Slashdot Mirror


Prentice Hall To Publish Open Content Licensed Books

lma writes "Bruce Perens has convinced Prentice Hall to publish a series of books under an Open Source license. The 'Bruce Perens' Open Source Series' will be available first as hardcopy in bookstores, and the Open Source text will be available electronically a few months later. Prentice Hall is counting on people buying the books even though the electronic version will be freely available later. I like the model, since I prefer to read paper, but like the electronic version for reference."

52 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. My prediction... by Anand_S · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Microsoft Press will be pissed about this. "Open Source books will be the death of the industry!"

    1. Re:My prediction... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Let's give them a run for their money :-) To do that, we need to make this a big bookshelf. Want to write something? I need authors. It won't make you rich, but it will do good for both you and the world.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    2. Re:My prediction... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Mostly I am looking for user or developer documentation for Free Software. I would hope that I'll get some of the software authors, but I recognize that many of them would rather code. Note also that writing a book does not make you wealthy (me neither). It doesn't pay as well as consulting. On the other hand, if you aren't working anyway... The benefit of writing a book is that you are valued more as an employee, consultant, or scholar. You know the cliche: He wrote the book about it!

      Bruce

    3. Re:My prediction... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
      I did a list a while back, and it turned out that my authors are more in touch with new stuff than I am. For example, I think I might have mentioned intrusion detection, but didn't put Snort on the list. I would rather that you think about what you have invested your time in, and what special areas you can contribute to. Is there an area you currently have expertise in where the rest of the world would profit from a brain-dump?

      Thanks

      Bruce

    4. Re:My prediction... by AntiFreeze · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well, what kind of range in books are you looking for?

      Are you just looking for thicker technical manuals, or are you considering expanding some HOWTOs into books form, writing and expanding better and more detailed man and info pages, teaching certain tools from scratch, putting together cohesive references for the open source developer, or other documents like that?

      Some of these really need to be written. But as part of your series? What areas do you want to see covered, what areas do you think have been covered enough, and what areas do you think should be left to O'Reilley?

      Or to go backwards, there's one area I feel O'Reilley is extremely poor in: development with multiple tools. I'm not talking lex and yacc, but rather (off the top of my head) perl and C, or pyhton and shell scripts. They have "perl for sysadmins" and pocket references, but no good books on how to use separate tools well together. The closest they come to discussing the use of separate tools together (from what I've read, and I may be completely missing a section of their books) are their books on web CGI programming.

      If there were a good book out there on, say, how to use perl and python together to write text-intensive apps with killer object models, I'd buy it in a second. My point is, there are a lot of tools out there, and I think there just aren't good books out there on how to use the tools together -- each tools seems to be encased in its own book with very spartan references to how to use it with other tools. This can be fixed, easily. I think books bridging tools together could do very well.

      So what do you want to get written?

      --

      ---
      "Of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller

    5. Re:My prediction... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 5, Informative
      What you need to do is put the electronic version online before or concurrently with the print version. See the Baen Free Library, Baen Webscriptions, and the Honor Harrington CD-ROM (now hosted on-line in its entirety by express permission of Jim Baen).

      And see this quote from Jim Baen, on the Baen Bar:
      Baen has experienced a mysterious 50% increase in gross dollar sales in the previous year. Also, our "sellthrough" (percentage of books placed in the market that sell to end-point customers) has improved from the rather startling 63% to the truly stunning 74%. I'm tentatively blamiing this on my wacko e-net proclivities. (Insert a Crazy Eddie ad pastiche here)
      There's every sign that having the books available for free or cheap on-line has done nothing but good for the sale of print books by Baen. It might do the same for you.
      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    6. Re:My prediction... by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 3, Informative
      What you need to do is put the electronic version online before or concurrently with the print version. See the Baen Free Library...

      I love the Baen Free Library (BFL), but I think you're misrepresenting the results. By and large the books in the BFL were placed online after the print version. In most cases, significantly after, long after the print version is selling only handfuls of copies. In this case, yes, there is strong evidence that a free online version can boost print sales. The BFL doesn't publish stuff in new release specifically because of concerns of gutting sales. Mind you, the BFL's concern doesn't mean that the free release will gut sales, just that they're not willing to be the one to do the experiment at the risk of sales.

      Relatedly, I encourage everyone to visit Baen Free Library, if only "Prime Palaver" articles in which the person manging the library discusses the plan and the actual results. It's very enlightening.

  2. Novel Concept, But Not the First by CBNobi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bruce Eckel's been releasing his programming books electronically for the past few years. (Not sure of its licensing, however)

    This is probably one of the first cases of a publisher supporting this, however.

    1. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Eckel is to be commended for his bravery, and generosity in doing this.

      I own the printed versions of his Thinking in C++ & Java books, and keep the HTML versions at home & office.

      It would be nice if ORA did this more often, instead of leasing access to electronic copies through Safari.

      --
      Huh?
    2. Re:Novel Concept, But Not the First by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
      I'm not claiming to be the first. Go look at Creative Commons for a list of people who got there before me. But Prentice is the world's largest technical book publisher and that's important. They have done individual titles under the OPL before, but never a series.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  3. Assuming the quality of the titles... by Nutrimentia · · Score: 3, Interesting

    this may prove to be a defining moment in the battle of copyright control. If these books sell, and continue to sell after the electronic copy is available, it will add some serious weight to the argument that digital availability of information precludes sales and marketability.

    I'm a bit surprised they are publishing in hardcover instead of a Sam's/O'Reilley/etc sturdy paperback though.

    1. Re:Assuming the quality of the titles... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      It's a soft cover. Pretty much like every other technical book these days. I haven't tested the binding for durability, but I'd hope these folks have that down by now.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  4. Finally, I don't have to... by jmuzic1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    lug all my books home every day. I can see it now..."Open source may provide treatment for back pain"

    1. Re:Finally, I don't have to... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      Note that Prentice Hall PTR is the technical book, not text book division.

      Bruce

  5. Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 4, Informative

    >>This is a tremendous departure for a mainstream publisher.

    ORA has done this already with a MySQL book. At the time of publication no less.

    Granted, it's the printed version of the electronic reference manual. But it IS an open source book. I think they're calling it O'Reilly Community press.

    Additionally, ORA open sources some of their out of prints.

    --
    Huh?
    1. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I don't want to diminish O'Reilly's efforts, they did the original Open Sources book mostly in Open Source, and a number of others, and some other publishers have as well (about my favorite is the Ruby book). But Prentice Hall is the largest technical book publisher in the world.

      Thanks

      Bruce

    2. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
      The assumptions are not necessarily flawed, they just may not apply to 100% of the people. We want to make some money. We're willing to experiment.

      This series is in retail stores. I appreciate that demand publishing can do great things, but it's more of a mail-order phenomenon until it gets inexpensive enough to put the unit in a vending machine. And will that change things!

      Bruce

    3. Re:Oreilly / MySQL Reference Manual by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Please don't think in any way that I'm trying to detract or slam your new project.

      Of course not. The goal here is to get good documentation into Open Source, which is something we have had a problem with so far. The more of it, the better, wherever it comes from.

      And you don't have to be "honored", I'm just a fat old guy who posts on Slashdot.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. Amen to that! by rindeee · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I will ALWAYS buy good 'ole ink and pulp as I much prefer reading them. For reference I much prefer the searchability and rapid access of electronic (and the ability to carry a bunch of them on my handheld). I have gone so far as to "un-bind" some of my favorites, scan them and OCR/index them so that I can search them electronically. Then I have to go buy another copy to replace the one I destroyed. No more! I say hurray for this. Now I just hope these books don't suck.

  8. why do I suspect by SHEENmaster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    that when it finally comes out, months after the book, it will be in a clunky format such as pdf rather than something like sgml that we can convert to linked html or plain text as we desire.

    cat ebook.txt | grep explorer | grep bug | less to get all the paragraphs relating to the latest explorer bug.

    For an ebook format, I want something parsable and convertabl; pdf meets neither requirement.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:why do I suspect by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It will be in an editable format. We would like your changes for the second edition, after all. Unfortunately, they are still operating a .doc file shop there at Prentice. But we have OpenOffice, which can turn .doc files into its own XML format, as well as several other open formats. I have had no problem using OpenOffice to read the books.

      Bruce

  9. Open Source? by Quaoar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does that mean I get to rewrite who won the civil war in my history book? SCORE!

    --
    I'll form my OWN solar system! With blackjack! And hookers!
    1. Re:Open Source? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
      I think the best example of how this is handled is Wikipedia. That project is AWESOME! They have written a whole darned encyclopedia as Free Software (under the GNU FDL), the level of scholarship is high, and it is coming up a lot on google of late because their page ranking is now very high. This means it is answering questions for a lot of "real" people, not just Free Software developers :-).

      They seem to have a meta-discussion process for handling argument, but I haven't looked very deeply into it. They get stuff done.

      Bruce

  10. Copyleft is important. by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I run a web site that catalogs free books (see my sig), and I've seen many many cases where books are originally free for downloading, but then the author's web site mysteriously disappears, and your only option is to buy the print version. This is exactly the sort of thing that gave Richard Stallman conniptions and led to the GPL for software: the idea that software could go from being free to being unfree. In fact, I see it as a much bigger problem for books than for software.

    Too bad there doesn't seem to be any information about what the license is, or what editable form they'll be available in. He does refer to the possibility that profs could edit it and make their own versions.

    1. Re:Copyleft is important. by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
      Open Publication License 1.0 with no options taken. It passes the Open Source Definition in that form. OSI will not certify the license because it is actually 4 separate licenses, depending on which of those boxes you check, and only one of them is an Open Source license. I'll try to get an OSI-certified license in place for later works. OSI has really only done one so far that is for text rather than software.

      Thanks

      Bruce

  11. _Text Processing in Python_ almost under model by Lulu+of+the+Lotus-Ea · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have recently completed a book for Addison-Wesley. Well, almost completed--it needs to make it through copyediting and indexing still, which will probably (unfortunately) mean several more months until it is printed.

    One thing that I did--with permission of my publisher--is make the text of the book completely available during writing, and it will remain so into the future. Shameless plug, you can find it at http://gnosis.cx/TPiP/. I cannot say honestly that being allowed to provide it this way was a deciding issue in choosing a publisher; but it certainly does make me feel better about writing the book.

    Admittedly, this is not quite the same thing as an OpenContent license. You are free to read the book at the URL listed, and print yourself a personal copy. But the book is under copyright, and you cannot reproduce and sell the text yourself. Still, I believe it is a step in the right direction... maybe my next book will manage to go a step farther.

    Yours, David...

  12. This is perfect by RainbowSix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Take for example my paper copy of The Hitchiker's Guide to the Galaxy. I've read that thing probably a dozen times. A beautiful work of art. But, there is always that time when I want to find a quote for my website or to have a laugh with someone. That is when the text files are essential.

    I know I'll be buying more books when I know I can search through them, because not every book I've read has been easily locatable scans on my favorite ftp sites :)

    --
    --------
    It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  13. Re:Nice title by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
    I sincerely did not ask for it to be named after me. That's Prentice's idea, and they need my name there to differentiate them from any other Open Source line that someone else does. I find it a bit embarassing, but will live with it for the good of making books that are Open Source licensed.

    Actually, it has created tremendous difficulty for me. I have to get all of the doors widened in my home now, so that I can get my head through them :-)

    Bruce

  14. Re:Proof reading! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
    Dan Gilmore pointed that out to me, and we are getting after Barnes and Noble about it. Somebody must be typing really fast! We think it might have happened at the wholesaler, who sends data batches to the bookstores.

    Bruce

  15. Re:Astronomy by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
    Please be sure to register the book with Creative Commons. I know that there's a Debian Astronomy package set, besides the ham radio package set which has a lot of satellite stuff. Lots of people can use it.

    Thanks

    Bruce

  16. Re:Paper pricing by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Funny
    Anyone in the know about Open Source will understand that the books are free text when they see my name.

    The copyright page says it's OPL licensed, although there is a bug in the copyright page which I will fix in the electronic version, because someone didn't understand the OPL when putting together the copyright page. It goes to the trouble to say that you can use it under the OPL, and then after that says "no copying". Duh!

    Bruce

  17. Re:There should have by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Informative
    I would like to hear from translators who want to produce Open Source books and make a little money too.

    When we put the books online, there will be an "ask bruce" on the site.

    Thanks

    Bruce

  18. Re:Good thing I'm not in charge of PR though! by jbolden · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How would they do that. 1000 pages at $.04 / page = $40. Throw in binding costs, plus the disadvantage of lower quality... And I'll tell most libraries aren't getting $.04 a page after equipment, labor, consumables.

    Its very hard to beat the economics of a webpress.

  19. A note about the license by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
    The license, at present, is the Open Publication License with no options taken. If any of the options were taken, it would not be an Open Source license (the options restrict modification and commercial use). We are open to other Free Software licenses, my contract explicitly allows the GNU Free Documentation License (which I would like to see used without immutable sections, which I feel make the work not Open Source).

    Thanks

    Bruce

    1. Re:A note about the license by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
      Whatever we can convert the .doc file into. Yes, Prentice PTR is still a .doc file shop. I think the XML format used by OpenOffice might be best. I have used OpenOffice to read the books.

      Bruce

  20. Ripping off college students one edition at a time by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

    The books will cost $50-$75 dollars while they're being sold at university bookstores, then released free as soon as the course is over so that the resale value of the book is zero.

    However, the free book will be useless for the next semester's courses, because a new edition will have been released to update the book for the changing technologies, of course.

    See, it is possible to make big money with open source... although this wasn't what we had in mind.

  21. Redefine the history of the civil war by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yes, the link here will let you do just that.

    Bruce

  22. Re:This will work for technical titles by EvanED · · Score: 3, Interesting

    >>Also, we'll probably see a rash of lawsuits or lobbying by the textbook industry to help them maintain the monopoly they have. After all, we wouldn't want continually improving and affordable materials to fall into the hands of our students. Oh! The horror!

    Really. It's my first year, second semester (well, that's misleading; officially it's my fourth, so I'm taking higher level stuff than your typical second semester person) at Penn State and I'll be paying ~$450 for ALL USED books. Outrageous, especially considering that tuition+room&board+fees for me is little over $1000/semester.

  23. Re:Nice title by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Richard will be annoyed. But then I've done a few things to piss him off lately. I hope he will be somewhat consoled by the fact that the books are free software.

    Bruce

  24. Re:Will those books be available in Spain? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Interesting
    We would like to hear from people who want to translate books.

    Bruce

  25. Re:Don't forget by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Don't worry. They wanted me on board for credibility. That would lose it for them.

    Bruce

  26. topics? by drDugan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    really -- this was asked above but not aswered.

    What topics are you looking for? Do they have
    to relate to open source software? Some
    guidelines would be niec if you are soliciting
    authors.

    1. Re:topics? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3
      Well, I think I have only seen one book proposal refused so far. So, we are open to what you propose.

      They should relate to Open Source software, either as user documentation or as developer documentation. I suppose there are some "Open Source" topics that are not about software - either hardware or policy - and those would work too. If you want to do something else, but it's a technical book, we might be able to help.

      Generally you can ship a CD with the book, so you can make sure that all of the examples are distributed, and you can make sure the version of the software you are writing about is distributed with the book.

  27. Re:This will work for technical titles by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Informative

    You might find this thread about purchasing used textbooks from England at a substantial savings to be helpful:

    Tip on buying textbooks...

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  28. Re:Ripping off college students one edition at a t by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, the instructors can actually customize the books for their own courses, although they will have to comply with the OPL terms when they do it.

    Bruce

  29. Re:Bigger Implications... by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative
    Well, Prentice Hall PTR is not the division that makes text books. PTR makes technical books. One victory at a time, and that next one might be a good deal more difficult. But it's already happening at the colleges, rather than the publishers.

    Thanks

    Bruce

  30. Re:Perens' vs Safari by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'd position the current paradigm we are using in these terms:

    These are paper books just like all of the other paper books in the book store. We pay the authors the same, we wholesale them the same, and you pay for them the same. They happen to be under a license that lets you shove them in the copier with impunity. A bit later, not too long, you get nice clean electronic "source code". People who don't want to pay for the book could use it, but we don't think there really are a ton of them. The license is a real plus to the author, as the books need never die even if the publisher loses interest, and there is no fight about electronic rights as authors are having with most publishers. We might be able to do second editions a bit more often, if we get enough community help.

  31. Re:What about tomorrow? by yeOldeSkeptic · · Score: 4, Interesting
    But, what happens when books become like CDs (easy and inexpensive to make exact functionality copies)? Would enough people pay for the hardcopy to support the author enough to put food on his table?

    Yes they will. If they value their time and the book enough. Even if a laser printed copy of a downloadable is cheaper by a few dollars from the press-printed book, I strongly believe that most people would still go for the convenience and quality of the latter. Why?

    Well, 10 dollars is certainly worth much less than the time that I have to spend printing, collating and having the book bound professionally. I would rather pay the extra ten bucks and avoid the aggravation. So, yes, there will be a market for open books for as long as the value of the book is much greater than the cost of buying it.

    As I see it, open books will revolutionize the industry in the following way.

    1. No book will ever be out of print. Troff is several decades old but it is still alive and kicking in the form of groff. Because groff is open sourced, it will continue to exist in the net somewhere and it will continue to be improved even if only incrementally. Compare that with say, WordPerfect which is almost on the way to extinction. (Please no counter-arguments about warez or how it is still on your hard disk!)
    2. Financially successfull open licensed books will be of a better quality than comparable closed-licensed books. Why? Because in order for the book to succeed it must be of the quality where people are willing to pay for it when a downloadable copy is available. This leads to...
    3. Cost of publishing will drop. Publishers will be able to test probable success of any book cheaply by having it downloadable on the net. All the publisher has to do is log all downloads (in order to count popularity) and provide a survey form inquiring whether the reader would buy a hard-copy of this book if it is available on the market and for how much. No need to print 10,000 copies of a book and then discover what a crap it is. However, it could also mean...
    4. Writing will cease to be as profitable a profession as it is today. But as RMS himself will say (with paraphrasing) just because book writing is not very profitable does not condemn you to write books. If writing books won't put food on your table, then perhaps you better find some other profession. On the other hand...
    5. Some Joe will discover a hidden talent in writing. It is so easy to publish an open book, (put a copy on the net while he is creating it) that many bored and talented individuals may just give it a try. Publishers may just discover the next Stephen King, Richard Feynmann and Donald Knuth this way! It could even be you!
  32. Bruce Perens - The biggest karma whore ever? by tmasssey · · Score: 3, Funny
    Wow! I've never seen someone respond so much to a topic they were related to, and get so much karma because of it. Share the wealth, buddy! :)

    Actually, it's nice to see someone so personally involved: with his own projects, the community in general, and with individuals. If the content of these books are competitive, they will definitely move to the front of my buying list.

  33. Reference vs. Introductory by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 5, Informative

    What I've noticed when I buy dead tree books is that I get much more value out of the books that can be used as reference tools. Typically these are books that touch on subjects that aren't quickly moving targets. For example, I recently bought an O'Reilly book on Bash at a used book store. The book isn't 100% up to date (1999 I believe), but it has helped me move a long way in my Bash scripting and is still very relevant. It's a great reference book. However, I also bought a book that explained what W.I.N.E. is and provided some usage examples at about the same time. Unfortunately, that book is incredibly out of date now and since it was also published in 1999. At this point, it's just s brick. (The W.I.N.E. project changed the way the config files work, so this book is really useless as a reference book)

    With that said, I'd like to point out that if these books are expected to sell as dead tree items, they should probably be more "reference" books than introductory books and probably deal with subject matter that changes slowly over time. The addition of the electronic version makes it relatively easy to keep THAT version up to date, but it doesn't help the owners of the dead tree version when they are not able to access the Internet.

    As an aside, I'd also like to point out the electronic books might benefit from being on CD-RW as opposed to CD-R. Considering that CD-RWs are pretty ubiquitous these days, a dead tree book could come with the book in electronic format on a CD-RW. That way, a user could keep their electronic version up to date by running an "updater" program that would check for the latest version, open the disc for writing, add changes to the disc, and then close the session to make it readable again. THAT would add enough value to the dead tree version that I think people would be kept interested in all three approaches: Paper Book, Online Version, and CD-RW distributed with book. The only reason people don't typically care about included CDs is that they become irrelevant VERY quickly. Just a thought.

  34. Browsing this thread at +3 or more is kinda funny by Kjella · · Score: 3, Funny

    It looks like an article about Bruce Perens, commented by Bruce Perens and almost nobody else. Any karma you'd like to burn off, I think now is the time. After this article you should have enough to go around.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings