Rambus Wins Case Against Infineon
rednoise writes "Yahoo is running a story about how a Federal Circuit Court in California (I think) has (unbelievably) ruled that RAMBUS did NOT intentionally mislead members of JEDEC when the committee was developing the SDRAM specification. RAMBUS' stock skyrocketed something like 57% on the news. This is very bad news for owners of computers."
This slashdot story is written rather poorly. For example you could have explained why it is a bad thing for computer owners. Only the statement alone looks a bit too little.
"Now I'm going to McDonalds for a delicious cheeseburger." Don't forget to take your SUV, unless you're a terrorist of course.
~D:
If you paid attention to the articles about Disney, you'd realize that patents are eternal.
~D:
Exactly what is "in my not so humble opinion" supposed to mean in this case? Is "FuzzyBad-Mofo" widely acknowledged as having an educated opinion on the subject of DRAM interfaces?
/o'er trumpeting his "Yeah, I hate them too!" opinion as loudly as possible?
Or is he just another uninformed