From DRM to Rights Management Services
miladus writes "Microsoft has formed an academic Think
Tank on Trustworthy Computing. The Academic Board is to advise
Microsoft on 'security, privacy and reliability enhancements in[...]
products and technologies so that Microsoft can obtain critical
feedback on product and policy issues related to its Trustworthy
Computing.' An interview
with two members of the board is an interesting read, especially
concerning the global implications of privacy. Of note, is the absence
of DRM discussion.
But DRM shows up as 'Rights Management Services' in the promised Widows
Rights Management Services to be released later this year. it will
deliver a 'platform-based approach to persistent policy rights for
Web content and sensitive corporate documents of all types'"
So, Everyone that goes to the new version of Office will be locked into a forced upgrade stream? What happens when MS comes out with Office 12? Will everyone that uses 11 find that their documents suddenly "expire" because the new version of office is out?
:)
I don't like it. MS wants to control every 0 and 1 that flows through your computer.
Looks like its time to dig out the 'ole Commodore 64.
Just my 64k-is-enough-for-me's worth
-RickTheWizKid
For example, where I work, we are required by law to have a level of security on certain information; this info should never be reaching people who do not fall under the same laws.
With a technology in place to protect that data, our jobs as the IT staff becomes much easier.
MS is, in my view, breaking new ground with this; some people may not like what they are doing, but you have to admit that nobody else is putting this stuff into their OS (when there is clearly a need for it).
Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.
Will Microsoft use drm to make sure the DOJ can not investigate them for illegal practices. If Bill Gates unfamouns email about choking netscapes air supply timebombs then the doj would have no evidence. Case closed!
http://saveie6.com/
but I think you must trust MS 100% before this can be considered a "good thing."
.).
"With a technology in place to protect that data, our jobs as the IT staff becomes much easier."
It's very simple, if, say, my medical information gets out 'cause some MSCE stopped thinking about security 'cause MS told them to, you better believe I am going to do everything in my power to destroy that incompetent individual's career.
I see people stupidly pick MS all the time for no other reason than it is "MS." Well guess what, most of the time things are NOT working as a result. That's fine, but when we are talking about security required by laws, you better make damn sure YOU actually understand the system you are implementing, and I have yet seen an MS product implemented by someone who actually had an understanding of the innerworkings of the product (though they did read the marketing brochure . .
Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
Here's how it works. The new version of Office comes out, and it's perfectly backward compatable.
But it isn't *forward* compatible.
So all you have to do is get one company that a lot of other companies need to do business with in on the plot and get them to make the switch.
Your Office documents are perfectly readable by them, but everything they send YOU your older version can't read. So if you want to continue to do business with them you have to switch too.
It's a very effective way to force upgrades without giving any overt appearance that that's what you're doing.
They don't lock you out of your documents. They lock you out of everybody else's.
KFG