Should The Next Windows Be Built On Linux?
scrm writes "The next version of Windows should be built on top of Linux, according to this article by Robert Cringely of PBS." If Microsoft wanted to, they could be the world's largest vendor of Free software .. couldn't they?
That's about as likely as Jack Valenti saying, "We actually don't need copyrights to last this long," or Duke Nukem Forever being released.
This
If anyone could ruin the stability of Linux.....it would be Microsoft.
peace be with you.
Will Linus accept the BSOD patch for the kernel?
MicroSoft could say "Hey, look at how often Linux crashes now!"
You mean, like OS X?
No, he means like Lindows.
specifically, what a premise.
Let me start thinking that way.
You can get to a root prompt in Linux. You can do so in BSD as well. Solaris, also.
Apparently, these are all actually the same thing - they're all running Linux, underneath it all. And because it's that simple, it's just marketing - since the product is free - Solaris is just hyping it up so that people will use CDE.
Lets go further. Also, you can find a brain inside every animal. Cats have brains.
So, deep down, we're all cats, right*?
*Really old, bad movie quote
Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
I cringed while reading this.
Honorary Member of Jackie Chan's Kung Fu Process Servers
Yea Microsoft would never base their products on something that apple made.. oh.. wait a minute....
"Should The Next Windows Be Built On Linux?"
No because I hate Microsoft and I refuse to see any good that could come from it.
you're bang on, man
;)
again, we think, who combines the awesomeness of *nix with the gui wikedness of XP? Oh yeah, apple!
"Old man yells at systemd"
That's because the misread it as the BSoD licence and thought it fitted their products perfectly.
"E pur si muove!" - attributed to Galileo Galilei, 1564-1642