Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Applies For .NET Patent

Wojina writes "Microsoft has applied for a comprehensive patent on what appears to be the entire implementation of the .NET CLR (Common Language Runtime) and the framework APIs. Microsoft's CLR is an implementation of the CLI (submitted to ECMA for standardization). Does this bode ill for the Mono project? See the CNET News story." And a chaser: Nept points to this interesting Microsoft-funded .NET obfuscation project.

22 of 620 comments (clear)

  1. Erm, isn't it just a virtual machine? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think Donald Knuth has prior art.

  2. What a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Looks like they are patenting. The concept of client server computing.

    Well it looks like we all owe them everything.

    Where should we send the check?

    1. Re:What a joke by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where should we send the check?

      You can PayPal it to bill.gates@microsoft.com

      Or you can go to CompUSA and plunk $579 on Office XP Professional. It all ends up in the same place.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  3. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hell, IIS opens *all* your computing resources to the distributed computing system

  4. Other Details... by Fringe · · Score: 5, Funny
    The wide-ranging patent surely includes...
    • The Blue Screen Of Death
    • The 200-page EULA in a 5-line scroll-pane
    • Solitaire as a Productivity Application
    • FUD as a revenue-centre
    Didn't they invent Al Gore also?
  5. Patent is ludicrous by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 4, Funny
    21. A system as recited in claim 19, wherein male person inserts a penis into the female person. The female person's insertion point (herein referred as "vagina") shall accumulate the male person's semen until such time as the male person has entered the completion phase. This completion phase is what enables the spawning of child persons.

    The above is just as rediculous as the real thing.

    --sex

    --
    Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    1. Re:Patent is ludicrous by MeanMF · · Score: 3, Funny

      Unfortunately, Slashdot is about the last place to go looking for prior art for this one...

  6. Raise your hand by Teckla · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please raise your hand if you thought Microsoft was going to allow .NET to be a reasonable and viable platform on non-Windows operating systems!

    All of those raising your hands, please contact me. I have an exciting opportunity for you. I'm trying to get some money out of Nigeria.

    -Teckla

  7. Re:Linux? by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, like the US Patent Office is really choosy about what they'll accept in the way of patents.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  8. Re:CNET Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dude, you really should not post the entire text of articles. It shows a total disrespect of copyright laws and is liable to get you fired someday, Anonymous Coward or no.

  9. .NET? by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 3, Funny

    And here I thought .NET was a code obfuscation project!

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  10. Re:CNET Article Text by enos · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do you honestly believe that we're going to slashdot CNet?

    --
    boldly going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse
  11. Re:Name Changing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    umm - .COM?

    maybe like:

    Internet Explorer

    SQL Server

    C umm - Sharp

    word umm - just word, drop the perfect part

    You would think that they could at least inovate a product name. Rename MONO .COM and then submit a patent.

  12. Re:hmmm by silvaran · · Score: 3, Funny

    You start by claiming the sun, moon and stars

    You're absolutely right. They're going to work on the stars next year.

  13. Re:Okay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Also From Mono's FAQ

    Question 666: Will Mono ever be genuinely useful enough that Microsoft takes note?

    No. Mono will be permanently between 60 and 75% complete. This should be enough to allow toy applications to run and advocates to trumpet our success, but far enough away that no Windows-oriented .NET software is ever successfully ported to Mono. Thus ensuring that Microsoft does not "cut off our air supply", if you know what we mean.

    Furthermore, we are sure that if some contributors ever bring us closer than 75-80% to source or binary compatibility with Microsoft .NET (c), that Microsoft will introduce a raft of new APIs and features ensuring that our compatibility level will drop back below the required threshold. Because Microsoft learned at the knee of IBM, we are fairly certain that they will not let their products stagnate in a manner similar to AT&T's UNIX(tm).

    We've taken our inspiration from the other wunderkind Microsoft compatibility project, Wine. As most have noticed, Wine has avoided any legal or marketing attention from Microsoft due to systematic lack of useful compatibility. If RMS be with us, we achieve the same.

  14. Re:uhhhhh by Doug+Neal · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're American, right?

    This is a pound sign: £

    # is not. It's a hash. Most Americans seem to be confused on this, I hope this post clears it up :P

    Besides, "C Pound" just sounds stupid.

  15. Re:hmmm by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny
    MS will just patent Darkness

    They might have a case for that one. :^)

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  16. Re:Wow, they are patenting RPC and Web Browsers by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hehe, I worked with a lawyer at my company with a coupla workmates filing a patent we came up with for my company.

    When we entered the room, we knew what it did, and the lawyer had no clue. When we left, we had no clue, and he seemed to be telling us what it did.

    He really did research and stuff, real work he put in. But still its quite funny. They are English Obfuscators.

  17. Re:And a collective exclamation of "STUPID" by Synn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Naw, dude. I talked with Bill the other day and he SAID it was cool.

    He wouldn't lie to me, would he?

  18. Ah, I love the smell of evil in the morning. by gstaines · · Score: 3, Funny
    Bill Gates, gets out of bed and can smell something in the air. His lawyers have been busy overnight. "God! I love the smell of EVIL in the morning" says Bill

    News Flash: "A new anti-trust law passed today requires microsoft ship its software with a new scratch and sniff sticker on all of its products. Lawmakers apparently want consumers to be able to smell the Evil that is Microsoft before making their purchases" But Chairman Bill Gates likes the smell so much that he is painting he new estate in florida with a paint modeled on the scratch and sniff stickers.

    News Flash later that day: Microsoft is reportedly trying to aquire a patent on the smell of evil, The odor of fear and the stench of stupidity, all reported important for its next product release.

  19. Re:hmmm by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're having trouble with the moon. Seems that a little-known government agency known as "NASA" went there before Microsoft even existed, thus claiming the moon before Microsoft ever did. Microsoft engineers are currently working on a magic time machine to overcome this obstacle.

    All your moonbase are belong to us.

  20. Re:hmmm by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 4, Funny
    They're having trouble with the moon. Seems that a little-known government agency known as "NASA" went there before Microsoft even existed, thus claiming the moon before Microsoft ever did.

    In other news...

    Microsoft have recently announced funding for a new research project into the history of space travel. This will build up to culminate in a series of "one-off" TV shows hosted by former X-Files cast members, which will prove conclusively that man has never been to the moon.

    A court case against NASA is expected to follow shortly, alleging that other "one-off" TV shows hosted by the same former X-Files cast members and describing man's visit to the moon were faked, and that Microsoft's reputation as the number one supplier of moon-based products has been irreparably damaged.

    We now return you to our regularly scheduled Microsoft bashing.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.