Slashdot Mirror


P2P File Sharing Could Cost You A Bundle

geekee writes "CNET posted an article claiming you could be liable for $250,000 in fines and up to 3 years in prison for p2p file sharing. This is due to an obscure law called the No Electronic Theft (NET) act passed in 1997 (signed by Bill Clinton). Although the Justice Department has not prosecuted anyone under this new law, some members of congress have asked John Ashcroft to begin prosecuting. In response to the request, John Malcolm, a deputy assistant attorney general, said to expect some NET Act prosecutions."

9 of 789 comments (clear)

  1. Canada's Great eh? by jclendenan · · Score: 5, Informative

    At least in our great state north of the 49th parallel we don't really have to listen to our music with the fear of the FBI coming in and arresting us for listening to music we downloaded to evaluate. Our wonderful government just takes our money from buying blank media instead.

    but it would be nice if we could get some kind of representation in the senate or congress so we could voice out conserns.

    What ever did happen to representation in government?

  2. NET act defines nonfinancial gain as financial by phr2 · · Score: 5, Informative

    It specifically says if you upload a copyrighted file in order to be allowed to download other copyrighted files, the downloads count as financial gain even though you don't get any cash. Welcome to the doublespeak future.

  3. It's not a democracy. It's a republic. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Switzerland, they actually let people VOTE on whether they want these acts or not.

    Nice to hear it. Wish we had that here.

    Got to love America?s "Democratic" government, passing laws without even letting the people know.

    Actually, the US isn't a democracy. It's a republic. The general population doesn't vote on the laws (as in a democracy). The enfranchised portion of the general population votes on the legislators, then the legislators vote on the laws.

    Originally the general population voted on the representatives and the states chose the senators (with the states' population in turn chosing the state reps and governor who were the ones chosing the senators). But that got changed so the population votes directly on both.

    Of course sometimes they pass laws without the CONGRESSMEN knowing.

    - The congresscritters rarely read the text, but depend on the recommendations of their staff, their party, (or sometimes their major contributors B-( ).

    - Even if they want to read what they're voting, often it's impossible. The staffers put together the final text of enormous bills, which appear on the legislators desks within hours, or even minutes, of the final vote. (I recall one that was a stack of paper several feet thick that showed up in just such a fashion.) I've yet to hear of a congresscritter voting against a bill because "I haven't had time to read it."

    - A conference committee might completely re-write a bill (possibly with similar staff "assistance"). Both houses normally rubber-stamp a conference committee's results.

    And even when the congresscritters know what they're voting on, maybe nobody else does, or has a chance to comment. For instance:

    The "Firearm Owners Protection Act" was a bill to protect gunowners from the web of 30,000-ish conflicting state, county, and local firearms laws when traveling. A tiny bill that said ~"If it's legal where you start your trip, legal where you finish it, and locked up in between, it's ok to transport it no matter what the state and local laws say in the places you pass through"~. Much support from pro-firearms groups.

    In the minutes before the final vote it was amended to also ban the manufacture of new machine guns for sale to private citizens in the (already heavily regulated) private market. So the supply would be limited to those already papered - and thus become obsolete, expensive, and eventually disappear.

    SURPRISE!

    Of course it passed. (And some pro-gun organizations got a lot of undeserved flack for "selling out" the machine-gun fans, when it was really a crooked political gambit by the anti-gun politicians.)

    Of course the Swiss don't have this problem. Their government REQUIRES them each to have a machine gun (or some other piece of large-scale military nastiness) handy. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  4. Re:Code 431.322.12 of the Internet Privacy Act by miratrix · · Score: 5, Informative

    You do know that there's no such thing called Internet Privacy Act, right?

    I'll take that as a joke. :)

  5. Re:Sooo, what else is new? by Snaller · · Score: 5, Informative

    File swappers are already commiting theft.

    Its not theft - its a copyright violation. Big difference.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  6. Re:It's not a democracy. It's a republic. by Spellbinder · · Score: 5, Informative

    yeah of course :p
    if we join the army we get a automatic rifle and even some bullets to keep at home (it's part of our militia system)
    but it is not legal to buy or own other such weapons
    they wanted do requier tank crews to keep their tanks at home but nobody had space for it, so they just sold the old once to people for near to nothing,
    it's a shame that you have to keep it inside of a building or i would have bought one :p
    what we have is called a half direct democracy
    that means we have some sort of congress too and to my happiness no president(if i look at bush). but we have also the possibility to infulence our law or constitution directly by a public vote
    what you have is called a indirect democracy in our schools

    --


    stop supporting microsoft with pirating their software!!!!!
  7. Encrypted IRC by Tomble · · Score: 5, Informative
    I found out recently there's a project called SILC that is pretty much an encrypted replacement for IRC, and is apparently quite a bit better than the IRC based alternatives.

    Not used it myself yet, but it sounds neat.

    --
    Be careful! New moon tonight.
  8. Re:It's not a democracy. It's a republic. by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 5, Informative

    Democracy isn't orthoganal to a republic. Thats a myth.

    republic
    Pronunciation: ri-'p&-blik
    Function: noun
    Etymology: French rpublique, from Middle French republique, from Latin respublica, from res thing, wealth + publica, feminine of publicus public -- more at REAL, PUBLIC
    Date: 1604
    1 a (1) : a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president
    (2) : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government
    b (1) :a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law
    (2) : a political unit (as a nation) having such a form of government c : a usually specified republican government of a political unit <the French Fourth Republic>
    2 : a body of persons freely engaged in a specified activity <the republic of letters>
    3 : a constituent political and territorial unit of the former nations of Czechoslovakia, the U.S.S.R., or Yugoslavia

    democracy
    Pronunciation: di-'m-kr&-sE
    Function: noun
    Inflected Form(s): plural -cies
    Etymology: Middle French democratie, from Late Latin democratia, from Greek dEmokratia, from dEmos + -kratia -cracy
    Date: 1576
    1 a : government by the people; especially : rule of the majority
    b
    :a government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised by them directly or indirectly through a system of representation usually involving periodically held free elections
    2 : a political unit that has a democratic government
    3 capitalized : the principles and policies of the Democratic party in the U.S.
    4 : the common people especially when constituting the source of political authority
    5 : the absence of hereditary or arbitrary class distinctions or privileges

    So we in the USA live in a Democratic Republic .

  9. Re:+2 Informative on the MQR standard by Blkdeath · · Score: 5, Informative
    Man, I wish I had some of last week's mod points left. If you are correct (and it appears you are), this whole article/thread is a waste of time. It's almost a case of Slashdot trolling itself!

    The No Electronic Theft law and the supposed "Internet Privacy Act" are two separate laws. Moreover, one was referenced in an article submission quoted from a reputable (subjective, I know) news source, and the other was an off-hand comment by one of the half-million or so Slashdot subscribers.

    Trolling about trolling. Yeesh.

    --
    BD Phone Home!

    Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.