Slashdot Mirror


"Turn-Key" Linux-Based Fileservers?

idjitProof asks: "I work for a non-profit organization with about 70 satellite offices. We're trying to find a cheap way to get these offices out of the stone age and into an ethernet with centralized, secure file-storage. I was wondering if there is a Linux hardware solution that is fairly dummy resistant or, alternatively, remotely configurable (with decent security). I spent the better part of today searching the web, but all I could find was boxed software products, no hardware solutions. I'd appreciate links to any companies that might have this kind of product."

63 comments

  1. Not quite sure of the question... by TC+(WC) · · Score: 1

    Is there some reason you can't just set up a distro how you'd like it on an appropriately powered machine and just use that? You can easily set it up so you can log in from elsewhere to admin it...

  2. Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by jerde · · Score: 2

    Linux may be free, but you're looking for something that costs money and comes with support...

    Apple's XServe servers aren't a bad deal. OS X is based on FreeBSD, so don't think that Apple is still in their proprietary little world any more. They're certainly better at embracing open standards than that silly Redmond company. :)

    - Peter

    --
    INsigNIFICANT
    1. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by sweetooth · · Score: 5, Informative

      Dell and IBM both sell Linux boxes with all the support your want (or are willing to pay for).

      Though apparently most people forget this.

    2. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 3, Informative
      Since they're non-profit, I guess this means budget. Xserves are more than $7000!! what planet are you from?

      Redhat Advanced Server + 2 (or more) $200 Wallmart boxes (for redundancy) per remote.

      All the redundancy & clustering is handled out of the box.

      With $upport of varing level$, you're way ahead, <snagglepuss> an order of magnitude even...sheesh!</snagglepuss>

      --

      --
      "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

    3. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell are you smoking, Xserves are NOT 7000 dollars. You can customize them to that price if you feel so inclined. However $3000 is still pretty pricey.

    4. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Prob smoking AU$... The internet is not the US despite what you ummm know....

      $3000 is with 256M. OSX needs 370M to not hit the pagefile... I think thats what he was at....

    5. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      $3000 is with 256M. OSX needs 370M to not hit the pagefile...

      That's completely bogus. I used an iBook with 256 MB every day for over a year with zero problems at all. My new Power Mac was only recently upgraded from 256 MB to 512 MB, and the only time I noticed swapping before the upgrade was when I was running Virtual PC. 256 MB would be just fine for an XServe, particularly if you're not running a web server or any additional stuff like that. Any extra RAM would be used for filesystem caching, which would be a good thing, but not a make-or-break thing.

      --

      I write in my journal
    6. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      TROLL!!

      run top for yourself and see...m'kay?

      ie: open a terminal and type top...

      How much is used with nothing else open? hmmm...

    7. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pffffffffff-ha-ha-ha!

      (That's the sound of coffee spewing out of my mouth as I burst into uncontrollable laughter.)

      You actually use top to measure memory usage? Top?? Jeesus Christ, man.

      "Top." Heh heh heh.

    8. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the better question would be "What planet are you from?"

      I just went to http://store.apple.com/ and configured a single processor Xserve with 512megs RAM and 4x60gigs ATA.

      Grand total? A little over $4000.

      Your $7000 remark only holds for the top of the line model.

    9. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You realize that Red Hat Advanced Server costs several thousand dollars per seat, and is overkill for a simple file server. Your proposed solution isn't much cheaper.

      Maybe you meant Red Hat Professional.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    10. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1
      You only need one "seat". For all the rest you just install from the same copy. The "seat" is for the docs and support. Besides you manage all the servers from one "seat" anyway (or not, it still don't matter). As for overkill, you are essentially right, but there was a requirement to be easy, and the need for redundancy and clustering == AS.

      Anyone can d/l AS free. It's the support & stuff(docs?) that costs.

      so for PREMIUM subscription
      $2500 / (70 * 2) = $17.86US
      or
      $799 / 140 = $5.71US
      or
      $costOfBandwith + $costOfCDR = SRPMS

      --

      --
      "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

    11. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      You haven't read the services agreement carefully for AS.

      Once you agree to that agreement by buying one copy of AS, you must license each copy per-seat. I get really sick of explaining this to people.

      http://www.redhat.com/licenses/

      http://www.redhat.com/licenses/rhlas_us.html?loc at ion=United+States&

      (Asterisk emphasis mine)

      BY *USING OR PURCHASING* RED HAT LINUX ADVANCED *SERVER OR SERVICES*, CUSTOMER SIGNIFIES ITS ASSENT TO THIS AGREEMENT. ...

      REPORTING AND AUDIT. If Customer wishes to increase the number of Installed Servers, then Customer *will purchase* from Red Hat *additional Services for each additional Installed Server*. ...
      Customer expressly grants to Red Hat the right to audit Customer's facilities and records from time to time in order to verify Customer's compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
      ---

      Go read it, it's plain english. The only way you could get around this is by never purchasing advanced server (compiling it all yourself), and thus never agreeing to this agreement. Of course, you won't get any of the support services at all. Otherwise, if you buy one copy of AS and then install it on multiple servers, you are violating this agreement, and Red Hat can audit you and force you to license the unlicensed servers.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    12. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Welcome to Darwin!
      [server:~] root# free
      free: Command not found.

      so on OSX _you_ use?

    13. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      70+ rsync sessions + whatever means you want RAM+

    14. Re:Why not one of the commercial UNIXes? (Apple?) by Ratso+Baggins · · Score: 1
      bugger!

      --

      --
      "we live in a post-ideological world..." - Billy Bragg.

  3. Cobalt by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Is the Cobalt Qube dead?

    Why not roll your own? If you are going to remote admin it, certainly you can set it up on your own.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Cobalt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My vote for the Cobalt Qube (Linux/Samba network storage) because it's turn-key.

      If money is tight roll your own would suit - are there any distros that just serve up samba storage?

    2. Re:Cobalt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that I think about it, E-Smith suits most of the requirements.

    3. Re:Cobalt by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      not dead by any means.

      Qube 3

      i however think rolling your own is a much better deal if you RTFM and know what your doing. SunCobalt products are for the dumbest of the dumb if ya ask me. (or maybe the laziest of the lazy.)

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  4. Netmax/Toshiba by martin · · Score: 4, Informative

    have teamed up to do this kind of thing.

    http://www.netmax.com/products/magnia_prods.html

    We use their software based distro in a couple of our remote office at work.

    1. Re:Netmax/Toshiba by k_stamour · · Score: 1

      I have also HAd good lick with: http://www.clarkconnect.org/index.php Its Redhat 7.3 file(SAMBA) email firewall proxy web-cache etc etc etc ready to go. apt-get commands auto installs in seconds for any additional software you need. It's also free... So I have had excellent results on my test box and plan to deploy.... An his support pages are very easy to follow for newbies.

      --
      Julius Caesar - Act I, Scene i: "What mean'st thou by that? Mend me, thou saucy fellow!"
    2. Re:Netmax/Toshiba by k_stamour · · Score: 1

      Did I say Lick? I ment luck... he he

      --
      Julius Caesar - Act I, Scene i: "What mean'st thou by that? Mend me, thou saucy fellow!"
  5. Not hard by infonography · · Score: 1
    My company has been working on an open source drop in disk that creates fileserver, print servers, & the like. The mostly piles of scripting. Look at Kickstart (same as Jumpstart on Solaris) for Redhat Linux. You will be able to setup the scripts to make it look identical to whatever you want.

    Failing that sort of effort you might just want to do a full system backup of a master that works they way you want. Copy the backup to cdrom and fire up the RIAA disapproved duplicators and go to it.

    Look in your local events paper in the musicians section there are ads for bulk cdrom houses, these do press runs for Demos tapes and limited releases mostly. If you can convince them that it's not copyrighted material they may even do it for the Tax Deduction.

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  6. EXACTLY what you want! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is the Aries from Celestix. The model linked has groupware apps, as well as file/web/Internet sharing. They make a few models. Some have embedded CheckPoint FW-1 (pricey). You can get a more basic config for about $700.00 USD.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:EXACTLY what you want! by Directrix1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe Snap! Servers would be more down this person's alley. They are rack mountable, easily configurable, and relatively cheap. Although, I can't imagine a plain old file server bringing a company out of the stone age. Time to bring in a middleware tier if you want to be considered "out of the stone age".

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
  7. Cheap Secure Comercial File Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quantum's SNAP! servers take 5 minutes to install and configure. Great support from Quantum. Fantastic linux based devices.
    http://www.quantum.com/

  8. eSmith by Kz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Now called SMS, but the same thing (look in www.e-smith.org for the free version and support).

    It's a cd you pop into a pc and turns it into a really dumb-proof server. very complete and cheap!

    --
    -Kz-
  9. Clarkconnect! by fordboy0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clarkconnect is a robust "turnkey" server package that really kicks ass. I have used e-smith, Mandrake's SNF (Single Network Firewall) and Smoothwall.
    I am running this firewall/fileserver on a P100 with 96M of ram, so performance was pretty important to me.
    I run the following servers on the box...
    Appletalk (netatalk), Samba, FTP (Proftpd), HTTP (Apache), SMTP (exim), DHCP, SSH, CUPS, WEBMIN and SQUID.
    The performance of the box is outstanding and very robust. It has a really nice web-based interface for modifying the box's setup.
    I'm not knocking any of the others... I still have an e-smith server running at a clients and it's been chuggin' along for a couple of years now.

    Just my $.02
    -Fordboy0

    --
    Ligaguinggligagiggagoogoogwillgo
  10. Linksys by Khazunga · · Score: 2
    If you're just looking for cheap fileservers, this is a nice option:

    http://linksys.com/products/group.asp?grid=35&scid =43

    --
    If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    1. Re:Linksys by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      i belive he was looking for a "linux" based soulution.

      and since the linksys requires a windows PC it probably runs windows as well. (not to mention the "scandisk" and "defrag" utilities it has on it.)

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    2. Re:Linksys by Khazunga · · Score: 2

      I have no idea if the NAS uses linux. I do know for sure that their WiFi routers and home gateways do run linux. And more, they run linux with excellent support: constant software updates, new features, etc. Linksys does have the expertise to do the NAS with linux, and I'd be surprised if they did otherwise (therefore paying the MS tax).

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
    3. Re:Linksys by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      just read their site.

      first there is this:
      # Share music, video, or data files, with managed access by user name or group
      # Built-in disk utilities - backup, self test, scandisk, defrag
      which means it has some version of windows utils. since "scandisk" and "defrag" AFAIK do not and never have run under linux.

      and the more interesting part is the "user name or group" aspect. that strikes me as windows file sharing.
      and then of course there is also the fact that it actually "requires" a windows PC.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
  11. "Network Attached Storage" by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

    It looks like the hardware people use the phrase "Network Attached Storage" for devices that are dedicated to serving files. LinkSys calls theirs EFG80 (such poetry), but you need a Windows PC to run setup. Sun has a whitepaper. A Google search on "Network Attached Storage" turn up mostly hardware turnkey solutions.

  12. Para-Docs by mchappee · · Score: 2

    Para-Docs offers a turn-key solution for file management. In addition to traditional file serving, the appliance offers document management with workflow, trigger-fired messaging, and a ton of other features. The appliance is linux-based and uses postgres for it's database. It rocks, and is available at several price points.

    Let me know if you need any additional information.

    Matthew
    matthew@mattshouse.removethis.com

    --
    /. finds me to be 20% Troll, 80% Funny
  13. You missed the first question by Gothmolly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why?

    Seriously, if its a small satellite office which has survived until 2003 without a LAN, LET IT BE. It sounds like you're trying to push a square peg into a round hole. Something is obviously working.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:You missed the first question by sporty · · Score: 2

      Unless it can enhance the workplace. Yes, some enhancements should never happen, like employee-tracking, but hey, if it is the difference of doign job X in 1/5th the time with no other effects, why not?

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:You missed the first question by Gothmolly · · Score: 2

      Except that it isn't without any other effects - cost of the boxen, training, resistance to change by old employees, etc.

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  14. e-smith gets my vote by Raleel · · Score: 2

    why? you mentioned secure remote file storage for 70 satellite offices.

    esmith can do smb, as well as vpn. sounds like it'll fit your bill. The install is straight forward, and you can get pre-setup boxes from www.myezserver.com, as well as support.

    --
    -- Who is the bigger fool? The fool or the fool who follows him? --
  15. Do you want NAS? by faster · · Score: 2

    The Excel Meridian NAS is pretty cheap, and support is great. A client of mine got 160G of RAID5 for $1k. You can reach files via Appleshare, SMB, NFS, and HTTP. Novell, too, I think. Web-managable, knows rsync (if you turn it on), pretty easy to set up and run.

  16. centralized?? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You lost me at "centralized." You've got 70 branch offices and you want to create a centralized file server for all of them? Have you considered how much this is going to cost per month is telecom charges alone?

    If you're remotely accessing a file server, a point-to-point T-1 per branch office is the absolute bare minimum you'll need for connectivity. Don't even think about using a VPN over the Internet; the latencies will be so high that nobody at the branch offices will be able to tolerate using the central file server, so they'll store their files locally, which defeats the whole purpose.

    A much better idea would be to put small NAS devices at each branch office, and a big server at the central office. Have the central server back up each NAS server every hour, either using a commercial backup product like Legato (bad idea) or using the NAS vendor's remote mirror feature (good idea). Snap's remote mirror feature, for example, is called Server-to-Server Synchronization. You can do remote-to-central syncs over a VPN over DSL or something equivalent.

    There will probably be occasions when a branch needs to access files from another branch. When that happens, you can either have the person who needs the file mount the appropriate filesystem from the central office and copy his file, or you could get a little fancier. You could easily whip up a simple system for scheduling asynchronous file requests. Person X goes to a web page (hosted at the central site) and finds the file that he wants, then clicks a button to submit a transfer request. He goes about his business while the file is transferred via FTP (probably) from the central server to the branch server, then he gets an email, IM, or SMS informing him that the transfer is complete. You could just let all the transfers happen at once, or you could get a little fancier by priority-queueing the requests and executing them in order. This would have the advantages of being easier for your users-- they wouldn't have to know where the file was stored; they could just search for it-- and of keeping all the files on the various NAS servers for easy administration and backup.

    Email me for more details. ;-)

    --

    I write in my journal
    1. Re:centralized?? by aderusha · · Score: 2

      it seems pretty clear that he's talking "centralized" within the location (not across the WAN), which is why he needs 70 of these things.

  17. Qube by sql*kitten · · Score: 3

    We're trying to find a cheap way to get these offices out of the stone age and into an ethernet with centralized, secure file-storage. I was wondering if there is a Linux hardware solution that is fairly dummy resistant or, alternatively, remotely configurable (with decent security).

    Get a Cobalt Qube, or whatever Sun renamed them to when they bought the company. Plug it in, switch it on and it does all your typical LAN services like file'n'print, web proxy cache, firewall and so on. All remotely administered via a web browser.

  18. Look at the Cobalt appliances from Sun. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Qube or Raq 550 provides the simplicity you are looking for. Also check out the Control Station for remote management and administration.

    http://www.sun.com/hardware/serverappliances/

  19. vpn and central server by loners · · Score: 1

    Central office gets a vpn server and file server
    (plenty of links above)

    each satelite office gets a vpn endpoint/router
    http://www.cdw.com/shop/products/ default.asp?EDC=4 03464
    (dont know how well they work yet but they seem simple and small)

  20. recipe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Find Pentium II 300 for 80 bucks on eBay, or in the back room at work.

    Put some IDE hard drives in it, set up raid, install slackware fromt the web...

    install webmin

  21. Penguin Computing by macemoneta · · Score: 2

    They make some nice rack mount units that should do the job (about $13K for a RAID 5+1 500GB hot swappable Relion 240 configuration).

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  22. SnapServers by msoftsucks · · Score: 1

    I've used these devices extensively. (Snapservers - www.snapservers.com). They are Linux based NAS devices that take no more than 10 minutes to set up. They are much more superior than anything than M$ can dish out. They have different performance levels at very reasonble prices. These devices eliminate the blackmail that M$ has been attempting with their new licensing scheme.

    --
    Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
    Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
  23. My company does exactly this... by rindeee · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wow! Cool...someone looking for exactly what my company does. Give is a look at Premier Networks

    We set up many of our systems for secure remote administration as a lot of our customers simply want us to handle it. We are not a hardware shop, we are a professional services company and our prices reflect that fact (they are extremely competetive).

  24. Why not home grown? by dasunt · · Score: 2

    If they are small offices or don't do much over the lan, just grab an old pentium, throw in a large enough hard drive for their needs, and install your network-fileshare-system-of-choice and sshd. If they are stuck on dialup, just have the servers accept call-ins as well. Once you get one configured how you like it, mirror it to the rest. Cheap, easy solution. (Oh, and buy UPSs. I know this is a non-profit, but they are worth every penny.)

    Including the UPS, I'm guessing each machine could be configured for about 120GBs of storage without going overe $300. You're going to be hard pressed to find a NAT that will do the same thing for that price. Don't worry about the reliability of a home-brew solution - a properly setup NFS/Samba/sshd server will probably stay running until the hardware fails. Plus, all of the components are cheap, and easily replaceable.

    Oh, one last thing : if they need backups, either look into rsyncing it to a main server, or teaching the secratery to swap tapes at the end of the day. Plus, you probably want to set up a cron job, timed so that every day, 2 or 3 of the machines email you with their status for the month.

    Of course, I'm not in your shoes, and maybe something like a NAS/SAN is what you really need.

  25. Plenty of FBSD turnkey out there. by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    A quick google search or just goto freebsd.org and nose around..

    Tons of options out there.. for most every need/budget..

    A little bit of homework goes a long way.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  26. And then your users balk by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    Give them a week of using VPN to get to all their files and they will start a riot..

    Not that it doesnt work, but latency sux.. and it runs your cost up due to major increase in bandwith needs.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  27. Listen: Linux Comes with Support. by gilgongo · · Score: 2

    In addition to the almost limitless support provided by discussion forums on the internet, you can get commercial support for Linux from many companies in your area. Pick up the phone book.

    Blimey. Some people...

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
  28. Quantum NAS servers by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 2

    The Quantum Guardian NAS servers sound like exactly what you want. It's turnkey hardware fileserver solution that uses Linux behind the scenes. I posted some detailed information about one of these devices here. It's a pretty polished system and you might want to take a look at it.

  29. OT: e-smith 5.6...? Where to get it? by ivi · · Score: 1

    The Subject asks it all, folks.

    Background

    The latest post on the front page
    of www.e-smith.org refers to a 5.6
    version of SMS (formerly e-smith),
    but none of the ISO's are ver 5.6

    Has someone got a URL link for a 5.6
    ISO?

    TIA

  30. OT: "You can't post to this page." by ivi · · Score: 1

    Why should it take me three (3) clicks
    on the button to get a reply to
    post ['using Opera 6.04, if relavent]?

    TIA

  31. Re:OT: e-smith 5.6...? Where to get it? by maggard · · Score: 2
    Y'know, if you'd have bothered to actually look around a bit on the site you'd have found the answer yourself instead of running back to /.

    However, since apparently you're not real good with online resources I'll just feed it to you:

    1. There are two versions of e-smith/SMS: Commercial and non-commercial.
    2. The commercial version went to 5.6 recently
    3. The non-commercial 5.6 is still in beta (hence the beta-files)
    4. This is the regular release procedure for the product, most expect 5.6 non-commercial any-day-now
    5. As to exactly when: "When it's ready"
    If you've any other questions I really suggest you invest a few minutes looking over the e-smith.org website, particularly the FAQs and the General Phorum. Your question has been answered there MANY (many, many,) times far more authoritatively.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  32. Another vote for E-Smith by maggard · · Score: 2
    I recommend the free E-Smith Server or it's commercial implementation the Mitel Networks SME Server with ServiceLink (offers more default office collaboration services as well as a easy updates, remote services, etc.)

    A stripped down Redhat-based distrib entirely managed by a well-scripted web-interface they really can be locally administered by the Office Administrator. The install is short and sweet and with a few questions it sets up a well organized server offering 'bout anything a modern office would want all automagically.

    Ok, actually it's all done off an impressive system of scripts and templates but as far as J. Random "Administrator" is concerned it just works, and all from the clean browser-interface. Groups and accounts, POP & IMAP, LDAP and Webmail, all come built-in. A hardy user community contributes their own extensive set of ports and script templates including user self-management web interfaces, MySQL administration, mp3 jukeboxes, log and queue management, etc.

    I set this up on a donated Compaq box a year ago for a local youth services organization (read: Human Services-type folks who don't know anything about computers, aren't inclined to learn much, and really just want this stuff to work with a minimum of muss and fuss so they can get on with their real work) and they've loved it. Ok, actually they don't care: It just does what they need it to do, is easy to get to do those things, offers the services they needed and they're not interested beyond that, which is a Good Thing.

    Oh yeah, services they use their E-Smith box for are:

    • Firewall protecting their office network
    • Caching speeding their web-browsing
    • A filter blocking many of the web-ads
    • A local email-server for their inter-office confidential email
    • A NAT allowing them to save money on the ISP plan they use
    • Shared File-Space
    • Shared Address Book
    • Shared Printers
    • Personal Directories so everything isn't only stored on their individual aging PCs
    • IMAP folders so all of their email records aren't only stored on their individual aging PCs
    Next up is getting them a tape-backup for disaster recovery and reconfiguring things so all of their email is local IMAP-based and downloaded by the server so they can use MS Outlook in the office or the web interface when out of the office, and then VPNs for them when they're working from home.

    Personally I've got E-Smith servers in both of my residences (different countries) where I use a Unison implementation for E-Smith to keep both boxes synchronized. It also provides a handy VPN between both houses as well as offering all of the other services listed above. Next up it'll be hosting photo galleries and some web sites for the family as well as a Twiki server for friends to share.

    Oh, and best thing about all of this? It runs on low end PIII's, 200MHZ w/ 128MB RAM, not speed demons but stable, reliable, secure, and very effective. Did I mention trivial to administer too?

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:Another vote for E-Smith by billyhoward · · Score: 1

      I agree, I have used E-smith for clients for a year or two now, and cannot praise it enough. I setup a small oil company with a mail, file, web, samba serving beast. It also makes it trivial to set up vpn. It is a great product.

      Billy

  33. QSOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out qsol.com

    we have a number of their 'devices'. they kick ass.

  34. Netapp filers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.netapp.com/products/filer/

    If need fast remote NFS access but don't want the headache of micro managing replication, consider
    Netapps NFS caching devices:

    http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/olio/gu id es/DNFSDatasheet.pdf