Slashdot Mirror


Programs for Reading Text Files?

dotpl asks: "Recently I acquired a number of books in text format from Project Gutenberg and archived them for later reading. When I came to read, I realised how hard it is to read text files on the computer screen, so I thought about developing a 'reader' that you can read text files with, selecting the fonts and colors you like, and which has a bookmarking feature - a la Vim - so you know where you were reading before. Then I realised that a software of the sort must already exist. How do you read big text files without suffering from severe eye strain?" While a browser may go a long way to providing the necessary functionality, most browsers bookmarking facilities are sorely lacking for this type of work, since they don't mark the position in the page, just the page, itself. Has anything like this been written?

131 comments

  1. "Has anything like this been written?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes. It's called lp. Or lpr. Take your pick.

    If you truly want to save your eyes, this is by far the best solution. I don't care what kind of monitor it is, or how good the fonts look. Staring at a monitor produces considerable eye strain. Staring at properly illuminated paper does not, to nearly the same degree.

    But I sympathize with the desire to save paper and ink. Hopefluly someone else has a good solution along those lines...

    1. Re:"Has anything like this been written?" by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Try a *very* old reflective-screen laptop. Not a backlit LCD, just plain old reflective. Trouble is, they tend to be a little bulky.

    2. Re:"Has anything like this been written?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must still have a cheap monitor and/or video card. I use the monitor all day at work and I have no problems reading. I even set my fonts to something really small. First you should get a wideo card and monitor that has at least an 85 Hz Refresh rate, higher is better. If you can get one with a 100 Hz Refresh rate then do so. You also need to get room lights that you can dim so that you can reduce glare - a flat screen helps too. I have flourescents that are on dimmer control and I set the dimmer quite low. The monitor emits plenty of light, so you don't need additional light to read text.

    3. Re:"Has anything like this been written?" by LowTolerance · · Score: 1

      This is true. No software is ever going to make looking at a computer screen easy on the eyes. Not only that, but the loss of mobility with a computer takes a big comfort hit. How often do you sit in the same position while reading a book? You are not given so much freedom while staring at a computer screen, be it a monitor or a laptop screen.

      So until computers are book-sized and book-weighted, with brighter, non-reflective screens, they will never replace books for the wonderful pastime of reading.

    4. Re:"Has anything like this been written?" by n9hmg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The mobility - yes. I read almost exclusively from gutenberg, using the best document reader I've ever seen, which also happens to be free, cspotrun (Get it, see spot run? A simple reader.) It does everything you are talking about, and there's no flicker in PalmOS. Edit the texts and prep them with any of the utilities - I generally just use makedocw. The format (tealdoc, aportisdoc, whatever it is) compresses the docs about 2:1.
      All of your docs are always at hand, and open to wherever you last viewed them, and with the autooff function of palmos, you can shut off the light and read a book that, if you fall asleep reading it, saves your place and turns off the light.

    5. Re:"Has anything like this been written?" by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Staring at a monitor produces considerable eye strain.

      If your eyes are being hurt by looking at your monitor, you have your contrast set too high.

    6. Re:"Has anything like this been written?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What better way to be easy on your eyes than to have your computer read to you? I use a text-to-speech reader for E-texts. The free versions (as if I would buy software!) Readplease 2000 -Can read very long passages, very good for reading e-texts (I've used it to read for 1/2 hour without intervention before, maybe longer) Readplease 2003 Sorry, they only work with Windoze(TM). I recommend you install both versions. Readplease 2000 is better for reading books, Readplease 2003 has better visibility (that is if you are going to read along with it instead of just listen) but can only reading chunks of text smaller than 16000 bytes.

    7. Re:"Has anything like this been written?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what i have always used is "cat textfile|less" in any random terminal that i am at. catting the file allows me to fall asleep at the keyboard without getting large spaces of unreadable text(read keyboard meets forhead typing) that is auto saved by your office program

    8. Re:"Has anything like this been written?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *hands you the useless use of cat award*

  2. Maybe just lose the boilerplate at the front? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

    One thing that would improve readability of Gutenberg titles would be for them to loose the huge mass of boilerplate text at the front. Often when I open a Gutenberg textfile I have a hard time finding the title to see exactly what it is I am about to read. There's always a huge mass of the same repetetive stuff up front.

  3. easy by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1

    konsole + vim

  4. Convert to PostScript before viewing by Dan+Ost · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I usually use enscript to turn it into postscript
    and then use gv to peruse it. By doing this, I
    create pages so that I have a sense of where I
    am in the document and gv lets me easily advance
    forwards and backwards using space and backspace
    (seems about as intuitive as you can get).

    --

    *sigh* back to work...
    1. Re:Convert to PostScript before viewing by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Very intuitive. Makes much more sense than some random keys like, say, "Page Up" and "Page Down."

      -Peter

    2. Re:Convert to PostScript before viewing by dotgain · · Score: 0

      Can't suggest this highly enough myself. enscript can do heaps of things, n-up printing, columns, any font. After that you can use gv to view it, or use less paper printing it becuase you've got 2 or 4 pages on one piece of paper.
      Not got *nix? The Apple laserwriter driver has some of this built in. I've used it to print a 400 page book 4-up on A4. (2Pp 2 sided).

    3. Re:Convert to PostScript before viewing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those work as well, by the way.

    4. Re:Convert to PostScript before viewing by darqchild · · Score: 1

      I find that opening in a text editor, with a clear font works.
      Also, if you adjust your font size and size of your editor window to resemble a page in a book, you will find your text files much easier to read

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    5. Re:Convert to PostScript before viewing by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      In gv, the page up and page down keys move ahead or
      back one logical page. Space and backspace will
      move up (down) one screen's worth on the page or
      move to the next page if you're already at the
      bottom (top).

      Again, perfectly intuitive (at least to me).
      If only all viewers could has as well a designed
      UI as gv...

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
  5. XML by heldlikesound · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a job for the overhyped, yet underused markup langauge that is XML.

    --


    Cloud City Digital: DVD Production at its cheapest/finest
    1. Re:XML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Maybe, but getting structure from unstructured text would be a bitch. carriage-return = end of paragraph, except when it's a blockquote, and single lines are assumed to be headings, except when they're in speech marks because that single line might be in the middle of a conversation... it's hell giving structure to plaintext, but once there XML would be suited (XML to XSL-FO to Printed Page).

    2. Re:XML by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know much about XML but I have read many of the free SF books available from Baen, they seem to use some kind of XML/Javascript formatting that absolutely kicks ass, you can search for pages #, change the fonts, everything!

      I recommend that you download one of the books from the Baen free library and check out the source.

    3. Re:XML by perkr · · Score: 1

      I understand that you are ironic, but how is structuring the text going to make it much easier to read? Clearly the poster wants something that enhances the readability of text mass. Most texts, like novels, do not have very much of a structure in them.

  6. Festival by arunkv · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Try Festival from the University of Edinburgh. It's been available for years and the team continues to make improvements to the system all the time. Source is available here. In the past, the Systems Development Laboratory at the Indian Institute of Technology has also experimented with using Festival for reading out documents in Indian languages, although I don't know the current status of the project.

    1. Re:Festival by arunkv · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I misread your comment. Looks like you are not interested in the spoken word but just easier visual reading.

    2. Re:Festival by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Festival kicks ass, but I still want a talking 3D head to go along with it.

  7. EText Reader by alphaseven · · Score: 4, Informative

    You could try EText Reader, for linux or windows. Allows you to read zipped etexts as well as retrieve online Project Gutenberg texts. You can also select the font and bookmark stuff.

  8. eye strain by Spudley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It has always struck me as odd that so many people seem to think it's a good idea to read books on their computer screen. With the eye-strain problems of current display technology, I simply can't see how anyone could even contemplate it.

    Until there is a display technology available that doesn't have this problem, you're better off printing it. Rather use up a bit of paper and ink than damage your eyes.

    --
    (Spudley Strikes Again!)
    1. Re:eye strain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't flatscreen monitor considerably better on the eyes? (I've read that CRTs are like looking into a dull lightbulb)

    2. Re:eye strain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, they are, but CRTs being like dull lightbulbs isn't the reason. CRTs basically flash on and off really fast (really old ones do it at 60Hz, most people don't notice the flickering above 75 or 85 Hz), while LCDs display the image constantly. There's other differenced between the two, like sharpness (LCDs win in this), color (your viewing angle effects the color you see on an LCD, so if you need super-accurate color LCDs suck), refresh rate (a lot of old LCDs change their pixel states too slowly to keep up with video or games or other onscreen motion; good new ones are vastly better, but some people still notice it).

      Before anybody starts an LCD/CRT flame war, please go and actually use both kinds. All too often I see people bashing LCDs because they saw a laptop back in '94 and decided that LCD tech sucks and will never improve, ever. Same goes for people who hate CRTs because they've never run theirs at higher than 70Hz, or have only used 10 year old blurry, worn-out ones. Don't base your judgements on tech by the cheap-ass generic crap sold at CostCo.

    3. Re:eye strain by spuke4000 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Rather use up a bit of paper and ink than damage your eyes.

      I had the same concern (I sit in front of a computer 8 hours a day at work) so I asked an optometrist this week. Her answer: looking at a computer screen causes 'short term' eye strain, but no long term damage. Basically, get a good night's sleep and your fine.

      --
      This post cannot be rebroadcast without the express written constent of Major League Baseball.
  9. Search for SMALL by yerricde · · Score: 4, Informative

    To skip the PG boilerplate, search for the text END*THE SMALL, capitalized and punctuated exactly so.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  10. My ideas by dacarr · · Score: 1
    Emacs.

    If you're on OS/2, 'e' works, but tedit is less overhead.

    If you're on Windoze, Notepad.

    But by far, you can always print the file. Unless you have the sun right overhead it's gonna save big time on eyestrain.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:My ideas by unitron · · Score: 1

      And of course if you're running straight DOS (MS or PC), there's always good ol' browse.com (the file, not a URL) from about 10 years ago. Very handy to have on boot, utility, and emergency floppies.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  11. Reading big files? by (H)elix1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do you read big text files without suffering from severe eye strain?"

    Wait for the movie, silly...

  12. LCD by yerricde · · Score: 2, Informative

    Until there is a display technology available that doesn't have this [eyestrain] problem

    The future is now. Here's how LCDs work.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  13. Fundamental problem by babbage · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I'm not sure if I'm on the wrong track here, but I definitely feel out of step with the other comments I've seen so far. It seems to me like your main problem isn't so much the software you're using as it is the display technology itself, yes?

    This is a pretty well known & documented UI shortcoming with contemporary screens: between the fact that the typical monitor is backlit (thus, you're staring into a lightbulb the whole time -- and a flickering one at that) and the very low resolution compared to print (isn't typical resolution on the order of 72 dpi? that's worse than a cheap bubble-jet printer...), reading long texts off a CRT or LCD display isn't comfortable for most people. It's been written that this resolution issue is making computers a lot more uncomfortable for people than most folks realize, and that only with better screens (reflective instead of back-lit, and resolutions of say 1000dpi and higher) will reading electronic displays come to feel as comfortable as paper does for the average user.

    I forget if I read about this in some of Jakob Nielsen's stuff, or Donald Norman, or maybe someone else, but in any case it's a matter that UI specialists are aware of. Last time I was reading about this -- a year or two ago now, maybe a little longer -- it was estimated that such technology is still a decade off, and I'm not sure how much progress has been made since then. Probably not much.

    My favorite idea for dealing with this is the "electronic paper" being tested by groups like Xerox PARC and E-ink, where a sheet of this paper-like film has a matrix of particles that can, depending on the charge being applied to different parts of the matrix, arrange themselves to display arbitrary text or images. The idea is to figure out how to make a high quality version of this stuff that can be mass produced & sold for little more than traditional paper, so that a computer of the future might end up looking a lot like the books of the past, with the pages for the display and the computing components in the spine. That way you could have whole libraries in a portable format, textbooks (or Gutenberg texts :) could be downloaded & students would keep the same "book" from class to class, you could scribble notes on it for your own reference, or maybe even have it recognize what you're writing & use a stylus instead of a keyboard, etc. But aside from all the neat potential aspects of such a device, one of the explicit goals in trying to build it would be to end up with an electronic display format that is as comfortable & familiar as paper.

    1. Re:Fundamental problem by sporty · · Score: 2, Informative
      This is a pretty well known & documented UI shortcoming with contemporary screens: between the fact that the typical monitor is backlit (thus, you're staring into a lightbulb the whole time -- and a flickering one at that) and the very low resolution compared to print (isn't typical resolution on the order of 72 dpi? that's worse than a cheap bubble-jet printer...), reading long texts off a CRT or LCD display isn't comfortable for most people. It's been written that this resolution issue is making computers a lot more uncomfortable for people than most folks realize, and that only with better screens (reflective instead of back-lit, and resolutions of say 1000dpi and higher) will reading electronic displays come to feel as comfortable as paper does for the average user.


      Try setting the background to black and the text to a low intensity shade of white (or colour). Increase the fonts to a size above average for text book reading, and doublespace. For me, it gives the least eye problems. I do almost the same for coding. Otherwise my eyes start to hurt aftere a while.
      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:Fundamental problem by AstroMage · · Score: 1

      Try setting the background to black and the text to a low intensity shade of white...

      I wonder why /. doesn't do the same for the site itself- it would help in reading the site, no?

    3. Re:Fundamental problem by krilli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "thus, you're staring into a lightbulb the whole time -- and a flickering one at that"

      i just want to know why everyone says that having light from a lightbulb flickering at 60hz reflected into your eyes via a sheet of paper is inherently better than having a monitor flickering at your eyes directly ...

      (if lightbulbs flicker at all, that is ... do they? or is the filament glowing steadily?)

      anyway, what I do when i'm reading text off the computer screen is

      a) I reduce the length of the lines

      our vision system has a hard time tracking lines longer than X words. this is what makes you "miss" sometimes when you're moving your eyes to a new line.

      b) increase the contrast to maximum, decrease the brightness all the way down (or as far as it will go down) and use a gamma control to even things out a bit (for Linux, the "gamma" and "xgamma" commands - in Windows / MacOS, the Adobe Gamma control panel. if you have access to a hardware color calibrator gadget, use that).

      if you do this, i promise you that you will have so much fun reading from your monitor, you'll even be digging up your old .txt ascii-porn files from that bbs way back when ...

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    4. Re:Fundamental problem by sporty · · Score: 1

      There's been this strange thing about black sites (or dark ones of any shade) being... depressing. I think people relate the web to paper and not TV. A white pamphlet wouldn't be depressing, while a black tv add isn't. Who knows.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    5. Re:Fundamental problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screens have nothing to do with dpi!

      dpi has to do with printing, not monitors!

      Do some reading on the subject before speaking.

    6. Re:Fundamental problem by babbage · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The term is commonly used in printers rather than display technlogy, but the concept applies just fine to displays -- do some math before complaining! :)

      All it means is "dots per inch", and it's perfectly valid to find that ratio for a typical resolution (640x480 on the low end up to, what, 1920x1240 on the high end?) and screen size (14" for a small CRT, 12" for a small laptop LCD, up to maybe 23" for the biggest common screens today?).

      For the low end, that works out to roughly 45dpi and on the high end 83dpi (approximately -- I'm dividing screen pixel width by screen diagonal inches, which isn't quite right, but it gets you in the ballpark anyway). Last time I checked, even the cheapest bubblejet printers could do 300dpi printing, and did half that at "low" resolution.

      Even the best video technology available does barely a quarter of the rate cheap printers typically do -- nevermind high quality ones. The difference may not seem obvious, but it is very real, and all computer users are probably subconsciously aware of it, if not consciously -- this plays a big role in the perceived strain in reading large amounts of material off a monitor.

    7. Re:Fundamental problem by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      Studies actually show the opposite is true: reading dark text on a light (reflective) background is easier on the eyes.

      You're right in that the biggest contributor to eye strain here is the bright flickering light in your eyes.

      The solution to this is to operate your monitor at the highest refresh rate it will support and to adjust the brightness, contrast and color temperature settings to match your environment. If I open up a window that's all white, and hold up a white sheet of paper next to the monitor, the brightness and color should match. For me, this means raising the refresh rate of my monitor to 85+Hz, dropping the color temperature rather significantly and reducing the contrast.

      Secondary to that, consider raising the resolution of your monitor as high as it'll go without sacrificing the refresh rate. To compensate for the apparent shrinkage in size of all of your display elements and text, instead of just making those things bigger, raise your system's DPI settings. In theory, everything should look exactly the same size that it did before you raised your screen resolution, except it'll be sharper and clearer. A 12pt font should appear the same size regardless of medium and resolution.

    8. Re:Fundamental problem by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      why everyone says that having light from a lightbulb flickering at 60hz reflected into your eyes via a sheet of paper is inherently better

      It takes a certain amount of time for light to "fall off" when an electrical current stops or is reversed. For typical incandescent filaments, that "fall off" time is very long, so you would find it very difficult to measure any flickering.

      For fluorescent lamps (especially older ones), the difference is more severe, as the light falls away rather quickly. Fluorescent lights used to be a huge health issue in offices. Nowadays, the phosphores tend to emit light for longer periods, so the flickering isn't as bad.

      Monitors are the worst, though, since they need to be able to react to high-speed motion, so the image persistence needs to be very short.

      Fortunately, you'll be hard pressed to find a monitor nowadays that's limited to 60Hz. 85Hz is typically a standard minimum and that tends to reduce the apparent flickering significantly (though there will always be some that say they can still see it). Get up to 100Hz or better and you're fine.

      b) increase the contrast to maximum, decrease the brightness all the way down (or as far as it will go down)

      This is the wrong way to go about it. Generally, good color calibration tools require that you first set your monitor's brightness and contrast settings to a "sane" value first, where that "sane" value means the brightest white on your screen matches the brightest white around your screen (e.g. a sheet of paper). The goal there is to match your monitor's lighting with your ambient lighting. Once that's done, additional gamma or color profile settings can be used to scale your grays and match colors properly. But still, fixing your lighting is probably the biggest thing to help your eyes.

    9. Re:Fundamental problem by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      Don't be a troll. DPI is just as valid in the world of monitors as printers. Maybe "PPI" (pixels per inch) might be more appropriate, but it's stupid to invent new terms when the existing one works just fine.

      Really, when you change screen resolutions, you ought to change your system's DPI settings to compensate, so that a 12pt font looks the same size no matter what screen resolution you're running at. So, you see, DPI settings do have a value in the world of computer screens.

    10. Re:Fundamental problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      both color calibration methods i've used, Adobe Gamma and a Gretag-Macbeth hardware gadget, told me to turn contrast *all* the way up, and brightness *all* the way down ... unless using an old monitor with faded phosphors, which neccesitates a higher brightness setting ... so that's what i based my input on

    11. Re:Fundamental problem by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      It's usually worded something like this:

      Step 1. Turn brightness all the way down and contrast all the way up.

      Step 2. Turn brightness up just below the point where 'black' ceases to be black.

      Step 3. Turn contrast down to the point where 'white' matches the intensity of ambient white.

      Step 4. Adjust gamma to the point where rows of white/black/white/black lines look about the same as 50% gray (usually a side-by-side comparison)

      Step 5. Adjust color temperature (or other color-matching settings) so that 'white' matches the color of ambient white. Some applications ship with color matching tiles so that you can fine-tune red, green and blue to match real-world colors on the tiles.

  14. Just about any modern text editor will do... by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 1

    I have a big collection of manuals, literatures, and lyrics in text format. Most of the time, I find any of my perferd text editor would allow me view without much problem. gvim, xemacs, UltraEdit32, even notepad would let you change font, set wrapping, get the line number (for bookmarking).. just take your pick.

    Sometimes when I find plain text not enough for the perticular item I am reading, I just run it through some scripts to turn it into HTML or postcript so I can read it in my favorite browser/viewer.

    For myself, atleast, I find this is already more then enough for my day-to-day reading.

    1. Re:Just about any modern text editor will do... by LeninZhiv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed. The trick is just getting things tweaked to suit your tastes.

      For a number of packages and tips that should help you do what you want to do, check out the Display category of the Emacs wiki. There you'll find all the stuff you need to set up more scrolling options, nice fonts, display preferences, even moving the mouse out of the way.

      I'll also second the comment made elsewhere here that using a light-on-dark colour theme feels easier on the eyes to me (I like blue-sea).

    2. Re:Just about any modern text editor will do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      even notepad would let you change font, set wrapping, get the line number
      $ notepad
      bash: notepad: command not found
      $ cd /usr/ports/editors/notepad
      bash: cd: /usr/ports/editors/notepad: Permission denied
      What is this thing Notepad?
  15. hate to day it but M$ has a good solution by unixbob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not a popular recommendation on /. I know, but the microsoft reader does what you want. It remembers the last page in an ebook you read, and lets you continue reading from that point next time you read that doc.

    --
    The Romans didn't find algebra very challenging, because X was always 10
    1. Re:hate to day it but M$ has a good solution by ianezz · · Score: 3, Informative
      With GNU Emacs you can set named bookmarks referring to a specific position in specific files (i.e. with M-x bookmark-set).

      Then, in a different session, jumping to a bookmark (M-x bookmark-jump) automatically opens that file again and positions the text where you set the bookmark (even if the text changed in the meantime: Emacs bookmarks keep some context lines with them).

      OTOH, the thing I really miss is a nice program from the Amiga days called "muchmore", which provided a sort of full-screen equivalent of the well known "less", but with smooth scrolling, autoscrolling, and both scrolling speed and direction could be changed by simply moving the mouse pointer towards or away from the screen borders. IIRC, it too had bookmarks on texts.

    2. Re:hate to day it but M$ has a good solution by jbolden · · Score: 1

      How? I downloaded it to try it on text files and doesn't seem to accept them. What are you supposed to do?

  16. Use Weasel Reader by KDan · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you have a palm, it's much much easier to just use Weasel Reader (formerly gutenpalm). It's actually designed for reading books, keeping bookmarks, etc - and even extracts the chapter headers for you when you create the pdb file from the txt file.

    Also the palm screen is less straining than these bright old monitors, a lot less.

    Daniel

    --
    Carpe Diem
    1. Re:Use Weasel Reader by Calmiche · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have to agree. I REALLY hate reading on my computer monitor. It gives me a cricked neck, horrible eye-strain and afterimages after just 45 minutes or so. Changing it to white text on black background helps a lot, but what you really need is a palm pilot!

      I use an m505 and it's great. Any of the newer generations palms should be great. (Don't use the nasty old green screen ones.)

      I can fit tons of books on it. (My 64 meg card holds about 160 books.) I use a program called Handstory, which allows me to change font sizes, bookmark lines, sort books into catagories, convert documents back and forth to my computer as well as acting as an online or offline webbrowser.

      It's great, since it's nice and compact. I can carry it in my pocket. My girlfriend likes it since I can read in bed, using the backlight, without disturbing her. A fully charged battery will last 8 hours, and it only takes 20 minutes or so to recharge enough to read for a couple more hours.

      It is a lot more comfortable, and my eyes don't hurt from using it like my computer screen does. The only problems I have is that, 1 the up and down buttons are placed at the bottom, rather than on the sides. (Some of the new Sony Clie's have jog dials on the side.) and 2, I have a hard time working with technical books, since drawings and schematics don't do well on such a small screen.

      Calmiche,

    2. Re:Use Weasel Reader by KDan · · Score: 1

      You can get Weasel Reader to display the stuff horizontally, so that the button will effectively be on the side. You can also set it to "auto-scroll" so that you don't even need to press the button (but it gets a bit annoying as I don't usually read at constant speed). I used it on an old palm and I never was bothered by the green screen.

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
  17. Re:Festival and eye strain :-) by dmanny · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mistaken or not, speech synthesis certainly would reduce eystrain. That's what the query wanted. Your solution stands alone in that it is the only one that solves the problem in such an absolute way.

    --
    All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
  18. Find a high quality LCD Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've used a whole lot of CRT monitors over the years ranging from really cheap to really expensive. I've just bought a PowerMacG4 and the 17" Studio Display from Apple. Compared to a highend Sun 20" monitor (Sony Tube) Without a shadow of a doubt this display is the best I have ever used. It's closer to a 19" CRT in feel though. Flat panels are still too damn expensive. (Bought a Mitsubishi Projection Screen HDTV rather than a Plasma Panel)

    I want a second 17" Studio Display but I'll have to wait a few months before I can swing the $699 which is $200 off what I paid for the first 17"!

    Tip: Turn down the brightness on your monitor/display, especially if the room is darker. Avoid flourescent lighting as well. You get a lot of flicker from flourescent lighting. The LCD doesn't seem to have the problem with flourescent lighting.

    If you are on Mac OS X make sure you've set the Anti-Alias mode for the display you have. ie. Flat Panel or CRT.

    Note: Samsung makes most of the Apple displays so look for their products for a PC clone. Really good displays.

    Increase font size and experiment with black on white or white on black or white on blue, etc. I use gViM like this; change the color scheme now and then to give my eyes a break.

    Printing a large book like one of the Mark Twain books would use a hell of a lot of paper. Reading 8x11 or 8x14 paper is not the same as a book either. Running something off like that at Kinko's would be expensive. You might as well go to the local library and borrow the book for real. Or buy your own copy.

    1. Re:Find a high quality LCD Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta love these idiots who don't know how to refill an inkjet. God bless ya'll.
      Personally, I print thousands of pages a week for little more than the cost of the paper which is incredibly cheap. I even bind them into books by hand. It's remarkably simple if you're even slightly creative.
      When the digital replacment for paper comes along I'll be happy to toss out all my printed copies because they didn't cost shit --although it would be a pity to destroy such handsome. well bound volumes-- and in the meantime if a digitial replacement for paper takes another twenty years I couldn't care less.
      I'm telling ya, cheap printing is the next MP3/Divx and it is going to make this digital paper thing irrelevant. The answer is here today. The DIY refill thing hasn't caught on in the States yet, but it's taking off like mad in other countries. Freedom of the press. I love it and I'm sure the conservatives in the US will fight it every inch of the way. How ironic.

    2. Re:Find a high quality LCD Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, a lot of us once had printers that cost about $0.01 per page (in ink) to print, and even then we didn't bother printing whole books out.

      You might like your inkjet, but it isn't exactly a revolution in cheap printing. That happened a long, long time before inkjets existed.

    3. Re:Find a high quality LCD Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in color with graphics at 1200dpi and 20ppm? I doubt it.
      Things have changed. I print volumes that are higher quality than the originals for a fraction of the cost. That was not possible in the past.

  19. QREAD by almightyjustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Project Gutenberg has a utility for exactly this purpose called QREAD. It's available here.

    --

    Omnes arx vestrum sunt adiuncta nobis.

  20. my tips by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, I've long found that using light text on a black background relieves much eyestrain - so much less radiation hitting your eyeball, plus a nice high contrast. If you run at really high resolution (and up your font size), the letters are really well-formed, too.

    Using a sans serif font also helps readability on computer screens (the opposite of readability on paper - apparently this is accredited to the low dpi on computer screens).

    Try changing settings to suit your own preferences, and don't _ever_ just blindly accept any program's default settings - especially for how things are displayed - everybody's pattern recognition psychology is unique in one way or another. Change fonts and font sizes, change screen resolution, vary the contrast (light on dark, dark on light), etc. Make sure you're using proper lighting in the room you have your computer in. These things all make a big difference, and each can vary a fair amount for each individual.

    Have a day.

    1. Re:my tips by Piquan · · Score: 1

      While increasing the resolution can improve clarity, it often comes at the price of refresh rate. Watch out!

    2. Re:my tips by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Look, I have a sub-$100 (US) videocard (GeForce 2mx) that I got a few _years_ ago that lets me run at 1600x1200 32-bit colour at 85Hz, which oughta be plenty for anyone. That kind of thing shouldn't be a problem anymore.

      But refresh rate IS a good point to watch out for. People need to learn to configure their freaking computers.

    3. Re:my tips by questionlp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Video cards can pump out high resolutions at fairly good refresh rates, but there are two limiting factors: the monitor and the quality of the video.

      Sure, a video card can pump out 1600x1200 at 85Hz, but it doesn't help if a monitor can only do 1280x1024 at 75Hz. Also, the quality of the RAMDAC and the components between it and the monitor are also very critical. Some people have complained about the GeForce's 2D quality, some haven't...

      That's why I love my Matrox G450 and dual monitors at work (1600x1200 @ 85Hz each) :)

    4. Re:my tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5, accurate.

      Anyone who spends time MUDing will have already realized this too. Black background + white (or offwhite) text is nice for when you're going to view many colors on a screen (like on a MUD). Other good text colors are dark green or bluish-purple.

    5. Re:my tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not, the other way around is better for your eyes, or at least that's what an IBM study I once read said. The extra light from a light background allows your pupils to contract, which makes it that much easier to focus.
      The best colors for reading turned out to be the black on light gray used in most modern GUIs these days, if I remember correctly.

    6. Re:my tips by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well all I know is that light on dark makes my eyes hurt _much_ less. Keep in mind that not all studies are perfect, and that study you mentioned may have been old enough to not be valid with modern displays - they may have misinterpreted what was causing problems. Also, note that the ambient lighting would also change those results _drastically_. Test out both methods, and with alternate lighting, to find out what's best for YOU, and don't rely on information you've read elsewhere.

    7. Re:my tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes a lot of sense to reverse the colouring, considering you're moving from a subtractive to an additive colour system. But all of this will really depend on how well adjusted your monitor is. If the convergence on it sucks ass (like my monitor) you're better using red, green or blue on black, and if your tube is getting fuzzy, try grey on black.

    8. Re:my tips by orasio · · Score: 1

      In fact, that is not correct, as you receive much more radiation while reading a well-lit sheet of paper, and your eyes might even like it.
      Eyes have towo major enemies in displays, low resolution and low refresh rates. If you need to pick only one, pick high refresh rates, like 75+ for a 17", and more for a bigger one, or get a non-flicker monitor like an LCD.

      Also, black on white is much clearer, it helps focusing, the only problem with black on white is that flicker could become more visible, and increase eye strain, but it is avoidable.

    9. Re:my tips by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I can tell say with absolute certainty that is completely false. Perhaps there was something terribly wrong with their experiment, or perhaps there was no experiment at all and you're the standard /. troll.

      Either way, it's a fact that your eyes strain much more trying to pick the dark object out of a field of bright light. If you don't believe that, try reading the label on a light bulb while it's turned on!

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    10. Re:my tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lightbulb experiment is entirely bogus. The excessive light coming from the bulb would cause your pupils to shrink and make anything hard to see, let alone read. Please try to cite something meaningful.

  21. Downsampled Texts.. by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always thought that plain text "books" should be more then "plain text". More like HTML or that damned XML everyone keeps talking about.

    While the original would be formatted to display on screen with all the bells and whistles it could also be "downsampled" to lower quality for other devices like a PDA or something.

    But I'm just babbleing...

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
  22. Ninnle does this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need not look any further. Ninnle Linux comes bundles with all the necessary tools for reading large text files.

  23. PDA by texchanchan · · Score: 4, Informative

    1. Open Gutenberg file in UltraEdit (shareware)

    2. Run this macro
    InsertMode
    ColumnModeOff
    HexOff
    UnixReOf f
    Find "^p^p"
    Replace All "QQQQ"
    Find "^p"
    Replace All " "
    Find "QQQQ"
    Replace All "^p "

    3. Save file.

    4. Run MakeDocW (free) on the file.

    5. Hotsync to the Palm/Visor.

    6. Read and bookmark in CSpotRun (free but you can send a donation). Annotate in something else.

    The only thing that'll cost you is the PDA itself and I bet a used 2-meg one isn't that much.

  24. Look at MS Reader by mcgroarty · · Score: 2, Informative
    MS Reader does a lot of things well. The bookmarking is one such thing. The bookmarks are tied to a word, not a line or a page. You can adjust font sizes or other options which will affect the layout, and your bookmarks are still good.

    The layout is attractive and natural, with ample margins, and no scrollbars or other such interruptions. The menus are all brought up by clicking on unobtrusive text at the top of the screen.

    MS Reader also allows plugins which can be activated on selecting a word, changing pages, etc. The three I've seen are a dictionary, a translation utility and a verbal reader.

    MS Reader uses .LIT files, which are pretty much just bundled and compressed HTML. It would be nice to see a similar open source book format.

  25. HTML + browser by aldjiblah · · Score: 2, Informative
    is all you really need.

    With style sheets you're able to define exactly how the document should look, and display it across different platforms and browsers.

    I use this concept, along with small scripts I've written myself (you know Perl, right? :) to read Sci-Fi / Fantasty titles I've downloaded from Direct Connect on my Zaurus PDA.

    Highly recommended, since you can easily adjust the screen brightness on your preferred display device and turn off the regular reading lamp that's otherwise certain to annoy your spouse.

    --
    sig sig sputnik
  26. Text to PDF by Alpha27 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are a number of options out there for this, and it make take care of the text rendering on the screen, and you can print from them as well. You can even read pdfs on some handhelds as well (I can on my zaurus).

    I would recommend this route if you know some programming and you should be able to piece something together.

  27. uh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    and which has a bookmarking feature - a la Vim

    So, uh, why don't you use vim then? Vim has a shitload of features for jumping around between files and remembering your spots. Just today I discovered that ctrl-O and ctrl-I moves you between files you've opened recently, furinstance. And it remembers your spot in each one. Use Gvim and change the font to HUGE and you can read with minimal eyestrain.

  28. Exactly the reader I wanted by obtuse · · Score: 1

    I'm interested in making my texts into audiobooks. I can read on the screen easily enough, but there are times I'd be happy to hear them read, even by a machine.

    Etexts to listen to on my Zaurus would be fun, and I don't just mean MP3s.

    As someone who reads aloud, I know it'll suck because not only will there be no inflection, but the pronunciation will be marginal. Still, it could be interesting. I'm also interested in the possibility of combining this with some sort of inflectional markup language.

    --
    Assembly is the reverse of disassembly.
  29. Import into a Word processor! by Stardate · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The first thought that came into my head was to just import the plain text into your favorite word processor (MS Word, AbiWord, OpenOffice, etc) and just select all and choose your favorite font! You can increase the point size and apply full justification as well.

    I thought like Homer, "Everybody is stupid except for me." but i'm drunk so i'm a little violent now.

    and i'm using windows... sigh. i have to install cygwin on my home pc... a simple bash prompt would calm me down so much... :-)

    --
    "... I declare our city to be a free and independent state to be named Tri-Insula!" --Fernando Wood, Mayor of NYC 1861
  30. palmreader by retsamxaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I use a program called palm reader for my Palm. It keeps bookmarks, and it's portable. Many are talking about the issues with PC monitors, but I think a huge ergonomic issue is that you can't "curl up with it" like you can with a book or a magazine.

    --
    Spiritual Leader of Green Bay Net
  31. Emacs? by Piquan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Personally, I use Emacs. I set the font to something san-serif, big, and very readable, use view-mode (for ease of scrolling), and use bookmarks. I also make the Emacs full-screen; even the title bar goes off the screen.

    I do this on my laptop, and this helps.

    But usually, I prefer to use paper.

  32. Bet you haven't thought of this by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Not a program, but a nifty device for the blind. Since it costs about $1600 (lots of moving parts in that tiny device) I'm accepting donations to help defray the cost.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Bet you haven't thought of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That device is cool -- I remember bullshitting with friends about a Braille output device years ago (early '80s) (I called it "tacteo"), but of course, making it happen is the magic. If you are really blind, tell me how I can pop you a few $ for it. As a person with classic "Coke bottle" glasses, I have alot of sympathy for the truly visually impaired.

    2. Re:Bet you haven't thought of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a lot of moving parts in a dot matrix printer, but they don't cost anything near $1600. Considering the output pins are going to be just miniature solenoids I'd be surprised if you couldn't make these devices from OTS components and undercut these guys by a factor of 8 ... unless of course they have patents ...

    3. Re:Bet you haven't thought of this by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      My wife is blind (hard to let you know, you being AC and all:) As for money, the best bet is to click on the link and see if there is anything there for you. If not... Send me email or post in a journal.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:Bet you haven't thought of this by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about trying to kludge something together, just for fun. I've got several old printers at work just dying to be ripped up.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  33. GutenMark by Rabin+Vincent · · Score: 5, Informative

    GutenMark is a GPL'd program to format Project Gutenberg files into LaTeX. From here on, this can be converted into PS or PDF (sample), which can be easily read in a viewer with a large font size. This program also removes the PG banner, seperates text into chapters and italizes the appropriate words. And the page numbers give you free bookmarking.

    1. Re:GutenMark by samjam · · Score: 2, Informative

      GutenMark is excellent, once it has chapter recognition for contents table linking directly yo chapters in it's HTML output it will be top notch

      If you take html output from GutenMark you can feed it to the free (as in beer, not speach) MobiPocket Publisher you can then view the resulting compressed ebook practically on any platform including the new P800 using the free mobi pocket reader.

  34. In the meantime, use a Mac or Windows by GCP · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I realize that's sort of a flamebaity thing to say in this audience, but there's just no comparison between the quality of text on a Mac or Windows and on Linux.

    I use Linux for work and for fun, but I always set it up so that most of my interaction with it is via a terminal program running on Windows. Many of my coworkers use Macs to access their Linux (and other Unix) machines, and I'll have to admit that the text on their Macs looks a little better than on my Windows machines.

    None of us can put up with the ugliness of text in current Linux GUIs, which looks like the Mac of almost 20 years ago.

    I expect Linux to catch up in the next five years or so (I sure hope so, because I'm using it more and more), but it's pretty hard to look at currently. I don't want to have to keep relying on some other OS to provide a tolerable window into my own Linux box.

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    1. Re:In the meantime, use a Mac or Windows by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Insightful
      None of us can put up with the ugliness of text in current Linux GUIs, which looks like the Mac of almost 20 years ago.

      Odd...I find that text on my Linux box is much more readable than on a Windows machine or Mac. (Ugliest text I've ever seen was defintely on a Power PCMac I had on my dekat at one job.)

      Of course, part of it is using the right font for the job. I use Lucidia Typewriter, a lovely fixed-width sans-serif font, in my emacs and terminal windows, and it's a joy. In my browser (galeon), I get to use fonts that aren't fscked up by "anti-aliasing" (worst idea ever - making characters blurry does not increase readability!)

      If you're trying to use some WYSIWYG word processor or something, there may be more of a problem - but that's a fundamental issue that fonts that work on paper don't work on screen, and vice-versa.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:In the meantime, use a Mac or Windows by krilli · · Score: 1

      ?

      "None of us can put up with the ugliness of text in current Linux GUIs, which looks like the Mac of almost 20 years ago."

      I think "last years Linux GUIs" would be more appropriate. Have you looked at the gnome 2 screenshots, for example?

      --
      Jag pratar lite svenska.
    3. Re:In the meantime, use a Mac or Windows by HeelToe · · Score: 1

      My Linux installation looks much better than my Windows installations.

      Have you looked at freetype and the TTF fonts available? This stuff looks great and is easy to read for me.

  35. PostScript formatting by turgid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you have something like gv (or ghostview) that'll read postscript documents, a2ps does a wonderful job of pagenating and formatting text of all kinds ready for printing to a Postscript printer or viewer. However, that doesn't solve your bookmarking problems. It should relieve some of the eye-strain, though.

  36. Weasel for palm by Jason+H.+Smith · · Score: 2, Informative
    Put it on your handheld and use Weasel Reader. IIRC, it was designed to read Gutenberg texts, and it was originally called Gutenpalm. Anyway, Weasel has all the usual features for ebook readers, and it uses zlib, so its texts are smaller than the PalmDoc native format. Very highly rated on palm.freshmeat.net.

    Also, it comes with programs to convert .txt files, so you can also use ps2ascii and read postscript or even PDFs.

  37. Good advice re Palm by texchanchan · · Score: 1

    ..."I can fit tons of books on it...." Even an 8-meg Palm III can hold 10 or 12 full-size books depending on what else you've got on there and a 2-meg would be adequate, holding say 3 volumes, if you just used it for that.

    And, ..."I can read in bed..." A PDA is so light and convenient it'll spoil you for anything else. Read in bed, in line at the grocery, anywhere. The reading in bed feature is best, though--no more cramping your hand around a paperback to hold it open or wearing out your arm with a heavy hardback.

    As for the old monochrome screen, it took a day or so to get used to, but by now I've read through a significant fraction of Project Gutenberg on that same green screen. So it's doable. William Morris would roll in his grave to see his typographical classics in CSpotRun, but at least they're available for a new generation of readers.

    1. Re:Good advice re Palm by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I must now do over 60% of my reading with my Palm. For me I think the portability is the key, you can fit a whole library on a cheap MMC card, and mine is always in my pocket, so I can read in the queue at the supermarket, or while in the "littlest room". Why am I using a euphemism on Slashdot?

      Also with software like Plucker or Avantgo you can sync things like Slashdot or a newspaper web site to them as well,so they can replace magazines as well as books.

      One suggestion for those of a PC bent; there are Palm simulators (used primarily for software development) that will run on your PC and will handle any of the many Palm document readers.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  38. Plucker by clonebarkins · · Score: 1

    Plucker is a viewer for PalmOS, but I believe they were working on a viewer for X as well.

    --

    "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." -- Ayn Rand

  39. Emacs, part 2 by i0wnzj005uck4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Someone already mentioned Emacs, but...

    It'd be trivial to bind a command to a key that allows the bookmarking of a file (ie, saving of a line number to .#filename or some such), and another jump-to-bookmark function as well. Heck, if you were feeling particularly l33t, you could extend normal text mode to do it for you (ebook-find-file automatically jumping to bookmarked line). As for fonts, it's quite simple to either change the fonts in XEmacs or (as I prefer) simply up the font size on your terminal emulator.

    The nice part about emacs is that you can also write a quick script to remove useless text, like the license stuff at the beginning, since most of it is standard cut-and-paste. Not that you'd want to distribute such an edited copy, but for your own personal use. Plus, it's not like you have to go download emacs from some site...

    --
    - Cloud
  40. check out the alt.binaries.e-book faq by llzackll · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://kickme.to/ebookfaq/

    look at the e-book readers section. You will find something you like on that page.

  41. Here's how _I_ do it: Rocket eBook by dpbsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "How do you read big text files without suffering from severe eye strain?"

    Well, you asked... I have a number of scripts--they're written in Apple's MPW, but think "shell script" and "egrep" and you'll get the idea--that are specifically tuned to Project Gutenberg's format. Massages line breaks, provides true open and close quotes, and so forth.

    They output the particular restricted subset of HTML that's acceptable as input to RocketLibrarian. Then I use RocketLibrarian to download them into my Rocket eBook, which really has very good characteristics. The size is right (midway BETWEEN PDA and laptop) and the screen is very readable.

    Unfortunately... the Rocket eBook was acquired by a bunch of business geniuses at Gemstar who proceded to morph it into the REB1100, which is essentially identical to the Rocket EXCEPT that you can ONLY use it to read purchased (and expensive!) content. No "personal content" allowed any more.

    It's a pathetic mess and if I get started I'll rant for hours...

    But the bottom line is that I've NEVER been able to read comfortably from a fixed CRT sitting at a desk. And I've NEVER been able to read comfortably on cramped 160x160 pixel Palm.

    But reading from the Rocket, which I purchased mainly for the specific purpose of reading PG texts, I read pleasurably and comfortably for hours.

    It's a darned shame that the eBook industry has seemingly killed itself through greed and digital restrictions management.

    1. Re:Here's how _I_ do it: Rocket eBook by dsoltesz · · Score: 1
      Me too- it was the first thing I thought of when I saw the headline. I suck Gutenburg texts, web pages, and other stuff straight off the web with Rocket Librarian. I actually bought the thing to use for web-based coursework when I was in school, and I still use it to store web pages I want to read on-the-road. I've also spent quite a bit on eBooks for the thing. GemStar royally fscked up when they took away the ability to load on personal content - I was all set to upgrade, and was chomping at the bit to get my hands on the new model until I found out they'd made this change. Gemstar didn't take the time to figure out how their new customers were using the product and lost a lot of them in the process.

      If you can get your hands on one of the original Rocket eBooks, I highly recommend it.

    2. Re:Here's how _I_ do it: Rocket eBook by bkolden · · Score: 1

      You can still create eBooks for the Rocket eBook with the 'rbmake' project: http://rbmake.sourceforge.net/
      Then import the .rb file via the RocketLibrarian, although you will probably have to convert the text to HTML before using 'rbmake'.

      --
      -- Brian Kolden
  42. Stardate: nice mp3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where do I get more? I guess you could call it English folk music -- it could be on The White Album, Led Zeppelin III or early Pink Floyd.

  43. ToM Reader by keksov · · Score: 2

    Really nice soft... http://tomreader.pisem.net/tom_setup.zip

  44. Palm works great for me by pmuellr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Like other people suggested, I use a Palm. I've been using iSilo since it's been out; this is great for all kinds of stuff, including gutenbooks. I do a little work on 'em before hand to actually convert them to HTML (I don't understand why Gutenberg doesn't do this, but ... whatever).

    I used to use a Palm Vx (160x160 4-bit grayscale), but have since moved on a 320x320 Sony Clie. When you get into a beat on the reading, turn on the autoscroll, and you don't even have to touch the PDA. The new Clie-with-a-keyboard's have 320x480 displays, and it sounds like from the description at iSilo that they support that mode. It's really a nice, inexpensive, well-supported program.

    Be careful in looking at PDAs for displays that smear or bleed display contents when scrolling. For some reason, a lot of b&w Palms do this, and the color ones don't (at least the Sony Clie's don't seem to). I'd go nuts if I had to put up with a crappy display while reading. Bonus for reading off a PDA, if you can stand it, is that you don't need a light source. In fact, I have read my kids gutenbooks at night, and we turn off all the lights: my book becomes the light source.

    I was also briefly thinking about getting a Rocketbook. I think this would probably be another good way to go if the screen is nice and big, doesn't have tracers when scrolling, and I can put anything I want on it.

  45. With a Stephen Hawkings voice! by dexter+riley · · Score: 1

    Think of the possibilities! Stephen Hawkings reads "Lord of The Rings"! Stephen Hawkings reads "The Deep End of the Ocean"! Stephen Hawkings reads "A Brief History of Time"!

    No, wait, they already did that one.

    1. Re:With a Stephen Hawkings voice! by dmanny · · Score: 1

      But I waited until they did the movie. :-)

      --
      All my previous sigs now look like this one, I wish they were permanetly recorded when used. :-(
  46. insert into explorer using by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i inserted all text into html document, and used the command.

    use a dark background and a light text. scroll using the mouse-wheel.

  47. emacs ? by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
    or one of its clones ?

    after all can't you use emacs for EVERYTHING ?

    --
    I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
  48. ice book reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the best by far for reading ebooks is ice book reader, has auto scrolling, excellent colours to stop eye strain. Just google it to find it. Other than that id recommend a pocket pc or palm with mobipocket reeader, that how i do all my reading and i never have a problem.

    TrickyRic

  49. Listen! by xchino · · Score: 1

    cat document.txt | festival --tts!

    I like using text to speech synthesis software such as Festival to have text read to me while I work. Granted it's not always the most articulate, it gets 99% of the job done just fine..

    --
    Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. It's just that yours is stupid.
  50. KVim? by spoonist · · Score: 1

    Personally, I use KVim. I set the font to something san-serif, big, and very readable, repeatedly use the 'j' and 'k' keys (for ease of scrolling), and use marks ("m[a-zA-Z]" and "m'"). I also make the KVim window really big, but not full-screen; I keep the title bar on the screen.

    I do this on my monsterous LCD monitor, and this helps.

    Usually, I prefer to save a tree.

  51. "list" by jmaslak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    DOS had a utility (not included with it, of course) called "LIST" which let you change colors and bookmark (IIRC). It didn't let you change fonts, but I have read lots of manuals with the program. It was basically "less" on steroids.

    1. Re:"list" by bonezed · · Score: 1
      omg, list was the best program ever in DOS.

      used to use it for everything, these days I use less for most everything

      --
      ---- Put Sig here:
  52. Does Not Matter... by mattfish · · Score: 0

    The text font or colour does not matter to help eye strain. Staring at a computer monitor does that, period. If you really want to read it that abd on the computer you can by a screen shield that goes over you monitor that helps cut some of the harmful ray down.....

    1. Re:Does Not Matter... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which types of screen shields are recommended by you folks?

      The last type I saw made it impossible to see anything on the screen. They were basically a nylon type of net. Lo-tech.

    2. Re:Does Not Matter... by mattfish · · Score: 1

      I do belive that they are all the same. The material does cut down radiation and help with eye strain. I have had one for about a year and it does make a big difference. They are cheap, try one out and if you dont think it works send it back :)

  53. ascii2pdf or txt2pdf by krismon · · Score: 1
    with ascii2pdf, you can specify font,size, margins.

    spits out a pdf file you can read with any pdf viewer.
    http://www.bulldog.tzo.org/ascii2pdf/

    txt2pdf is shareware.. more features..
    http://www.sanface.com/txt2pdf.html

  54. Link (Re:"list") by NaDrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Buerg Software, home of LIST.

    --
    Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  55. Good text readers.. by psycho_tinman · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Try ETextViewer, Tom's eTextReader or even Metapad (www.liquidninja.com ?)..

    I personally prefer Tom's eTextReader myself, have read some fairly large texts on it (Gibbons Decline and Fall of the Roman empire, for example). you can set background colours, it actually renders the pages like a book (double columns).. YMMV, but I read a lot of texts off the screen and I havent found anything better.. This assumes that you're using Win32, of course.

    For a Palm OS device, Weasel Reader rocks..

  56. Fix your lighting and display settings by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

    A lot of readability problems have to do with poor lighting. Really, the brightest white on your screen should match both the color and luminosity of a piece of white paper held up next to it.

    Adjusting your monitor's brightness, contrast and color temperature settings can make a huge difference in eye strain.

    The second recommendation I would make would be to put your monitor at the highest resolution and refresh rate it'll support (don't sacrifice resolution for refresh rate, though) and adjust your system's DPI settings to compensate. This ensures a 12pt font is displayed as 12pt and not scaled to something annoyingly small.

  57. Long term problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Basically, get a good night's sleep and your fine.

    Sure. Like getting drunk. Short term pain and sleep it off. You're fine the next day, right?

    Until you find yourself doing it 8 HOURS A DAY for A FEW DECADES.

  58. why not vim or emacs? by keramida · · Score: 1

    Why not vim? I regularly read works of quite some length in vim or emacs. Both editors run fine in an xterm with colours of your choise and have bookmarking capabilities.

    I've read quite a few books in xterms with -bg steelblue4 -fg #e8e8e8. Your preferred colours might vary slightly or a lot, but isn't it nice to be able to read a document in X11, bookmark it there, then open it later while on a virtual console and still be able to find the bookmarks? :-)

    --
    My other computer runs FreeBSD too.
  59. "Offline readers"?!?! by RLiegh · · Score: 0


    My memory is dim; but didn't they used to have software that downloaded your mail or articles from whatever BBS you were reading and do teh same thing?

    I'd imagine looking around the text utils section of simtel.net might be worthwhile...

  60. And when your new format can no longer be read... by Hecatonchires · · Score: 1

    Ascii can be read by pretty much everything. I think PG have a page on why they use the formats they use.

    HTML, if used properly, would be great, but people can't resist those pretty bells and non-standard whistles.

    XML(XHTML for this?) would then require an additional something to parse it out and display it. That abstraction may be better design, but its a pain if all you want to do is distribute free, unfettered text.

    SGML - well, most people find this one a bit... complex.

    Word.doc? Shudder.

    PG have only recently moved to HTML. They are concerned more with the propogation and longevity of these texts, less the nifty features.

    --

    Yay me!