Slashdot Mirror


Review: Illegal Art

An anonymous reader writes "I just got back from the Chicago opening of Illegal Art, Freedom of Expression in the Corporate Age, January 25 - February 21 (See the website for location, film screening dates, and information on the panel debate featuring Lawrence Lessig) and quite enjoyed myself." The anonymous review follows.

The reader continues:

The exhibit is of artwork on the legal fringes of intellectual property, litigation clouds loom over many of the pieces. (Buy now! This is a limited time offer! ;-) Even to an artistic ignoramus such as myself, it's clear the exhibit contains classic works of the genre. In this category are such items as the "Disneyland Memorial Orgy" (Poster, 1967) by the Mad Magazine artist Wally Wood, and the trademark certificate which certifies Professor Kembrew McLeod's ownership of the phrase "Freedom of Expression" (Conceptual, 1998). I also particularly enjoyed the finely detailed Spiderman quilt (Untitled) (Commercial fabric and recycled materials, 2002) by Ai Kijima and the counterfeit postage stamps, including "Prozac" (Computer generated laser print, 1996), of Michael Hernandez de Luna. De Luna creates stamps good enough to fool postal workers, as attested to by successfully delivered letters complete with postmarks. (Sorry, I cannot find any contact info for this Chicago artist on the web.)

An exhibition like this is innately political and nowhere is this more apparent than in the exhibition's video accompaniment, much of which is strongly anti-war and anti-corporate. Like the visual artwork, the borderline legality of the video work is due to its appropriation of corporate trademarks and sampling of copyrighted work. What makes it interesting as well as sometimes funny, regardless of your politics, is how the material reveals the manipulative techniques of everyday media and thereby turns the content against its owners. The very strength of the alternative message the videos present is often due to the strength of the original images.

Audio works are also included in the exhibit but I have not had the time to sample the wares.

Those who can't physically visit the exhibition in Chicago can experience many of the works via the Illegal Art web site. Video, audio, and visual art is available for download. A number of works have been added to the exhibit since it has come from New York. Images of the Chicago artists' work should be added to the web site as soon as the organizers get around to it. FWIW, rumor has the exhibit traveling to San Francisco.

25 of 146 comments (clear)

  1. No Comments? by Poeir · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, is there something good on TV or something?

    --
    Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  2. Becoming more rare by RoguePsion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is good to see that in this age of major corporatism and restrictive copyright laws that there is at least some vestige of free expression. Too bad it is not showing in my area.

  3. My favorite by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The ascii-art version of the CSS-auth code: http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/DeCSS/Gallery/Pooshee bla-dvd.html

    1. Re:My favorite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Corrected link free of karmic charge!

  4. Of particular interest.... by Cali+Thalen · · Score: 4, Funny

    ....to those of us who are reading /. instead of being out at a themed party *cough* might be the "Disneyland Memorial Orgy" link.

    (yeah, I'm one of the above mentioned too...go figure)

    --
    Chaos, panic, disorder...my work here is done.
  5. Regarding the piece "Disneyland Memorial Orgy" by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 3, Informative

    This kind of stuff has been on the Internet for years but Disney seems to pretend it doesn't exist. Anyone ever hear of any lawsuits coming out of this sort of fan art/fiction (other than Star Trek, which has gotten a lot of press here :).

    (Note: I know the piece I am talking about is from the 60's, not implying it's unoriginal :)

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    1. Re:Regarding the piece "Disneyland Memorial Orgy" by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "This kind of stuff has been on the Internet for years [news] but Disney seems to pretend it doesn't exist."

      That may be because it's unfeasible for Disney to hunt down and pursue every last infringer.

  6. I wonder... by FyRE666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What would happen if I copied their site and put it online on a Geocities page? Think they'd sue?

    1. Re:I wonder... by Tom · · Score: 4, Funny

      right now, I guess they'd be happy to have a mirror. :-)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:I wonder... by mildness · · Score: 3, Funny

      http://www.illegal-art.org/contract.html

      ELECTRONIC END USER LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR VIEWING ILLEGAL ART EXHIBIT WEBSITE AND FOR USE OF LUMBER AND/OR PET OWNERSHIP

      NOTICE TO USER: BY METABOLIZING YOU ACCEPT ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, USE OF YOUR HOME AND CAR BY THE AUTHORS OF THIS AGREEMENT.

      This Website End User License Agreement accompanies the Web Pages and related explanatory materials ("Crap"). The term "Crap" also shall include any upgrades, modified versions, or repaintings of the Website licensed to you by either The Prince of Wales, a sentient washing machine, or my old Rabbi (the one who used profanity). Please read this Agreement carefully. At the end, you will be asked to accept this agreement and provide this Website with a warm, lingering, creepy hug. If you do not wish to accept this Agreement, simply click the "I do not accept" button while forcefully shoving your computer off the back of your desk ("Card Table").

      Upon your acceptance of this Agreement, this Website grants to you a nonexclusive license to use this Website or your own Shoes ("The Dressy Ones"), provided that you agree to the following:

      1. Use of the Website.

      1.1 You may use this Website on a hard disk or other storage device. On a scrap of drywall with a Sharpie, install and use the Website on a file server or a tomato server for use on a network or a VHS copy of the motion picture "Network" or for the purposes of (i) permanent installation onto the small of your back at the base of your spine via a tattoo or other storage devices or (ii) for providing the illusion of working while at work (using the following methods of deception: looking intently at the screen, moving the mouse, and typing decisively on the keyboard); and make backup copies of the Website for later printing and spreading out in an alley to make a nice bed.

      1.2 You may make and distribute unlimited copies of the Website, including copies for commercial distribution, as long as each copy that you make and distribute contains this Agreement and is created in one of the following media: carved out of ice, as in an ice sculpture centerpiece; smeared in mustard on the side of a white or off-white panel van; or taught to a parrot who is then condemned to fly the earth for eternity, incessantly repeating the mantra of this Website.

      2. Copyright and Trademark Rights. The Website is owned by its authors ("the Elks Clubs of America") and its suppliers. Its structure, organization, and code are the valuable trade secrets of the Freemasons, probably. The Website is also protected by United States Copyright Law and a group of big, scary goons who will happily beat you until you're ejecting teeth like a winning slot machine. Use of any trademark does not give you any rights of ownership in that trademark, jackass. Except as stated above, this Agreement does not grant you any intellectual property rights in the Website. Got it, fucko?

      3. Restrictions. You agree not to modify, adapt, translate, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble or otherwise attempt to discover the inner motivations, dreams, aspirations, or weird, possibly sexual fantasies of the Website.

      4. No Warranty. The Website is being delivered to you AS IS and we make no warranty as to its use or performance. WE DO NOT AND CANNOT WARRANT THE PERFORMANCE OR RESULTS YOU MAY OBTAIN BY USING THE WEBSITE. LOOK, WHEN THIS WEBSITE GOES ALL CRAZY AND DESTROYS YOUR COMPUTER, KILLS YOUR PET, SLEEPS WITH YOUR SIGNIFICANT OTHER, DIGS UP ALL YOUR OLD POETRY AND LAUGHS AND LAUGHS, THEN CALLS UP YOUR FRIENDS AND READS THEM ALL THOSE REALLY EMBARRASING PARTS OUT OF YOUR JOURNAL, LIKE WHEN YOU SAID YOU WERE "DESTINED FOR BEAUTY" OR SOME SHIT LIKE THAT, WE MAKE NO GUARANTEES AND WILL SIMPLY JOIN WITH EVERYONE AND LAUGH AT YOUR SORRY ASS, BECAUSE DAMN, THERE'S NO FREAKING WARRANTY HERE. GET IT? NO WARRANTY. NONE. AT ALL.

      6. Notice to Government End Users. The Software and Documentation are "Real Bitchin'," as that term is defined at 48 C.F.R. 2.101, consisting of "Real Bitchin' (formerly 'Radical' items)" and as such terms are used in 48 C.F.R. 12.212 or 48 C.F.R. 227.7202, as applicable. Or maybe 56 C.Fsomething something. 7. Oh, and these things, too: . Consistent with 48 C.F.R. 12.212 or 48 C.F.R. 227.7202-1 through 227.7202-4, as applicable, as well as R2-D2 and JOHNNY 5, locked in a beautiful metallic embrace of everlasting robot love.

      PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OR DECLINE OF THE FOREGOING AGREEMENT BY CLICKING ON THE APPROPRIATE BUTTON BELOW.

      I Agree | I do not agree

      by Jason Torchinsky

      --
      bamph
  7. "Counterfeit" pound notes by pchown · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Here in Britain, we had an artist who drew pound notes. He wasn't forging them in the sense that he was going to pass them off as originals. His work is difficult to pin down; it is part parody but he is also improving the originals.

    What would happen is that the artist, Boggs, would go into a shop and ask to buy something. He would try to convince the person at the checkout to accept a Boggs note rather than a normal one. So, he might offer you a £5 Boggs note in exchange for £5 worth of goods. If you felt that his art was worth £5, you would accept.

    If you did accept, you were about to become very rich. He would tip off the people who collected his art that a note had been "spent", and the lucky shop assistant would be offered thousands of pounds for the note.

    Of course, Boggs was charged with counterfeiting currency, because the people who govern us don't have a sense of humour. In due course Boggs appeared in court, represented by pro bono counsel. It seems that Boggs offered to paint his fee, but, not wanting to get struck off, his lawyer said that he would rather work for free!

    After one of the most wacky trials I can remember, the jury voted to let Boggs off. In the process, the government made Boggs rich; thousands more people heard about his art, and the price went through the roof.

    Shortly afterwards, the British currency had one of its periodic redesigns. The banknotes had changed to include a claim of copyright. Presumably the government wants to be able to get an injunction against any future Boggs, rather than taking its chance in front of a jury.

    1. Re:"Counterfeit" pound notes by jdcook · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't know if Boggs is a Yank or a Brit, but he started with greenbacks and is best known for them. See his web page.

      --
      Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
    2. Re:"Counterfeit" pound notes by Patrick13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There was a PBS program about Boggs during a visit the US. If you can see it, it is definitely worth seeing.

      There are some examples of his work, interview transcript and whatnot.

      --
      ::.. check out some Cell Phone Reviews
    3. Re:"Counterfeit" pound notes by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't remember him being British or doing it with Pound notes, but there was a fairly long New Yorker article about his run-ins with the US Dept. of Treasury for doing the same thing with the dollar notes. Essentially making his own money and bartering for goods and services with it.

      If I remember right, the long-haired speculation was that the Treasury wasn't keen on this not so much because of the counterfeiting aspect of it but because they're more afraid of people using something other than dollars as a medium of exchange.

      I'm not sure what the law is about this. Is it specifically illegal for me to print up a 10,000 Flugelbucks and then convince everyone in my community that they should accept and use my Flugelbucks as a form of payment?

      I'm not even sure what the tax ramifications are of this. I suppose you're supposed to keep track of even direct barter (painting for plumbing) transactions above a certain amount -- but what if I start say painting houses and have only *ever* done it for Flugelbucks? If I do all of my other transactions in them, how do I know what the dollar value of the transactions is?

      It's kind of surreal path and I can understand where it would give people who like to keep economic transactions in neat and tidy dollar amounts a big headache.

    4. Re:"Counterfeit" pound notes by evilquaker · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'm not sure what the law is about this. Is it specifically illegal for me to print up a 10,000 Flugelbucks and then convince everyone in my community that they should accept and use my Flugelbucks as a form of payment?

      I doubt it, considering that some cities print their own money: Ithaca, NY most notably.

      I'm not even sure what the tax ramifications are of this... If I do all of my other transactions in them [Flugelbucks], how do I know what the dollar value of the transactions is?

      Most likely the "fair market value" in dollars would be applied. If you're painting houses, then you have to ask: what would someone else charge in dollars for this? Now, if you can find a service that no one else can/does provide, then maybe you've found a tax loophole that can be exploited... (but probably not, because IANATA)

      --
      To within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury. -- Tom Duff
  8. Slashdot: Tool of Disney? by reptar64 · · Score: 5, Funny

    One Disney lawyer to another: Let's shut their website down -- we'll plant a Slashdot article!

  9. Here's some illegal art by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 3, Funny

    OK, so it's not illegal, but it's still pretty funny... Check it out here.

  10. zine with companion articles by urbazewski · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This month's issue of the 'zine stay free! has companion articles and a CD with some of the pieces in/related to the exhibit, like negativland's U2 radio mix and sampled tracks from De La Soul and the Beastie Boys. I'm looking forward to seeing the exhibit in Chicago.

    --
    foldplay your photos won't know what hit them.
  11. The opening was off the hook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    .. . I dropped into the this place (western on the blue line, 2040 north milwaulkee upstairs, in the In These Times magazine office.)

    The show is off the hook. There is some video pastiche and collage from the first gulf war that was on GNN (www.gnn.tv?) that is amazing and oddly precient for what is going on now, what is about to happen yet again.

    They were asking for donations for the wine, but weren't pushy about it. Thusly, the wine ended up being resonably priced and quite good. It started to snow around 7pm or so, and I didn't get there till after six, so I didn't hear the opening speach (which was quite good, I heard).

    I'm so glad this came to Chicago, I'd seen the NY announcement and thought it bad ass. This show rules, and the SF MOMA should definitely try to scope it (it plays to the SF Moma strength of design) for a west coast engagement.

    But mostly, this stuff should be on-line. Somebody should take a good ditital camera and make some higer-res photos of the show and do a real on-line catalog, the low-res shit on the current site doesn't do it justice.

    They were giving out this CD of music that looked good (and soon to be MP3'd) that says: "Not for Sale: Stay FREE! 003"

    Ha. Right on. Also, it has an Invisibl Skratch Piklz track on it (also in CDDB as Various Artist Illegal Art): finally a free giveaway cd that doesn't suck. De La Soul track, Beasties, ubiquitous Negativeland "U2" track, hopefully some punk: tracks like "the JAMS - the Queen and I" sound kind of punk-rock, don't they?

    1. Re:The opening was off the hook by SirSlud · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Good sounding CD. I thought I'd expand on the appropriateness of some of those artsts:

      Invisbl Skratch Piklz - turntablist group that uses presumably copywritten recordings, deconstructing and reconstructing COMPLETETLY original music from prerecorded vinyl records.

      De La Soul - first rap group involved in sample-litigation for a sample they used from some Turtles (I think) song. Top 40 R&B Rap today is very canned, and rarely self-referential .. producers today obscure source samples as to not get caught using them, or create much of their sound from the ground up. Not that theres anything wrong with it, but De La ended up being the poster child for a persecuted movement in the progression of music. (Interested parties may also note that classical music greats would 'borrow' 3 or 4 bar melodies from each other verbatim .. what De La Soul got sued for has been happening, safely and positively, between musicians for centuries. Too bad the lawyers dont get it.)

      Negativeland - I _think_ they coined the term "Culture Jamming" ..

      Just felt like I should point out why these groups would be involved in an exhibit like this.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
  12. Re:For the most part, looks like the exhibit sucks by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Art can be purely asthetic, or it can be a message. Anything can be art.

    If you copied all your CDs, and called it art, poof! Its art!

    Whether is good art, or not, thats for you to decide. You didn't like it, good stuff.

    But art is a message (in this case) .. if you copied your CDs and put them on display, then its art. And think about it .. if you copy all your music (illegal) and put them on display (ie, youre not ripping the artist off because youre not even listning to their product, youre just making a point) .. why should that be illegal?

    I think thats the message there .. by putting the CDs on display, they cease being usable for their intended purpose, and become art - but, for reasons other than keeping artists from making free "CD Collection Exibits", its illegal to do that, and the point is made! The message is the irony that its illegal to copy information if you dont use that information in such a fasion that the original creator of the information should be compensated. Presumably, he could have copied anyones CDs .. the actual product (the music) is being completetly disregarded in this case, so no artist should get paid .. youre left wondering if this piece of illegal art, should, in fact be illegal.

    So who cares if its good or not .. should it be illegal to create art by copying data off of CDs, when the infomation on those CDs is never used by the purchaser? Should the purchaser owe the musicians on the CDs money for using their creations to make a statement .. should we not consider the context in which the information is being used before the law states that copying that information is illegal? Is this fair use? Etc, etc ...

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  13. They have a EULA! Beware by Warin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hum. When I went to the site, THIS popped up...

    NOTICE TO USER: BY METABOLIZING YOU ACCEPT ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, USE OF YOUR HOME AND CAR BY THE AUTHORS OF THIS AGREEMENT.

    This Website End User License Agreement accompanies the Web Pages and related explanatory materials ("Crap"). The term "Crap" also shall include any upgrades, modified versions, or repaintings of the Website licensed to you by either The Prince of Wales, a sentient washing machine, or my old Rabbi (the one who used profanity). Please read this Agreement carefully. At the end, you will be asked to accept this agreement and provide this Website with a warm, lingering, creepy hug. If you do not wish to accept this Agreement, simply click the "I do not accept" button while forcefully shoving your computer off the back of your desk ("Card Table").

    Upon your acceptance of this Agreement, this Website grants to you a nonexclusive license to use this Website or your own Shoes ("The Dressy Ones"), provided that you agree to the following:

    1. Use of the Website.

    1.1 You may use this Website on a hard disk or other storage device. On a scrap of drywall with a Sharpie, install and use the Website on a file server or a tomato server for use on a network or a VHS copy of the motion picture "Network" or for the purposes of (i) permanent installation onto the small of your back at the base of your spine via a tattoo or other storage devices or (ii) for providing the illusion of working while at work (using the following methods of deception: looking intently at the screen, moving the mouse, and typing decisively on the keyboard); and make backup copies of the Website for later printing and spreading out in an alley to make a nice bed.

    1.2 You may make and distribute unlimited copies of the Website, including copies for commercial distribution, as long as each copy that you make and distribute contains this Agreement and is created in one of the following media: carved out of ice, as in an ice sculpture centerpiece; smeared in mustard on the side of a white or off-white panel van; or taught to a parrot who is then condemned to fly the earth for eternity, incessantly repeating the mantra of this Website.

    2. Copyright and Trademark Rights. The Website is owned by its authors ("the Elks Clubs of America") and its suppliers. Its structure, organization, and code are the valuable trade secrets of the Freemasons, probably. The Website is also protected by United States Copyright Law and a group of big, scary goons who will happily beat you until you're ejecting teeth like a winning slot machine. Use of any trademark does not give you any rights of ownership in that trademark, jackass. Except as stated above, this Agreement does not grant you any intellectual property rights in the Website. Got it, fucko?

    3. Restrictions. You agree not to modify, adapt, translate, reverse engineer, decompile, disassemble or otherwise attempt to discover the inner motivations, dreams, aspirations, or weird, possibly sexual fantasies of the Website.

    4. No Warranty. The Website is being delivered to you AS IS and we make no warranty as to its use or performance. WE DO NOT AND CANNOT WARRANT THE PERFORMANCE OR RESULTS YOU MAY OBTAIN BY USING THE WEBSITE. LOOK, WHEN THIS WEBSITE GOES ALL CRAZY AND DESTROYS YOUR COMPUTER, KILLS YOUR PET, SLEEPS WITH YOUR SIGNIFICANT OTHER, DIGS UP ALL YOUR OLD POETRY AND LAUGHS AND LAUGHS, THEN CALLS UP YOUR FRIENDS AND READS THEM ALL THOSE REALLY EMBARRASING PARTS OUT OF YOUR JOURNAL, LIKE WHEN YOU SAID YOU WERE "DESTINED FOR BEAUTY" OR SOME SHIT LIKE THAT, WE MAKE NO GUARANTEES AND WILL SIMPLY JOIN WITH EVERYONE AND LAUGH AT YOUR SORRY ASS, BECAUSE DAMN, THERE'S NO FREAKING WARRANTY HERE. GET IT? NO WARRANTY. NONE. AT ALL.

    6. Notice to Government End Users. The Software and Documentation are "Real Bitchin'," as that term is defined at 48 C.F.R. 2.101, consisting of "Real Bitchin' (formerly 'Radical' items)" and as such terms are used in 48 C.F.R. 12.212 or 48 C.F.R. 227.7202, as applicable. Or maybe 56 C.Fsomething something. 7. Oh, and these things, too: . Consistent with 48 C.F.R. 12.212 or 48 C.F.R. 227.7202-1 through 227.7202-4, as applicable, as well as R2-D2 and JOHNNY 5, locked in a beautiful metallic embrace of everlasting robot love.

    PLEASE INDICATE YOUR ACCEPTANCE OR DECLINE OF THE FOREGOING AGREEMENT BY CLICKING ON THE APPROPRIATE BUTTON BELOW

    Isnt this Yew-la thing bad?

  14. Re:What are you guys trying to do today? by Glytch · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords.

  15. Re:This sums it up for me. by JimRay · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hmmm...perhaps if you'd take a moment to figure out why McLeod trademarked the phrase, you'd be able to make an informed commment on the subject.

    McLeod, who was at the opening (I met him, chatted for a brief sec), trademarked the term and then named a zine "Freedom of Expression". He then got a buddy of his to start a punk zine also called "Freedom of Expression" and then sued his friend, hiring a lawyer whom he didn't let in on the gag. The whole point of the exercise was to show the ridiculousness of trademark. As McLeod said himself, "Freedom of Expression is not for sale." The entire suit was an exercise in analyzing culture and property rights.

    He's also suing AT&T over the use of the phrase in an ad campaign they're running.

    Amazingly enough, all of this information was readily available from the links in the story. Who knew?

    --
    My other computer is your Windows box
  16. more articles from the show... by seamusmh · · Score: 4, Informative

    hi, we've put together a package of articles to coincide with the show. here's some links:

    AN UPHILL BATTLE: INTERVIEW WITH LAWRENCE LESSIG
    Stanford Law School professor Lawrence Lessig is the nation's leading advocate for intellectual property law reform; we interview him about the state of the movement.

    THE PIRATES OF HOLLYWOOD
    The language of film may be universal, but don't tell that to the Motion Picture Association of America--you might end up in court.

    MUSIC FOR THE MASSES
    When Lester Chambers stepped onto the stage to galvanize the audience with "People Get Ready," his band included one guy who looked like he might be from the IRS. But he wasn't. He was there from the Federal Communications Commission.

    FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
    The power of corporations to censor was greatly expanded by the passage in 1998 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which was written by and for the lobbies that paid to push it through Congress--the software, entertainment, pharmaceutical and other intellectual property industries.