Slashdot Mirror


Hudson River Shipwrecks Secretly Mapped

jonerik writes "According to this article in the New York Times (registration required) more than 200 shipwreck sites lying beneath New York's Hudson River have been mapped by sonar. In fact, scientists feel confident that the location of every Hudson shipwreck between Manhattan and Troy has now been pinpointed, adding that the nearly oxygen-free mud of the Hudson nearly guarantees that many of the wrecks and their contents are almost perfectly preserved. The hitch? For the time being the maps - paid for as part of the $186 million Hudson River Estuary Plan - are not being published since state officials are nervous about the prospect of so many shipwrecks suddenly being opened up to salvagers on one of the U.S.'s busiest rivers. 'We don't want to ring the dinner bell for people who have ulterior motives and don't behave responsibly,' says Mark L. Peckham, a historic preservation coordinator at the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation. In the meantime, state officials are now attempting to determine the historical significance of the wrecks and how they might be protected, which should hopefully lead to the publication of the Hudson River maps at some future date."

15 of 262 comments (clear)

  1. so by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    they don't want to publish the areas of the shipwrecks, but anyone with the money or power to go dig up ships has some ethics in them.

    also, who is to say these ships now 'belong' to the state of NY ? i never understood that, it should be finders keepers.

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
    1. Re:so by Joe+U · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Who is to say anything below Tarrytown is even property of the state of NY?

      The Hudson river is bordered by two states, New York and New Jersey. Does NJ have a say in this as well?

      (And No, I'm from NYC)

  2. National Park by ifreakshow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The government should make the bottom of the river a national park. This would ensure that the ships are preserved as long as our country. Imagine if the Greeks or Egyptians had done this.

    1. Re:National Park by JordoCrouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Preserving such historical sites is important for future generations.

      Unfortunately, we have absolutely no idea how to preserve a ship under water.

      In fact, we are sitting around helplessly watching the Titanic and the ships at Pearl Harbor disintegrate (which, BTW is a very bad thing - since the ships at Pearl still have a lot of fuel trapped within them). The only way we can "preserve" a ship is to raise it out of the water, and that can only be done under certain circumstances.

      So +10 points for the thought, but -100 for complete inability do to anything about it.

      --
      Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!
  3. You know... by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...you can say what you want about freedom of information, etc, but the saddest part is that this data really would be used destructively by those who would rather have a barge full of salvaged steel than a glimpse into the past.

    It's a serious disappointment that society has arrived (not recently) at a state where truly worthwhile information is rightfully withheld because we, as humans, can't treat things with respect.

    --

    -
    Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    1. Re:You know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What arrived? Name a time in history where this wasn't the case? I mean even the Pyramids were plundered not too long after they were built. I don't condone the behavior but I am not fool enough to think it is a recent development.

  4. It's only a matter of time by carl67lp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Any sort of technology that is available to the upper echelon eventually trickles its way down to the common person wishing to use it for "ulterior motives."

    I should think that a more prudent way of handling this project would have been to map all of the ships, catalogue them, survey them individually (with divers, remote subs, or the like), and only then proclaim a successful project. At the same time, you could publish the maps without a problem.

    To announce to the world that you have maps simply invites people to use whatever means at their disposal to procure them--social engineering, hacking at computers storing the maps, or good old-fashioned information leaks.

  5. Insurance companies may take the loot by RY · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The insurance companies may have standing to intercept any salvage operation of the wrecks.

    Once the insurance company pays out the claim they own the ship and cargo. If a salver raises the ship or cargo then the insurance company can collect on the find.

  6. Wise course by the_rev_matt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think that from a historical significance perspective, this is not a Bad Thing(tm). Allow the museums etc first shot at those wrecks of historical interest before the vultures descend.

    --
    this is getting old and so are you

    blog

  7. Dirty Politicians by ifreakshow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) Map Bottom of Hudson River Don't release information to the Public
    2) Give "rights to salvage" to political contributors
    3) Profit

    1. Re:Dirty Politicians by misterhaan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      1) Map Bottom of Hudson River Don't release information to the Public
      2) Give "rights to salvage" to political contributors
      3) Profit
      The crazy thing about politicians is that they do these steps in a different order: 1, 3, then 2 (maybe)
      --

      track7.org has all kinds of interesting stuff!

  8. Re:Titanic by f.money · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Titanic was/is in international waters. The Hudson is in NY state. BIG jurisdictional difference.

    Not sure what the right answer to this is, but keeping it under wraps for the time being seems to be the wise course of action.

    Jon

  9. Re:Interesting ethical questions by liposuction · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bah. This is just another case of a government made up of people, not trusting the people that pay it's bills.

    Rediculious.

    --
    "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
  10. Re:Interesting ethical questions by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are other solutions to this than to simply hope nobody leaks the maps, which is what they're doing (actually, what they're doing is akin to telling people you have $10,000 buried in a can somewhere in your nice garden, but you won't tell them where. Tomorrow the garden will be gone...)

    For instance, they could provide the information, along with notices that disturbing the PCB laden sediment is hazardous, as well as illegal. Then go and actually bust the people who decide it was worth the risk (use the map data to see where to catch them)

    In the end, I suppose the decision has to be made based on whether the government thinks it can beat back the blithering idiot masses who don't care.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  11. too late by lazlo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    'We don't want to ring the dinner bell for people who have ulterior motives and don't behave responsibly,'

    Sorry, you're too late. The people with ulterior motives who don't behave responsibly have already been elected, and were the ones that directed the study to be done. They now have the information, and aren't giving it to the rest of us.

    --
    Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?