN line who had been acquired and the new parent then acquired, with definite drops in service with each new owner. I had spent 2 months without service (trying to get a new Toshiba router to work following the demise of my Webramp unit) being bounced between the ISP and Toshiba customer service. Neither one wanted the problem solved, they just wanted me to go away. So I did.

    Over the past few years with Speakeasy I have had two problems, one was a telco problem and one was a speakeasy problem. In each case, they took complete control of the problem management, made sure I had access to logs of what was going on and who was expected to do what when, so I always knew what was going on. In one case it was resolved in a matter of hours, in the other it took a couple of days.

    I have NEVER had to wait more than a few minutes to talk to a customer service person -- mind you, the times I have needed to do so have been few and far between.

    They recently expanded, creating a new POP in the Chicago area (I had previously been served via a POP in the Seattle area). The migration was flawless (from my perspective). They gave all their customers plenty of notice as to what was going to happen and when, then carried it off without a hitch.

    I now have additional options -- primarily cable -- that would be much faster and cheaper. I continue to stick with Speakeasy due to their willingness for me to tinker with my own servers, and the fact that for most email and web browsing, faster speeds are not usually much of a benefit. While there are certainly times when they would come in handy (large downloads), I find that probably half or more web sites manage their connection to the lowest common denominator, the 56K modem connection.

    In my case, when I look at all the options, having the freedoms afforded me by virtue of being a Speakeasy customer still outweighs the relatively few times I am seriously bandwidth-constrained. On those occasions, I think about getting a cheap cable service just for downloads and web surfing. I'd still run my email through Speakeasy, as they do a very good job of deflecting spam.

    1. Re:Great service by eggboard · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is my experience as well. I'm in Seattle, so Speakeasy is local, but it's not why they've been so great. I was using Qwest at home and another local ISP for DSL at the office, and Qwest sucked (five days of downtime once, vast phone waits, untrained tech support) and the other ISP was charging by the gig for traffic!

      I switched to Speakeasy and while it hasn't been entirely error free, they deal with their mistakes or the telco mistakes. When I moved my office a few months ago, I called and said, can we have a new circuit ready to go at the new location and then we switch the ATM circuit from my current office to my new office keeping all the IPs and so forth?

      No problem they said. But we're moving on July 5 (a Friday after a Thursday holiday). No problem, they said. I called them, it took a few minutes, the IPs were moved. I shut boxes down at old office, drove them across town, powered them up, and I was live.

      That's what the extra dough is for.

      Because of the noncompetitive structure under which they have to get service, they're charging a realistic amount. When the next wave of technology comes, however, we should be seeing huge speed bumps in DSL without (in any reasonable world) the same kind of huge price increases.

      Up north of Seattle in the tiny town of Snohomish, you can apparently get 8 Mbps down and 1 Mbps up for less than $100/month. Why? They brought fiber (or lit fiber) into the local switch, and the part of the telco setting prices up there thought this would work out. That puts the lie to the real underlying costs...

      --
      Freelance tech journalist for the Economist, MIT Technology Review, Macworld, and others
  13. A Happy Speakeasy Story by jcwren · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been a Speakeasy customer for about 4 years now, carrying an IDSL line. Short of two incidents, I've never had any problems with service. The first incident was when they had Redback router problems. I can't remember the head honcho's name at the moment, but he was sending out status reports daily on the repairs. Turns out they had a backplane problem in the Redback, and a bad patch bay, and the combination of the two was very difficult to debug.

    So while that was frusterating, at least we as customers knew what the hell was going on. Try getting that out of Bellsouth.net (my ADSL provider). But the *real* story of how good their customer support is this:

    While I'm quite happy with Speakeasy, I really wanted to get another ADSL line (I host a small group of people as a non-profit project). Speakeasy isn't yet offering ADSL in my area, but Earthlink is, and with static IPs (Bellsouth does also, but no statics. Morons.) So my IDSL goes out (about the time Bellsouth has 7 line trucks on the street), so then I think "Well, it's a good time to switch". Bellsouth came out, put in a new phone line, Earthlink provisions it, the ADSL modem shows up, it gets installed, it sort of works. At this point, since I'm now really moving to ADSL, I don't worry much about the down IDSL.

    People can connect to the system. Mostly. Mail works. Mostly. Well, I can't send mail. After much discussion with Earthlink, who lied to me saying "Oh yes, there are no blocked ports", it turns out that they block outbound SMTP. Annoying. But they claim there's no problem in the routing, in spite of the fact that 50% of people can't connect, 50% of my outbound pings don't, etc. Talking to tech support, I said "I need this routing fixed, and I need port 25 unblocked." Them: "We don't see a routing problem, and we can't unblock port 25." Me: "OK, and I can't use your service. Disconnect it NOW."

    So they did, and I go back to Speakeasy, calling in a trouble ticket. I explain that the time the service went out, Bellsouth was had every line box up and down a 3 mile stretch hanging wide open. "Yea, sounds like a line problem. They prolly swapped lines with you and Grandma Jones. We're on it!", says they.

    Next day, someone knocks on the door. It's a technician with a modem. "Dude, gotta new modem for you. We think yours is cooked." New modem is installed, it works! Yay! Everyone is back up, mail flows, Speakeasy makes me happy again.

    Then I get the bill for $300. $150 modem, $150 install fee. Yikes! I always knew a modem replacement wouldn't be free, but $300? No warning? I call Speakeasy, complement them on great service, and say "But this $300 was a little surprising. I mean, couldn't have someone mentioned it?" So they break it up over 3 payments, make it a little easier. Then the girl says "Hey, I can credit you for some service, since you had down time. How long was your service out?" "Well, it went out two weeks ago, but I was switching to Earthlink (only because you good people don't offer ADSL), so I'd say I noticed a week ago." "Gotcha, 30 days. OK, well, that's about $96 credit there. We'll do that!". Yay! $200 for a new modem. But not the end of it...

    So I get the Speakeasy service survey, and because I like Speakeasy, I actually honestly fill it out. Complete with the $300 story. I get a call from the lady in charge of customer service: "Our people screwed up and didn't follow the script. You should have been told that the tech was coming, and the costs involved. We're crediting your for the modem, and the remaining $56 on the service call." I love this woman. Maybe she'll marry me, and we can figure out how to get free service for life.

    There were complaints that Speakeasy had bad customer service at one time. I know they've made very agressive efforts to improve. I can only say that in my experiences to the support center has been nothing but friendly, knowledgable people, who actually WILL do something about your problem. Unlike, oh say, Bellsouth, where IF you can find out who to talk to, generally don't know squat.

    Some of my folks would still like ADSL on that server. IDSL serves them well enough, and ADSL wouldn't see a dramatic improvement in uplink speeds for them anyway. Once Speakeasy offers ADSL, I'll switch. Until then, I'll pay $96 a month (yea, it's high. That was another reason to move to ADSL), but it's reliable, I've got 3 static IPs, no blocked ports, I can share on my WiFi if I choose, and I get EXCELLENT customer service.

    jcwren

  14. Covad also welcomed line sharing last I checked by Adam+J.+Richter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As I mentioned in replying to a previous slashdot story, Covad welcomed line sharing the last time I checked, including wireless, including for-profit. This was the big selling point that the Covad sales rep used to convince me to sign up, and I described in detail the idea of reselling my covad connection over an access point just to make sure there was no misunderstanding.

    In general, DSL providers seem to be less worried about usage patterns than cable modem providers, probably because having separate lines from the DSL Access Multiplexer to each subscriber gives them a more reliable ability to throttle individual customers if necessary, as opposed to having a shared local loop in the case of cable modems.

  15. Just move to Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here in Tokyo I have adsl 8mb down/2up for about $50 US a month. They, and by they I mean probably 5 or 6 different companies, are now offering 12mb. They don't care if you share bandwidth or what. They are concerned with getting customers signed up and using their service. From what I hear, most people in the US aren't too happy with their high speed access. Maybe if companies worked more at customer service and less on pinching pennies they'd get more people opting for high speed access.

    1. Re:Just move to Japan by rnd() · · Score: 4, Informative
      The US is in the unique position of having ancient POTS lines: miles and miles of copper that works fine for voice, but is difficult to squeeze data through.

      In the US, populated urban areas have much more competition and thus lower rates on broadband. Some smaller cities (40-50K people) may have only ISDN or very limited DSL availability at $100+ per month.

      Tokyo sounds like it'd be a good place for broadband: lots of people who want it, relatively small geographical area meaning that the providers' return on investment for infrastructure is very good.

      By the way, if anyone wants to sign up for Speakeasy DLS, Sign up here

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  16. Speakeasy is GREAT by rnd() · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've been a speakeasy customer for 3 years now and the service has been excellent. I subscribe to the 1.5/384 package with a couple of extra static IPs.

    By the way, Speakeasy now has a promotion and is giving a free XBox, PSII, or Gamecube to new subscribers for certain plans.

    To sign up for Speakeasy, click here to give me credit for the referral.

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

  17. Speakeasy billing is a nightmare by zenyu · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Anyone have any experience to share about speakeasy.net, specifically their customer service as well as how badly the bells abuse their monopoly when you sign up with an alternative dsl carrier?

    Unfortunately there is bad news on this front. If you try to get an ADSL over your POTS line you might end up having a line that goes out for hours switches to your bell's DSL service for days at a time and Speakeasy will give you no support with that problem. My bell said there was a problem with the Covad equipment and Speakeasy's techs said there was a problem with either the Covad or the bell equipment, and billing told me I couldn't cancel the billing on the disconnected line without paying the $300 disconnection fee. I ended up pulling out much hair by trying to talk to several billing people before going to my credit card's ombundsman. I used the helpful evidence from their tech support people, plus some collected from logs by my sysadmin at work, and e-mails from other Covad ISPs to create a report showing the problem and all my efforts at getting the problem fixed. My credit card company reversed the charges and I stopped getting hounded by their billing department after a month or so. But I had to spend way more than $300 of my time and on the report and on learning a lot more about my attorney general, consumer affairs, etc. In case I had needed to go further.

    The really sad thing is that if they hadn't treated me so badly over $300 I would have given them great PR because I felt they really had tried their best to get the line working before deciding it wasn't anything they could fix technically. I didn't agree with them on not confronting the bell, which I was very willing to help them with, but I understood that if they didn't have enough customers with this problem the cost of getting it fixed with lawyers would be greater than whatever money they might make off a few years of providing DSL to those customers. I saw this as a Covad - Verizon problem that they were only secondary actors in, I felt bad for them. Then they wanted me to pay the $300 Covad was going to charge them for a lemon line and had billing people with a phone attitude that had me infuriated. At that point, I was ready to spend years and thousands of dollars disputing the bill. I shrugged when my bike was stolen, I was mildly annoyed by the cost of the dental work when I was attacked in an attempted mugging, I was actually annoyed when a family member that had volunteered to pick up a last paycheck cashed it. It is not easy to get me past annoyed to angry. Speakeasy managed it.

    There are many nice DSL providers outside of the local bell and Speakeasy in most cities. I've had a good experience with a local one that supported WiFi before Speakeasy did. You would serve yourself well to find a good local ISP too.

    1. Re:Speakeasy billing is a nightmare by rnd() · · Score: 4, Informative

      It depends on what tech you get. Speakeasy has grown a lot as a company in the past few years. It used to be that you'd wait on hold for 40 minutes and finally talk to someone who had a lot of expertise. Speakeasy initiated an effort to hire more tech support reps. There were a few bad apples who were absolutely infuriating to deal with. 90% of the Speakeasy support personnel that I've spoken to have been excellent and have been perfectly willing and able to schedule a conference call with Covad's techs and do a loop test, etc., to get to the bottom of any issues.

      I think the bad apples are (fortunately) gone. My Speakeasy DSL has had minimal downtime, and now that the growing pains are over, Speakeasy is once again a joy to deal with on the phone.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  18. Re:They Should Be Liberal Considering by z84976 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Look, I once had a great deal with PheonixDSL for 768/768 SDSL for $38/mo. Then they went out of business. Then I had Megapath 768/768 for $50 then they decided it was no longer worth it. So then I had Telocity SDSL 768/768 for $50. Until their back-end carrier (northpoint) went out of business. Then I had DirectvDSL ADSL 1.5/256 for $50/mo until, just the other day, they went out of business. Now my new $90/mo 1.5/384 speakeasy is on order. Know what? I will GLADLY PAY MORE if it means they can actually sustain the business model and keep the lines lit up. The sad thing is, I would have paid a bit more to ANY of them if they could have put forth a sustainable business model. I say GO SPEAKEASY! Charge what it really costs, make a buck, but STAY IN BUSINESS FOR ME!