Slashdot Mirror


The Riddle of Baghdad's Battery

Jodrell writes "The BBC has an interesting article about a 2,200 year old battery discovered in Iraq in 1938. It is basically a clay pot containing a copper/iron core immersed in an electrolye solution (probably acidic vinegar). The article talks about how this priceless artifact as well as many others, from the same civilisation that invented writing and the wheel, could be threatened by the impending war."

11 of 943 comments (clear)

  1. Not the "same civilization" by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Read some history. Iraq is not populated today by the same peoples that invented this device or "discovered the wheel" as you say thousands of years ago. The Islamic faith and the migrations of Arabic peoples into historically Persian regions over time has erased the cultural legacy of these peoples you refer to.

    1. Re:Not the "same civilization" by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Interesting

      could very well do the same thing the Taliban did in Afghanistan

      All brown people look alike huh?
      Iraq and Afghanistan are NOT THE SAME THING!

      As evil and dangerous as Saddam is, he is not a taliban, and in fact Iraq was on the Taliban's list of not-nice-places. Iraq is a modern country (kinda), where women can go to school and work and show their faces in public. Saddam has founded a lot of archeological digs, he even had replicas built of the excavated sites so that the people could go look at their countrie's past glory without damaging the originals.

      Try to get this in your head: Saddam and Oussama are NOT THE SAME PERSON, they don't agree on anything except that they both resent the US.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  2. Saddam wasn't too concerned about artifacts.... by tcopeland · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...when he invaded Kuwait in 1990 and his soldiers ransacked the museums:

    http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/sanction/ir aq 1/000801a.htm

    Tom

  3. 9 volt battery on the tongue by tomzyk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And the Greeks kept electric eels in big wading pools and would walk into the water and get zapped. It doesn't mean they knew what electricity was; they just knew it felt cool to get a mild shock.

    I don't see how they can assume these are batteries when there is no evidence of wires or mechanical devices that would use the electricity.

    A few months ago I saw something on the Discovery Channel talking about all of this. They found similar things (bowls/pots with acid in them) in South America too. They said all of these most likely were for magical purposes (cool shock or possibly even coating/electro-plating jewelry), but not batteries.

    --
    Karma: NaN
  4. This area has been under so much war. by jellomizer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    To say oh we cant go to war because there might be some artifacts that will be destroyed by it. Is pritty lame reasioning because these artificats have been around durring a lot more war then we will go thew in our lives. That area of the world is basicly War Central and has been sience before these artificats were created. So if dont go to war what will stop these people from testing their weapons and distroying these artifacts themselfs when testing their own armament. Or just by digging holes to hide there ileagal stuff.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  5. Cheney says it is by thelexx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here: http://www.policyreview.org/summer93/cheney.html

    Excerpting:

    Policy Review: It is now two years after the spectacular victory of the United States and its allies in Desert Storm. What objectives were achieved during this war?

    Cheney: The best way to evaluate Desert Storm is to consider what the world would be like today if we hadn't fought and won this war. If we had taken a pass on Saddam's occupation of Kuwait, by today he would have the eastern province of Saudi Arabia and would sit astride about 50 percent of the world's oil reserves, which he could control directly when you add up Kuwaiti, Saudi, and Iraqi oil reserves. He'd be able to dominate the rest of the reserves in the Persian Gulf. And he'd have nuclear weapons. We had to stop this from happening. And we did.

    --
    Notice how the nukes are clearly a secondary consideration.
    --

    P.R.: You got out of Iraq without going all the way to Baghdad. Are you worried that Saddam Hussein is still in power today?

    Cheney: I'd rather he were not in power, but I don't see him at this point as a threat to any of his neighbors. In that part of the world, I'm more concerned about Iran. Saddam is unable to sell oil; without selling oil, he can't generate the revenue he needs to rebuild that military machine we destroyed. The Iranians aren't faced with that situation; they have access to the world's markets, they are selling oil, and they are using some of that revenue to regenerate their forces and expand their capabilities. For example, they're buying diesel-powered submarines and MiG-29s from the Russians.

    --

    Nah, can't be about the oil.

    --
    "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  6. Re:Bad Priorities by phutureboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    and those people we would call weak-willed moral relativists.

    Thank you for the name calling.

    There are some of us, thank you very much, who oppose the war on ideological grounds. Some of us believe that the function of the U.S. military should be to defend the citizens of the U.S., not to run around the world "installing" democracies. We should lead by example, not by force.

    Unless, of course, you believe that Saddam only poses a threat to his own people, so why should we care?

    Um, you really think that Saddam poses a threat to the U.S.? I've followed the administration's incredibly weak attempts to convince us that he does, but I still don't see it.

    I don't believe for one second that this is primarily about oil, but it certainly isn't about the national security of the U.S.

  7. Hey everyone, check this guy out! by Un+pobre+guey · · Score: 3, Interesting
    since the media is anti-war

    Whoa! Damn! This dude is on to something! Wow, he must watch Fox TV or read Newsweek, those bastions of pacifism and respect for international law!

    I am humbled by such an acute insight, such pithy observation. I would never have noticed by merely reading or watching "the media." Thank God Anonymous Coward has opened my eyes to the truth!

  8. RTFA: Did they throw away 11 others too? by FreeUser · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Under the right circumstances, ordinary pieces of metal (like plumbing) exposed to acid can make "batteries" by chance. More intriguing is the "un batteried" iron obelisk I recall hearing about in India--an iron monument that has resisted rusting for hundreds of years.

    That is very interesting in its own right. However,

    I think it's likely that the ancients put some vinegar in this metal container, discovered that it corroded badly, and threw it away.

    They've found at least 12 such primative batteries, so unless they were throwing away a bunch of defecting jars that all mysteriously resembled batteries far more closely than simple storage jugs, I think the idea that they suffered a little accidental corrosion and threw it away is rather unlikely.

    Virtually everyone believes these were primitive batteries, and used as such, but not to drive bronze age equivelent walkmans or the like. Rather, some believe it may have been to imbibe idols with magical "shocking" capabilities to lend credence to local religious cults, an invention that occurred likely by accident, reproduced by trial and error, and then applied (secretively) by the priests of Baal (or whatever cult was popular at the time) as a way to convice people of the divinity of their statue.

    That they were batteries designed to deliver a low amperage, fairly low voltage electrical current is pretty widely accepted. Why they were made, and what they were used for, is really anybody's guess at this point ... the secret seems to have died with the makers.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  9. No evidence... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Interesting


    Israel ? And what was Donald "lets invade" Rumsfelds job during the 80s... err selling chemicals to Sadam.

    We know, beyond any reasonable doubt that the US has helped Israel get WMD, we also know its sold them to Britain as well.

    So there are two official cases where it has happened. And officially the US and Britain supplied billions of dollars of arms equipment to Iraq during the Iran v Iraq war.

    What else do we know
    1) CIA trained Bin Laden and many people in Afghanistan against the USSR, many of these became the Taliban.

    2) The US supplied weapons to terrorists in the Iran/Contra scandal.

    So yes, apart from these cases and lots more there is no evidence at all to say that the US has potentially the dirtiest hands on the block.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  10. Re:No! by N3WBI3 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The only thing keeping the kurds in the north safe is US air power, look even today Iraq is saying it will dismantle its longest range missles. I am never for doing something because its popular, or it sells well. Getting WMD out of Iraq is good enough for me and most of the American people (Bush does after all answer to us not the French or the Germans). To say we neeed to find a reason people will like is to say that being a popular president is more important than doing the right thing, Clinton did that for 8 years in his forign policy and I put us in the mess were in with Iraq.

    I just think it funny how people assume Bush is a moron, when he always seems to outwit his political opponents. He got the democrats to vote on giving him authority to attack Iraq, and though he has taken fire from the world for being a 'cowboy' he has got inspectors back in Iraq (by forcing the UN), and now Iraq may take apart its missles. Bush has done more on Iraq in 2 years than Clinton did in 8 and he has not fired a shot. I hope a bomb never falls on Iraq, I have a sister in law over there right now and a brother who might have to ship out in the event of a long war, but I agree with them when they say the right, not the easy or popular thing, has to be done.

    Right now the Democrats are killing themselves in the senate with regards to Estrada, a philibuster, I welcome the government doing nothing for awhile, keep it up.

    --