Slashdot Mirror


Recycling Pay Phones into Terminals

Roland Piquepaille writes "Two weeks ago, The Washington Post published a story about the death of the pay phone. It was aptly named "Requiem for the Pay Phone." Basically, it argued that as cell phones use increase, pay phones are retired from the streets. Now, according to Fortune in "Making Pay Phones Pay," Bell Canada is trying to change this situation. "Bell Canada recently started converting public pay phones in Toronto, Montreal, and Kingston into terminals for 'Wi-Fi' Internet connections. Some U.S. phone companies may soon follow suit." Check this column for more details and concerns or visit the Bell Canada's AccessZone page for details on the program and pilot locations."

51 of 138 comments (clear)

  1. Ok but by TerryAtWork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When will we see the utopian frog-on-a-lilly-pad wi-fi stuff I read about in Wired?

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  2. If my Phone/DSL company (Verizon) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Started including Wi-Fi access via their pay-phones for me, it'd make me not only a happier customer, but one willing to pay a bit more for service.

    1. Re:If my Phone/DSL company (Verizon) by itwerx · · Score: 2

      WiFi (and more) payphones are already happening. Check out Metrophone.
      Their website sucks, so here's an article which talks about them a little. No mention of WiFi in either the website or the article but it's available.

  3. Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/11/162825 7&mode=thread&tid=95

    1. Re:Dupe? by LostCluster · · Score: 2

      Too bad we can't mod artcles down as -1 Redundant...

  4. How about 911? by Ryu2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I just thought of this.... Could it be a point of argument that removing pay phones reduces access to 911 emergency services for those economically disadvantaged who don't have cell phones? Have there been any studies done to test the validity of this (eg, crime rates vs. pay phone presence?)

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:How about 911? by Simon+Field · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Pay phones are going away because they are not making money.

      This idea may save those pay phones, since DSL and voice can co-exist. And having a phone by the WiFi terminal allows you to get tech support (for another quarter?) when things aren't working.

      As for people who can't afford cell phones not having access to 911, I don't know if this is more of a problem since the cell phone was invented, or less. Finding someone with a cell phone nearby these days may be easier than finding a pay phone nearby was in the bad old days.

    2. Re:How about 911? by Tokerat · · Score: 2

      Seems there might be other reasons besides economic situation for not having a cel phone (dead battery, burning in the fire you're trying ot report, stolen when you got mugged, etc.)

      Perhaps it would be a good idea to have an auto-dial "hotline" handset at each access point for emergencies, similar to the "Police call boxes" located on college campuses and downtown areas?

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    3. Re:How about 911? by qqtortqq · · Score: 3, Informative

      Up until a few months ago, I worked as a section 8 housing cop, and NO ONE in the ghetto uses pay phones. Most folks will wander for half an hour begging to use someone's phone who has one rather than stick the 50 cents in one of the many conveniently located pay phones. Whenever there was a problem on the property, magically 50% of the residents knew about it in less than 2 minutes, and a few would invariably come find us. We wandered the 4 buildings the whole night, and were never hard to find.

      As for people without a phone that don't live in apartments, im sure it works the same way; they go to a neighbor's, or in case of emergency, the neighbor who hopefully has a phone will hear the screaming.

    4. Re:How about 911? by macemoneta · · Score: 2

      Unless I'm at the mall, there isn't a pay phone around here for miles. I just keep an old cell phone (without service) in my car for emergencies. 911 calls still work, even if the phone is otherwise without service.

      Many people have multiple cell phones from previous service contracts. It's pretty easy to get an old phone from a friend, acquantence or local community service.

      My previous employer regularly collected old cell phones to give to community services, so that they could redistribute them to those that needed emergency phones.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    5. Re:How about 911? by axxackall · · Score: 2
      Could it be a point of argument that removing pay phones reduces access to 911 emergency services for those economically disadvantaged who don't have cell phones?

      That nothing to do with Bells. Telcos originally started the payphone business with the only goal to make money, not because the govt ordered them to do so. Therefore, if this business is not working anymore let them get phones out of the street.

      And if the safity of citizens is any concern of the govt then the govt must compensate telco all TCO they have plus prenegotiated profit minus total revenue. Otherwise, let the govt to buy out the payphone business from telcos and run it on their own for the money of tax payers if the tax payers agree to pay such a price for very doubtful benefit in their security.

      --

      Less is more !
    6. Re:How about 911? by zulux · · Score: 2


      You muct be one those grown up stupid ass crack-babies. Where in the fuck did I mention race.

      Get you panties out of a bunch and go watch your credit-card-financed big screen TV.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    7. Re:How about 911? by kesuki · · Score: 2

      there are two ways to do this 1. have '911' phones installed in areas where they're needed. 2. offer incentive programs (tax credits etc) for putting pay phones in low income areas. in the former you have single purpose phones that can only be used for 911. in the later low-income people can have a full function pay phone should they decide to order a pizza or, they could even use it as a 'home' phone number, to apply for jobs, so that maybe someday they could afford a cell phone.

    8. Re:How about 911? by Tassach · · Score: 2
      Sorry, but you are Wrong Wrong Wrong.

      Every cell phone carrier is required by Federal law to accept 911 calls, at no charge, from any cellular device, regardless of whether or not the calling device has a valid subscription or not.

      The question of whether or not that call actually goes through is a different matter altogether - a 911 call from an unsubscribed phone has just as much chance of connecting successfuly as one from a subscribed phone. And assuming that your call does go through, the way it is handled is no different than a landline call. 911 systems are overloaded in many areas; this affects landline calls just as much as wireless ones.

      As you noted, the bulk of problems calling 911 from a wireless phone are the same ones encountered making any other wireless call: weak or no signal, dead batteries, no available circuits, and so forth. A wireless connection will never be as reliable as a landline; that is the nature of wireless.

      The point is not that you can't rely on being able to call 911 to save your ass. Numerous Supreme Court decisions say that while the police have a duty to protect society as a whole, they are under no obligation to help any particular individual.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  5. Is it useful? by El+Pollo+Loco · · Score: 2

    I'm all for mass adoption of these technologies. But I can't see this being useful for another 10 years. When cell phones came out, they were more of a novelty. People were always around a land line, and didn't need the freedom. People didn't start to really need them all the time until 10-20 years later. I think the same thing about internet access everywhere. Sure it's cool, but how many people really need internet everywhere? By the time it will be useful, I'd guess everyones moving over to a different standerd.

  6. Everything old is new again by Toasty16 · · Score: 2
    Though I wonder how many quarters it'll take to get 10 minutes of Wi-Fi access? I can just see it: "Please Mr., can you spare a quarter? I gotta finish this upload to the home office in Duluth or else!" And thanks to the the wonders of wireless, you've already walked a half block away from the payphone and now you're gonna have to hoof it double time to make it before your connection is lost.

    And don't even get me started on the resurgence of phone phreaks!

  7. Money by trans_err · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The idea truly is grand, and how great will it be to sit on the sidewalk, or outside of the movie theatre with your laptop soaking up those WiFi rays.

    1. I dont understand how they plan on making money, will you have to preregister with bellsouth, or whomever.

    2. I see a lot of potential if this could be used in conjunction with PDA's, the idea of being able to walk to certain parts of the street and hit a DSL connection would be very nice.

    1. Re:Money by kawaichan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      how payment might work:

      1) Your laptop/PDA/whatever requests an IP address via DHCP.
      2) Access point hands out IP address, makes a note against that IP address that "has not paid yet"
      3) At this point, all that you can do is access HTTP and DNS.
      4) You point your browser at any web site - let's say http://slashdot.org for grins.
      5) DNS succeeds.
      6) Your computer does an HTTP GET.
      7) Access device sees you've not paid yet. Sends HTTP REDIRECT to https://fork.it.over.to.me
      8) Your laptop looks that up. Gets an IP address.
      9) Your laptop requests page.
      10) Page comes up - input credit card here.
      11) You do so. Access device marks you has "paid for 1 Hour". Ports open up.
      12) You again try /., and it goes through.

      --

      kawai
    2. Re:Money by jedrek · · Score: 2

      This isn't just a theory, my friend was flying through Helsinki during the christmas season, so he pulled out his notebook waiting for the plane and *boom*, three different wireless networks. All of them charged, all of them cut you off after 5 minutes if you didn't give up a credit card number.

      Still, good stuff.

  8. It would be interesting to see the business model by Simon+Field · · Score: 2


    I understand how pay phones make money.

    Would this work the same way? I feed coins into a slot, and then my WiFi card sees a carrier?

    Maybe it is even somewhat secure. Suppose after I drop the coins, an LCD screen tells me what to use for WEP keys. If every 10 minutes, I need to drop more coins and get a new WEP key, I can stay ahead of the guy in the van outside who is trying to collect a day's worth of data to break that first WEP key.

    Or, it could be an open WiFi channel, on the cafe jukebox model. I drop the coins, and share the bandwidth with everyone else within range. I then use a VPN and/or PGP when I want privacy.

  9. Acoustic Modems by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

    There was a Hackers 2?!? Oh god. On a similar note my friend made a 56k acousitc modem. :D

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Acoustic Modems by erpbridge · · Score: 2

      Hackers 2:Takedown was the story of Kevin Mitnick, from the beginning of his social engineering career up through the cracking that led to his imprisonment. It had nothing to do with the original movie, except for the fact that both had individuals who were interested in gaining illegal access to other individual's resources (whether it be an improperly secured phone network or improperly secured computer network.)

      Unfortunately, the chief advisor to this movie was the guy who he cracked that took him to court and led him to prison. So, the movie is a little one sided and not as true to life as possible.

      But, as they say, history is written by victors.

  10. My proposal. by kaosrain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why don't we all band together, and whenever a user submits a dupe we all add them to our 'foes' list? Doesn't directly stop anyone from posting repeats, but if I knew that submitting one could get me hundreds of foes, I'd probably check my submissions for duplicates.

    1. Re:My proposal. by kaosrain · · Score: 2

      It's a good idea to punish the submitters and not the editors (since we obviously know when something's a dupe within seconds of it posting), but often difficult to find out who actually submitted the article (in this instance:)

      The user you requested does not exist, no matter how much you wish this might be the case.


      Well, in cases like this, we Slashdot the user! ;)

    2. Re:My proposal. by *xpenguin* · · Score: 2

      How about a new category / icon for duplicates? That way I can just set my preferences to ignore them!!

      You make it sound funny, but it's actually a great idea. If a story is found to be duplicate, it's topic icon can simply be changed and be ignored by users that hate duplicate stories.

    3. Re:My proposal. by Spunk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Parent is correct. I'll repost the AC's comment here so it's +2 rather than 0

      -----
      That is a stupid idea. Often dozens of people submit the same story, but until one of them is accepted, there's no way for them to know that they have already been posted by someone else. What happens is that 10 people submit the same story. Then a slashdot editor accepts it. Then later, a slashdot editor accepts another one from another user, even though both users posted around the same time. Or even the second (dup) may have submitted theirs before the one that was accepted first.

      So yes, the slashdot EDITORS should be punished. NOT the submitters
      -----

  11. Cafe Security by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 4, Insightful



    While this plan isn't without its merits, its also going to be without users such as myself for some time. No matter show secure the "FI"delity is stated, I get about the same warm fuzzies transmitting anything of any value over such a system as I would shopping online at an internet cafe.

    And its not really the systems themselves that concern me, but the human error factors ... and mostly privacy factors. I can't imagine any large corporation implementing such a system without the temptation of at least using my demographics, if not outright selling any non-secure personal information to me to the highest bidder.

    This not to say I'd never use it ... just not for anything really important or private. At least for now.

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
    1. Re:Cafe Security by zulux · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No matter show secure the "FI"delity is stated, I get about the same warm fuzzies transmitting anything of any value over such a system as I would shopping online at an internet cafe.

      Do wha I do: Make a secure tunnel from your laptop to an OpenBSD server you have hanging off the net and set up as a gateway. They can grab all the wireless packets they want, but it ain't gonna' get them anywhere.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  12. Just so we're all clear... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dupe 1 (orig)
    Dupe 2 (orig)
    Dupe 3 (orig).

    Ok? Check the originals for more comments, I don't think it'll fly unless it's outrageously cheap and can maybe be paid just by walking by with an RFID tag or something else equally effortless. Geesh.

  13. Maybe by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe people like me would use the pay phone more if it were 10 cents per a call, not 50-75 cents like it is now. And maybe I would have a "land line" phone in my home if it weren't nearly $50 a month after taxes, FCC feens, 911 imposed fee, etc.

    Or, the monolpy phone companies can just coninue to loose money and customers to cell phones.

    [/rant]

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Maybe by qqtortqq · · Score: 2

      Around here, payphones at $.35 weren't making money. The biggest cost was looking up where the phone you were calling was located, so they knew if it was long distance or not. To fix this, the phone company jacked up the price to $.50 to cover the lookup cost, but then gave you unlimited minutes. When I worked security, some sites required you to sit in your car all night. I brought my laptop and acoustic coupler, was able to surf for usually 45 mins at a time before something disrupted the coupler or I lost the connection for some other reason. $.50 for 45 mins was not a bad deal at all.

    2. Re:Maybe by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2

      I live in the good old USA. We have the same issue here: No one is using pay phones. Why would you at .50-.75 cents?

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  14. Re:wifi = excellent idea by webword · · Score: 2

    Better solution = powerline broadband

    The idea is to use exactly the same lines as the power lines for broadband. Nice!

  15. or better yet FIX it! by asv108 · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Modify slashcode so that if a user submits a dupe, he/she is banned from submitting a story for X amount of days. This would still leave a gaping hole because anonymous users could post dupes, but it would be better than the current situation. Perhaps slashcode should have automatic duplication checking? Some code that would check stories from say the past 2 weeks and look for inordinate amount of matching words and/or phrases? I would do it myself, but I'm not a PERL haxor. Anyone here know PERL? Slashcode is an open source project, fix it! If we took the gross of the amount of hours spent writing about duplicate slashdot posts and put it in to slashcode development for duplicate story checking, dups would be nonexistent.

    1. Re:or better yet FIX it! by packeteer · · Score: 2

      Although the editors are under no obligation to avoid posting dupes i disliek em as much as anyone else. If at my job i did a task i have to do regularly after it had just been done i would get in trouble. In a capitalist system like ours we should be going to something better than slashdot if we are unhappy but apparently nobody cares enough to change anything.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  16. Cost? by Transcendent · · Score: 2

    Bell Canada is trying to change this situation. "Bell Canada recently started converting public pay phones in Toronto, Montreal, and Kingston into terminals for 'Wi-Fi' Internet connections.

    So now we'll have to pay how much for phone calls now?

  17. Re:It would be interesting to see the business mod by Simon+Field · · Score: 2


    Actually, I'm sure that there are a number of ways to make money and still keep the customers happy. In an airport, I could charge the customer a buck for unlimited time. When the carrier drops, I assume he's done and gone. Since the bandwidth is shared, I can accomodate the occasional person who stays on all day, and the guy in the house across the street with a directional antenna.

    But I don't understand the point of your comment about security. You seem to be saying that since locks can be cut, broken, or picked, that there is no point in having locks.

    By providing WEP keys, you are giving the customer a reasonable expectation of privacy, especially if the keys are changed faster than current technology can decrypt them. This expectation of privacy is an important legal distinction, and can be useful in prosecuting the person who cracks the security and abuses the information gained. Many people rely on the legal system to deter theft and vandalism, rather than relying on locks and fences.

    Don't let the best be the enemy of the good. We may not be able to prevent all armed robberies, but reducing the odds of my getting robbed at gunpoint is a worthwile endeavor.

  18. Already in the UK by Cally · · Score: 3, Interesting

    BT has been doing this in the UK for ages - I think I saw the first ones (in Liverpool St station, London) in late 1999 or early 2000. There's one on the corner of my street now. (Brixton.)

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  19. Problem by Mike+McTernan · · Score: 2

    Hmm - so each payphone is going to have the bandwidth of [roughly] 1 DSL line. This doesn't sound like much.

    The other problem I forsee is that people living near to phone boxes may just decide to use the WiFi instead of getting DSL installed depending on how it's priced - this would be bad since the WiFi bandwidth could get used up by these static users (Although the phone company wouldn't care if they still got cash).

    On the plus side, it may mean that many more exchanges get DSL capability installed.

    --
    -- Mike
  20. Already doing this by s20451 · · Score: 2

    The University of Toronto is already doing this for its 802.11b connections. However, they do payment by assigning an account to the MAC address of your wireless card, which means that you only have to authenticate once. (Are MAC addresses easy to spoof?)

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:Already doing this by macemoneta · · Score: 2

      Yes, they are trivially easy to spoof, and even easier to "sniff". If I were at the University of Toronto using this system, I'd contest every charge after the first, saying I'd never made the connection.

      At the very least, they should be (securely) prompting for a userid and password, and matching that to the MAC address(es) previously authenticated before associating the accounting information.

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    2. Re:Already doing this by Doc+Hopper · · Score: 2

      Regular Ethernet cards (10baseT, 100baseTX, GigE, etc.) have MAC addresses that are trivially easy to spoof. Every wireless card I've ever used (four, now, from different vendords) has the mac hard-coded into the card. You can try to spoof the mac, but coming out from your port (or responding to ARPs) it reports its hard-wired MAC address.

      In general, most WAPs these days just require you to use a PPTP connection over them so that you have encrypted traffic and user authentication. Sign in using PPTP, and every packet on that PPP interface can be billed to you.

    3. Re:Already doing this by macemoneta · · Score: 2

      Uh, you're using a weird wireless card. All Ethernet cards have a hard coded MAC, wired or wireless. They can all be overridden:

      [root@buggsb root]# ifconfig wlan0
      wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:06:25:xx:xx:xx (changed for publication)
      inet addr:13x.x.x.x Bcast:13x.x.x.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 (changed for publication)
      UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
      RX packets:2071986 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
      TX packets:4172682 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
      collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
      RX bytes:969512650 (924.5 Mb) TX bytes:1160156046 (1106.4 Mb)
      Interrupt:3 Base address:0x100

      [root@buggsb root]# ifconfig wlan0 down
      [root@buggsb root]# ifconfig wlan0 hw ether 00:01:02:03:04:05
      [root@buggsb root]# ifconfig wlan0 up
      [root@buggsb root]# ifconfig wlan0
      wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:01:02:03:04:05
      inet addr:13x.x.x.x Bcast:135.82.8.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 (changed for publication)
      UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
      RX packets:2072456 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
      TX packets:4173602 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
      collisions:0 txqueuelen:100
      RX bytes:969569432 (924.6 Mb) TX bytes:1160184256 (1106.4 Mb)
      Interrupt:3 Base address:0x100

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

    4. Re:Already doing this by macemoneta · · Score: 2

      I retract the statement; the user interface reports the MAC address change, but the card does not transmit the changed address.

      I guess that means you can't do a wireless failover. Is that intentional, or just a deficiency in the current drivers/fimware/hardware?

      --

      Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  21. Beware the Standards! by Durindana · · Score: 3, Informative

    I used several different types of these toll-booth terminals, run by British Telecom, on a recent holiday, and discovered something not to my liking: at least the way BT does it, you'll have trouble with sites that consist of more than bare HTML. The thing was Windows- and IE-based, of course, and it did not do Javascript well at all (though it didn't seem to be a performance issue). Also the terminal refused to work with WebObjects sites... so without those two I couldn't check email at all. Waste of a pound or two.

    Now Bell Canada certainly could use a better implementation. BT at least screwed this up.

  22. War On Drugs Already Killed Their Pay Phones by billstewart · · Score: 3, Informative
    The War on Drugs already killed pay-phone availability in areas where those "economically disadvantaged" live. One of the other commenters said that they only see drug dealers using them,
    but not only _do_ they use them, replying to their beepers from phone numbers that aren't easily traced to them, but police and cities have discouraged phone companies from providing them there because they want to discourage drug dealers, and this is most common in poorer urban areas. Pay phones used to be able to support incoming calls as well, but the telephone deregulation changes in the 80s and early 90s that let them be privately operated instead of only run by telcos killed that, because private operators didn't get any revenue from receiving calls (and also, the War On Politically Incorrect Drugs also meant that drug dealers would use them to receive calls.)

    A few years ago, before I got a cell phone, I was trying to hunt for an apartment or house to rent in the San Francisco Bay Area. This involved a lot of trying to contact landlords and property managers to get in to see places that were advertised, but they're never in their offices - you call their beeper or answering machine and leave your phone number. I did have a beeper, but of course with no PAY PHONES around, it was hard to call them back. In some areas, there'd either be a 7-11 or else a restaurant that had a phone in the back, so if we'd left enough calls in a given area, we'd get coffee and more quarters and wait. Really frustrating....

    Of course, pay phone usage in poor areas also went down because of low-cost lifeline phone rates, and because deregulation meant that the prices of pay phone calls went way up, and in high-crime neighborhoods, a coin-operated pay phone looks a lot like a parking meter - it's a box of money sitting there for any teenager with a spare metal pipe, unless it's in a well-lit high-traffic area.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  23. Dupe! by gmarceau · · Score: 3, Funny
    Well, its turns out that living in Montreal and caring for the phone company there(*) is useful to spot duplicate stories :

    Bell Canada Turns Payphones into Public Hotspots
    Posted by michael on Wed Dec 11, '02 11:59 AM
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/11/162825 7&mode=flat&tid=95

    (*) : Bell Canada actually offers very good service, ground lines phones, cell phones, dsl, it's all good

    --
    This post was compiled with `% gec -O`. email me if you need the sources
  24. yeah, yeah, yeah. by twitter · · Score: 2
    I get about the same warm fuzzies transmitting anything of any value over such a system as I would shopping online at an internet cafe.

    If you never bring your wi-fi into the cafe, you will never know if the cash register is transmitting your credit card via wi-fi. Hardee-har-har. Oh, and you better not buy anything over a cable modem because that's a shared connection that can be sniffed. Your dial-up traffic is also sniffed by the local bell. Better give up now and go back to barter. They can't take things off of you can they? Oh my, yes they can. Sorry.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  25. Re:Well by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
    "I'm American, so I don't know how big an area Bell Canada actually covers up there, but in the world of business travel, where its unusual to hit up the same city more than say, once every two weeks, how much is it really worth to be on the internet for an hour per visit?"

    Bell Canada is frickin huge. They own practically all the phone line hardware all across the country. Almost everyone (at least 99% of people) get their local service from Bell because there is no other choice. Bell Canada also has nationwide long distance service, mobile phone service, dialup internet access, DSL access (with limited areas of course), Satellite access, Corporate class web hosting. They own a large amount of the canadian fiber backbones (BellNexxia). To summarise, Bell is everywhere and if all their payphones had WiFi, it would probably be the biggest WiFi network in the world.

  26. Here in the UK by Fembot · · Score: 2

    It is possible to surf the net from many payphones, and more still can send text messages and emails.

  27. Pay phones? What are those? by dghcasp · · Score: 3, Informative
    Funny this should come up now... I just saw something about pay-phones in the Facts & Arguments column of friday's Globe and Mail (italics mine...)

    In October, a shopping mall devoted to 1960s-and-earlier nostalgia opened in Tokyo, The New York Times says. Ichome Shotengai (District 1 Shopping Area), which attracts the elderly, has been doing booming business in an otherwise flat Japanese economy. "Increasingly, young people are turning up to gawk at the artifacts of a world they never knew -- boxy televisions that play tapes of the original black-and-white shows, beauty salons with posters of big, beehive hairdos and public telephone booths with rotary dial phones. In a country where almost everyone under 30 owns a cellphone, it is not uncommon to see young people step into the booths unaware that the caller has to turn the dial to operate the old phones."