Microsoft Applies For .NET Patent
Wojina writes "Microsoft has applied for a comprehensive patent on what appears to be the entire implementation of the .NET CLR (Common Language Runtime) and the framework APIs. Microsoft's CLR is an implementation of the CLI (submitted to ECMA for standardization). Does this bode ill for the Mono project? See the CNET News story." And a chaser: Nept points to this interesting Microsoft-funded .NET obfuscation project.
POOP!!
Oh, I'm a Republican
I got a small schling
I like to bomb niggahs
and make a lot o' bling
I got a bunch o' friends
in high up places
They helps me get dem
government graces.
You think I'm smart
I just know who's who
I couldn't run a fruit stand
without the red white & blue
I'll drop some crap
about Jesus the Christ
You'll buy it all
and vote for me twice
'Fact, Jesus is comin'!
Real soon, now!
So we gotta prop up Israel
That ol' sacred cow
Don't need no history
Don't need no schoolin'
I got my ideology
To keep me a shootin'
Liberals! Faggots!
Commies and queers!
Socialist hippies
Full o' pussy tears
Propaganda's m'friend
But I calls it "fact"
Even though I don't read
'Cept for Chick tracts
Facts? No! Don't need em here!
We're conservatives! We work on FEAR!
Don't like what we say?
Well FUCK YOU, bud!
We'll shove it down yer throat
and tell ya it's good!
Where do you want to go today?
hahahahahahah1!!Gglglah
Maybe if you post this a few more times you might finally get +5
----
Go canucks, habs, and sens!
Shut up, bitch.
Do all your posts start with "Linux?" because you're a fucking karma whore
Nice hendrix quote.
So you're saying that unless you work for Microsoft, you shouldn't be a programmer?
Your words, not mine. Perhaps you were just setting up a strawman to knock down with a clever (not) retort. Or perhaps you just couldn't quite comprehend what I wrote. Okay, I'll try to keep it to words of one or two syllables:
It was a mistake to try to copy MS's newest APIs and designs because they can (and will) patent that stuff and shoot you out of the water. Besides (the part of my first comment you ignored), it also makes the MS idea seem better in the eyes of users, and why settle for a late copy when you can have the real thing?
As for your other comment: MS couldn't sue over Linux because any relevant IP belonged to AT&T -- and that court fight was settled with BSD. (Besides, the one patent AT&T had on Unix, the suid bit (things were different about software patents in those days) had both been released to the public domain and expired. Copyrights didn't enter into the Linux effort the way they did with BSD, Linus never saw AT&T code.)
-- Alastair