Slashdot Mirror


Talk to the GNUWin II Team

imevil writes "GNUWin II is a collection of Free Software for Windows, and it also includes articles about Free Software and explanation pages. It is multilingual (it was born as a Swiss product). You can browse the CD online or download the ISO from one of our mirrors. The GNUWin II team is ready to answer to your questions, about GNUWin II, and also about GNU Generation, the student association at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology of Lausanne who gave birth to the GNUWin project."

24 of 178 comments (clear)

  1. Pun time by MondoMor · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those guys are really dedicated.

    They don't GNU Win II Quit! LOL OMG WTF

    kill me

  2. Missing FAQ question by MoThugz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Q20: Who's the chick in the pictures?

    1. Re:Missing FAQ question by rmarll · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q20: Who's the chick in the pictures?

      That, is the girl that gets guys like me to buy their software.

    2. Re: Missing FAQ question by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > Q20: Who's the chick in the pictures?

      I forsee a worse than usual slashdotting coming on.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    3. Re:Missing FAQ question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That answer question is answered on the site, there's a The GNUWin team [en] page. Her name appears to be Thi Ngoc Tu Ho and then a little search on Google seems to reveal she has a Home Page and if you go there, and click on My Life Partner you'll see that her life partner is one Ivo Blöchliger and if you cross reference back to where it all started, the GNUWin team page, you'll see that this guy is the first guy on the GNUWin team. Maybe they can add it to the FAQ now that I've done the legwork.

    4. Re:Missing FAQ question by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hmm, I don't think that's the same girl.. her picture doesn't seem to match up with "logiciels".

      Perhaps it's Vicky Rezzonico (see the picture on the team page, and here)? The hair colour matches at least, there. But I'm probably wrong, there are several women on that team list who have no pictures up.

      Okay, next person gets to go hunt down photos of all the photo-less people on the team page =)

    5. Re:Missing FAQ question by Bullet-Dodger · · Score: 3, Funny
      Q20: Who's the chick in the pictures?

      Wow, there's one way of getting people to read the article.

  3. Major problems by kruetz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What was the hardest aspect of producing the GNUWin II CD? Was it selecting the software? Was it making sure the software worked okay (ie, were there any major portings issues, and if so, how much work did you have to do vs. how much did the developer do). Was it something else entirely?

    Also, what criteria did you use to select the software? Did you consider which applications had a UI that Windows users would find more comfortable? Did you consider any programs that you weren't able to get running under Windows?

    BTW, best of luck with the project. My father has been using the Win32 port of the GIMP for about two years now and loves it! As I type, he's (ab)using his work's net connection to d/l the ISOs.

    --

    This sig intentionally left bla... dammit!
    Who's got the whiteout?
  4. from the "making-windows-liveable" dept? by TheReckoning · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Windows is pretty easy to live with as it is.

    I guess it depends on your paradigm... command-line commandos don't like the GUI's insulation, while GUI geeks hate remembering a bunch of bizarre program names.

    Unless I'm missing the point - the only real failing of Win32 is that a lot of stuff can't be scripted because of the lack of a CLI. Does GNUWIN allow for some of this? Does it have hooks into system admin programs on Win32?

    1. Re:from the "making-windows-liveable" dept? by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Interesting

      >> Unless I'm missing the point - the only real failing of Win32 is that a lot of stuff can't be scripted because of the lack of a CLI

      If anything, Windows is even more scriptable than linux because of COM and it's progeny, ActiveX. The functionality of just about every portion of the OS is available, and that of any application that chooses to expose it's functionality. So script away in VBScript, Javascript, TCL, or any other COM-aware language - dealers choice.

      Linux is great and all, but you really wind up with an incohesive jumble of software, each developed in it's own little bubble with no knowledge of the others. If your lucky you can get an integer return value to tie it all together.

      The problem with most free software for windows is that it carries the *nix school of thought. No exposed interfaces, and they don't like to play nice with the rest of the system. COM is really a binary format that has nothing to do with OS's (there's no reason it couldnt be implemented in linux), so it's not about it being proprietary.

      MS-bashers are quick to point out shortcomings in the OS, but never seem to notice the Good Things (tm) that make it popular.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:from the "making-windows-liveable" dept? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I agree that COM makes Windows scripting quite functional given a large object model that lets you control many aspects of the system, including full CIM support. The OOPish nature of it is considerably easier to deal with than parsing stdio anyday. I also like that Windows Scripting is a plugin model that lacks a language (although it comes with VBScript and JScript.) I use Windows Scripting with ActiveStates Perl. Works wonders.

      However, while I enjoy the world of scripting, I greatly dislike the standard Windows commandline. I think it was a big mistake to hold onto the DOS moniker, especially when the advent of Windows NT made it possible to provide something entirely new. Batch scripting is a horrible joke given it's syntax and shortcoming of useful commandline utilities. The latter is slowly changing with Windows XP and Windows 2003, but it's still not *ix level.

      But then the question becomes do I really want it *ix level for the shortcomings in that I mentioned in the first paragraph? Why not an object-oriented moniker like Windows Scripting provides? You would spare yourself the requirement of parsing and gain the possibility for command completion and parameter information that could even get new users into the habit.

    3. Re:from the "making-windows-liveable" dept? by Patrick13 · · Score: 3, Funny

      If anything, Windows is even more scriptable than linux because of COM and it's progeny, ActiveX.

      Yah... Haven't you noticed all the great viruses that people have been making?

      --
      ::.. check out some Cell Phone Reviews
    4. Re:from the "making-windows-liveable" dept? by m8pple · · Score: 3, Interesting
      There is a COM implementation for linux from softwareag. Admittedly it's geared towards transparent DCOM interop with windows machines rather than ActiveX style scripting, but pretty much all of the base COM stuff is there. Can be a bitch to get things working on it sometimes though.

      More interestingly, Mozilla is largely hooked up using COM (well, they call it XPCOM, but it's extremely similar in the fundamentals), and there are mappings to JavaScript and Python. Maybe more people will expose applications/components using XPCOM in the future; isn't the web browser supposed to be the operating system anyway?... or maybe I'm out of date :)

      Anyway, I agree, OLE/ActiveX/COM are great, and hopefully linux (or I guess more probably KDE/Gnome) will eventually incorporate some or all of the functionality they provide. But better, with less stupid gotchas, and less bloat (as a user I love OLE, as a developer I loath it:)

  5. Re:cygwin? by Kourino · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, GnuWIN includes Cygwin, as well as several packages that aren't in Cygwin. For example, LiteStep, which only makes sense on Windows (since it's an alternative Windows shell - that is, litestep.exe runs instead of explorer.exe). Not all of the stuff in GnuWIN is actually GNU. It's just a convenient collection of free/gratis (are all these free/libre?) apps for Windows.

  6. This bothers me ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 4, Funny

    GNU/FSF is ran by RMS who feels that the world should be free, but GNU now wants to support the windows platform officially? If you can run these popular tools on windows will RMS be emailing windows and telling them to rename windows GNU/Windows?

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  7. Slashdotted, FAQ and software list by jonman_d · · Score: 4, Informative

    The site's moving at a crawl, so here's the FAQ and software list (what I just happen to have open when I noticed its slashdottedness):

    Q1: What is GNUWin II ?
    R1: GNUWin-II is a free software distribution for MS-Windows. It includes a large spectrum of programs, notably a whole office suite (MS-Office compatible), Internet utilities, development tools (C, C++, ...), typesetting software (LaTeX), calculus environments, games, ...

    Q2: Who made GNUWin II ?
    R2: GNUWin-II was made and is still being improved by GNU Generation, a team of students of the EPFL who promote free software and operating systems. It is a collaborative and voluntary project.

    3: What is the purpose of GNUWin II ?
    R3: The purpose of GNUWin-II is to help Windows users discover the free software and Open Source world. After using free software on MS-Windows, it is easier to migrate to a free operating system (GNU/Linux for instance), where the same programs are used.

    Q4: How much does GNUWin II cost ?
    R4: GNUWin II is free (as a "free beer"). The programs included on the CD are free software (here, free is to be understood as free in "free speech"). The edition work and HTML pages that contain GNUWin-II are themselves copyrighted under a free license.

    Q5: Why GNUWin II and not GNUWin 98 ?
    R5: Because GNUWin-II is the second version. The first one can be seen here. GNUWin is not a Microsoft product, and we do not count "3.1, 3.11, 95, 98, 2000" !

    Q6: May I copy this CD ?
    R6: Yes, you are encouraged to do so, and to distribute copies of this CD.

    Q7: May I lend this CD to a friend ?
    R7: Yes, you can give / lend / copy / distribute this CD as often as you want to.

    Q8: Where can I get the licenses so that I can use the programs included on the CD ?
    R8: You do not need to buy licenses, as all applications on the CD are free software or Open Source software.

    Q9: May I use the programs included on this CD for professional or commercial purposes ?
    R9: Yes you may. There are no restrictions on the use of the programs.

    Q10: What is the difference between the programs included on this CD and freeware that can be found on the Internet ?
    R10: Most freeware programs are "free" in the sense that they don't cost you money ("free" as in "free beer"). This is your only freedom. On top of this, these programs are often watered-down versions of commercial products (be it with limited functions or limited time of use). The programs that are included on this CD are "free" in all senses of the term : they are "costless", they are unlimited, you have the right to distribute them, and most important, their source code is freely available, and you may modify it to improve the program or fix bugs.
    This ensures that the program will always be costless in the future, and allows to keep the program alive, even if its original developers lose their interest in it.

    Q11: What is "source code" ?
    R11: Source code is a text written in a programming language that was used to create the program. The source code is often kept secret by companies so that nobody can understand how the program works, nor check what it actually does. All programs on this CD are "Open Source", that is their source code is available; thus, everybody can improve, correct or check the program.

    Q12: Where can I get the source code for the software included on this CD ?
    R12: The source code is available on the Internet on the official program site. The link to the site in available at the description page of the program.

    Q13: Can I install the programs included on this CD on my Macintosh computer ?
    R13: No you cannot, for technical reasons, unless you have a PC emulator. There is already free software distribution for Macintosh, like fink. In addition, MacOS X can be turned into a full GNU system, using GNU/Darwin.

    Q14: Can I install the programs included on this CD on my Linux/Unix computer ?
    R14: No you cannot, for technical reasons, unless you have a MS-Windows emulator. But most of the programs included on this CD were initially developed for Unix or GNU/Linux. In this case, you can download the GNU/Linux version or the source code on the official site. The link to the program official site is available at the description page of the application.

    Q15: Do I need to install Linux to use GNUWin-II ?
    R15: No, you do not need to. On the other hand, most of the programs included on this CD were originally developed for GNU/Linux; if you want to migrate to Linux, you can go on using the same applications on the Linux platform.

    Q16: What version of Windows is needed to run GNUWin-II programs ?
    R16: GNUWin-II should not require any particular version. But we cannot test all applications on every available Windows version, and it might happen that some programs work badly, or even not at all, on some Windows version. Should this case arise, we would be grateful if you report the problem to us.

    Q17: Who can I contact if I have questions or problems ?
    R17: Please send an e-mail to gnuwin@listes.epfl.ch

    Q18: Why is the XXX software not on GNUWin ?
    R18: There might be several reasons for this :
    o The software might not be free. It's not enough for a software to be free of charge to be on GNUWin, the source code must also be available to the public.
    o There might already be an application on GNUWin that has the same features. There is no need to have half a dozen of FTP clients, for instance.
    o The software might have a very specific use. GNUWin is aimed at a wide public who have discovering free software, not at specialists.
    Anyway, GNUWin also holds a list of links to similar projects that cannot be o n the CD itself, but deserve attention.

    Q19: Why is software XXX on GNUWin even though it's not free software ?
    R19: GNUWin promotes free software in the sense of the FSF, and advocates use of the GPL. However, we do claim our right to decide by ourselves whether or not an application is "free enough" to be part of GNUWin.
    To be part of GNUWin, a software must be free to execute, the source code must be available freely and widely, and redistribution must be authorized without restriction. Freedom to distribute modified Source, although a valuable and esteemed feature, is not required. Thus you can find for instance Scilab and Povray on GNUWin.

    --

    Quick start:
    * OpenOffice
    * 7-Zip
    * Mozilla

    General purpose:
    * The Gimp
    * Zinf
    * X-Tractor
    * HTTrack
    * WinJab
    * Sylpheed

    Engineer:
    * MiKTeX
    * Dia
    * GnuPlot
    * R
    * Scilab
    * Maxima
    * PuTTY
    * HTTrack
    * GPG

    Developper
    * SciTE, Vim or XEmacs
    * GNAT Ada Compiler or Mingv32 or Python
    * MySQL
    * HTTrack
    * GTK+ or Simple Direct Media Layer or wxPython
    * Inno Setup
    * MiKTeX

    Kids:
    * TuxPaint
    * TuxType
    * Jump'n'bump
    * TuxRacer

    Webmaster:
    * Apache
    * MySQL
    * Python
    * The Gimp
    * iXplorer
    * PuTTY
    * CatFish

  8. Richard Stallman quote by Guiri · · Score: 4, Funny

    "It's GNU/Win and no GNUWin"

  9. Dear Good Sirs by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have set up us the Google cache of every page. Just keep clicking 'next' to view each page of their site in various languages.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=link:codwwioy63YC:g nuwin.epfl.ch/en/&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe =off&start=10&sa=N

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
  10. Question from the group by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    GNU Win II is an excellete project. Good job guys! Also, check out The Open CD as well.

    www.theopencd.org

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  11. Popularity by bfree · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do you have, or would you consider adding, a voluntary popularity rating system for the programs on your CD? I'm thinking of the likes of the debian popularity-contest which tracks which programs are installed (and how often they're used I think) to decide what programs should be included on which CD of their release. It would also help for the Linux (BSD, any other FreeOS you care to name) community as they could see which programs Windows people like and therefore can help most in bringing them across from Win to Lin.

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  12. No: there are no Legal liabilities from GNUWin II by No+Panic · · Score: 3, Informative


    GNUWin does Not use SCO libraries.
    There is no liability to SCO.

    There is no registration.
    Nobody is tracking you.

    --------

    Some legacy SCO applications were ported to Linux using SCO libraries. Those are the ones with legal libabilities. GNUWin did not do that.

  13. Re:Why Bother? by kirkjobsluder · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Windows already runs more software then linux.

    People who use windows often pirate copies of commercial software so they don't need or want open source software.


    Believe it or not, there are people who prefer to use open source software on windows. Some of these people consider piracy to be ethically problematic.

    The biggest point about open source software is not price, but freedom. Even though I get Microsoft products legally for $5 a CD (one perk of university life), I still don't like the closed security model, the license restrictions and the understanding that using the software after I leave the university will require shelling out $400.

    The fact that I use (and pay for) some closed source software on windows, does not mean that I should not benefit from open source software when available.

  14. Re:Why Bother? by The_Dougster · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I use Cygwin all the time at work because I don't have the option of installing Linux. It is pretty dang convenient for a lot of things, especially little bash 1-liners for doing bulk file renaming and such. Consider:

    $ for i in *.ps; do ps2pdf.bat $i; done
    $ for i in *.pdf; do mv $i form_${i%.pdf}-031015.pdf; done

    If you have a hundred or so files which you want to rename or prepend things or change the suffix, for instance, it is a slick way to do it rather than clicking away for hours.

    Likewise, you can use awk to do some pretty nifty tricks with large text files.

    And finally, I don't rate to get a copy of Visual Studio, so if I want to write a little program for some reason then Cygwin's g++ is my only option, or the GNAT Ada95 compiler in GNUWin (I have it installed as well). These GNUWinII programs are more GUI-style programs which really Cygwin is mainly command-line based. I can't get by without Gimp and I have been using the GNUWin version for a couple years at work now.

    --
    Clickety Click ...
  15. Re:Why Bother? by JordoCrouse · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That way you actually encourage people switching to linux.

    Lemme stick some numbers out there for you. Of all the people currently using Windows, I would only say that about 10% feel comfortable in a Unix environment. And lets say that another 5% are beginners, but are willing to try. And of that 15% who might switch, at least half will switch right back again. So really, you only have roughly 7% of all personal computer users that would end up choosing Linux (and feeling comfortable with it).

    Given these numbers, why would you even want to keep open source programs like Mozilla, Apache and the GIMP away from 93% of your possible user base? Why not expose as many people as possible to the chewy goodness of open source? Why cut them out because they are unwilling or unable to use anything except a operating system from Redmond, WA?

    Free as in speech, indeed.

    --
    Do you have Linux and a DotPal? Click here now!