Slashdot Mirror


Rambus Wins Case Against Infineon

rednoise writes "Yahoo is running a story about how a Federal Circuit Court in California (I think) has (unbelievably) ruled that RAMBUS did NOT intentionally mislead members of JEDEC when the committee was developing the SDRAM specification. RAMBUS' stock skyrocketed something like 57% on the news. This is very bad news for owners of computers."

19 of 379 comments (clear)

  1. Freedom to innovate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thank goodness that the Microsofts and the Rambuses in the world are protecting the freedom to innovate. Why, if they ewre taken down, people would be forced to buy things from smaller companies which as we all know are totally incapable of innovation.

    Now I'm going to McDonalds for a delicious cheeseburger.

    1. Re:Freedom to innovate by dubiousmike · · Score: 1, Funny

      Um, I'll have a Fillet O' Fish.

      some Irish guy is rolling over in his grave with that product name...

    2. Re:Freedom to innovate by BrainInAJar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ahh, good old Tim O'Fish.

      A chipper wee lad he was... fell to the galloping consumption, he did...

      May God rest his tiny soul.

  2. Rambus Stock by Salden · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, I'm going to start a company and my goal will be to win as many court cases as possible. That'll pump up my stock price!

    1. Re:Rambus Stock by refactored · · Score: 3, Funny
      Nah! Bad Business model.

      Become a Lawyer and make your goal to have as many court cases as possible.

      That's immediately a 50% increase in profit, you win whichever way the case goes, and you win double if they appeal..

  3. fuzzy math by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The company's stock soared on the news, rising $54.75, or 57 percent, to close at $11.69 on Nasdaq.

    Ah, Yahoo.

    1. Re:fuzzy math by Kallahar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whew, thank goodness I bought their stock when it was worth -$40 a share! :)

      Perhaps the sentence was misleading on Yahoo's part. They should have said "initially rising to $54".

      But then again, look it up at it's stock today and you'll see that it started the day at $7.50, then rose to $12 on the news. I have no idea where yahoo got $54 from, but the 57% part was right.

      Travis

    2. Re:fuzzy math by JLyle · · Score: 3, Funny
      Ah, Yahoo.
      Hey, don't mock Yahoo just because their proofreading skills aren't as good as the Slashdot editors'.
  4. Which RAM? :) by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's all fine and good, but I _still_ don't know which motherboards take what RAM ...

  5. Re:Not very well written by Ponty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Once again, why? As someone who doesn't have a modern i386, I really don't know anything about that world of RAM.

  6. The terrorists have already won... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "ANY BREAKFAST BAGEL SANDWICH" at McDonald's!
    Terrorist 1: "What are we doing here, Abdul?"
    Terrorist 2: "It should be obvious, Mohammad. We are getting sandwiches."
    Terrorist 1: "This place is a symbol of all that is evil about the West, Abdul. Simply being present here corrupts the soul. It is an abomination before Allah."
    Terrorist 2: "The clown is indeed disturbing. But the large purple fungus-man amuses me."
    Terrorist 1: "You know that is not what I am talking about. This place flaunts its degenerate Western values in the face of Heaven. It must be expunged from the Earth!"
    Terrorist 2: "Keep your voice down, Mohammad."
    Terrorist 1: "IT IS THE WILL OF--"
    Terrorist 2: "SHUT UP, YOU FOOL! DO WANT TO BE ARRESTED BEFORE...ahh, before we can order our delicious food? No, no, fellow citizens, my friend is simply agitated about the--ahh--swill served at that Wendy's down the street. Not like this fine establishment. No, no."
    Crew chief: "Welcome to McDonalds, sir, can I take your order?"
    Terrorist 2: "Ahh, yes. I will have a Big Mac, regular fries, and a large orange drink."
    Crew chief: "And you, sir?"
    Terrorist 1: "Hmm. What is this 'Happy Meal' item?"
    Crew chief: "That's a children's meal, sir. You'd probably prefer a larger sandwich."
    Terrorist 1: "ZIONIST WHORE! YOU WILL BURN IN THE FLAMES OF HELL!"
    Terrorist 2: "SHUT UP, YOU FOOL! He--He--He is a collector! He needs but one more Hot Wheels toy to complete his collection! Right, uh, uh, Sam?"
    Terrorist 1: "Yes, fine."
    Terrorist 2: "Right. Right. He will have the cheeseburger Happy Meal with a cold refreshing Coca-Cola. I am very sorry he became so agitated."
    Crew chief: "That--That's okay, sir. Your order will be ready in just a moment."
    Terrorist 2: "Mohammad, you fool. You must keep your mouth shut. Let me do the talking."
    Terrorist 1: "My name is not Sam."
    Terrorist 2: "I know that. We are supposed to blend with the Americans, remember?"
    Terrorist 1: "Do not call me by degenerate Western names, Abdul."
    Terrorist 2: "Did you pay no attention during training? Weren't you listening to--"
    Crew chief: "Number 23!"
    Terrorist 2: "Come on. That's our food."
    Terrorist 1: "Hmm. This meal doesn't look very happy. And the portions are very small."
    Terrorist 2: "Shut up, Mohammad."
    Terrorist 1: "And this toy car appears to be cheaply constructed."
    Terrorist 2: "Shut up, Mohammad."
    Terrorist 1: "What is this?"
    Terrorist 2: "Hmmm? Oh, that's the Monopoly scratch-off game. Scratch away the silver parts of the card and you win a prize, like food or money. Not like that, Mohammad. Use a quarter."
    Terrorist 1: "Hmph. More tools for spreading blasphemous Western values."
    Terrorist 2: "Use the edge of the quarter, Mohammad."
    Terrorist 1: "Oh."
    Terrorist 2: "Allah help me..."
    Terrorist 1: "A-Abdul! Look! Look! I won!"
    Terrorist 2: "Really? That's wonderful. What was your prize?"
    Terrorist 1: "It says I won 'any breakfast bagel sandwich!' You see? What is a breakfast bagel sandwich?"
    Terrorist 2: "They slice a bagel in half, then put eggs and meat inside it. It's fairly tasty. Better than the pancakes, I'll tell you that."
    Terrorist 1: "I can't believe it! Can I get it now?"
    Terrorist 2: "No, they only serve that for breakfast. We'll get one in the morning, alright?"
    Terrorist 1: "I--I--Oh, alright. It cannot be helped. I still can't believe this, Abdul! I've never won anything before!"
    Terrorist 2: "You'll have to try the sausage bagel. You'll love it."

  7. Re:Not very well written by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    This slashdot story is written rather poorly.

    You're new here, right?

  8. Re:Not very well written by norculf · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't really say. So far, my PA-RISC workstations's performance has not been impacted by this ruling. Further reports as events warrent...

  9. RAMBUS & Bill Clinton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now it is OK to lie about something you did to make money, but lie about getting head from an intern while president and you will give the AM radio talking heads foder for CENTURIES.

  10. Re:Not very well written by jazman_777 · · Score: 5, Funny
    This slashdot story is written rather poorly. For example you could have explained why it is a bad thing for computer owners. Only the statement alone looks a bit too little.

    You have to wait for the second posting of this news, at least. Just be a little patient.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  11. slashdot considered harmful by Xtifr · · Score: 3, Funny

    The really strange thing (to me) is that back when I first met ChrisD (back when he was involved with SVLUG), he was as intelligent and insightful as the next fellow. Now he joins the /. editorial staff, and he suddenly seems to have lost the ability to read or comprehend. Is it possible that working as a slashdot editor can actually cause physical brain damage? :)

    Indeed, the jury is still out (as it were) on Rambus. They have won a decision, but not the case. The case is going back to the lower court.

  12. Re:How was JEDEC deceived? by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 4, Funny
    short of torturing the RAMBUS representatives

    Which is starting to look attractive to some people about now...

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  13. Re:How pathetic by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 2, Funny

    your example is a little different than actuality, here's what really happened:

    (RAMBUS's business model)

    1) Go to JDEC meeting
    2) sign a contract that says you cannot patent technology introduced into the JDEC specification, and you must reveal all patents you hold or are pending that may conflict with the JDEC specification
    3) Use JDEC specifications to produce a patent on memory technology. Also, introduce your (patented) ideas at the JDEC meeting and get it in the JDEC standard.
    4) ???
    5) Pofit!

    --
    Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
  14. Fuzzy Math by PetWolverine · · Score: 2, Funny

    The company's stock soared on the news, rising $54.75, or 57 percent, to close at $11.69 on Nasdaq.

    So the company's stock rose $54.75, to close at $11.69...having opened at what, -$43.06?

    How can a stock price be negative? Does this mean that more shares were sold short than actually existed? So somebody borrowed stock, sold it short, borrowed it back, and sold it short again...

    --
    I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.