Discuss BIOS and Palladium Issues With an AMIBIOS Rep

Posted by Roblimo on Monday January 13, 2003 @05:00AM from the is-trustworthy-computing-trustworthy? dept.

After this Slashdot discussion about the relationship between BIOS biggie American Megatrends Inc. (AMI) and Palladium appeared, we got an email from AMI sales engineer (and former Linux.com contributor) Brian Richardson, who wrote, "I am a bit concerned that the information you provided misled your readers into thinking AMI was promoting Palladium or taking some sort of anti-open-source stance. This might be due to the fact that TCPA was mistakenly equated to Palladium, or questioning how Linux would run on a TCPA-enabled system ... or by the horde of angry Slashdot readers telling us they would never buy an AMI product because we were forcing standards on them." Brian offered himself up as (his words) a "Slashdot interview victim" to clear things up.(Update by RM: And, says Brian, he's happy to answer other BIOS questions as well.) So ask, already, and let's get things cleared up. (Usual Slashdot interview rules.)

1 of 453 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Here's a simple one... by Sheetrock · 2003-01-13 05:06 · Score: 4, Redundant

Will Linux and other alternative operating systems continue to install and function properly on computers containing AMI BIOSes?

--

Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
-- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.