IBM To Repair Smoking Monitors
Rio writes "A local6.com story says IBM is recalling to repair 56,000 G51 and G51t computer monitors because the circuit board can overheat and smoke, posing a fire hazard. IBM has received several reports of monitors overheating and smoking, including one report of minor property damage, according to the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Comission." And I thought all that smoke was just my mobo overheating.
I'd like one of those monitors! I'll find myself some dremel and a steel girder to create the first monitor/grill combo ever! Steak anyone?
Hate me!
If only tobacco companies would be as obliging!
"IBM G51: The hottest monitor available!"
When right next to the article on the monitors, is this:
Man Who Allegedly Ate Cat's Tail Ruled Insane
and
Thousands Flock To See Gold Toilets
Can't they just *cough* *cough* patch it?
*cough*
Soko
"Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
First IBM hard drives, now IBM monitors. What's next to kick the bucket?
. . . from components they popped off of returned deskstars.
No I'm not trolling.
Do those smoking monitors have to be used outside in California?
Trolling is a art,
Did you mean mojo? Yeah, Baby!
Maybe IBM should rethink its business focus. Perhaps they should manufacture baseboard heaters, toaster overs, wave solder baths...
Trolling is a art,
IBM has received several reports of monitors overheating and smoking
sounds like these monitors just bought themselves a first-class ticket to detention. They should have smoked in the bathroom where nobody would see them.
I blame the parents.
Build your own website - full service homepage system your m
It's good that a company actually has the balls to recall a faulty product. It's kind of a shame that it has to be a fire hazard to make it happen, and not poor quality. I guess it's the lawyers who made the call, fearing wrongful death suits when some kid dies of inhalation while playing UT.
The PC market is flooded with second rate, faulty, poorly designed and nonfunctional hardware.
I once had an NEC monitor that burned out on me, had it replaced, that one burned out, replaced again, that one burned out ad nauseum - 5 in a row. By the 6th, they had stopped manufacturing them and I got a different one, which still works fine today.
I knew the monitor was designed poorly, they knew it was designed poorly (they only made 'em for like 6 months). Wouldnt a recall have been easier and cheaper than cross shipping me 5 replacements in a row?
Oh well. I just wish there were more corporations willing to stand behind their merchandise.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
I'd say they were more of a water risk....
If you have a smoke detection system that will set off sprinklers in the event of smoke....
then all your machines are Toast!
AOL Member: My monitor seems to be smoking. ...uh ...tells you, by olfactory cues, how fast your internet connection is. [co-workers dying of laughter in background, turning blue] We just upgraded our network, so that's probably what you're seei ...er, smelling, sir.
Customer Support: Oh. Err... [looking at breakroom longingly] Is that an IBM monitor you have there, sir?
AOL Member: Why yes, it is.
Customer Support: Well, then that would be the new Smell-sation monitor feature, sir. It
AOL Member: Oh, wonderful! Thank you! [click]
My
Limekiller
It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.
My guess is that most of the people that use these are business customers (ie. used as cash register displays or something like that) and they don't want to lose any repeat business.
The 6541 model of IBM monitors are quite old since they were manufactured from June 1997 - September 1997. It's amazing that they still work. Our company used to purchase Acer 34 and 76 monitors and they all failed within 3 years.
And only 5 reported failures? In almost 6 years? That doesn't sound too bad to me...
Chris
These things are ancient. I've gone through at least two monitors since the G51 was introduced. And a decent new 17" monitor is about $120. Seems like it would be cheaper for IBM to just give owners a credit towards a new monitor.
Perhaps IBM is banking on the fact that most of these dinosaurs are sitting on a shelf somewhere because their tubes blew out long ago. I know I wouldn't bother getting a 6-year-old 15" monitor fixed, even if it was for free.
They are withdrawing all the 117,000:
[rant] ;-)[/rant]
It's only the US-centric slashdot, who want us Europeans to burn...
Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.
The IBM monitors that shipped with IBM PS/2 computers in the late 1980's were notorious for bursting into flame. Flames would shoot out of the monitor's vents at the top of the case. One morning I found one had charred the top of its case overnight. Luckily it burned itself out without tripping the office sprinklers. THAT would have been more exciting.
Which reminds me of the sick joke I dreamed up for our IT boss at that job. We were thinking of calling him up on his honeymoon vacation, and saying, "Don't worry about the fire in the data center. The sprinklers put it out!"
Around that time I was interviewing at a 100% "True Blue" IBM shop. I mentioned that the new IBM monitors are known to burst into flame. The response was, "Oh yes, the monitors do often catch on fire. But then IBM replaces them for free under warranty!"
IBM's immediate response was to send adhesive labels for the monitors that advised powering them off when not in use. New monitors came with the sticker pre-applied at the factory.
Ever dream you could fly? Get up from the Flight Sim. I Fly
An old but good story...
-----
Free P2P Backup, Windows & Linux
Focus, guys, focus! Thinkpad Batteries!
WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
That reminds me of the best coincidence I ever ran across. At my first job, we were developing a desktop environment for DOS (file manager, various utilities, etc). This was in Southern California in 1990.
One of the project managers was testing the calculator and did something to get an overflow error. At that moment, the Whittier quake happened. The PM filed a bug report: "Arithmetic overflow in calculator causes earthquake." The bug stayed open until just before shipping, when it was closed as "Cannot reproduce."
What if life is just a side effect of some other process and God has no idea we exist?