WiFi Woes With .11g
Herby Werby writes "The Register has an article on the incompatibility between .11g and .11b across differing unnamed vendors due to premature roll-outs. The part which really hurts is the suggestion that if there's a .11b participant to your .11g network then either it gets ignored or the network reverts to .11b status. Anyone tried this yet with their new Powermacs?" As the article points out, this is most likely due to the fact that .11g hasn't really even been set as a *standard* yet, so incompatibility is to be expected. I just hope vendors get really good with flash updates.
this makes perfect sense from a bandwidth slice point of view. if each card is getting an equal fraction of bandwidth (or time or whatever) and the b- cards are only exploiting that bandwidth at their normal 11MB/s flux then well yes they are wasting bandwith (but thats becasue they are B-cards).
the transmitter is still jamming bits as fast as it can, it just cat jam them as fast to the B-cards
of course a better situation would be if the bandwidth could be shared better so the b-cards got a smaller slice. but I doubt the b-cards would work that way.
Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
For those not privy to Apple-specific jargon:
Airport==802.11b
Airport Extreme==802.11g
Donate background CPU time to fight cancer.
This was not redundant.
Donate background CPU time to fight cancer.