Slashdot Mirror


Remotely Counting Machines Behind A NAT Box

Overtone writes "Steve Bellovin of AT&T Labs Research has published a paper showing how to remotely count the number of machines hiding behind a NAT box (in IMW 2002, the Second Internet Measurement Workshop). Your friendly DSL or cable broadband provider could implement this technique to enforce their single-machine license clause. Bellovin explains how to change the NAT software to defeat the measurement scheme, but the fix is complicated and unlikely to appear in commercial home gateways anytime soon."

6 of 574 comments (clear)

  1. What about NAT behind NAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What about when I put a NAT machine behind a NAT machine? ;-)

  2. FreeBSD by PunchMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Our technique is based on the observation...that the "id" field in the IP header is generally implemented as a simple counter

    Recent versions of OpenBSD and some versions of FreeBSD use a pseudo-random number generator for the IPid field.

    So my FreeBSD will look like thousands of PCs? LOL, that sure would piss the cable company off.

    --
    I'll have something intelligent to add one of these days...
  3. Re:what if they are chained? by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 5, Funny
    if your cable company is composed of jackasses

    You mean there are some that aren't?

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
  4. Re:Not where I'm from by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you live in Liberty City or Vice City?

  5. AT&T can't stand slashdotting? by random_nick · · Score: 5, Funny
    Not even an AT&T host can stand slashdotting?

    --
    Even random is random. My nick, too.
  6. Attention Customer: by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 5, Funny
    We are terminating your 28.8kbps dial-up service due to the following violation of the TOS:

    Our expert system has detected that you are sharing a single connection with 4,179 computers.

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.