Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba To Show Laptop Fuel Cells at CeBit

war3rd writes "According to The Register, Toshiba has finally been able to build a fuel cell for laptops that they will unveil at CeBit next week. The fuel cells are expected to last approximately 5 hours and are compatible with existing lithium-ion batteries. Form factor remains the only issue. The trick is that they use the water by-product from the cell to dilute the methanol source as it enters the reformer, and are therefore able to store higher concentrations of methanol in the cell. My only concern is how quickly can they get this to market?"

10 of 292 comments (clear)

  1. SHOULD be ethanol by nweaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want a fuel cell to be practically usable, you should make it run on 40% Ethanol, 60% water. That way, there is a commonly available fuel (Vodka) which can be easily purchased most everywhere in the US (outside Mormonstan at least).

    If you can make the fuel cell deal with more impurities, you could also use Whiskey or Tequila or similar distilled spirits.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh god, I'd never manage to refuel the thing to capacity!

      "... And one fur the doktuuur ..."

      On second thought, a laptop battery would be much more covert than a flask, for sneaking liquor into a club.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
    2. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Canada, 80% to 90% of the cost of a bottle of hooch is taxes. Vodka power would be bloody expensive. Then again, if you power the user with vodka as well, they're less likely to complain :)

    3. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sorry sir, you must be 21 with 3 IDs to purchase fuel for your laptop.

    4. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

      A two liter bottle of cheap vodka, some porno and three AOL cds. I don't know what you had in mind for tonight, but leave me out of it.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    5. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 4, Funny

      Warning: Do NOT drink your laptop.

      I guess this is what they mean when they say alcohol is a Gateway drug...

  2. New LAW the CUI by nlinecomputers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coding under the influence.

    Honest officer I was just fueling my laptop.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  3. Re:More details? by DuckDuckBOOM! · · Score: 3, Funny
    Can you hook up a fuel tank and run it as long as the tank is kept full?
    [snort] I just got a visual of some ubergeek with one of those stupid hats made to hold dual beer cans, two bottles of methanol in place, tubes running down to his laptop...

    ..actually, one can of methanol and one of beer wouldn't be bad. As long as you remember which tube is which.

    --
    Life is like surrealism: if you have to have it explained to you, you can't afford it.
  4. Re:but how long will they last? by cribb · · Score: 5, Funny
    It's amazing that the poster of this story can't even read the article

    you're new here, aren't you?

    --
    Hostes alienigieni me abduxerunt. Qui annus est?
  5. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 3, Funny
    I've said it before, I'll say it again. No American (I don't mean the company, I mean the nation) airliner will ever be hijacked again (well, not EVER, but as long as living memories of 9/11 exist.) If a terrorist with a freaking AK-47 opened up on a plane, half the plane would still rush at him. And they'd probably win - it's hard to take down that many people with any kind of weapon, when those people have nothing to lose.

    Let's get this back on topic. Realistically, can you really hijack a plane using a laptop fuel cell? "Everybody down, or I'm gonna bust this cell open, let the methanol evaporate for 20 minutes, and then light it, making a 'pop' noise that may be quite loud!". I think not. Of course, that's not to say that overzealous security standards won't let them on anyway, but I don't think they're a realistic threat to airline safety.

    --

    Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).