Prentice Hall To Publish Open Content Licensed Books
lma writes "Bruce Perens has convinced Prentice Hall to publish a series of books under an Open Source license. The 'Bruce Perens' Open Source Series' will be available first as hardcopy in bookstores, and the Open Source text will be available electronically a few months later. Prentice Hall is counting on people buying the books even though the electronic version will be freely available later. I like the model, since I prefer to read paper, but like the electronic version for reference."
this may prove to be a defining moment in the battle of copyright control. If these books sell, and continue to sell after the electronic copy is available, it will add some serious weight to the argument that digital availability of information precludes sales and marketability.
I'm a bit surprised they are publishing in hardcover instead of a Sam's/O'Reilley/etc sturdy paperback though.
Etc, etc, ad nauseam, and so on and so forth.
I will ALWAYS buy good 'ole ink and pulp as I much prefer reading them. For reference I much prefer the searchability and rapid access of electronic (and the ability to carry a bunch of them on my handheld). I have gone so far as to "un-bind" some of my favorites, scan them and OCR/index them so that I can search them electronically. Then I have to go buy another copy to replace the one I destroyed. No more! I say hurray for this. Now I just hope these books don't suck.
that when it finally comes out, months after the book, it will be in a clunky format such as pdf rather than something like sgml that we can convert to linked html or plain text as we desire.
cat ebook.txt | grep explorer | grep bug | less to get all the paragraphs relating to the latest explorer bug.
For an ebook format, I want something parsable and convertabl; pdf meets neither requirement.
You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
Eckel is to be commended for his bravery, and generosity in doing this.
I own the printed versions of his Thinking in C++ & Java books, and keep the HTML versions at home & office.
It would be nice if ORA did this more often, instead of leasing access to electronic copies through Safari.
Huh?
Thanks
Bruce
Bruce Perens.
Thanks
Bruce
Bruce Perens.
>>Also, we'll probably see a rash of lawsuits or lobbying by the textbook industry to help them maintain the monopoly they have. After all, we wouldn't want continually improving and affordable materials to fall into the hands of our students. Oh! The horror!
Really. It's my first year, second semester (well, that's misleading; officially it's my fourth, so I'm taking higher level stuff than your typical second semester person) at Penn State and I'll be paying ~$450 for ALL USED books. Outrageous, especially considering that tuition+room&board+fees for me is little over $1000/semester.
Bruce
Bruce Perens.
really -- this was asked above but not aswered.
What topics are you looking for? Do they have
to relate to open source software? Some
guidelines would be niec if you are soliciting
authors.
Bruce
Bruce Perens.
Yes they will. If they value their time and the book enough. Even if a laser printed copy of a downloadable is cheaper by a few dollars from the press-printed book, I strongly believe that most people would still go for the convenience and quality of the latter. Why?
Well, 10 dollars is certainly worth much less than the time that I have to spend printing, collating and having the book bound professionally. I would rather pay the extra ten bucks and avoid the aggravation. So, yes, there will be a market for open books for as long as the value of the book is much greater than the cost of buying it.
As I see it, open books will revolutionize the industry in the following way.