Apple Releases Mac OS X 10.2.3
justzisguy writes "Apple has released Mac OS X 10.2.3 for Jaguar via the Software Update utility. The update 'delivers enhanced functionality and improved reliability for the following applications, utilities, and technologies: AppleScript, Classic compatibility, Disk Copy, Disk Utility, Image Capture, Mail, OpenGL, Print Center, and Rendezvous. It provides audio, disc recording, graphics, printing improvements, as well as AFP and WebDAV networking improvements. The update also provides updated security services and includes the latest Security Updates.'"
- Benad
I don't know whether this was legit in 10.2.2 or not, but it doesn't cause a panic in 10.2.3.
Just updated. Happy as a clam, so far.
I write in my journal
After an hour of strenuous testing, I have some hard data to back up sockit2me9000's informal benchmark. First a clean install of Mac OS X Jaguar 10.2 is performed on an 800MHz PowerBook G4 with 512MB of RAM. Boot time and iCal launch time is measured four times. For each trial, the system is booted cleanly. No userland applications are running at the time of iCal Bounce Measurement (ICBM).
Finally, the 10.2.3 update is installed, and the above measurements are repeated.
Data: (10.2)
Trial 1:
Boot time: 28.452 seconds
ICBM: 1.989 bounces
Trial 2:
Boot time: 26.985 seconds
ICBM: 1.687 bounces
Trial 3:
Boot time: 27.189 seconds
ICBM: 2.176 bounces
Trial 4:
Boot time: 25.923 seconds
ICBM: 1.878 bounces
Data: (10.2.3)
Trial 1:
Boot time: 22.785 seconds
ICBM: 1.373 bounces
Trial 2:
Boot time: 24.873 seconds
ICBM: 1.284 bounces
Trial 3:
Boot time: 22.291 seconds
ICBM: 1.262 bounces
Trial 4:
Boot time: 25.843 seconds
ICBM: 1.348 bounces
It is observed that the average boot time for 10.2 is 27.137 seconds, with an average ICBM of 1.932 bounces. On the other hand, 10.2.3 yields an average boot time of 23.948 seconds, with an average of 1.317 bounces. Clearly, 10.2.3 is faster in all cases.
This intensive analysis has led me to the only conclusion that may be derived from these results: there are no plastics that require waxing for the optimal frisbee density. Further analysis may be required in order to determine the optimal frisbee color, however.
From the KB article:
> Adds a Canadian English language spell checking dictionary.
Woot! Er, I mean Wout!
Some of you may not be aware that MacOS X's printer sharing uses the CUPS system.
There was a big public disclosure today about CUPS exploits, and there's sample code and methodology available now, for white and black hats alike.
At any rate, it has been confirmed that the 10.2.3 update patches the security holes in the CUPS code in addition to lots of other security and performance-related stuff.
I'm repeating this in this thread because some Mac-types may gloss over the security/unix sections, because they don't think it applies to them.
Bottom line: it does, and it's big stuff, so get your swupdate a-running.
--dr00gy
OpenGL 1.4!!!! That's why it's a 51 meg download.
All of my games now run MUCH faster, WarCraft3, Alice, Quake3, AvP even the Sims.
- Canadian English Dictionary, about fekkin' time.
- my G4's FireWire Port, which had a tiff with my iBook about 6 months ago (via Target disk mode) and weren't speaking, have reconciled and are now working things through
- there's strange flattened aqua widgets in metal-skinned cocoa apps.. minor tweak
- G4's insomnia was cured (and identified - File Sharing. Always the File Sharing.)
- OpenGL 1.4 Noticeable difference in speed. This applies to QuartzExtreme as well.. I'd say a good 15-25%
- basic FTP support in the Finder works well now
- fixed the stupid Keychain bug
If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
Then that's your decision, and IMO, your mistake. But don't slam HFS+ unless you know all the info. UFS has some advantages yes, but Apple does not recommend its use for OS X except for Development and compatibility...HFS+ is preferred for several reasons.
Perhaps you should read the paper by Wilfredo Sanchez, who was at the time a lead developer on Darwin/OS X. The first section is called "File systems" and discusses HFS+ vs UFS. A good read..and you might find that you could have incompatibilities with some files and programs that base themselves on the old Mac Toolbox (and Carbon to some degree). Just a thought.