Slashdot Mirror
Lab-Grown Steak
swight1701 writes "New Scientist has an article about several researches who are trying to perfect growing seafood, chicken and beef in the lab without the animal. NASA started the program by wanting to provide burgers for Mars astronauts, and researchers hope to look to McDonalds, et al as funding sources in the future. The biggest problems being nutrient delivery to thick meat and exercise for the sedentary slabs. Processed meats seem to be something that may be a reality soon, while your animal friendly filet mignon may take a little while."
I dunno why I thought of that...
Lab...geeks...beef...
Oh well, I've got karma to burn.
Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
Anonymous post. No credibility. Looks like someone has too much time on their hands and wants to tell a story.
This is slashdot, news for nerds. Off topic posts without credibility are a waste of everyones time. I can understand if the story were true and this man was looking for justice (retribution?), the slashdot crowd is wide and varied and does indeed include people employed in positions with greater understanding of the law, who may be able to lend assistance.
Long story short, these are perilous times, there is an elevated risk, better to check everyone and slow things down than to have another 2000+ lives lost. I understand the narrators point-of-view, and while some empathy is appropriate, the needs of the many - outweigh the needs of the few. This is the truth upon which justice has been founded. The loss of an unborn child's natural birth, and the missed opportunity to take part in a friends wedding is unfortunate. But far more unfortunate would be the loss of 'National Security' if another tragedy such as 9-11 should occur.
Here's the original appearance of this article
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/monahan1.html
SUVs are safer in (multiple-vehicle) collisions, but not in braking or handling... and their single-vehicle accidents are deadlier than automobiles, IIRC.
This is a common misconception...
I heard the author of High and Mighty, Keith Bradsher, interviewed by Michael Medved. I had originally thought he simply set out to demonize SUVs by any method possible, so I started listening skeptically - but I was convinced of his argument by the end of his interview (though Medved wasn't). He didn't come across as a boo-hoo uses-too-much-gas-so-it's-hurting-mudder-erf kind of guy - he made his points rather well, without the appeals to emotion I [almost] expected.
His main point was that he wanted people to be fully aware of the risks involved with SUVs... not to eliminate SUVs altogether. He gave explicit license to people that need them for off-roading, or carrying large loads.
He was more of an advocate for defensive-driving safety - he owned a "maneuverable" Audi with excellent braking and handling, and that was his general approach to car safety.
Overall... he raised some points that I don't usually hear considered when people want to buy an SUV.
0x0D 0x0A
www.mirc.com -- DALNET #war_with_iraq a great new chat with updated news in realtime! see you there!