Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Crusoe-Powered Computer

jonmason00 writes "Just checked the Transmeta webpage, and discovered that they are now offering a Crusoe TM5800 System Development Kit. It's a bit expensive ($995) and you gotta register before you can buy one, but they need your support." How about an Astro development kit instead? :)

12 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. They need my support? by tgd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Sorry, this might be an unpopular view because Linus works there, and all, but no company needs my support if they've got a product I find useful for a price that is competitive with other companies, and I won't waste my money supporting someone else's unsucessful ideas, just because they've got cool technology or cool employees.

    1. Re:They need my support? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry, this might be an unpopular view because Linus works there, and all, but no company needs my support if they've got a product I find useful for a price that is competitive with other companies, and I won't waste my money supporting someone else's unsucessful ideas, just because they've got cool technology or cool employees.
      Well, as I understand it, TransMeta has products that are lower powered and run cooler than Intel's, which isn't just fluff, and $995 for a development board is pretty reasonable. (Not for a production model, but development kids are usually pricey). Seems intruiging to me.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  2. Here's why by Compact+Dick · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Intel and AMD have both signed on to Microsoft's Palladium program. We need a chip maker who hasn't succumbed to this yet.

    A crappy marketing strategy is no reason to write off an innovative technology [and yes, for once I believe the word is used rightly here.] The lower power consumption specs don't hurt either.

    1. Re:Here's why by MisterFancypants · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Intel and AMD have both signed on to Microsoft's Palladium program. We need a chip maker who hasn't succumbed to this yet.

      That's a great theory, but meaningless. In various interviews David Ditzel has been quoted as saying that Transmeta's chips would be in a unique position for Palladium because the Code Morphing layer would allow them to implement the security features without having to change their designs since that CMS isn't accessible to normal system software and thus is hack-proof-enough to meet the Palladium specs. Not exactly the kind of thing you'd hear from someone who is going to make a stand against Palladium.

      I'm pretty positive Transmeta WILL implement Palladium if it is required for future Windows releases. They haven't said they won't, they just haven't said they will. You assume that because Linus works there, they will decline, but business reality will make them accept it just as AMD did. How many laptops do you think are sold for the Linux market compared to the Windows marker? Transmeta is in deep enough trouble without cutting out 90% of their potential market in the future by thumbing their nose at Windows/MS.

  3. They don't need my support by MisterFancypants · · Score: 4, Insightful
    They need to create a product that I feel is worth buying. That is what businesses do. Just because Linus works for them doesn't mean they have any reason to exist. If they can't compete on the merits of their products, then let them die.

    And, just for the record, this product isn't one I will be buying. It is way overpriced for what you are getting. A comparable barebones motherboard + CPU based on Intel or AMD could be had for an order of magnitude less money without requiring any kind of signup deal.

  4. Yes Linus works there but... by sirtimbly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not our responsibility to keep the company afloat. I'm all about supporting software projects that obviously serve the open source movement, but a business faces risks when playing in the processor arena. I am happy to pay money for projects like the free blender foundation. Transmeta is responsible for getting their processors put into retail products, we are not responsible for donations.

    --
    Sir Timbly of Cannatuna, offical Knight of the Heptagonal Table
  5. Off-topic rant by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's with this "you gotta register"?

    Why can't businesses be content with getting my money?

    Oh, because they're not selling commodities anymore, they're turning their customers into commodities to be sold.

    Shall I supply my blood type and a DNA sample and a piss test and fingerprints in addition to my social security number and home phone and mother's maiden name?'

    Get out of my life! Sell me your product and go away! I am not a number, and I don't need to be in your database!

  6. or use a mini-itx for $100 by horster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    or you could just use via's mini-itx multimedia platform for around $100 (board, cpu, network, sound & video).

    mini-itx.com

  7. C3 is a dog, but it doesn't matter by X_Caffeine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Similar to the way that an Athlon 1600+ is faster than an older 1600mhz Tbird, the VIA C3 processors are nowhere near as fast as equivalently clocked Pentiums or Athlons. I'm highly skeptical that a 900mhz C3 is close to the performance of a 900mhz Crusoe, which by most accounts performs as you would expect a near-1ghz processor to do.

    But man, Transmeta has totally missed the boat by not making basic, affordable computers available to hobbyists. FlexATX and C3-driven Mini-ITX boards are enjoying the kind of hobbyist popularity that helped put AMD on the map a few years ago. This $1000 "developer board" is too little, too late, and too much freakin' $$$!

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
  8. Re:How about access to the cpu "core" by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's now, what, 4 years later and they still only have x86. Shame on you guys for lying to me like that!

    I don't think they lied, it all has to do with reality. The reality is that the cpus have not sold in the quantities that they would have liked. In order to spend money on resources to come up with these other "personalities" you have to get the money from somewhere. I can't imagine that it would be cheap to develop such a thing and make it performant enough to justify the expense. Like the original poster of the article said, their hurting and it sure doesn't make any sense to pour money into supporting other chips that don't have nearly the market as the intel chips anyway. plus one of their claims to fame, low heat dissapation, isn't as big of a deal with the PPC since the chips run at lower clock rates and use less power in general anyway. Do cut them some slack, nice idea, just no money in it, sounds familiar.

  9. Agreed 1000% by bhsx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sort of OT; but why isn't the EPIA series, especially the 6000 model with 800MHz C3 not gaining more attention? It runs fanless, has TV-out on the board, can take 1GB of ram and has everything you could need on the board, throw it into
    one of these which happens to have an external PS and a front USB port and was pretty much designed with the EPIA 6000 in mind. I've harped on it before, but why isn't this the preferred RYO PVR platform?
    The form factor fits right in with your vcr, and the case comes with a pci-riser card to fit that AMD AWIP card for TV-in, and excellent 3D. Nearly silent and the price is right (the Mobo/Case costs around $195). You could make a fantastic PVR/PC-compatible-gaming-consolesque system for around $500. $195 +$100(AIW) +$75(80GB eide hdd) +$60(1GB pc133 ram) +70(DVD/CD-RW comb0 drive). Add it up. And that's a lot of overkill on the ram, but hey, it's cheap. So why isn't this a story? Because it's not coming from Intel, AMD, or Transmeta? All of this "digital convergeance" is leading to more and more embedded arenas, if we can make a box like that at retail prices, think of what we could prototype for our own foray into the embedded market...

    --
    put the what in the where?
  10. Re:Why bother? VIA has em beat by barawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt the Eden platform is actually lower power than the Crusoe platform. Running fanless simply means that the processor has a low power dissipation - that is, W/mm^2 - power per area. It doesn't necessarily mean that it actually uses low power.

    That, and the Crusoe devkit is basically designed for a laptop. You can't buy a charge controller/keyboard/touchpad interface for the Eden platform.

    Not to mention the fact that you get schematics, as well. For $995. That's cheap.