3D Mark 2003 Sparks Controversy
cribb writes "3DMark 2003 is out, sparking an intense debate on how trustworthy its assessment of current graphics cards is, after some harsh words by nVidia and the reply from Futuremark. THG has an analysis of the current situation definately worth reading. The article exposes some problems with the new GeforceFX previously mentioned in a slashdot article on Doom3 and John Carmack. Alas, here seems to be no end to the troubles with the new nVidia flagship." If you've run the benchmark, post your scores here, and we'll all compare.
Did I get a first post?
I am a viral sig. Please help me spread.
...in soviet russia, contreversy sparks you.
"IF you've run the benchmark, post your scores here, and we'll all compare" If only my computer could get a score...
69.
Actually, that's what I did instead of spending my time with a pointless benchmark. My computer works fine for everything I need it to do.
IF you've run the benchmark, post your scores here, and we'll all compare.
Yeah, how small *is* your penis?
And the point of running a gaming benchmark from a BASH shell is??
------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
I got a score of 1337, of course. This shit is for people wanting to compare penis length without actually whipping it out.
The graphics cards benchmark YOU!
Dude, you suxx0r, everyone else who has half a clue got 31337 =)
Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
I don't have much bandwidth, but I'd send you a divx copy if you email me nice like.
01101001 01100001 01101101 01101110 01101111 01110100 01100001 01101100 01100001 01110111 01111001 01100101 01110010