Slashdot Mirror


Toms Hardware Reviews 65 CPU's, Past & Present

An anonymous reader writes "Toms Hardware has an interesting review of 65 processors ranging from 100 MHz to 3066 MHz. They spent more than 300 hours benchmarking and recording the scores. Worth a quick glance, especially for the Unreal Tournament 2003 scores on the 100 MHz pentium!" CT: Yeah yeah. It's a dupe. Funny that not a single reader emailed me in almost 2 hours to tell me.

24 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Fastest Double Posting ever ? by Tux2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    cool ;-)

    --
    Denken hilft.
    1. Re:Fastest Double Posting ever ? by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think Taco and Hemos had a fight. They're ignoring each other now, and refusing to read each others posts.

    2. Re:Fastest Double Posting ever ? by llamalicious · · Score: 5, Funny

      no no no.

      You see, Taco and Hemos are getting along just fine... It's Toms Hardware they're mad at, so they teamed up and are attempting the first mass-double-slashdotting DDOS.

      Let's see if Tom's can handle it!
      Banzai !!!!!!!!!!!

    3. Re:Fastest Double Posting ever ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Obviously they were fighting over who would get the "first post."

    4. Re:Fastest Double Posting ever ? by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 4, Funny

      *waves hand in front of face* There is no 2nd post.

  2. Deja vu? by NeoTron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Damn! There's been a change in the Matrix!

    1. Re:Deja vu? by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't this a duplicate? Hey, just submitted it again, we'll see whether we can get that in triplicate!

  3. Reposting?!? by danormsby · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everyone repost quick! Lets reduce Slashdot to one story!

    --
    Omnis amans amens
    1. Re:Reposting?!? by ccweigle · · Score: 4, Funny
      Everyone repost quick! Lets reduce Slashdot to one story!

      Here's what I think they should to for April Fools this year: one made-up story, posted over and over again, all day long.

      And it should be about a new technology to prevent /. dupes.

  4. New recipe. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    The Slashdot Sandwich

    Take a tasty filling of Gameboy Advanced SP information sandwiched between two two layersof duplicated Tom's Hardware links.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  5. (ot) SLASHDOT, I CAN FIX YOUR PROBLEMS!!! by raygundan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For a reasonable fee per story, I am offering my services to the editors of /. as a proofreader and duplicate checker. Additionally, I will assist if necessary (at a negotiable hourly rate) in adding code to automatically send the draft article blurbs to my wireless device. I am unable to proofread overnight (I have to sleep sometime), so that will have to be covered by another shift, or written off as "happy slashdot error time."

    I cannot guarantee 100% error correction, but I will stake my job on significantly decreased rates of grammar and spelling mistakes, and far fewer duplicate postings.

    I would also like a T-shirt that says "I work for slashdot".

    Please, for the sake of your readers, hire me. I want to help!

    1. Re:(ot) SLASHDOT, I CAN FIX YOUR PROBLEMS!!! by Dan+Crash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll take the overnight shift. Seriously.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  6. One post for each CPU reviewed? by Quarters · · Score: 4, Funny

    Only 63 more duplicates to go!

  7. Re:Worst dup[e... *EVER!* by Docrates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    actually, this is easily the only type of dupe I can understand and accept. If they're close together, it means that two editors were working on the same story almost at the same time, which is understandable, but when they're hours or days appart it can only mean that slashdot editors don't read slashdot...

    --

    There are two kinds of people in the world: Those with good memory.
  8. Re:same topic deserves same posts, no? by PetiePooo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sorry. Comments of this nature are not appropriate for this forum. This thread is strictly for discussing duplicate stories.
    If you wish to discuss the contents of the TomsHardware CPU review, please post your comments in this discussion.

    Timothy, you wanna take a crack at it too? ChrisD? Any other /. editors? Bueller? Bueller?

  9. Re:Hey Taco by Duds · · Score: 5, Funny

    My god that wife of his is distracting him

  10. I just pity the guy... by TheMidget · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... who got stuck with the 100 Mhz CPU!

  11. Stop bitching Malda... by EnglishTim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    CT: Yeah yeah. It's a dupe. Funny that not a single reader emailed me in almost 2 hours to tell me.

    Funny that - perhaps people get the idea that you won't look at their mails, seeing as you can't even be bothered to read your own goddamn website...

    I can't believe you actually get paid to do this...

    1. Re:Stop bitching Malda... by Duds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's even worse. He posted the intervening story too.

      I.e - when we first got on, he didn't even read the FIRST FUCKING STORY.

      Even if he didn't look at the front page till he blindly approved the gameboy one, he'd still have had to check that posted properly and not read the headline below it, which you'd think would be virtually impossible.

      So the only possible conclusion is that not only does he not check the front page himself EVER he doesn't even ever check if a story got submitted right.

  12. CCmmddrrTTaaccoo...... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...... ttuurrnn ooffff llooccaall eecchhoo!!

  13. hahahah by JPelorat · · Score: 4, Funny

    "CT: Yeah yeah. It's a dupe. Funny that not a single reader emailed me in almost 2 hours to tell me."

    Oh, I *see*. It's OUR fault. Gotcha.

    Moron.

    Hey spacklewit, you can't be bothered to read your own website, why would we think you'd bother to read your email too?

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  14. Oh please.. by doubleyewdee · · Score: 5, Insightful
    CT: Yeah yeah. It's a dupe. Funny that not a single reader emailed me in almost 2 hours to tell me.


    Come off it. I don't see where you get off bitching because nobody told you that you posted a dupe of a story two stories down. I mean, had you taken a cursory glance at your own site you probably would have seen this story.

    You know, if you didn't want us to pay for this, I wouldn't even care. But I cannot believe that you are bitching at paying customers because of your lack of editing. What gives? As I've said before this site has editorial practices slightly worse than that of your average grade school newspaper. I think it's really insulting that you would expect anyone to pay for this.

    Let me up the ante here. You editors are pretty tech-savvy, right? I just used Mozilla's oft-praised tabbed browsing feature to open another tab and look up the post I linked above. Now, when you are approving submissions, how hard would it be to have a second tab open to make sure you aren't posting a dupe. I mean, look, you guys approve at most 20 stories a day. Between the four or five (estimate) active editors, that's.. well.. not a lot. It wouldn't be hard to simply say "when I'm ready to approve a story I'll make sure there aren't any dupes." This kind of work wouldn't take long at all, and combined with a little editing would go a long way towards getting some new subscribers. I, for one, pledge to subscribe when the editorial quality of this site improves. That means, basically, that every other story can't have glaring grammatical or spelling errors, and that dupes are practically nonexistant.

    I realize that everybody makes mistakes, myself included, but the number of mistakes from people who are professionals (and you are professionals if you do this for a living -- you do) is just too much to be tolerated -- or at least paid for.
    --


    you can take the road that takes you to the stars...
    1. Re:Oh please.. by smoondog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There should be a category for duplicates. It is obvious that they now have a policy to announce duplicates when they are discovered. When a dup is announced, it should be moved to this category and we can all remove (or not remove) that category from our preferred view. Then users don't have to worry, the /. team doesn't have to pull the story and (of course) the editors still won't have to do their jobs...

      -Sean

  15. Incredible by Iamthefallen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Waaaa waaaa, the people who I ignore as much as I can and who pay my salary refuse to do my job for me, waaa, waaa

    If I had a breif spell of insanity and thought that Slashdot editors gave a crap about what anyone thought, or even for a moment believed that the editors listen to input, yeah, I might've written a mail. But it seems that everything else that people write Slashdot about, suggestions and complaints alike, is ignored as soon as possible. So why should anyone bother to write you Taco?

    I like Slashdot, I like the people on Slashdot, I'm a Slashdot addict, I'll refresh the front page after I'm done writing this. But man, the staff running this place is unbelievable. No spell checking, ever. Dupes, trolls, fakes, bad URLs etc etc all find their way through to the frontpage way too often indicating that half the time the staff don't even read the article, much less check links or such. There is no staging or testing lab, it's quick hacks and patches on the live boxes which every now and then brings the site down or creates some other, ahem, interesting results.

    In short, the Slashdot staff isn't even trying anymore. Complete stagnation.

    Aaaah it feels good to burn some karma, of course, I'll never get to moderate anything after this rant though.

    --
    Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues