Slashdot Mirror


Opera Gives That C64 Feel

howcome writes "Opera yesterday relased beta2 of the forthcoming 7.0 version. Opera now supports mulitple user style sheets and by selecting "Nostalgia" from the menu all web pages suddenly resemble Commodore 64 (screendump1 screendump2) from 20 years back. Also, there is a handheld emulator to see what a page will look like on a handheld device running Opera. To get you through Christmas, you can also use the "fast-forward" button. Try it on Google (screendump)!"

5 of 362 comments (clear)

  1. Oops by SmartGamer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Predictably, the images are down.

    Opera just made a mistake, in my opinion, with that. I liked how they kept the browser streamlined and stripped down; this new feature is, possibly, a sign of creeping featurism and surrender to the forces of software bloat.

    Oh well. I guess if I want a simple browser, I should stick to Lynx.

    --
    Warning: Poster of this comment is a nerd. Just like everybody else here.
  2. Re:sadly, they are not the world's fastest anymore by oldwolf13 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    have you even used opera?

    the engine is still faster then anything else I've used, and I've just about tried them all (especially on older hardware).

    and as for opera not being the best... it's got quite a few people who've *actually* used it for awhile who believe it's far superior to anything else out there right now.

    One of the first things to go onto my machine is opera, no matter what OS I'm running.

    Sure, the c64 thing is silly... that's what it's intended to be... probably a coder just having some fun one day threw it in there as comic relief.

    get-a-grip (not the shoes)

    --
    If I can't smoke and swear I'm fucked.
  3. Opera for the Mac by Xenex · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The parent post did refer to Opera for the Mac. Have you actually used it before? It's terrible.

    Version 6.0 was just release (it's a Carbon app that runs on 8, 9, and X), and it's horribly slow, ugly looking, and uses non-standard keyboard shortcuts. I had very high hopes for Opera on the Mac, but this release has all but shattered them for me. It's almost the exact opposite of Opera 6.0 on Windows.

    I've been using Opera on Windows for the best part of 4 years, and swear by it. However, I don't even bother with it on my iBook. Perhaps when they eventually release Opera 7 for the Mac (which will be a *long* way off) things will be better, but I'm not holding my breath...

  4. Re:sadly, they are not the world's fastest anymore by IdleTime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have used Opera since it was launched many years ago and I currently use Phoenix on Gentoo Linux here at work in production. Both are great browsers, but Phoenix is still lacking in some sense.

    One feature I miss in Phoenix is handling both the select-buffer and the cut-and-paste buffer in Xwindows, it only handles the select buffer. Opera does and I need it since I do a lot of cut and paste between web-pages and an internal tool written in Java (only supports the cut and paste buffer)

    Another issue, which is a bug in Phoenix is downloading UNIX compressed files (.Z). Phoenix does not save them at all.

    I can go on and on with differnces, but I don't need to. Both browsers are good and I'm sure Phoenix will be even better as their development goes forward. Browser wars are stupid. Test several browsers and pick the one that covers your usage. It may not be the same as everybody else chooses, but so what?

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  5. PERFECTLY? *rofl* by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The majority of websites today seem intent on popping up these annoying other windows, which I never requested. Strangely, in Opera I never see this problem.

    If having needless application windows showing up all the time is your idea of perfect, you can keep it - I'll take my 'imperfect' browser any day.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.