Slashdot Mirror


Archive.org Deploys Macromedia Software Titles

Jon-Erik Hexum writes "Now at the internet archive, the new software section contains over 10,000 CD-ROM titles donated by Macromedia. In an interesting discussion, the Software Archive is struggling with deciding on the best method for preserving CD-ROM images for the long term."

148 comments

  1. Wow. by theplaidranger · · Score: 0

    No replies, and they're already Slashdotted. Must be some kind of record.

  2. WooHoo!! by BobRooney · · Score: 1

    No more pirating...er, i mean sampling with the intent do delete Flash 4 off of IRC...

    1. Re:WooHoo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the site:

      Macromedia and the Internet Archive are working together to provide an online catalog of the names, titles, publishers, and release dates of more than 10,000 CD-ROM titles developed with Macromedia products and published under the Made with Macromedia program. These titles are not available for download, except when an individual developer or publisher has expressly granted permission to the Internet Archive. Should you wish to make your title available for download, please contact info@archive.org.
      We welcome all feedback!

  3. This prompts for a name change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Macromedia Software.... "Macrosoft" maybe?

  4. Best CD-Rom backup system by br0ck · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Best CD-Rom backup system by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nah, text printout of binaries is the best backup method. After all, OCR is getting better, right?

      Hey it worked for PGP...

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:Best CD-Rom backup system by cscx · · Score: 0

      the best method for preserving CD-ROM images for the long term.

      Personally, I'd take a digital picture rather than use film. Then copy the pictures to various media (CD, Hard disk, etc) for backup.

    3. Re:Best CD-Rom backup system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, too few people have punchcard readers.

      The real answer to backing up 10,000 CDs....

      555,556 Floppies!

      Everyone has a floppy drive.

    4. Re:Best CD-Rom backup system by ahknight · · Score: 1

      Oh, sure, leave the Mac users in the dark again. Thanks bunches.

      Damn PC usin' fools <grumble>

    5. Re:Best CD-Rom backup system by sconeu · · Score: 1

      You're off by a factor of 10!

      650M * 1floppy/1.5M * 10000 = 4,333,333 floppies!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Best CD-Rom backup system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Everyone has a floppy drive.


      Except for Mac users.

    7. Re:Best CD-Rom backup system by terrencefw · · Score: 1

      You'd need stainless steel punchcards, to resist corrosion and other degradation.

      --
      Like tinyurl, but one letter less! http://qurl.co.uk/
    8. Re:Best CD-Rom backup system by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 1

      Not quite everyone. Mac users aside, I decided not to include one in the Wintel computer I built 3 years ago. I only had one problem and that was when I put a new network card in and the driver only came on floppy. But, I was able to put the old one in, download the driver to the hard disk, and re-install the network card, installing the driver from a local disk. Haven't had any need of one since.

      --
      Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
  5. wow, already? by ceejayoz · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Slashdotted already? Goodness... that didn't last long!

    Of course, when offering 10,000 CDs for download... a little extra bandwidth would probably be prudent.

    1. Re:wow, already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And this time no one is suggesting that Slashdot should mirror the sites it links to. Strange.

    2. Re:wow, already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nawww... they saw the story post and ran screaming yanking cables out!

    3. Re:wow, already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Slashdotted? that's ok.. we'll just look up the page on archive.org..

      oh, wait.

    4. Re:wow, already? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "I've had more insightful things come out of my penis."

      Unfortunately this has never been witnessed by a female.

  6. Archive.org refusing connections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... that was quick. /. effect in action!

  7. Why preserve... by cube00 · · Score: 0

    ...when you can use them as frisbees!

  8. How best to store these things... by KimiDalamori · · Score: 3, Funny

    they have these little, thin Plastic things called 'Compact Disks'...

    Oh, wait...

    --
    Lagito ergo expectabo
    1. Re:How best to store these things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compact DISC, ya dolt!

  9. Use the Public by Jason1729 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The best way to preserve this media would be over a distributed network. People sign up to voulenteer space on their computers and then download only the media they want to archive. To retrieve the information, have a simple search client that will show you who has that information...Oh wait, that's just a P2P network.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:Use the Public by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that when the software is no longer "hot" or people need that extra terabyte of space to install Windows XXXPP++.Net or whatever copies will quickly disappear.

      Not much archival value left then. P2P networks are great distribution mechanisms... they suck as archival systems. Public P2P networks at least.

    2. Re:Use the Public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly what I recently stated on the archive.org public forums. Why not leverage the existing intelligent/swarming/file-authenticating P2P networks for distribution purposes? eDonkey and Overnet would be *PERFECT* for this...

      -W

    3. Re:Use the Public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The people who posted against this idea just don't get it. You wouldn't just store one copy in the P2P network, you'd have hundreds, or thousands of copies of each piece of information. The redundancy is what makes it such a good idea. To ensure the data is valid, you could store MD5 checksums on the main server, and even download multiple copies and compare them to each other.

    4. Re:Use the Public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, BUT, by making use of the networks, they would still conserve a lot of bandwidth taken by the more popular files. Using ed2k or Overnet, they could also "host" those files, ensuring that at least one source would always be available.

      -W

    5. Re:Use the Public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. The question is, which P2P network to use? Because of the way they handle files (and allow users to share chunks of incompletes), I would again suggest Overnet and/or eDonkey2k... Admittedly though, they are used for "illegal" material primarily and thus may well be subject to some kind of government persecution ala Kazaa (although, could something like that really be shut down?).

      Perhaps a new network should be created for this content? Then again, wouldn't it eventually be tapped into and used for the same purpose as all other P2P networks? :)

      This *IS* the way to ensure data redundancy, in any case...

    6. Re:Use the Public by On+Lawn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We've been discussing this somewhat at work. AFS and CODA do distributed (redundant, not p2p) file serving, and have their own backup system. Thats my favorite option for ensuring live-good data, lots of copies everywhere kept live.

      On the other side of the fence is are proponents of very centralized, backed up storage using DVDr's for product snapshots and tapes as a sort of revision control system.

      Perhaps some mixture of both is what we'll do, but its the principle I'm talking about!

      _____________________________
      Onroad: Boldly reporting the SUV war from the middle of the road.

    7. Re:Use the Public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the best way to preserve data is to carve them into stone. We're still reading info carved thousands of years ago - now it'd be a challenge just to pull data off a 5.25" floppy from 15 years ago!

    8. Re:Use the Public by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in 5000 years, the language has changed to the point where only a few scholars can read it and they're only guessing. Maybe they made up the translations to get research money.

  10. best method for preserving CD-ROM images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Have sex with them. Then they'll never leave you alone!

  11. The obvious solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should burn the CD images to CDs.

    1. Re:The obvious solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, cause compact disc is definitely the best place to have them when someone wants to download it... that seek time, and buffering really helps the kb/s...

    2. Re:The obvious solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worked fine on my BBS. And that was with a 2x CD.

    3. Re:The obvious solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just laminate them!

  12. The Best Way for Storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's put it on papertape. If it's ever deemed worth junking, we can well it as kleenex or toilet paper. It might take a while to reload it, but it's better than retyping it from hardcopy source (on greenbar, no less).

  13. I'm obviously out of the loop here.... by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm obviously out of the loop here....

    What the heck are on those 10,000 cds (cd's?) anyways, and why is it so cool? Games? MP3s? Movies? Pr0n?

    1. Re:I'm obviously out of the loop here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the age of Macromedia and the number of programmers working for them, dividing by 10,000 should give something like 10 man-hour of work put into each CD. They can't be all that interesting.

      Sounds like the "3-year-old cheddar, company founded in 2001" stuff you see at the supermarket. Something looks wrong.

    2. Re:I'm obviously out of the loop here.... by Cruciform · · Score: 2, Funny

      Interactive Jenna!

      (Sorry, no link, too many porn popups) ;)

    3. Re:I'm obviously out of the loop here.... by eclectus · · Score: 1

      As nice as Macromedia seems here, the US gov't may intervene and stop this for national security concerns.

      (ha ha only serious)

      --
      This signature is a waste of 42 characters
  14. why was parent modded up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this requires a p2p client which a) takes effort and b) is pretty risky.

  15. Famous last words.. by gmuslera · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey! I have 10.000 CDs with software to share!"

    1. Re:Famous last words.. by Fluid+Truth · · Score: 1

      Hey! That's not such a bad idea. It works for Linus: "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it."

      --
      Apparently, of the rich, by the rich, for the rich.
  16. So can anyone give us kind of a list? by mrseigen · · Score: 1

    I know 10 000 items is going to take you awhile to list, but if anyone's gotten through, just post some notables.

    1. Re:So can anyone give us kind of a list? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hang on there... My browser didn't cache the page, but I got a screencap and am hard at work typing them in.

      Check back in a week.

  17. Preserving CD-ROMs by Wee · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I was looking for ROM to old games (MOO, MOO2, Starflight) a while back, and recalled that I had a box of floppies that also had some old games on them. Hardly any of the 3 1/2 floppies were any good and I couldn't even read the 5 1/4 inch ones I found. That got me curious about what will happen to my meticulously ordered and cataloged CD-R/ROM collection.

    While I was indulging my data storage daydreams, I came across a discussion board thread which talks about the various issues surround storing digital media (pictures, in this case). It was pretty intersting reading. I hadn't thought about gold-plated CDs before, and that sounds like a great idea as long as the hardware to read them exists for the duration of the media's shelf life. Even NASA has been having trouble in that area.

    At first blush, I'd say the way to save all the images would be some sort of distrubuted filesystem, a la Freenet. Package an ASCII metafile with the ROMs file format info along with the actual image file and that should do it. Some sort of centralized system of making sure that at least N copies exist in "the wild" and the data could be reasonably safe. I'm oversimplifying, of course, but it occurred to me that data integrity and file formats might not be the only barriers to long-term data storage. Governments aren't especially data-friendly 100% of the time, either. If you really want to save data for all posterity, you have to protect it from yourself as well.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  18. Redundant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope there are some redundant copies....that should make things easier...

  19. Preserving CD-ROM Images! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    deciding on the best method for preserving CD-ROM images for the long term

    Keep them in the standard .iso format. It's only physical media that will change, but with virtual drives, the iso format won't be unreadable!

    1. Re:Preserving CD-ROM Images! by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 1

      Assuming that anyone supports, let alone remembers ISO 9660 or, even better, FAT16, in 50 years. Of course, at that point we will also be dealing with the fact that Scorched Earth, though recoverable from it's filing system, can't run on a Undo-octal HP-AMD Thrashium Mark IX 2170.0032 THz on a 4.8 GHz bus

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:Preserving CD-ROM Images! by Nynaeve · · Score: 1

      But it will run on Bochs.

    3. Re:Preserving CD-ROM Images! by ZiZ · · Score: 1

      Well, I can emulate a PDP-1, which was from 1960 - that's a nice 40-some years so far... Seems to me that emulation (especially for something as popular as the x86 architecture, when it finally fades from vogue) is going to be around for a long, long time.

      --
      This flies in the face of science.
    4. Re:Preserving CD-ROM Images! by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      "But it will run on Bochs"

      Yeah, it'll work, but it probably won't be til 2050 that computers get fast enough to run at close to the original speed in Bochs. What's so hard about emulating x86 anyway? I can run 68K Mac software in Basilisk II with about a 8 to 1 speed hit because of the emulation. Bochs is closer to 100 to 1.

      The sad part is, in 2050 proprietary s/w like Virtual PC or SoftPC still won't be public domain yet.

    5. Re:Preserving CD-ROM Images! by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      decoding x86 is a royal PITA because of the variable length instructions and the different modes. vmware and plex86 running on x86 are very fast because they run a lot of code on the real CPU, but bochs is cross-platform, so EVERYTHING has to be emulated (you have to read the next x bytes and figure out what instruction is there, perform the operation, and repeat. And, you have to fake all the other stuff, such as PCI, IDE, etc.)

    6. Re:Preserving CD-ROM Images! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bochs is badly designed. Period. So also, by the sound of it, have been your emulation attempts.

      If your emulator core, and you apparently have written one from your comment, has issues decoding variable length instructions, bin it completely, think about the problem and redesign it from scratch. Efficient solutions - VERY efficient ones - do exist and are already widely used in i686-class processors.

      In particular - you appear to have been designing an interpreter. This is extremely dumb and neglects over fifteen years of work that has progressively led to the development of JIT, and then hybrid ("code morphing") intercompilers.

      Real mode is hard, but also slow and nothing uses it. Mode changing is a bitch on real CPUs too.

      Try designing an efficient intercompiler instead. You'll find they can run faster than the machine they're on in certain cases.

    7. Re:Preserving CD-ROM Images! by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      I haven't written any such program. (Well, a lisp interpreter once a few years ago). Everything I said was based on what I've learned in CE and CS classes. Maybe I am wrong.

  20. Great post... NOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    When will the /. editors learn that we can't read their frickin' minds??? Would the editor's private parts have stopped working and fallen off if he had actually given us a hint what was on these now-legendary 10,000 disks???

    As the article stands, we have no idea if this story is a genuine big deal or something we can all ignore.

    1. Re:Great post... NOT by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just go look at the site, or read the linked discussion thread? I mean, are your arms just painted on, or do they actually function?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  21. 10k Software titles, Macromedia & Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of making Macromedia software products available for Linux, they waste there time and money making some 10k pieces of software available via some internet archive. Way to go Macromedia. Instead of making money, you put your resources into the depreciable items.

    When will you wake up Macromedia? When quanta is better than you? When Microsoft decides to elimate Flash? When your stupid Apple users stop telling you that Apple is the #2 desktop (it is not).

    1. Re:10k Software titles, Macromedia & Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tone it down.

      Comments like yours give linux users a bad name.

    2. Re:10k Software titles, Macromedia & Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he was trying to say that he would surely buy a Macromedia product if it ran on Linux. However, they don't make them. I guess they subscribe to the "lets service 100% of the market, we don't need that extra cash" business plan.

  22. Introducing Slashdot Server Benchmarks by KoolDude · · Score: 5, Funny

    INTERNET Jan 29: Today Popular News Website Slashdot announced the Slashdot Server Benchmarking System. From their FAQ:

    How do we use your system ?
    We provide this service as a tool for analyzing the strength of your server. To use our service, simply pick up a random story from the internet and send it to us. We will post the story and the time taken to bring down your server is inversely proportional to the strength of your server. For best results, choose stories that contain evil news about M$, RIAA or USPTO. For advanced options...

    Slashdot demonstrated their system by posting links from Archive.org. The site was brought down in less than a minute. Many server manufacturers all over the world thanked Slashdot for providing such a wonderful service. "We see this as an opportunity to serve news to the world and testing our servers at the same time...", said Slash Dottroll, Product Manager at IBM Server Division.

    --
    getSexySig(); /* returns sexy signature */
  23. wow, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks like we slashdotted archive.org.... almsot as bad as slashdotting slashdot.

  24. Keep it simple and anticipate future needs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rip CDROM contents to bin or iso files. Store on hard drive in AmigaDOS format. Image hard drive using Drive Image. Split Image with rar and store rar files on series of Bernoulli drives. Backup Bernoulli drives to CDs.

    - Rube G.

  25. Re:A radical rethink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the Google cache showing the breakdown of titles by category.

    * 3D (35)
    * Adv/Mkt Collateral (37)
    * Audio (8)
    * Business Ap (370)
    * CBT (897)
    * Collection (7)
    * Commercial Design (45)
    * Corporate (179)
    * Demo (27)
    * Editorial (15)
    * Education (61)
    * Educational (1355)
    * Educational MM (178)
    * Educational Multimedia (47)
    * Edutainment (466)
    * Entertainment (788)
    * File Types (0)
    * Fine Art (60)
    * Government (1)
    * Illustration (58)
    * Interactive Business (482)
    * Interactive Portfolio (11)
    * Interactive Reference (185)
    * Kidsware (238)
    * Marketing Collateral (61)
    * Non-commercial (93)
    * Photo Manipulation (15)
    * Promotion (24)
    * Promotional (829)
    * Reference (354)
    * Self Promotion (9)
    * Shocked Sites (81)
    * Tool (2)
    * Training (4)
    * Type Design (21)
    * Uncategorized (1361)
    * Web Page/Site (59)

  26. Struggling is right. by sulli · · Score: 1

    as PHP submits to the onslaught of slashbots.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Struggling is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PHP isn't causing the problem. They're using an Apache mod_rewrite directive somewhere, and it's broken. When I try to go to the linked site, I wind up at

      http://www.archive.org/cdroms/macromedia.php/mac ro media.php/macromedia.php/macromedia.php/macromedia .php/macromedia.php/macromedia.php/macromedia.php/ macromedia.php/macromedia.php/macromedia.php/macro media.php/macromedia.php/macromedia.php/ ...with plenty more instances of "/macromedia.php/" than Slashdot's lameness filter will allow me to post.

      This sort of thing (the file or directory name repeating itself ad infinitum in the URL) is normally an indication that someone messed up a RewriteRule containing a variable. Most common cause is someone attempting to host multiple domains on one server via mod_rewrite, though I don't know whether or not that's what archive.org is up to.

  27. Not Macromedia Software by Dynedain · · Score: 4, Informative

    It doesn't appear that Macromedia is donating software, but rather a collection of Flash/Dreamweaver/Shockwave/Whatever projects that were 'Created with Macromedia'

    Here's the google cache:

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    1. Re:Not Macromedia Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OOooohh. Watch, I bet they stop getting slashdotted right away.

      Who wants that garbage?

    2. Re:Not Macromedia Software by thx2001r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to the Google Cache of the site that is, of course, knocked out, and slashdotted...

      "Macromedia has generously donated their collection of CD-ROM's to the Archive's CD-ROM & Software Library. The Collection consists of over 10,000 CD-ROM titles (from the Made-With-Macromedia Program) and we are in the process of making this into an accessible resource for people to use and enjoy.

      We welcome all feedback!"

      I wonder... these are software titles that were Made-With-Macromedia... I presume they were Made-By-Other-Companies... Is this some requirement of M W M that you send them a copy of what you made. If so, what right do they have to give it away to the entire world now?

      I'm sure they're not giving away copies of their Made-By-Macromedia software.. I haven't been able to browse it yet, of course, but I doubt they're giving away copies of older versions of Flash or Dreamweaver.

      Interesting that they regard everyone else's creations giveaways! Of course this is purely assumption... in a few hours when the slashdotted meltdown subsides, I'll take a look, but it seems pretty lousy if what I'm guessing is actually the case! After all, I seriously doubt Macromedia even ever made 500 software titles!

      --

      -Joe
      If we're all god's children, what's so special about Jesus? - Jimmy Carr

    3. Re:Not Macromedia Software by br0ck · · Score: 2, Informative

      It looks like you can get to the forums where they're looking for people to help out in SF.

      Also in the cache listing are cache links to many pages with listings of the actual cds. I'm not sure this stuff is really worth all the fuss, but I guess people have said that about most junk that historians and archeologists treasure today.

      OT: Did anyone else notice Google's new tour page? Ok, so I'm a little bored today.

    4. Re:Not Macromedia Software by GTIChick · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, it is/was a part of the licensing agreement with Macromedia. If you distributed CD-ROMs created with Macromedia Director, you had to send them copies of the CD. I don't know what the current license requires, as most of my work is Shockwave.

      --
      "Show me on the doll where the bad man touched you."
    5. Re:Not Macromedia Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These are all the CDs created with Director and/or Authorware. Part of the Made with Macromedia licensing requirements back in the 1990s included having the developer deliver TWO copies of any title made with these products to Macromedia so they could use them, usually for advertising purposes. This was a good idea in 1992, but a poor idea years later when everybody and their brother were making CDs using Director. They used to have a full time person just handling all the submitted titles. When she left the company, it was all just thrown in a closet. Obviously they've changed the requirements now. I wonder where all the Director pr0n went?

  28. wtf by heymjo · · Score: 1

    i tried loading their site in mozilla, and got a message back saying "redirection limit for this site exceeded".. wierd

    1. Re:wtf by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 1

      It's called the Slashdot Effect (tm). You must be new here. ;-)

  29. Next up: Macrovision titles! by sulli · · Score: 1

    Lower risk of slashdotting, as everything's 403 Forbidden.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  30. Macromedia ? by BESTouff · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope he didn't mixed Macromedia and Macrovision once again ... coz a Macrovision CD would be rather useless IMHO

  31. Is it really that big a deal? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 3, Informative

    10,000 CD-ROMs <= 10,000*700MB = 7 TB

    That isn't too much by today's standards, is it? Esp. considering you only need read-only access

    1. Re:Is it really that big a deal? by Zep1a · · Score: 1

      And that's assuming all 10,000 ISO's fill each CD. Maybe burn the ISO by catagory onto DVDs. The safest way might be EPROMs or PROMs but I'm not up on what the size limits of such things are at present. Zep--

    2. Re:Is it really that big a deal? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Nope, not much -- til you get the bill for the bandwidth!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  32. Re:A radical rethink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kickass...
    I count 8463, so I guess they've added a few since then.

    My only question:
    What on earth is CBT? (Something) Business Tools? With 897 titles, it's gotta be something that everyone's heard of, but I can't decode the acronym.

  33. Pyramids! by Stonehand · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, it worked for the Egyptians for thousands of years. Just include some redundancy for errosion-correction, and...

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    1. Re:Pyramids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, ... almost.

      Unfortunately the original specifications for the pyramids didn't include test and calibration equipment for pyramid-constellation alignment. Now that they are out of calibration we can't read all of the data and now we'll never find Elvis and Bigfoot.

      Of course you know how it happened... "Overseer, Overseer, I just ran the tablets through the abacus and we're way behind schedule and going to go over budget. If Pharaoh finds out he will be really ticked. What should we do?" "Eh, don't worry. We'll just blame it on the loss of the Hebrew slaves. No one will be eager to discuss that so they'll just drop it. Besides, nobody really cares about test anyway."

      Stupid @#$@# Overseer. :(

  34. Distributed Data by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not a bad plan, though. Though I would go one step further and convert any data still readable into a format that includes a description of itself. This would mean that every video/audio/image should have it's own decoder attached. HTML files would have the HTML spec. This may seem like a huge waste of space, especially on smaller files, but it is worth it for the time saved reading files later on. Of course, you need something that can always read the description, but one standard program could function for all files in this format instead of countless files. Now, this doesn't help for executables (currently, anyway) but could improve data retention.

    As storage availabilities and requirements rise, an encoder/decoder for many formats would become trivial, notable exceptions being made for massively integrated applications (*cough* Office *cough*)

    After all, how do you think Star Trek managed to take 50,000 year-old data crystals and read the files stored on them, or interface with Borg computers? : )

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    1. Re:Distributed Data by More+Karma+Than+God · · Score: 1

      Archive applications by including a standardized virtual machine of the hardware it runs on.

      --
      Go here to create your own Slashdot dis
    2. Re:Distributed Data by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Funny

      > or interface with Borg computers?

      Samba?

    3. Re:Distributed Data by davidstrauss · · Score: 1

      I believe you have just described XML. For images, BMP (if size really doesn't matter) has at least an obvious format.

    4. Re:Distributed Data by yerricde · · Score: 1

      I believe you have just described XML.

      Yes, but how would you store the W3C Recommendation that specifies XML?

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
  35. Aha, answered my own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In this context CBT seems to mean Computer Based Training. (possibly only for bankers?)

    1. Re:Aha, answered my own question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CBT - computer based training
      WBT - web based training
      CBI - computer based instruction
      CAI - computer assisted instruction
      etc.

      Lots of different ways of saying training/instruction/education materials that are used on a computer. These types of materials are developed by (typically) teams of instructional designers, subject-matter experts, multimedia programmers, graphic artists, video and audio experts, etc. The tool of choice for building these types of instructional materials are authoring programs like ToolBook, Director, Flash, mTropolis, Authorware, etc. These types of materials are used in schools, businesses, well, just about anywhere where it is more cost-effective to have computer based training instead of instructor based training.

  36. Slashdot is DOS attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't slashdot.org a web based DOS attack?

  37. Cool CD-Roms by Psychic+Burrito · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here are a few cool CD-Roms I've found, just to give everybody some idea what kind of stuff can be found: ("cool" or at least not extremely boring :-)
    1. Re:Cool CD-Roms by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Oooh, you found a much better stash than I did on my first quick look (I found myself somewhere amid web-based business models and games; architecture and history sound much more interesting). Nice to know it'll be worth a thorough perusal.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  38. Backups by porkface · · Score: 1

    Pick anything out there today and store them. Just pick something you expect will be easy to migrate, and have at least 3 backups in separate locations. None of today's digital storage media are very reliable long term. Also, plan on migrating before you have to worry about decay.

  39. The preserving machine... by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... was a tale from Philip K. Dick where music was encoded to animals or dna or something like that.

    If you want to preserve something forever, encode it in a DNA form (I think that most of DNA code is inactive, so there are plenty of space), grow an live thing from it, and while descendents last, your software will survive.

    A word of caution: don't try this with Microsoft software, the world have enough bugs already.

    1. Re:The preserving machine... by simonjester2424 · · Score: 1

      Well, one of the main problems is preserving a method to read the data, not just preserving the data. How are you going to preserve the method of reading the data from the DNA, and interpreting it?

      --
      Beware of gifts bearing Greeks.
    2. Re:The preserving machine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What story is that? I have the complete works of PKD, and I don't remember it. It also doesn't sound particularly PKD. Another author?

    3. Re:The preserving machine... by kaisa_sosey · · Score: 1
      Besides other issues...

      Whether DNA is inactive or not is part of the code. You cannot write an arbitrary data sequence and hope you still have an intron (inactive code).

    4. Re:The preserving machine... by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1
      What story is that? I have the complete works of PKD, and I don't remember it. It also doesn't sound particularly PKD. Another author?

      Hate to break the news to you, but perhaps your "complete" collection is missing a volume. :-) It's a collection of 15 Philip K. Dick short stories. No longer in print, but available used. I can't remember if Amazon is evil or good this week, but here's a link if you're interested:

      The Preserving Machine

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
    5. Re:The preserving machine... by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 1
      Well, one of the main problems is preserving a method to read the data, not just preserving the data. How are you going to preserve the method of reading the data from the DNA, and interpreting it?

      Silly person! As long as you're altering the DNA to store the data, you might as well tweak it a little more so the critter contains the decoding instructions.

      For instance, ever see one of those butterflies with circular wing markings that supposedly look like a large eye? And some scientist told you this was supposed to frighten off predators?

      Nope. Those wing patterns are actually tiny little CD-ROMs. If you pop one of these butterflies into your CD drive, you'll see that the disc contains a PDF file with details on how to decode the main message in the critter's DNA. (Turns out it's the missing 18 1/2 minutes from Nixon's Watergate tapes.)

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  40. Hrm, that's strange... by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    At first I read "Archive.org Destroys Macromedia Software Titles."

    And that seemed a little weird.

  41. VMWare by Proc6 · · Score: 1

    This is why Ive always loved and bought into the concept of VMWare (or similar) virtual machines. Software is pretty immortal, as the turing machine principle pretty much says any one turing machine can emulate another, so making sure the entire PC and OS can be emulated in software makes the software that runs within it immortal as well. The fact that you can run Linux and Windows entirely as self contained software as long as you can emulate the BIOS means they shouldb e around for a very long time, just keep porting the emulator to new hardware. I fear that Palladium and crap like it will bring this down though, as it starts to tie software to very specific hardware that yes, will crumble to worthless ashes quickly.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

  42. The obvious problem with that solution by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    The obvious solution

    They should burn the CD images to CDs.


    The obvious problem with that:

    The dies in writable CDs have a much shorter lifetime than the printed ones. Like three-ish years. So figure they have to make new copies ever two years, plus at least two spars of each, for redundancy. Call it 15K/year CD burnings just for this batch of 10,000 images.

    Now an automated burning operation can do a bit more than 7 1/2 disks/hour single-shift. But then you have to have a carousell to handle 10,000 CDs (times several for redundancy), in order to automate the process.

    So I don't think burning them to CDs is the solution.

    Call it 3 CDs per gig. Or a bunch more, since most of 'em won't be full, so make that 10/gig. That's one terrabyte. Don't we have hard drives about that big now? Build a RAID, mirror it (offsite), replace disks as they die, and clone the mirror every few years to cover for catastrophic multi-disk failures and obsolescence of the RAID platforms and disks. Online all the time that way, too.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:The obvious problem with that solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree about the shelf life. I have burned cds that are over three years old and read fine. I don't expect them to last forever but I've heard 'myths' about burned cds lasting only a year or two and haven't had that experience. I understand the dye will eventually deteriorate beyond recognition but if yours are only lasting a couple of years stop using them as frisbees.

    2. Re:The obvious problem with that solution by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I disagree about the shelf life. I have burned cds that are over three years old and read fine.

      Protect them from light and bleach fumes and they'll last a longer time than if you leave them lying about on your desk. B-) Protect them from oxygen and they'll probably last quite a while.

      But you can't count on it. Especially if they're your only backup. Doubly so if you keep sticking them in a drive and shining a laser on them because somebody wants to read the contents.

      So you have to assume they're short-timers when you do your planning.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    3. Re:The obvious problem with that solution by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Then there's the problem with physical failure of the media itself. I had a CD self-destruct in my drive, and it ate the drive. Little pieces of plastic everywhere. As CD speeds get faster, there's going to be more stress on the disk, and more failures.

  43. Is it worth preserving in the first place? by Proc6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I havent seen the list of 10,000 titles as the site is /.'ed But, um, is it crap we really want to keep anyway? I mean, history and time has a way of filtering crap out that isnt worth much and preserving that which is. The worthy will stay, the unworth won't. It may seem noble to try to preserve EVERYTHING, but whats really the point? When was the last time you REALLY needed AutoDesk Animator Pro v1.0 for DOS? Im sure some jackass will try to prove me wrong with an anecdote of how his lucky copy of OS/2 2.1 on 5.25" floppies saved a business, but generally speaking, maybe they should work to preseve 50 of the titles, rather than 10,000. There will be some loss, but we'll get over it.

    --

    I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!

    1. Re:Is it worth preserving in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, my name is J. Ackass, and I'm here to teach you, that you'll luuuv this stuff when we need prior art to fight some stupid patent

      Again

      Y.T.
      J. Ackass

    2. Re:Is it worth preserving in the first place? by justforaday · · Score: 0

      But, um, is it crap we really want to keep anyway? I mean, history and time has a way of filtering crap out that isnt worth much and preserving that which is.

      hmmm, must be why there are tons and tons of historical documents going back tens of thousands of years...oh yeah, and i guess all that bookburning and religios zealotry and wotnot falls into the "filtering crap" category... :-p

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    3. Re:Is it worth preserving in the first place? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is knowing what is worth keeping and what isn't. Look at games for instance - the value of a game is purely subjective. Is War in Middle Earth more worthy of preservation than Command and Conquer 1? Eric the Unready or Doom 2?

  44. OCR and CPIP by intermodal · · Score: 2, Funny

    OCR also worked for RFC1149 (carrier pigeon internet protocol)...well...sort of

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  45. Post it on Slashdot! by Codeala · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Dear archive.org admins,

    I suggest you post the iso images on slashdot (once your hardware stop smoking). That is clearly the best way to preserve these information for all time, since clearly /. itself cannot be /.'ed, right? Plus a /. editor secretly told me that they are keen to give back to the communities for all the sites they /.'ed over the year.

    To prevent user confusion, you may as well submit your story again, using the *exact* words of Jon-Erik Hexum. Why? /. is also known to *ahem* mirror their own stories from time to time.

    Yours,

    --

    Codeala - Just another mindless drone
  46. Re:A radical rethink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * pr0n (2048)

  47. DNA isn't that reliable by Squirrel+Killer · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If you want to preserve something forever, encode it in a DNA form (I think that most of DNA code is inactive, so there are plenty of space), grow an live thing from it, and while descendents last, your software will survive.
    Except that there's two problems with that, given the fact that DNA doesn't always replicate exactly. (IANA Biologist)
    1. Mutations - Happen all the time, look at albinos.
    2. Introns - Mutations are limited in practice because of introns, sections of DNA that don't encode proteins. IIRC, introns are a huge portion of all DNA, and mutations within them go completely unchecked. (Since they don't encode anything, mutations in introns don't express themselves, and thus don't effect the living creature positively or negatively.)
    While it's a neat idea, I wouldn't but any more trust in DNA than my stack of C-64 disks, especially over several generations.

    -sk

    1. Re:DNA isn't that reliable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that the capacity is surprisingly small.

      Consider: the average human has roughly 3 billion base pair (not the longest, but not the shortest, either). Each pair can be one of two types: A-T or C-G. So we have one bit of information per base pair.

      So that's 3 gigabits of data we can store. For the sake of simplicity, let's just assume that the entire genome is good for data storage-- not just parts of it. That works out to somewhere in the area of 500-600 megabytes.

      If we include some error-correction to prevent against the damage done by mutations, we lose even more capacity: if we have one bit of error correction for every four bits of data, knock another 20% off the capacity.

      Personally, I think a CD-R is a better investment-- a lot more standard, at the very least...

    2. Re:DNA isn't that reliable by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Well, in fact, maybe DNA is "designed" (by evolution forces) to not make exact copies. But biologically engeneered information storage "devices" (that reproduce, and preserves exact copies of information, in dna, rna or some other kind of molecular structure.

      Of course, using this kind of mechanisms must be used for real important things. If happens some kind of extintion-level event, like the big meteor in Deep Impact or a nuclear war, well, would be nice to send a message thru ants, amoebas or things of that kind to who will come after us.(yea, I know, too much science fiction and not applicable to the actual discussion :)

  48. OCR Better but not for this sort of thing by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 1

    OCR is getting better for recognizing language because it increasingly relies on linguistics (morphology, syntax and to a limited degree semantics). If you have something that isn't linguistic in nature (i.e. long strings of digits), it won't do a very good job for similar reasons as you find it easier to memorize Simpsons quotes than to memorize a 100 digit long string of random characters.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    1. Re:OCR Better but not for this sort of thing by gorilla · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, long strings of digits have a reduced number of morphs, which will make the recognition easier.

  49. Re:A radical rethink? by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
    * Shocked Sites (81)

    I'll be that they're really a shocked site at the moment! :^P

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  50. Why not... by Audacious · · Score: 1

    ...microfiche it? You can get a lot of pictures of the CD-ROMs that way. ;-P (I have a photograph...preserve your memories...)

    --
    Someone put a black hole in my pocket and now I'm broke. :-)
    1. Re:Why not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it could be a good idea! Burn the data in binary form to a sheet of platinum foil, using similar principle as the CDs use. No decay, and could be easily readable with eg. an ultra-hires scanner or a scanning laser reader.

  51. Re:Best CD-Rom backup system-Millipede. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah! Now this is some punchcards. Proably last as long too.

  52. Made with Macromedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't get to the site right now due to slashdotting, but I expect that this is simply a bunch of CD-ROMs that were sumitted to the MWM program. Part of the licensing agreement is that you send 2 copies of the CD you produce to Macromedia, as well as put their logo on your credits screen.

    There should be some of my work in there! When the site is back up I'll have a look.

    More info about the program here: http://www.macromedia.com/support/programs/mwm/

  53. more info on the CD-ROM archive. by h0l211 · · Score: 3, Informative

    hey all, I'm the volunteer at the Internet Archive who posted the 'call for comments' message on their CD-ROM forums, and I just wanted to clarify a couple of things: - the archive consists of CD-ROMs created by third parties with the 'Made For Macromedia' program, as another poster said. So it's all multimedia software created with Macromedia tools - basically, everything sent to Macromedia for approval between certain dates. Macromedia kindly donated this to the Internet Archive. - right now it's largely a physical archive, not a digital one - the content is still on the source CD-ROMs. - i'm a volunteer in the VERY early stages of looking at the Macromedia CD-ROM archive - in fact, my first day. i surface from the pile of software boxes to discover my call for archiving suggestions has slashdotted the site. hurrah! - there are currently only a couple of disc images downloadable from the site. they were put up last year, and I wouldn't recommend downloading them for now, since there's some compatibility and completeness issues with them. - most of the discs are either multimedia (like virtual guides to Jerusalem, educational guides) or what you might call ephemera (promotional CD-ROMs) The Internet Archive doesn't have any rights to post any of them online right now. - future plans would ideally include making some of these CDs available to the public for either remote access or download, providing the correct rights issues could be dealt with. With the shelf life of CDs somewhat of an unknown factor, creating digital archives of these discs and making sure they're preserved for future generations is important. Thanks, Simon.

  54. more info on the CD-ROM archive (formatted right!) by h0l211 · · Score: 5, Informative

    hey all,

    I'm the volunteer at the Internet Archive who posted the 'call for comments' message on their CD-ROM forums, and I just wanted to clarify a couple of things:

    - the archive consists of CD-ROMs created by third parties with the 'Made For Macromedia' program, as another poster said. So it's all multimedia software created with Macromedia tools - basically, everything sent to Macromedia for approval between certain dates. Macromedia kindly donated this to the Internet Archive.

    - right now it's largely a physical archive, not a digital one - the content is still on the source CD-ROMs.

    - i'm a volunteer in the VERY early stages of looking at the Macromedia CD-ROM archive - in fact, my first day. i surface from the pile of software boxes to discover my call for archiving suggestions has slashdotted the site. hurrah!

    - there are currently only a couple of disc images downloadable from the site. they were put up last year, and I wouldn't recommend downloading them for now, since there's some compatibility and completeness issues with them.

    - most of the discs are either multimedia (like virtual guides to Jerusalem, educational guides) or what you might call ephemera (promotional CD-ROMs) The Internet Archive doesn't have any rights to post any of them online right now.

    - future plans would ideally include making some of these CDs available to the public for either remote access or download, providing the correct rights issues could be dealt with. With the shelf life of CDs somewhat of an unknown factor, creating digital archives of these discs and making sure they're preserved for future generations is important.

    Thanks,
    Simon.

  55. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Oh great. First Google archives all my stupid posts from yesteryear, now all the stupid software I wrote will resurface and embarass me forever!

  56. Bootstrapping by yerricde · · Score: 1

    This would mean that every video/audio/image should have it's own decoder attached.

    In what programming language would you write the decoder? You'd have to store the specification for that language as well.

    HTML files would have the HTML spec.

    I'd assume the HTML spec would be written in Unicode text in the English language. The Unicode specification is also written in the English language. So how would you store the specification of the English language itself?

    Now, this doesn't help for executables (currently, anyway)

    All you'd have to store for an executable is a description of the virtual machine it runs on, that is, an emulator. But then, you have to write the description in some language...

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  57. Out of print may imply fair use by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The sad part is, in 2050 proprietary s/w like Virtual PC or SoftPC still won't be public domain yet.

    But if it's out of print, copying it may be fair use in the United States, as taking a work out of print may amount to an admission by the copyright owner that the work has so little value that any unauthorized use would not reduce its value.

    If you know of any precedents otherwise, please respond.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  58. confusion on the CDROM collection by brewsterk · · Score: 2, Informative

    I work with the Internet Archive, and I would like to correct some confusion. Short answer: people can not download the CDROM contents from the Internet Archive. There are 5 that are available because the Internet Archive got permission from the rights holder.

    Our statement that Macromedia donated 10,000 CDROMs is incorrect. What Macromedia graciously did was to let us use their catalog of the CDROMs sent to them through the Made With Macromedia program. The also let our staff examine the CDROM's so that we can ensure the catalog is correct and facilitate contacting rightsholders to see if they would be interested in access to their materials.

    We are very excited about providing access to any materials that people would like to be preserved. Please contact me, brewster@archive.org or more efficiently info@archive.org if you have any materials you would like to be added to the archive.

    -brewster

    1. Re:confusion on the CDROM collection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      goatse.cx

  59. Who's Jon-Erik Hexum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jon-Erik Hexum? Isn't that guy dead?

  60. Re:Turing machines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And ehm..... when was the last time anyone ever saw a turing machine in real life? That's just like saying the archive should store their 10,000 cds in a 'infinitely-powered-machine-with-infinite-storage- space-with-a universal-interface-that-can interface-with-anything'.

    Hey kids, did you know that:
    Any 'infinitely-powered-machine-with-infinite-storage- space-with-a universal-interface-that-can interface-with-anything' can emulate any other 'infinitely-powered-machine-with-infinite-storage- space-with-a universal-interface-that-can interface-with-anything'.

  61. while we're still in imaginary land... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah.... a shrink ray will be better. Shrink the data so that the whole archive can fit on a floppy.

  62. Re:more info on the CD-ROM archive (formatted righ by Reziac · · Score: 1

    I cruised thru a few of the listings... some obvious junk, but some looks like it might be useful as business examples, or for "company history" research, etc. At any rate, better to store too much data and have no clue what it's good for, than to pitch it and regret it later.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  63. Correct this item by RobotWisdom · · Score: 1
    Slashdot has really turned into Beavis-and-Butthead lately. Before taking down archive.org-- which struggles with demand at the best of times-- someone should have checked that:

    1) there's basically nothing to download, and never will be

    2) 99% of the 10k titles are utter junk anyway

    Hey guys-- get off your millionaire butts and fix this broken resource.

  64. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    "Yo, Mike!"
    "Yeah, Gabe?"
    "We got a problem down on Earth. In Utah."
    "I thought you fixed that last century!"
    "No, no, not that. Someone's found a security problem in the physics
    program. They're getting energy out of nowhere."
    "Blessit! Lemme look... Hey, it's
    there all right! OK, just a sec...
    There, that ought to patch it. Dist it out, wouldja?"
    -- Cold Fusion, 1989

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...